If you want wired, closed-back headphones for running, choose Superlux HD-662; if you need a USB recording interface with headphones, choose M-Audio M-Track Duo. For the running use case, I’d pick the Superlux because it is the headphone-focused option, while the M-Audio package is built around recording, streaming, and podcasting rather than portable listening.
Superlux HD-662 vs M-Audio M-Track Duo at a Glance
• Superlux HD-662: over-ear, closed-back wired headphones with a 3.5 mm jack, passive noise control, and a stated 10 Hz–30 kHz frequency range; the trade-off is that the cable connection is wired, not a wireless or charging setup.
• Superlux is for someone who mainly wants headphones for music, monitoring, or everyday wired listening.
• M-Audio is for someone who wants to record or stream with two inputs and also needs headphones for monitoring.
The Superlux HD-662 is the more direct choice if headphones are the main thing you need. It uses a closed-back, over-ear design with 50 mm dynamic drivers, a 32-ohm impedance, and a stated frequency range of 10 Hz to 30 kHz. Its design also includes a precision-tuned acoustic chamber and a one-sided cable. The product information describes the sound as accurate and detailed, with natural deep bass and a wide dynamic range.
That makes it a sensible fit for listening, studio monitoring, or situations where a wired pair is more useful than an interface. Passive noise control is listed, but that is not the same as active noise cancellation. So if your search is for noise cancelling gaming headphones for running, don’t mistake this model’s closed-back construction for electronic noise cancellation. It may help make listening more contained, but the data does not describe active noise cancelling.
For running, the HD-662 is the closer match of these two because it is a standalone pair of headphones rather than a recording bundle centered on a USB interface. Still, the listed details do not establish that it is sweat-resistant, wireless, or designed specifically for exercise. Its over-ear fit and 0.35 kg item weight are worth considering before choosing it for movement. If you specifically want the best USB-C charging on-ear headphones for running, this is not that: it is wired, over-ear, and its listed connection is a 3.5 mm jack.
The M-Audio M-Track Duo is a recording-focused package, not simply a competing headphone model. Its central component is a USB audio interface for Mac or PC with two combo XLR/line/instrument inputs, phantom power, and a stated maximum sample rate of 48 kHz. It also has a 1/4-inch headphone output, stereo 1/4-inch outputs, and a USB/Direct monitoring switch. Those features point toward recording microphones, guitar, vocals, or line-level sources and listening back through a computer setup.
The included HDH40 headphones are closed-back and over-ear, with 40 mm dynamic drivers and a 32-ohm impedance. Their listed features include a 2.7 m fixed cable, a 180-degree rotatable frame, telescopic arms, cushioning, and a flexible headband. That is useful for a desk where the long cable can reach an interface and the headphones can serve for monitoring or private listening. It is less compelling if you only want a simple headphone connection for taking a run.
Choose the M-Audio package if you need the interface as well as headphones. The two inputs and phantom power matter when a microphone or instrument is part of the plan; they add little to a runner who just wants to listen. The product information specifies USB connectivity, but it does not describe a USB-C headphone charging feature, active noise cancellation, or exercise-specific construction. For an “extra bass gaming headphones for running” search, neither package is clearly presented as a gaming headset with a dedicated bass tuning or gaming features.
• Best fit for running among these two → Superlux HD-662. It is a standalone wired headphone, while the M-Audio package is organized around a USB recording interface. Neither product’s listed details establish that it is made for running.
• Best for recording two sources → M-Audio M-Track Duo. Its two combo inputs accept XLR, line, or instrument signals, and phantom power is included.
• Best for a simple headphone-first setup → Superlux HD-662. Its listed connection is a 3.5 mm headphone jack; there is no need to use a recording interface just to get the headphone function.
• Best for computer monitoring → M-Audio M-Track Duo. The interface includes a 1/4-inch headphone output, stereo 1/4-inch outputs, and a USB/Direct switch for monitoring.
• Best for a stated extended frequency range → Superlux HD-662. The specification gives a range of 10 Hz–30 kHz, alongside a 50 mm dynamic driver.
• Best for a long fixed cable at a desk → M-Audio’s HDH40 headphones. Their cable is listed as 2.7 m, which can be convenient near recording gear but may be cumbersome while moving.
• Best for active noise cancelling → Neither, based on the listed features. The Superlux specifies passive noise control; the M-Audio details do not specify active noise cancellation.
• Best for USB-C charging or wireless exercise use → Neither. The Superlux is wired through a 3.5 mm jack, and the M-Audio package is USB-connected recording gear with wired headphones.
The keyword comparison can make these products sound like direct alternatives, but their jobs differ. The Superlux is a headphone purchase. The M-Audio is a compact audio interface bundle that happens to include headphones. If your decision is really about running, focus on the headphones’ fit, cable, and intended use rather than the M-Audio’s recording features.
