Citation Bank

• Abney, D. H., Warlaumont, A. S., Oller, D. K., Wallot, S., & Kello, C. T. (2017). Multiple coordination patterns in infant and adult vocalizations. Infancy, 22(4), 514-539. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12165 

• Alvarenga, P., Kuchirko, Y., Cerezo, M. Á., de Mendonça Filho, E. J., Bakeman, R., & Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (2021). An intervention focused on maternal sensitivity enhanced mothers' verbal responsiveness to infants. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 76, 101313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101313 

• Arterberry, M. E., & Bornstein, M. H. (2002). Infant perceptual and conceptual categorization: The roles of static and dynamic stimulus attributes. Cognition, 86(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00108-7 

• Augusti, E.-M. (2010). Look who’s talking: Pre-verbal infants’ perception of face-to-face and back-to-back social interactions. Frontiers in Psychology, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00161 

• Bakker, M., Kochukhova, O., & von Hofsten, C. (2011). Development of social perception: A conversation study of 6-, 12- and 36-month-old children. Infant Behavior and Development, 34(2), 363–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2011.03.001

• Baumwell, L., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., & Bornstein, M. H. (1997). Maternal verbal sensitivity and child language comprehension. Infant Behavior and Development, 20(2), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(97)90026-6

• Beier, J. S., & Carey, S. (2014). Contingency is not enough: Social context guides third-party attributions of intentional agency. Developmental Psychology, 50(3), 889–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034171 

• Bigelow, A. E. (1996). Infants’ memory for contingently responding persons. Infant Behavior and Development, 19, 334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(96)90388-4

• Bigelow, A. E., & Rochat, P. (2006). Two-Month-Old Infants’ Sensitivity to Social Contingency in Mother-Infant and Stranger-Infant Interaction. Infancy, 9(3), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327078in0903_3 

• Bornstein, M. H., Putnick, D. L., Cote, L. R., Haynes, O. M., & Suwalsky, J. T. D. (2015). Mother-Infant Contingent Vocalizations in 11 Countries. Psychological Science, 26(8), 1272–1284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615586796 

• Bornstein, M. H., & Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (1989). Maternal responsiveness and cognitive development in children. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1989(43), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219894306 

• Bornstein, M. H., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., & Haynes, O. M. (1999). First words in the second year: Continuity, stability, and models of concurrent and predictive correspondence in vocabulary and verbal responsiveness across age and context. Infant Behavior and Development, 22(1), 65-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(99)80006-X 

• Che, E. S., Alarcon, M. F., Yannaco, F. D. & Brooks, P. J. (2016). Maternal overlap predicts language outcomes for typical and late-talking children. In J. Scott & D. Waughtal (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 47-60). Cascadilla Press. Retrieved from: http://www.lingref.com/bucld/40/BUCLD40-04.pdf 

• Che, E. S. & Brooks, P. J. (2021). Maternal repetition and expansion of child utterances at the outset of combinatorial speech promote growth in MLU. In D. Dionne & L.-A. Vidal Covas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 45th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 120-133). Cascadilla Press. Retrieved from: http://www.lingref.com/bucld/45/BUCLD45-10.pdf 

• Che, E., Brooks, P. J., Alarcon, M., Yannaco, F. D., & Donnelly, S. (2018). Assessing the impact of conversational overlap in content on child language growth. Journal of Child Language, 45(1), 72-96. https://doi.org/10.1017.S0305000917000083 

• Clark, E. V. (2020). Conversational repair and the acquisition of language. Discourse Processes, 57(5-6), 441-459. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1719795 

• Clark, E. V., & Kelly, B. F. (2021). Constructing a system of communication with gestures and words. In A. Morgenstern & S. Goldin-Meadow (eds.), Gesture in Language: Development across the lifespan (pp.137-156). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, and Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000269-006 

• Clark, E. V. (2022). Language is acquired in interaction. In: S. Lappin & J.-P. Bernardy (eds.), Algebraic Structure and Natural Language (pp. 77-93). London: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003205388-4 

• Colomer, M., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2020). Language background shapes third-party communication expectations in 14-month-old infants. Cognition, 202, 104292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104292 

• Deligianni, F., Senju, A., Gergely, G., & Csibra, G. (2011). Automated gaze-contingent objects elicit orientation following in 8-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1499. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025659 

