If you want open-ear comfort and awareness for kids, choose TECKNET Open Ear Headphones; if you need in-ear listening with a touchscreen case and more total battery time, choose Rulbovs Earbuds.
For everyday movement, the TECKNET’s open design leaves the ear canal unsealed; the Rulbovs fit inside the ears and offer five EQ modes.
TECKNET Open Ear Headphones vs Rulbovs Earbuds at a Glance
• TECKNET’s biggest strength: an open-ear fit with flexible ear hooks, so kids can listen while remaining more aware of nearby sounds. Trade-off: the open design does not seal the ear canal.
• Rulbovs’ biggest strength: a touchscreen charging case, five EQ modes, and up to 48 hours of total playback. Trade-off: the earbuds sit in the ear, and their single-charge playback is listed as six hours.
• TECKNET lists up to 10 hours per charge and up to 40 hours with the case; Rulbovs lists six hours per charge and up to 48 hours total.
• Both have Bluetooth 6.0 and an IPX5 rating for sweat and light rain. Neither is intended to be submerged.
• Choose TECKNET for open-ear listening, activity, and a longer stated single charge; choose Rulbovs for in-ear sound, EQ choices, and case-based controls.
TECKNET’s defining feature is its open-ear structure. At 8 grams per earbud, with flexible hooks that rest around the ears, it is designed to avoid the pressure of traditional in-ear earbuds. That makes it a reasonable option for a child who dislikes having ear tips inside the ear, or who listens while walking, cycling, or moving around home and wants to remain more aware of nearby sounds. The design does not block the ear canal, so ambient noise can still be heard.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-18 · 6 min read · Independent comparison
For a family weighing the best waterproof headband headphones for kids, these are not a headband model: they are wireless open-ear earbuds. Their IPX5 rating is for resistance to sweat and light rain, not submersion. The available data also does not establish that they are purpose-built for children, so I would consider whether the ear-hook style suits the intended wearer rather than assume a child-specific fit.
The battery figures are a strong practical point: TECKNET lists up to 10 hours on a charge and up to 40 hours total with the case. A 10-minute charge is stated to provide up to two hours of playback, and the case has a smart LED battery display. Skip this pair if the priority is an in-ear seal, multiple EQ presets, or a stated active noise-cancelling feature. TECKNET lists no noise control, and its open design is not meant to isolate the listener from surroundings.
Rulbovs takes the opposite approach. These are in-ear earbuds, with controls built into an LCD touchscreen charging case. The screen can show battery levels and time, and the product information also describes playback and volume controls, wallpaper changes, remote photo control, and a “Find My Earbuds” function. That range of case features may appeal to a child who enjoys interactive controls, though it also means the experience is more feature-heavy than a simple charging case.
The earbuds offer five EQ presets—Standard, Rock, Pop, Classic, and Jazz—and list up to six hours of playback on a charge, with up to 48 hours total when using the case. Bluetooth 6.0 and an IPX5 rating are also specified. The IPX5 claim covers sweat and splashes; the product information explicitly says not to submerge them. For a family looking for the best true wireless earbuds for kids, these could suit a child who prefers an in-ear fit and would use the EQ and touchscreen features, but the specifications do not identify a child-specific design.
One point needs careful interpretation: the Rulbovs product information lists active noise cancellation, but does not explain its performance or provide a noise-reduction figure. I would not choose them on the assumption that they will silence a noisy room. If the goal is awareness of traffic or conversation, TECKNET’s open-ear design is the clearer fit; if the goal is an in-ear style and more playback time counted with the case, Rulbovs has the stronger stated total.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best for a longer stated single charge → TECKNET Open Ear Headphones. TECKNET lists up to 10 hours; Rulbovs lists up to six.
• Best for maximum stated total playtime with the case → Rulbovs Earbuds. They list up to 48 hours total, compared with TECKNET’s up to 40.
• Best for kids who want to remain aware of nearby sounds → TECKNET Open Ear Headphones. The open design does not seal the ear canal, although listening volume and adult supervision still matter.
• Best for choosing among sound profiles → Rulbovs Earbuds. They include five EQ modes; no EQ presets are listed for TECKNET.
• Best for a quick stated top-up → TECKNET Open Ear Headphones. The listed quick-charge figure is up to two hours of playback from 10 minutes of charging. Rulbovs lists a full recharge time of 1.5 hours.
• Best for screen-based case controls → Rulbovs Earbuds. Their LCD touchscreen offers several functions beyond basic charging.
• Best for sweat and light rain during activity → Tie. Both list IPX5 protection, but neither should be treated as submersible.
For kids, I would choose TECKNET Open Ear Headphones when the priority is a lightweight, open fit and hearing more of what is happening nearby.
Their up-to-10-hour single-charge figure is also useful for longer stretches between charging.
I’d choose Rulbovs instead for a child who prefers in-ear earbuds and will genuinely use the touchscreen case and EQ modes.
My recommendation is TECKNET for the more awareness-focused everyday use case, not because it is a child-specific headset—it is not described that way in the available product details.
FAQ
Neither is identified as a child-specific product in the specifications. TECKNET may suit a child who prefers open-ear listening; Rulbovs may suit one who prefers an in-ear fit and case-based features.
Rulbovs lists active noise cancellation, but the provided product details do not quantify its performance. TECKNET lists no noise control and has an open-ear design that does not seal the ear canal.
Both list an IPX5 rating for sweat and light rain or spray. That does not mean either can be submerged, so neither should be used for swimming.
• Sony-Dropship MDR-ZX310AP vs Sony WH-CH520
• Linsoul KZ ZS10 vs KZ Zax: In Ear Headphones
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.