The Strands Game is a conceptual framework and design motif that has emerged in interactive storytelling, puzzle design, and experimental game development. At its core, a Strands Game weaves together multiple narrative, mechanical, or informational threads—“strands”—that players must observe, manipulate, or reconcile to progress.
This article explores the idea, its design implications, variations, strengths, weaknesses, and cultural resonance.
Definition: A Strands Game organizes gameplay around several partially independent streams of content (narratives, mechanics, character arcs, clues, timelines) that intersect and influence each other. Success requires understanding how strands interact and making decisions that align or reconfigure them.
Origin and influences: The concept borrows from narrative techniques (nonlinear storytelling, braided narratives), puzzle hunts (interlocking clues), and systems design (modular mechanics). Examples include narrative games with parallel timelines, puzzle games with simultaneous physics systems, and ARGs (alternate reality games) that layer in-world artifacts across media.
Intersecting narrative strands: Multiple character perspectives or timelines that reveal different facets of a central mystery. Players piece together truth by synthesizing reports from divergent strands.
Mechanic strands: Separate gameplay systems (e.g., resource management + stealth + dialogue) that can be pursued independently but produce compounded outcomes when combined. Players must balance priorities across systems.
Spatial/temporal strands: Events that occur in different locations or times, where actions on one strand ripple into others—time-travel puzzles and cause-effect simulation games often use this.
Information strands: Clues distributed across media or formats (audio logs, emails, environmental detail). The player must aggregate and cross-reference them to solve puzzles or make informed choices.
Life is Strange (parallel timelines and character choices) — player rewinds time to alter outcomes; strands are choices and consequences cascading across scenes.
Return of the Obra Dinn (fragmented information strands) — disparate clues (skeletons, cargo manifests, logs) combine to reveal events.
ARGs like I Love Bees use multiple media strands (web, phone, real-world events) to form a coherent puzzle experience.
Cognitive satisfaction: Solving how strands interlock provides deep “aha” moments and a sense of mastery.
Agency and discovery: Multiple strands support emergent storytelling—players’ focus choices shape what they discover first and how they interpret events.
Complexity and overload: If not carefully balanced, strands can overwhelm players, creating confusion rather than intrigue.
Clarity vs. mystery: Provide affordances (visual cues, summaries, optional guidance) so players can track strands without spoiling complexity.
Pacing: Stagger reveals and provide checkpoints so players don’t lose progress or motivation.