• DeLoache, J. S., Chiong, C., Sherman, K., Islam, N., Vanderborght, M., Troseth, G. L., Strouse, G. A., & O’Doherty, K. (2010). Do Babies Learn From Baby Media? Psychological Science, 21(11), 1570–1574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610384145 

• Donnellan, E., Bannard, C., McGillion, M. L., Slocombe, K. E., & Matthews, D. (2020). Infants’ intentionally communicative vocalizations elicit responses from caregivers and are the best predictors of the transition to language: A longitudinal investigation of infants’ vocalizations, gestures and word production. Developmental Science, 23(1), e12843. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12843 

• Donnelly, S., & Kidd, E. (2021). The Longitudinal Relationship Between Conversational Turn-Taking and Vocabulary Growth in Early Language Development. Child Development, 92(2), 609–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13511 

• Dunst, C. J., & Kassow, D. Z. (2008). Caregiver sensitivity, contingent social responsiveness, and secure infant attachment. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 5(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100409 

• Elmlinger, S. L., Schwade, J. A., Vollmer, L., & Goldstein, M. H. (2023). Learning how to learn from social feedback: The origins of early vocal development. Developmental Science, 26(2), e13296. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13296 

• Ferguson, B., & Waxman, S. R. (2016). What the [beep]? Six-month-olds link novel communicative signals to meaning. Cognition, 146, 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.020 

• Ferjan Ramírez, N., Lytle, S. R., & Kuhl, P. K. (2020). Parent coaching increases conversational turns and advances infant language development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(7), 3484–3491. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921653117 

• Forgács, B., Tauzin, T., Gergely, G., & Gervain, J. (2022). The newborn brain is sensitive to the communicative function of language. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1220. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05122-0 

• Goldstein, M. H., King, A. P., & West, M. J. (2003). Social interaction shapes babbling: Testing parallels between birdsong and speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(13), 8030–8035. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1332441100

• Goldstein, M. H., Schwade, J. A., & Bornstein, M. H. (2009). The Value of Vocalizing: Five-Month-Old Infants Associate Their Own Noncry Vocalizations With Responses From Caregivers: The Value of Vocalizing. Child Development, 80(3), 636–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01287.x

• Goldstein, M. H., Schwade, J. A., Briesch, J., & Syal, S. (2010). Learning while babbling: Prelinguistic object-directed vocalizations signal a readiness to learn. Infancy, 15 (4), 362 – 391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2009.00020.x

• Goldstein, M. H., & Schwade, J. A. (2008). Social feedback to infants’ babbling facilitates rapid phonological learning. Psychological Science, 19, 515–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02117.x 

• Gratier, M., Devouche, E., Guellai, B., Infanti, R., Yilmaz, E., & Parlato-Oliveira, E. (2015). Early development of turn-taking in vocal interaction between mothers and infants. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01167 

• Gros-Louis, J., West, M. J., & King, A. P. (2014). Maternal Responsiveness and the Development of Directed Vocalizing in Social Interactions. Infancy, 19(4), 385–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12054 

• Hallart, C., Peirolo, M., Xu, Z., & Fourtassi, A. (2022). Contingency in Child-Caregiver Naturalistic Conversation: Evidence for Mutual Influence. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/cev8k 

• Hernik, M., & Broesch, T. (2019). Infant gaze following depends on communicative signals: An eye-tracking study of 5- to 7-month-olds in Vanuatu. Developmental Science, 22(4), e12779. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12779 

• Kaletsch, K. & Liszkowski, U. (2023): A new online paradigm to measure spontaneous pointing in infants and caregivers. Infant Behavior and Development, 74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2023.101907

• Kelly, C., Crawford, E., Morgan, G., & Matthews, D. (2022). Assessing a video-based intervention to promote parent communication strategies with a deaf infant: A feasibility and acceptability study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(18), 5272. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185272 

• Kochanska, G., & Aksan, N. (2004). Development of Mutual Responsiveness Between Parents and Their Young Children. Child Development, 75(6), 1657–1676. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00808.x 

• Kuchirko, Y., Tafuro, L., & Tamis LeMonda, C. S. (2018). Becoming a communicative partner: Infant contingent responsiveness to maternal language and gestures. Infancy, 23(4), 558-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12222 

• Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F.-M., & Liu, H.-M. (2003). Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(15), 9096–9101. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1532872100 

• Johnson, S. C., Shimizu, Y. A., & Ok, S. J. (2007). Actors and actions: The role of agent behavior in infants’ attribution of goals. Cognitive Development, 22(3), 310-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.01.002

• Lense, M. D., Shultz, S., Astésano, C., & Jones, W. (2022). Music of infant-directed singing entrains infants’ social visual behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(45), e2116967119. https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2116967119 

• Levickis, P., Reilly, S., Girolametto, L., Ukoumunne, O. C., & Wake, M. (2014). Maternal Behaviors Promoting Language Acquisition in Slow-to-Talk Toddlers: Prospective Community-based Study. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 35(4), 274–281. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000056

• Lopez, L. D., Walle, E. A., Pretzer, G. M., & Warlaumont, A. S. (2020). Adult responses to infant prelinguistic vocalizations are associated with infant vocabulary: A home observation study. PLoS ONE, 15(11), e0242232. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242232 

• McGillion, M. L., Herbert, J. S., Pine, J. M., Keren-Portnoy, T., Vihman, M. M., & Matthews, D. E. (2013). Supporting early vocabulary development: What sort of responsiveness matters?. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 5(3), 240-248. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAMD.2013.2275949 

• McGillion, M., Pine, J. M., Herbert, J. S., & Matthews, D. (2017). A randomised controlled trial to test the effect of promoting caregiver contingent talk on language development in infants from diverse socioeconomic status backgrounds. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(10), 1122–1131. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12725

• Mcquaid, N. E., Bibok, M. B., & Carpendale, J. I. M. (2009). Relation Between Maternal Contingent Responsiveness and Infant Social Expectations. Infancy, 14(3), 390–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/15250000902839955

• Morrison, S., Henderson, A. M. E., Sagar, M., Kennedy-Costantini, S., & Adams, J. (2021). Peek-a-who ? Exploring the dynamics of early communication with an interactive partner swap paradigm and state space grid visualization. Infant Behavior and Development, 64, 101576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2021.101576 

• Nikolaus, M., & Fourtassi, A. (2021). Modeling the Interaction Between Perception-Based and Production-Based Learning in Children’s Early Acquisition of Semantic Knowledge. Proceedings of the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL). http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.conll-1.31

• Nikolaus, M., & Fourtassi, A. (2023). Communicative Feedback in Language Acquisition. New Ideas in Psychology, 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.100985

• Nikolaus, M., Prevot, L., & Fourtassi, A. (2022). Communicative Feedback as a Mechanism Supporting the Production of Intelligible Speech in Early Childhood. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4rb5r3hq

• Nikolaus, M., Prévot, L., & Fourtassi, A. (2023). Communicative Feedback in Response to Children’s Grammatical Errors. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. https://psyarxiv.com/v83uj/

• O’Doherty, K., Troseth, G. L., Shimpi, P. M., Goldenberg, E., Akhtar, N., & Saylor, M. M. (2011). Third-Party Social Interaction and Word Learning From Video: Social Interaction and Video. Child Development, 82(3), 902–915. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01579.x 

• Olson, S. L., Bates, J. E., & Bayles, K. (1984). Mother–infant interaction and the development of individual differences in children’s cognitive competence. Developmental Psychology, 20(1), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.20.1.166

• Pagmar, D., Abbot-Smith, K., & Matthews, D. (2022). Predictors of children’s conversational contingency. Language Development Research, 2(1), 139-179. https://doi.org/10.34842/2022-511 

• Pretzer, G. M., Lopez, L. D., Walle, E. A., & Warlaumont, A. S. (2019). Infant-adult vocal interaction dynamics depend on infant vocal type, child-directedness of adult speech, and timeframe. Infant Behavior and Development, 57, 101325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2019.04.007 

• Richert, R. A., Robb, M. B., & Smith, E. I. (2011). Media as Social Partners: The Social Nature of Young Children’s Learning From Screen Media: Media as Social Partners. Child Development, 82(1), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01542.x 

• Rochat, P., Neisser, U., & Marian, V. (1998). Are young infants sensitive to interpersonal contingency? Infant Behavior and Development, 21(2), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(98)90012-1 