One practical point: the M-Audio’s 2.7 m fixed headphone cable is a desk-oriented detail. It gives room to sit back from an interface, but a long cable can be awkward around arms and legs during exercise. The Superlux has a one-sided cable, which can be tidier than a cable coming from both earcups, but the listed information does not give its length. I would not assume either model has a running clip, sweat protection, or wireless playback.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-23 · 15 min read · Independent comparison
For gaming, the same distinction applies. The Superlux is a closed-back headphone with passive noise control, which may suit focused listening in a quieter setup, but no microphone or gaming controls are specified. The M-Audio’s advantage is not gaming functionality; it is the interface’s ability to connect microphones and instruments to a computer. Neither set of listed features makes these purpose-built noise-cancelling gaming headphones.
I’d choose the Superlux HD-662 if I wanted one of these for running, because it is the more straightforward headphone-first option and has a one-sided wired connection.
That recommendation comes with a caveat: its over-ear design and listed weight do not make it an exercise-specific choice, and it is not wireless or USB-C rechargeable.
I’d buy the M-Audio M-Track Duo only if I also needed its two-input recording interface for vocals, instruments, or streaming.
For a dedicated running headphone, I would check the fit and cable needs carefully before committing to either.
Of these two, the Superlux is the more direct headphone choice because it does not depend on a USB recording interface. Its listed design is still wired and over-ear, and neither product is described as exercise-specific.
The Superlux lists passive noise control, not active noise cancellation. The M-Audio product details do not specify active noise cancellation either, so neither should be described as an active noise-cancelling option based on the listed features.
Choose the M-Audio M-Track Duo if you need to connect a microphone or instrument to a Mac or PC. It has two combo inputs, phantom power, and a USB/Direct monitoring switch; the Superlux is a headphone model, not an audio interface.
The better fit depends on what you need: the Superlux is the headphone-focused option, while the M-Audio adds a two-channel USB interface and bundled headphones. Check the current price on Amazon before deciding, then weigh the interface features only if you will actually use them.
રસીટ
If you want wired, closed-back headphones for running, choose Superlux HD-662; if you need a USB recording interface with headphones, choose M-Audio M-Track Duo. For the running use case, I’d pick the Superlux because it is the headphone-focused option, while the M-Audio package is built around recording, streaming, and podcasting rather than portable listening.
• Superlux HD-662: Over-ear, closed-back wired headphones with a 3.5 mm jack, passive noise control, and a stated 10 Hz–30 kHz frequency range. The trade-off is that they are wired, not a wireless or charging setup.
• M-Audio M-Track Duo: A two-channel USB audio interface bundled with closed-back, over-ear HDH40 headphones. Its strength is connecting microphones and instruments; its trade-off for casual listening is that the interface is geared toward computer-based recording.
• Superlux is for someone who mainly wants headphones for music, monitoring, or everyday wired listening.
• M-Audio is for someone who wants to record or stream with two inputs and also needs headphones for monitoring.
The Superlux HD-662 is the more direct choice if headphones are the main thing you need. It uses a closed-back, over-ear design with 50 mm dynamic drivers, a 32-ohm impedance, and a stated frequency range of 10 Hz to 30 kHz. Its design also includes a precision-tuned acoustic chamber and a one-sided cable. The product information describes its sound as accurate and detailed, with natural deep bass and a wide dynamic range.
That makes it a sensible fit for listening, studio monitoring, or situations where a wired pair is more useful than a recording interface. Passive noise control is listed, but that is not the same as active noise cancellation. If you are searching for noise cancelling gaming headphones for running, don’t mistake the closed-back construction for electronic noise cancellation. It may help make listening more contained, but active noise cancellation is not specified.
For running, the HD-662 is the closer match of these two because it is a standalone pair of headphones rather than a recording bundle centered on a USB interface. Still, the listed details do not establish that it is sweat-resistant, wireless, or designed specifically for exercise. Its over-ear fit and 0.35 kg item weight are worth considering before choosing it for movement. If you specifically want the best USB C charging on ear headphones for running, this is not that: it is wired, over-ear, and its listed connection is a 3.5 mm jack.
The M-Audio M-Track Duo is a recording-focused package, not simply a competing headphone model. Its central component is a USB audio interface for Mac or PC with two combo XLR/line/instrument inputs, phantom power, and a stated maximum sample rate of 48 kHz. It also has a 1/4-inch headphone output, stereo 1/4-inch outputs, and a USB/Direct monitoring switch. Those features point toward recording microphones, guitar, vocals, or line-level sources and listening back through a computer setup.
The included HDH40 headphones are closed-back and over-ear, with 40 mm dynamic drivers and a 32-ohm impedance. Their listed features include a 2.7 m fixed cable, a 180-degree rotatable frame, telescopic arms, cushioning, and a flexible headband. That setup makes sense at a desk, where the cable can reach an interface and the headphones can serve for monitoring or private listening. It is less compelling if you only want a simple pair for taking a run.
Choose the M-Audio package if you need the interface as well as headphones. The two inputs and phantom power matter when a microphone or instrument is part of the plan; they add little to a runner who just wants to listen. The product information specifies USB connectivity, but not a USB-C headphone charging feature, active noise cancellation, or exercise-specific construction. For an “extra bass gaming headphones for running” search, neither package is clearly presented as a gaming headset with dedicated bass tuning or gaming features.
• Best fit for running among these two → Superlux HD-662. It is a standalone wired headphone, while the M-Audio package is organized around a USB recording interface. Neither product’s listed details establish that it is made for running.
• Best for recording two sources → M-Audio M-Track Duo. Its two combo inputs accept XLR, line, or instrument signals, and phantom power is included.
• Best for a simple headphone-first setup → Superlux HD-662. Its listed connection is a 3.5 mm headphone jack; using the headphones does not require a recording interface.
• Best for computer monitoring → M-Audio M-Track Duo. The interface includes a 1/4-inch headphone output, stereo 1/4-inch outputs, and a USB/Direct switch for monitoring.
• Best for a stated extended frequency range → Superlux HD-662. Its listed range is 10 Hz–30 kHz, alongside a 50 mm dynamic driver.
• Best for a long fixed cable at a desk → M-Audio’s HDH40 headphones. Their cable is listed as 2.7 m, which can be convenient near recording gear but awkward while moving.
• Best for USB-C charging or wireless exercise use → Neither. The Superlux connects through a 3.5 mm jack, and the M-Audio package is USB-connected recording gear with wired headphones.
The keyword comparison can make these products sound like direct alternatives, but their jobs differ. The Superlux is a headphone purchase. The M-Audio is a compact audio interface bundle that happens to include headphones. If your decision is really about running, focus on the headphones’ fit, cable, and intended use rather than the M-Audio’s recording features.
The M-Audio’s 2.7 m fixed headphone cable is a desk-oriented detail. It gives room to sit back from an interface, but a long cable can be awkward around your arms and legs during exercise. The Superlux has a one-sided cable, which can be tidier than a cable coming from both earcups, but its cable length is not specified. I would not assume either model has a running clip, sweat protection, or wireless playback.
The headphone specifications also do not settle every sound preference. The Superlux is described as accurate and detailed, with natural deep bass; that gives a clearer indication of its intended sound than the available HDH40 details do. The M-Audio headphones are described with a 40 mm dynamic driver and 32-ohm impedance, but no matching frequency range or bass-specific tuning is listed. If pronounced bass is your priority, I would not assume either product has an “extra bass” feature.
For gaming, the same distinction applies. The Superlux is a closed-back headphone with passive noise control, which may suit focused listening in a quieter setup, but no microphone or gaming controls are specified. The M-Audio’s advantage is not gaming functionality; it is the interface’s ability to connect microphones and instruments to a computer. Neither set of listed features makes these purpose-built noise-cancelling gaming headphones.
I’d choose the Superlux HD-662 if I wanted one of these for running, because it is the more straightforward headphone-first option and has a one-sided wired connection.
That recommendation comes with a caveat: its over-ear design and listed weight do not make it an exercise-specific choice, and it is not wireless or USB-C rechargeable.
I’d choose the M-Audio M-Track Duo only if I also needed its two-input recording interface for vocals, instruments, or streaming.
For a dedicated running headphone, I would check the fit and cable needs carefully before committing to either.
FAQ
Of these two, the Superlux is the more direct headphone choice because it does not depend on a USB recording interface. It is still wired and over-ear, and neither product is described as exercise-specific.
The Superlux lists passive noise control, not active noise cancellation. The M-Audio product details do not specify active noise cancellation either, so neither should be described as an active noise-cancelling option based on the listed features.
Choose the M-Audio M-Track Duo if you need to connect a microphone or instrument to a Mac or PC. It has two combo inputs, phantom power, and a USB/Direct monitoring switch; the Superlux is a headphone model, not an audio interface.
The better fit depends on what you need: the Superlux is the headphone-focused option, while the M-Audio adds a two-channel USB interface and bundled headphones. Check the current price on Amazon before deciding, then weigh the interface features only if you will use them.
• Kinglucky Clip vs eleror Invisible Mini Earbuds
• keephifi KZ EDX Pro vs NewTH Replacement Game Microphone
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.