Search this site
Embedded Files
SYNCHRONOME 2177
  • Home
    • Story of my nome
    • HARWARE
    • MY NOME TIMER
    • Minimum Timer
    • Measuring energy
    • The aerodynamics of lead
    • The tangent rule
    • A magnetic escapement
    • THE SHOP
SYNCHRONOME 2177
  • Home
    • Story of my nome
    • HARWARE
    • MY NOME TIMER
    • Minimum Timer
    • Measuring energy
    • The aerodynamics of lead
    • The tangent rule
    • A magnetic escapement
    • THE SHOP
  • More
    • Home
      • Story of my nome
      • HARWARE
      • MY NOME TIMER
      • Minimum Timer
      • Measuring energy
      • The aerodynamics of lead
      • The tangent rule
      • A magnetic escapement
      • THE SHOP

The tangent rule

published on HSN 2020-2

Full text article published @ Horological Science Newsletter.

The subject here is the check of the relationship between the timing of the impulse and the period duration, Airy's tangent rule.

At this youtube video you can follow the development of the actual raw data of a power pulse delay scan

  • The parameters of this magnetic escapement experimental run are:

one impulse very 5 periods, the 70 ms impulse occurs at 10 set delays from 100 ms (7 mm at bob's level) before to 100 ms after the pendulum crossing of the vertical

In agreement with Airy's tangent rule, see P.Woodward, My own right time, pag.69, the period at impulse lengthens for delayed impulses and shortens for the early ones, the period variations disappear in the noise when the impulse is centered within a few mm.


The amplitude of the period variations is in surprisingly good agreement with Woodward's theoretical expression.

n is the number of periods in a clock impulsing cycle, n=5 in this case, n=15 in a standard synchronome.

The free pendulum Q, measured in the same run, is around 5500 at 1.8 to 2.2 deg of amplitude, the relevant amplitude for this experiment.


Google Sites
Report abuse
Page details
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse