I am a political scientist who studies democratic decline, nationalism, and anti-minority violence (broadly defined), with a regional focus on South Asia. I have recently co-edited three special issues: the first on Hindu Nationalism and Anti-Christian Violence for Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, co-edited with Kenneth Bo Nielsen (University of Oslo) in 2025; the second on Hindutva and the Rule(s) of Law for Social & Legal Studies, co-edited with Raphael Susewind (LSE) in 2024; and the third, titled Relocations of Hindutva: Hindu Nationalism under Modi 3.0, co-edited with Nielsen and Alf Gunvald Nilsen (University of Pretoria) for Development Studies. I am currently working on a co-edited book volume on Religious Nationalism, Minorities, and Democracy in South Asia with Paul Rowe (Trinity Western University, Canada).
I hold a PhD in Politics from the King’s India Institute (completed on a Mazumdar Studentship) and an MA in International Relations (with distinction) from the Department of War Studies, both at King’s College London. I completed my BA (cum laude) at Concordia College, Minnesota, with a double major in Global Studies and Political Science and a minor in Business.
I am affiliated with the King's India Institute, King's College London, the Centre for Asian Studies in Africa, University of Pretoria, and the Centre for South Asian Democracy, University of Oslo. I am a co-founder and currently serve on the board of the ASPIRE Network, a new UK-wide network for teaching-track academics in Politics and International Relations.
Below is a catalog of my articles, special issues, opinion pieces and media appearances.
A grotto in a Dalit-dominated urban poor area of Bangalore, India. It depicts an Indianized intepretations of the Mother Mary (wearing a sari) and baby Jesus.
Nielsen, K.B., Nilsen, A.G. & Selvaraj, M.S. (Eds.) (2025). Relocations of Hindutva: Hindu Nationalism Under Modi 3.0. Forum for Development Studies.
In this special issue introduction, we use the 2024 Indian national elections as our entry point for critically assessing the configuration and direction of Hindu nationalism as a hegemonic project under Modi 3.0 – a project that has forged an intimate connection between neoliberal accumulation strategies and ‘Hindutva’ as a vehicle for ideological legitimation. Rather than seeking to determine whether the elections mark a setback or a consolidation for Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), we ask how and to what effect they signal a more profound geographical and sociological relocation of the wider Hindu nationalist project. Working with the notion of ‘relocations’, we seek to capture the simultaneous yet uneven contraction and expansion of Hindutva’s footprint across multiple geographies and demographic categories, both prior to and after 2024. Drawing on the granular state-level analyses contained in the contributions to this special issue, we argue that while contemporary Hindu nationalist politics displays a considerable degree of flux, fluidity, and in some cases even vulnerability, its unfolding relocations in crucial ways contribute to the continued reproduction of Hindu nationalist hegemony under Modi 3.0.
Selvaraj, M.S. & Nielsen, K.B. (Eds.) (2025). Hindutva and Violence Against Christians in India. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics.
In this special issue, we analyse the trajectory and forms of anti-Christian violence in India and its role in the wider Hindu nationalist project today. Inspired by Galtung’s work on direct, structural, and cultural violence, we show how different forms of anti-Christian violence have waxed, waned, and combined in shifting constellations at different moments of India’s postcolonial political history and in different state contexts. At the current conjuncture, however, the imagined threat of ‘the Christian Other’ has acquired an unprecedented centrality to Hindu nationalist politics, producing a systemic escalation in anti-Christian violence across many states. This violence is, we argue, characterised by a strong convergence of direct, structural, and cultural forms of violence, involving vigilante attacks and police complicity, but also an increasingly coercive use of state law, coupled with the production of a wider cultural common sense about the antinational essence of non-Hindu religious minorities.
Selvaraj, M.S. & Susewind, R. (Eds.) (2024). The Rule(s) of Law Under Hindutva. Social & Legal Studies.
India is increasingly described as an ‘ethnic democracy’, ‘populist majoritarian autocracy’ or ‘ethnocracy’: a form of rule supported by an electoral majority rooted in ethnic affiliation, with limited and eroding checks and balances that would protect minorities. Over the past decade, constitutional arrangements shifted, ‘dog-whistle’ laws were passed and legal institutions starved of resources. In studying these developments, we want to ground generic studies of populist/majoritarian/autocratic law by unpacking the specific Indian version of it: how does Hindutva as a political ideology and the current dispensation as political agents conceive of the rule of law, its purpose and function? Which rules do they want the law to follow? This special issue combines papers that trace Hindutva's own ideological commitments with those tracking material changes in legislation or jurisprudence and map out their differential consequences for India's minorities, culminating in a wider reflection on the rule(s) of law under autocratic circumstances.
Selvaraj, M.S. (2025). Karnataka: A Dominant Caste “Revolt”?. Forum for Development Studies.
This article explores the changing political dynamics of Karnataka following the 2024 general elections. In 2024, the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) coalition comprised of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Janata Dal Secular party, which together represent the interest of the state's dominant caste groups including Brahmins, Lingayats and Vokkaligas. This was necessitated by the Indian National Congress’ dominant showing in the 2023 state elections, attributed to its coalition of religious minorities, backward castes and Dalits. This paper will show that despite its success in the 2024 elections, the NDA coalition has not yet been fully consolidated. It further argues that the dynamics of contemporary politics in Karnataka may challenge its long-term sustainability. The article argues that to consolidate this coalition, caste-based campaigning will likely now dominate state-level politics centred around questions of welfare and affirmative action. Communal issues, which marked the previous BJP government’s term in office, will be restricted to parts of the state where it remains socially and politically beneficial.