• Rochat, P. R. (2001). Social contingency detection and infant development. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 65(3), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1521/bumc.65.3.347.19847 

• Rollins, P. R. (2003). Caregivers’ contingent comments to 9-month-old infants: Relationships with later language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000110 

• Roseberry, S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2014). Skype Me! Socially Contingent Interactions Help Toddlers Learn Language. Child Development, 85(3), 956–970. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12166 

• Senju, A., & Csibra, G. (2008). Gaze Following in Human Infants Depends on Communicative Signals. Current Biology, 18(9), 668–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.03.059

• Shimizu, Y. A., & Johnson, S. C. (2004). Infants’ attribution of a goal to a morphologically unfamiliar agent. Developmental Science, 7(4), 425-430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00362.x

• Smith, N. A., & McMurray, B. (2018). Temporal responsiveness in mother–child dialogue: A longitudinal analysis of children with normal hearing and hearing loss. Infancy, 23, 410-431. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12227 

• Smith, N. A., McDaniel, V. F., Ispa, J. M., & McMurray, B. (2023). Maternal depression and the timing of mother–child dialogue. Infant and Child Development, 32, e2389. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2389

• Smith, N. A., & Trainor, L. J. (2008). Infant-directed speech is modulated by infant feedback. Infancy, 13, 410-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/15250000802188719 

• Suarez‐Rivera, C., Linn, E., & Tamis‐LeMonda, C. S. (2022). From Play to Language: Infants' Actions on Objects Cascade to Word Learning. Language Learning, 72(4), 1092-1127. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12512

• Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., & Bornstein, M. H. (1989). Habituation and maternal encouragement of attention in infancy as predictors of toddler language, play, and representational competence. Child Development, 60(3), 738-751. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130739 

• Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Bornstein, M. H., & Baumwell, L. (2001). Maternal Responsiveness and Children’s Achievement of Language Milestones. Child Development, 72(3), 748–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00313 

• Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., & Bornstein, M. H. (2002). Maternal responsiveness and early language acquisition. In Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 29, pp. 89-127). JAI. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2407(02)80052-0 

• Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Bornstein, M. H., Baumwell, L., & Melstein Damast, A. (1996). Responsive Parenting in the Second Year: Specific Influences on Children’s Language and Play. Early Development and Parenting: An International Journal of Research and Practice, 5(4), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0917(199612)5:4<173::AID-EDP131>3.0.CO;2-V

• Tamis‐LeMonda, C. S., Bornstein, M. H., & Baumwell, L. (2001). Maternal responsiveness and children's achievement of language milestones. Child Development, 72(3), 748-767. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00313 

• Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Bornstein, M. H., Kahana-Kalman, R., Baumwell, L., & Cyphers, L. (1998). Predicting variation in the timing of language milestones in the second year: An events history approach. Journal of Child Language, 25(3), 675-700. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000998003572 

• Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Kuchirko, Y., & Tafuro, L. (2013). From action to interaction: Infant object exploration and mothers' contingent responsiveness. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 5(3), 202-209. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAMD.2013.2269905 

• Tauzin, T., & Gergely, G. (2018). Communicative mind-reading in preverbal infants. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27804-4

• Tauzin, T., & Gergely, G. (2019). Variability of signal sequences in turn-taking exchanges induces agency attribution in 10.5-mo-olds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(31), 15441–15446. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816709116 

• Tauzin, T., & Gergely, G. (2021). Co-dependency of exchanged behaviors is a cue for agency attribution in 10-month-olds. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 18217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97811-5 

• Thiele, M., Hepach, R., Michel, C., Gredebäck, G., & Haun, D. B. M. (2021). Social interaction targets enhance 13-month-old infants’ associative learning. Infancy, infa.12393. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12393 

• Tsuji, S., Jincho, N., Mazuka, R., & Cristia, A. (2020). Communicative cues in the absence of a human interaction partner enhance 12-month-old infants’ word learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 191, 104740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104740

• V. P. S., Ritwika, Pretzer, G. M., Mendoza, S., Shedd, C., Kello, C. T., Gopinathan, A., & Warlaumont, A. S. (2020). Exploratory dynamics of vocal foraging during infant-caregiver communication. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 10469. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66778-0

• Warlaumont, A. S. (2020). Infant vocal learning and speech production. In  J. J. Lockman & C. S. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of infant development: Brain, behavior, and cultural context (pp. 602–631). Cambridge University Press.

