Judges listen to teams present their arguments and score them based on their clarity, engagement with the central ethical dimensions of the case, deliberative thoughtfulness, and respectfulness. Judges should maintain an unbiased tone towards all teams. Judges should not discuss their scoring decisions with each other. Each judge is to rely on their own private judgment. Please refrain from explaining scores, giving overt criticism to a team during or after a match, or expressing disagreement with a fellow judge’s scoring.
Document link: How to score the initial presentation.
Document link: How to score the commentary, response, and judge Q&A.
Document link: Asking good questions.
Southeast Regional Ethics Bowl, Southeast Regional Ethics Bowl, Southeast Regional Ethics Bowl, Southeast Regional utheast Regional Ethics Bowl, Southeast Regional Ethics Bowl, Southeast Regional Ethics Bowl, Southeast Regional
Southeast regional ethics bowl, southeast rgional ethics bolw, ethics bowl, UNF, jacksonville, southeast regional ethics bowl