Kaisar, N.S., Nielsen, K.B. and Selvaraj, M.S. (2025). A deeper state?: Anti-Christian violence in contemporary Chhattisgarh. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics.63(1).
This article analyses the violence directed towards Adivasi Christians in Chhattisgarh in India between 2018 and 2023, under the governance of the Indian National Congress (INC). With Chhattisgarh as a case study, this article pursues a two-fold agenda. First, it maps the anti-Christian violence in the state perpetrated by Hindutva groups. Second, it analyses the persistence of such violence under an INC state government. The INC is a supposedly secular party competing electorally with the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Engaging with Jaffrelot’s concept of a deeper state, this article demonstrates how Chhattisgarh’s ‘deeper state’ exists even when the BJP is not in power. The interaction between the INC’s ‘soft’ Hindutva and anti-Christian violence at a local level in Bastar district is assessed, foregrounding the interplay of governance, vigilante groups and community members.
Selvaraj, M.S. (2025). The ‘threat’ of ‘conversions’: cultural violence in the 2008 anti-Christian violence in India Commonwealth & Comparative Politics. 63(1).
With the rise of the Hindu nationalist movement in India, a system of anti-Christian violence has emerged. This paper explores the movement’s justifications of physical and structural violence against India’s Christians, casting them as a form of cultural violence. It argues that Hindutva’s broad conception and portrayal of India’s Christians as a demographic, cultural and political ‘threat’ allows justifications for violence to be deployed adroitly and flexibly across varying state contexts, and the national level. The portrayal as an internal and external threat enables the movement to escalate tropes about the Christian ‘threat’, as and when required to justify direct and structural violence. Thus, making the system of anti-Christian violence in India more potent. By examining newspaper archives, civil society and government reports, and documents and speeches of Hindutva-aligned organisations, this paper revisits the 2008 anti-Christian violence, primarily in Orissa and Karnataka, India’s worst episode of anti-Christian violence.
Selvaraj, M.S. (2024). Acts of Violence ?: Anti-conversion laws in India. Social & Legal Studies. 33 (5).
Extant scholarship on anti-Christian violence in India is scant and predominantly focuses on physical violence. To address this gap, this article explores Freedom of Religion laws (also referred to as anti-conversion laws) as an example of structural violence faced by India's Christians. Thus far, scholars have studied these as a constitutional violation that denies a Christian's freedom of religion. Using Johan Galtung's violence framework, this article seeks to recast these laws as a form of structural violence against Christians. In doing so, it will show how Hindutva's anxieties about the demographic and political ‘Christian threat’ have become embedded into the law. Through an exploration of the southern state of Karnataka, where the Protection of Right to Freedom of Religion was passed in 2022, this article seeks to show how this structural violence interacts and reinforces forms of direct and cultural violence, creating a system of anti-Christian violence designed to maintain India's ‘Hindu majority’.
Nielsen KB, Selvaraj MS and Nilsen AG (2023). Hindu nationalist statecraft, dog-whistle legislation, and the vigilante state in contemporary India. kritisk etnografi: Swedish Journal of Anthropology. 6(2).
The ideology and politics of Hindu nationalism has always been predicated on an antagonistic discursive construction of ‘dangerous others,’ notably Muslims but also Christians. This construct has served to define India as first and foremost a Hindu nation, thereby de facto relegating religious minorities to the status of not properly belonging to the nation. However, under the leadership of the current Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Hindu nationalism has acquired an unprecedented political force. A key consequence of this has been that the discursive construction of dangerous others is now increasingly being written into law, through a process of Hindu nationalist statecraft. The result is, we argue, not just a de facto but increasingly also a de jure marginalization and stigmatization of religious minorities. We substantiate this argument by analysing the intent and effect of recent pieces of legislation in two Indian states regulating, among other things, religious conversions, inter-faith relationships, and population growth. Conceiving of such laws as dog-whistle legislation, we argue that they are, in fact, geared towards the legal consolidation of India as a Hindu state. We also analyse the intimate entanglement between these laws and the collective violence of vigilante groups against those minorities that Hindu nationalists frame as dangerous, anti-national others.
Rowe, P.S. and Selvaraj, M.S. (Eds.). Democracy Under 'Peculiar' Conditions: Religious Nationalism, Minorities, and Democracy in South Asia. (under contract with Palgrave Macmillan)
Kappen, M, Selvaraj, M.S. and Baskaran, T.S. (2015). Re-visioning Paradigms (Visthar Publications: Bangalore)
Selvaraj, M.S. and Choukar, M. (2025). Unpacking the "Hindu Male Protector": Hindutva's "Protection" of women, Dalits and Adivasis in Contemporary India. In Tedros, M. and Sinnamon, G. (Eds.) Ideologically Motivated Sexual Grooming. Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
Selvaraj, M.S. (2024). Intersectional Marginality: Compounding Structural Violence against Dalit Christians in India. In Prakash, A., Gupta, S.B., and Bochkovskaya, A. (Eds) Interrogating Marginalities Across Disciplinary Boundaries: Colonial and Post-Colonial India. Routledge.
Grimaldi, A.I & Selvaraj, M.S. (2022). ‘Teaching the Teachers: Reflections from two Graduate Teaching Assistants’, Postgraduate Pedagogy. 2(1):102-123.
Evaluation team for: Zahra, F.S. (2023). 'Pedagogies for flourishing in uncertainty and complexity: Exploring leadership, trust, and conflict resolution with clinical undergraduates via arts-based learning approaches', Towards creative wellbeing: Codeveloping Mulitmodal Pedagogical Approaches in Higher Education. 25-35.