• Watson, J. S. (1972). Smiling, cooing, and" the game". Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 18(4), 323-339.

• West, K. L., Fletcher, K. K., Adolph, K. E., & Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (2022). Mothers talk about infants' actions: How verbs correspond to infants' real-time behavior. Developmental Psychology, 58(3), 405. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001285 

• Abney, D. H., daSilva, E. B., & Bertenthal, B. I. (2021). Associations between infant–mother physiological synchrony and 4‐and 6‐month‐old infants’ emotion regulation. Developmental Psychobiology, 63(6), e22161. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.22161

• Bornstein, M. H., & Tamis-Lemonda, C. S. (1997). Maternal responsiveness and infant mental abilities: Specific predictive relations. Infant Behavior and Development, 20(3), 283-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(97)90001-1 

• Gergely, G. (2004). The role of contingency detection in early affect–regulative interactions and in the development of different types of infant attachment. Social Development, 13(3), 468-478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2004.00277.x 

• Keller, H., Kartner, J., Borke, J., Yovsi, R., & Kleis, A. (2005). Parenting styles and the development of the categorical self: A longitudinal study on mirror self-recognition in Cameroonian Nso and German families. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 496–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01650250500147485 

• Markova, G., Nguyen, T., Schätz, C. & de Eccher, M. (2020). Singing in Tune – Being in Tune: Relationship Between Maternal Playful Singing and Interpersonal Synchrony. Enfance, 1, 89-107. https://doi.org/10.3917/enf2.201.0089 

• Markova, G., & Nguyen, T. (2022). Interpersonal synchrony is associated with infants’ reactions to subtle changes in caregiver‐infant interactions. Social Development. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sode.12646 

• Masek, L. R., Weiss, S. M., McMillan, B. T., Paterson, S. J., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh‐Pasek, K. (2022). Contingent conversations build more than language: How communicative interactions in toddlerhood relate to preschool executive function skills. Developmental Science, e13338. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13338

• Téglás, E., Kovács, Á.M., Gergely, G. (2022). Dissociating Measures of Information- and Control-Seeking in 12-Month-Olds’ Contingency Exploration. In: Gervain, J., Csibra, G., Kovács, K. (eds) A Life in Cognition. Language, Cognition, and Mind, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66175-5_24 

MORE CITATIONS COMING SOON

• Bedford, R., Gliga, T., Frame, K., Hudry, K., Chandler, S., Johnson, M. H., Chairman, T., & Basis Team. (2013). Failure to learn from feedback underlies word learning difficulties in toddlers at risk for autism. Journal of Child Language, 40(1), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000912000086

• Boorom, O., Muñoz, V., Xin, R., Watson, M., & Lense, M. D. (2020). Parental responsiveness during musical and non-musical engagement in preschoolers with ASD. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 78, 101641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2020.101641

• Boorom, O., Alviar, C., Zhang, Y., Muñoz, V. A., Kello, C. T., & Lense, M. D. (2022). Child language and autism diagnosis impact hierarchical temporal structure of parent–child vocal interactions in early childhood. Autism Research, 15(11), 2099-2111. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2804

• Gergely, G. (2001). The obscure object of desire-'Nearly, but clearly not, like me': Contingency preference in normal children versus children with autism. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 65(3: Special issue), 411-426. https://doi.org/10.1521/bumc.65.3.411.19853 

• Harbison, A. L., Woynaroski, T. G., Tapp, J., Wade, J. W., Warlaumont, A. S., & Yoder, P. J. (2018). A new measure of child vocal reciprocity in children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 11(6), 903-915. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1942 

• Klin, A., Lin, D. J., Gorrindo, P., Ramsay, G., & Jones, W. (2009). Two-year-olds with autism orient to non-social contingencies rather than biological motion. Nature, 459(7244), 257-261. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07868

• Liu, T., Schultz, B. G., Dai, D., Liu, C., & Lense, M. D. (2022). Parent-child nonverbal engagement during spoken versus sung book-sharing in preschoolers with and without autism. Psychology of Music, 50(6), 1721-1739. https://doi.org/10.1177/03057356211058781

