If you want open-ear headphones for glasses wearers that leave your ear canals unobstructed, choose Sudroid Bone Conduction Headphones; if you need an in-ear Bluetooth headset for a more conventional earbud fit, choose AMPACO Headset. For glasses wearers, Sudroid’s open-ear design is the clearer match: it avoids adding an earbud inside the ear, though its wraparound band may still occupy space around the head and ears.
• Sudroid’s biggest strength: Bone-conduction sound and an open-ear fit, with 16GB of built-in music storage and an IP68 waterproof rating. Trade-off: Its titanium wraparound band is a more noticeable, structured design than separate in-ear earbuds.
• AMPACO’s biggest strength: An in-ear, wireless Bluetooth design with touch controls and a stated waterproof rating. Trade-off: The available product details do not specify battery life, Bluetooth version, storage, or audio performance.
• Choose Sudroid if you want to keep your ears open, listen during swimming or workouts, or play stored music without relying on a Bluetooth connection.
• Choose AMPACO if you prefer an in-ear headset and want a simple wireless option for general work, office, or driving use.
• For glasses wearers: Sudroid is the more direct fit for someone who dislikes placing earbuds in their ears, but neither product’s details confirm how its fit interacts with eyeglass frames.
Sudroid is built around bone conduction: the sound is delivered through vibrations rather than through an earbud inserted into the ear canal. Its open-ear design leaves the ears unobstructed, which may suit someone who wants to hear nearby sounds while walking, running, or exercising. That makes it a distinctive option among open ear headphones for glasses wearers who would rather avoid an in-ear fit.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Its titanium-alloy wraparound band and adjustable silicone section create a more connected, behind-the-head style. The listed weight is 42g. Sudroid supports Bluetooth 5.0, has a stated wireless range of 10 meters, and includes 16GB of memory for MP3 playback. The product information lists music and talking time of 6–8 hours and a charging time of two hours. Its IP68 waterproof rating is a useful detail for swimming and wet-weather workouts; the storage option also gives you a way to listen without depending on a Bluetooth connection.
Choose Sudroid if open ears, onboard music, and a swimming-oriented design matter more to you than a compact earbud form. Skip it if you specifically want earbuds that sit inside your ears, or if the wraparound band sounds less appealing than a minimal, separate-earbud design. Glasses wearers should also consider that “open ear” does not mean “no hardware near the ears”: the band still wraps around the head, and the listed details do not describe glasses-specific fit.
AMPACO is the simpler choice if your preference is an in-ear headset rather than bone conduction. Its listed features include wireless Bluetooth connectivity, touch controls, a lightweight design, and a waterproof designation. The product description presents it for settings such as office work, business, driving, and sport, but provides little technical detail beyond that general positioning.
That limited information is the main trade-off. The available specifications do not give a battery duration, Bluetooth version, wireless range, storage capacity, or specific audio details. The product is identified as in-ear, so it may suit someone who wants the familiar style of earbuds rather than an open-ear band. For glasses wearers looking for bluetooth earbuds for glasses wearers, that form may be worth considering—but the listed information does not say how the earbuds fit alongside glasses or whether they include any particular fit adjustments.
Choose AMPACO if an in-ear design and touch controls are your priorities, and you are comfortable making a decision with fewer published specifications. Skip it if you want bone-conduction playback, built-in music storage, a stated Bluetooth version and range, or a clearly specified IP68 rating. Those distinctions are explicitly listed for Sudroid but not for AMPACO.
• Best for keeping the ear canals clear → Sudroid Bone Conduction Headphones. Its bone-conduction design leaves the ears open instead of using in-ear earbuds.
• Best fit concept for glasses wearers who dislike earbuds → Sudroid Bone Conduction Headphones. The open-ear approach avoids inserting an earbud, although its wraparound band still sits around the head.
• Best for an in-ear style → AMPACO Headset. Its listed design is in-ear, making it the more conventional earbud-style option.
• Best for swimming based on the stated protection details → Sudroid Bone Conduction Headphones. It carries an IP68 waterproof rating, while AMPACO is described as waterproof without a specific IP rating in the available details.
• Best for listening to stored music without Bluetooth → Sudroid Bone Conduction Headphones. It has 16GB of memory and can switch between MP3 and Bluetooth modes.
• Best when a stated wireless range matters → Sudroid Bone Conduction Headphones. Its listed Bluetooth range is 10 meters; AMPACO’s available details do not state a range.
• Best when you prefer touch controls on an in-ear headset → AMPACO Headset. Touch control is listed for both, but AMPACO pairs it with an in-ear design.
• Best when published battery details matter → Sudroid Bone Conduction Headphones. Its stated music and talking time is 6–8 hours, while AMPACO’s available product information does not specify battery life.
I would choose Sudroid Bone Conduction Headphones for glasses wearers who want open ears, swimming-friendly design, and onboard music storage. The bone-conduction approach is a meaningful difference, not just a different-looking earbud, and the listed battery and connectivity details make its capabilities easier to judge. AMPACO makes sense if you specifically prefer in-ear earbuds, but its available specifications leave more practical questions unanswered. For my needs, Sudroid is the more convincing pick for glasses wearers who want to avoid an earbud sitting inside the ear.
FAQ
Sudroid has the more glasses-friendly concept for someone who dislikes in-ear earbuds because its design leaves the ear canals open. Its wraparound band still sits around the head, and the product details do not confirm a glasses-specific fit.
Sudroid is listed with an IP68 waterproof rating and is presented for swimming. AMPACO is described as waterproof, but the available details do not provide a specific IP rating, so the two claims are not equally precise.
Sudroid includes 16GB of built-in memory and supports MP3 mode as an alternative to Bluetooth. The available AMPACO details do not list onboard storage or a non-Bluetooth playback mode.
Sudroid’s listed music and talking time is 6–8 hours, with a two-hour charging time. No battery duration is provided for AMPACO, so the available specifications do not support a direct battery-life comparison.
• BlueFire 3.5mm vs Redragon H858: Gaming Headphones with
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.