Here's the thing about most electric toothbrush reviews—they just recite spec sheets. I've been using TAO Clean for four months now, and honestly? It's more complicated than the marketing suggests. In this TAO Clean Sonic Toothbrush reviews you will learn what I experienced using this toothbrush.
TAO Clean basically said "what if people wanted their toothbrush to look good?" While Philips makes toothbrushes that scream "medical device," TAO went full lifestyle brand.
Their lineup breaks down like this:
Aura Clean: The basic model that still costs more than most Sonicares
Umma Diamond: Premium version with extra UV bells and whistles
Standard models: All come with that signature cleaning station
The bet they made? People will pay extra for something that doesn't look like dental equipment on their countertop. Pretty smart, actually.
The Tao Clean Electric Toothbrush has over 1600 customer reviews with 70% of customers rating it 5 stars - click to read reviews!!
Opening this thing feels like unboxing an iPhone. Seriously—there's way too much ceremony for dental hygiene.
You get the handle (surprisingly heavy), the UV cleaning station, a couple brush heads, and some instructions that somehow miss the important stuff. The whole experience screams "premium," but I'm not sure that helps you brush your teeth better.
The cleaning station? Looks like a tiny modern sculpture. The handle has this tapered design that photographs beautifully but feels weird in your hand. Within about five minutes, you realize they prioritized Instagram over ergonomics.
The cleaning part: 40,000 vibrations per minute sounds impressive, and honestly, it works. Your teeth do feel cleaner than with manual brushing. The ultrasonic action gets debris off the gum line pretty effectively.
The UV sanitization: Five minutes of UV-C light supposedly kills 99.9% of bacteria. I haven't done any petri dish experiments, but it addresses that gross feeling about bathroom germs floating around. Whether it's worth the extra cost? That depends on how much toilet flush contamination bothers you.
Battery life: Never dies because it charges when docked. Simple. No complaints here.
The water resistance handles normal bathroom mishaps. Don't dunk it, but splashing won't kill it.
After three weeks of use, my gums definitely looked better. My dental hygienist even asked what I was doing differently—though that could've been the novelty of actually using an electric toothbrush consistently.
Compared to the competition:
Philips Sonicare: Same cleaning power, way better handle comfort
Oral-B models: Similar results, less attractive base station
Manual toothbrushes: This is definitely an upgrade for plaque removal
Works fine with braces. Handles sensitive gums on the lower setting. Nothing revolutionary, just solid oral care performance.
That UV cleaning creates a sharing nightmare. You can't easily swap brush heads because the whole sanitization thing needs the handle attached. For couples? You're buying two units or doing some weird bathroom choreography.
The ergonomics are genuinely annoying. That top-heavy design starts bothering your wrist after a few weeks. It's not a dealbreaker, but it's noticeable every single use.
The lighting situation is ridiculous. LEDs stay on 24/7, turning your bathroom into a spaceship. I ended up covering it with a washcloth at night.
Brush heads last the standard three months. Replacement costs are reasonable. The cleaning station maintains itself, which is convenient. Please continue on reading this TAO Clean Sonic Toothbrush reviews.
I've been tracking reviews across different sites, and the pattern's pretty consistent:
People love:
How it looks on their vanity
The psychological comfort of UV cleaning
Never dealing with dead batteries
Actual cleaning effectiveness
People complain about:
Wrist discomfort from the handle design
Sharing difficulties between partners
Constant lighting disruption
Counter space requirements
TAO's response? Mostly customer service rather than design changes. They seem committed to their aesthetic choices, even when they create usability problems.
TAO Clean costs $200+ when you can get similar cleaning performance for $80 elsewhere. You're paying for UV sanitization (genuinely useful) and design appeal (subjective value).
Buy it if:
You live alone and care about bathroom aesthetics
Counter space isn't an issue
Handle comfort matters less than visual appeal
Skip it if:
You need to share with a partner
Ergonomics matter for daily comfort
You want maximum value for money
Look, TAO Clean works. The UV sanitization is legitimately clever, and the cleaning performance backs up the price tag. But those design choices that make it Instagram-ready? They make daily use more annoying.
Better alternatives:
Philips Sonicare: Better ergonomics, proven track record
Oral-B iO: More features at similar price points
Budget option: Oral-B Pro 1000 for $30 if you just want clean teeth
You can buy direct from TAO or major retailers. Warranty covers normal use, but won't fix the fundamental design quirks.
Bottom line: This is a good toothbrush that looks great but feels awkward. Most people would be happier with something less photogenic that prioritizes daily comfort. But if you're single, have the counter space, and really care about bathroom aesthetics? It might be worth the trade-offs.
The UV cleaning is genuinely innovative. I just wish they'd spent as much effort on making it comfortable to hold.
tao clean reviews
tao clean toothbrush reviews
tao toothbrush
tao clean toothbrush
tao sonic toothbrush
tao electric toothbrush