• Nadel, J., Croué, S., Mattlinger, M. J., Canet, P., Hudelot, C., Lécuyer, C., & Martini, M. (2000). Do Children with Autism have Expectancies about the Social Behaviour of Unfamiliar People?. Autism, 4(2), 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361300004002003 

• Northrup, J. B. (2017). Contingency detection in a complex world: A developmental model and implications for atypical development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41(6), 723–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025416668582

• Northrup, J. B., & Iverson, J. M. (2015). Vocal coordination during early parent-infant interactions predicts language outcome in infant siblings of children with autism spectrum disorder. Infancy, 20(5), 523-547. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12090 

• Northrup, J. B., & Iverson, J. M. (2020). Multimodal coordination of vocal and gaze behavior in mother-infant dyads across the first year of life. Infancy, 25(6), 952-972. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12369 

• Northrup, J. B., Libertus, K., & Iverson, J. M. (2017). Response to changing contingencies in infants at high and low risk for autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 10(7), 1239-1248. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1770 

• Parish‐Morris, J., Hennon, E. A., Hirsh‐Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Tager‐Flusberg, H. (2007). Children with autism illuminate the role of social intention in word learning. Child Development, 78(4), 1265-1287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01065.x

• Preissler, M. A., & Carey, S. (2005). The role of inferences about referential intent in word learning: Evidence from autism. Cognition, 97(1), B13-B23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.008

• Warlaumont, A. S., Richards, J. A., Gilkerson, J., Messinger, D. S., & Oller, D. K. (2016). The social feedback hypothesis and communicative development in autism spectrum disorder: A response to Akhtar, Jaswal, Dinishak, and Stephan (2016). Psychological Science, 27(11), 1531-1533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616668558

MORE CITATIONS COMING SOON

• Elmlinger, S. L., Goldstein, M. H., & Casillas, M. (2022). Immature vocalizations simplify the speech of Tseltal Mayan and US caregivers. Topics in Cognitive Science.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12632

• Kuchirko, Y., Tafuro, L., & Tamis LeMonda, C. S. (2018). Becoming a communicative partner: Infant contingent responsiveness to maternal language and gestures. Infancy, 23(4), 558-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12222 

• Kuchirko, Y. A., & Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (2019). The cultural context of infant development: Variability, specificity, and universality. In D. A. Henry, E. Votruba-Drzal, & P. Miller (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior: Child development at the intersection of race and SES (pp. 27–63). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2019.04.004 

MORE CITATIONS COMING SOON

• Carouso-Peck, S., & Goldstein, M. H. (2019). Female Social Feedback Reveals Non-imitative Mechanisms of Vocal Learning in Zebra Finches. Current Biology : CB, 29(4), 631–636.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.026 

• Carouso, S., & Goldstein, M. H. (2018). Linking vocal learning to social reward in the brain: Proposed neural mechanisms of socially guided song learning. In S. Frühholz & P. Belin (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Voice Perception. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198743187.013.14

• Carouso-Peck, S., Menyhart, O., DeVoogd, T. J., & Goldstein, M. H., (2020). Contingent parental responses guide zebra finch song learning in naturalistic social conditions. Animal Behaviour, 165, 123 – 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.04.019

• Cate, C. T. (1986). Does behavior contingent stimulus movement enhance filial imprinting in Japanese quail?. Developmental Psychobiology: The Journal of the International Society for Developmental Psychobiology, 19(6), 607-614. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.420190611

• Faust, K. M., Carouso-Peck, S., Elson, M. R., & Goldstein, M. H. (2020). The origins of social knowledge in altricial species. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 2, 225 – 246. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-051820- 121446

• Goldstein, M. H., & Schwade, J. A. (2009). From birds to words: Perception of structure in social interactions guides vocal development and language learning. In M. S. Blumberg, J. H. Freeman, & S.R. Robinson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Developmental and Comparative Neuroscience. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195314731.013.0035 

• Haun, D. B., & Call, J. (2008). Imitation recognition in great apes. Current Biology, 18(7), R288-R290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.031

• King, A. P., West, M. J., & Goldstein, M. H. (2005). Nonvocal shaping of avian song development: Parallels to human speech development. Ethology, 111, 101- 117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2004.01039.x

• Lemaire, B. S., Rosa-Salva, O., Fraja, M., Lorenzi, E., & Vallortigara, G. (2022). Spontaneous preference for unpredictability in the temporal contingencies between agents' motion in naive domestic chicks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 289(1986), 20221622. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.1622

• Oller, D. K., Griebel, U., Iyer, S. N., Jhang, Y., Warlaumont, A. S., Dale, R., & Call, J. (2019). Language origins viewed in spontaneous and interactive vocal rates of human and bonobo infants. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 729. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00729 

• de Reus, K., Soma, M., Anichini, M., Gamba, M., de Heer Kloots, M., Lense, M., Bruno, J.H., Trainor, L. and Ravignani, A., 2021. Rhythm in dyadic interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1835), p.20200337. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0337

• Tauzin, T., Kovács, K., & Topál, J. (2016). Dogs identify agents in third-party interactions on the basis of the observed degree of contingency. Psychological Science, 27(8), 1061-1068. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616647518 

MORE CITATIONS COMING SOON

• Anna-Lisa, V., Rohlfing, K. J., Britta, W., & Cangelosi, A. (2015). Alignment to the Actions of a Robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(2), 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0252-0

• Broz, F., Nehaniv, C. L., Belpaeme, T., Bisio, A., Dautenhahn, K., Fadiga, L., ... & Cangelosi, A. (2014). The ITALK project: A developmental robotics approach to the study of individual, social, and linguistic learning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6(3), 534-544. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12099 

• Cangelosi, A., Metta, G., Sagerer, G., Nolfi, S., Nehaniv, C., Fischer, K., ... & Zeschel, A. (2010). Integration of action and language knowledge: A roadmap for developmental robotics. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 2(3), 167-195. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAMD.2010.2053034 

• Deng, W., Sargent, B., Bradley, N.S., Klein L., Rosales, M., Pulido, J.C., Matarić, M.J., & Smith, B.A. Using Socially Assistive Robot Feedback to Reinforce Infant Leg Movement Acceleration. IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2021), Aug-2021 https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515537 

• Fischer, K., Foth, K., Rohlfing, K., & Wrede, B. (2011, August). Is talking to a simulated robot like talking to a child?. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL) (Vol. 2, pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DEVLRN.2011.6037320 

• Fischer, K., Lohan, K., Saunders, J., Nehaniv, C., Wrede, B., & Rohlfing, K. (2013, May). The impact of the contingency of robot feedback on HRI. In 2013 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS) (pp. 210-217). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CTS.2013.6567231 

• Gaspers, J., Cimiano, P., Rohlfing, K., & Wrede, B. (2016). Constructing a language from scratch: Combining bottom-up and top-down learning processes in a computational model of language acquisition. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 9(2), 183-196. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2016.2614958

• Klein, L., Ardulov, V., Gharib, A., Thompson, B., Levitt, P., & Matarić, M.J. (2021). Dynamic Mode Decomposition with Control as a Model of Multimodal Behavioral Coordination. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462244.3479916 

• Klein, L., Ardulov, V., Hu, Y. Soleymani, M. Gharib, A. Thompson, B. Levitt, P., & Matarić, M.J. (2020). Incorporating Measures of Intermodal Coordination in Automated Analysis of Infant-Mother Interaction. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3382507.3418870 

• Klein, L., Itti, L., Smith, B. A., Rosales, M., Nikolaidas, S., & Matarić, M. J. (2019). Surprise! Predicting Infant Visual Attention in a Socially Assistive Robot Contingent Learning Paradigm. 2019 International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN46459.2019.8956385 

• Lohan, K. S., Pitsch, K., Rohlfing, K. J., Fischer, K., Saunders, J., Lehmann, H., ... & Wrede, B. (2011, August). Contingency allows the robot to spot the tutor and to learn from interaction. In 2011 IEEE international conference on development and learning (ICDL) (Vol. 2, pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DEVLRN.2011.6037341 

• Lohan, K. S., Rohlfing, K., Saunders, J., Nehaniv, C., & Wrede, B. (2012, November). Contingency scaffolds language learning. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DevLrn.2012.6400848 

• Lohse, M., Hanheide, M., Rohlfing, K. J., & Sagerer, G. (2009, March). Systemic interaction analysis (SInA) in HRI. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction (pp. 93-100). https://doi.org/10.1145/1514095.1514114 

• Lücking, P., Rohlfing, K., Wrede, B., & Schilling, M. (2016, September). Preschoolers' engagement in social interaction with an autonomous robotic system. In 2016 Joint IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL-EpiRob) (pp. 210-216). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DEVLRN.2016.7846821 

• Meltzoff, A. N., Brooks, R., Shon, A. P., & Rao, R. P. (2010). “Social” robots are psychological agents for infants: A test of gaze following. Neural Networks, 23(8-9), 966-972.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2010.09.00 

• Pitsch, K., Lohan, K. S., Rohlfing, K., Saunders, J., Nehaniv, C. L., & Wrede, B. (2012, September). Better be reactive at the beginning. Implications of the first seconds of an encounter for the tutoring style in human-robot-interaction. In 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 974-981). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343876 

• Rohlfing, K. J., Altvater-Mackensen, N., Caruana, N., van den Berghe, R., Bruno, B., Tolksdorf, N. F., & Hanulíková, A. (2022). Social/dialogical roles of social robots in supporting children's learning of language and literacy-A review and analysis of innovative roles. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 251. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.971749

• Rohlfing, K. J., Fritsch, J., Wrede, B., & Jungmann, T. (2006). How can multimodal cues from child-directed interaction reduce learning complexity in robots?. Advanced Robotics, 20(10), 1183-1199. https://doi.org/10.1163/156855306778522532 

• Sagar, M., Henderson, A. M., Takac, M., Morrison, S., Knott, A., Moser, A., ... & Jawed, K. (2022). Deconstructing and reconstructing turn-taking in caregiver-infant interactions: a platform for embodied models of early cooperation. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2022.2098781 

• Salem, M., Kopp, S., Wachsmuth, I., Rohlfing, K., & Joublin, F. (2012). Generation and evaluation of communicative robot gesture. International Journal of Social Robotics, 4, 201-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-011-0124-9 

• Tolksdorf, N. F., Siebert, S., Zorn, I., Horwath, I., & Rohlfing, K. J. (2021). Ethical considerations of applying robots in kindergarten settings: Towards an approach from a macroperspective. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13, 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00622-3 

• Tolksdorf, N. F., Viertel, F. E., & Rohlfing, K. J. (2021). Do shy preschoolers interact differently when learning language with a social robot? An analysis of interactional behavior and word learning. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8, 676123. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.676123 

• Vollmer, A. L., Schillingmann, L., Rohlfing, K. J., & Wrede, B. (2014, March). Humans and robots in asymmetric interactions. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction (pp. 506-507). https://doi.org/10.1145/2559636.2560027 

• Vollmer, A. L., Wrede, B., Rohlfing, K. J., & Oudeyer, P. Y. (2016). Pragmatic frames for teaching and learning in human-robot interaction: Review and challenges. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 10, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2016.00010 

• Wrede, B., Rohlfing, K.J., Hanheide, M., Sagerer, G. (2009). Towards Learning by Interacting. In: Sendhoff, B., Körner, E., Sporns, O., Ritter, H., Doya, K. (eds) Creating Brain-Like Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5436. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00616-6_8 

MORE CITATIONS COMING SOON

• Clackson, K., Wass, S., Georgieva, S., Brightman, L., Nutbrown, R., Almond, H., Bieluczyk, J., Carro, G., Rigby Dames, B., & Leong, V. (2019). Do helpful mothers help? Effects of maternal scaffolding and infant engagement on cognitive performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 266. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02661 

• Forssman, L., & Wass, S. V. (2018). Training basic visual attention leads to changes in responsiveness to social‐communicative cues in 9‐month‐olds. Child Development, 89(3), e199-e213. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12812 

• Kidby, S., Neale, D., Wass, S., & Leong, V. (2023). Parent–infant affect synchrony during social and solo play. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 378(1875), 20210482. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0482 

• Leong, V., Byrne, E., Clackson, K., Georgieva, S., Lam, S., & Wass, S. (2017). Speaker gaze increases information coupling between infant and adult brains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(50), 13290–13295. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702493114

• Nguyen, T., Abney, D. H., Salamander, D., Bertenthal, B. I., & Hoehl, S. (2021). Proximity and touch are associated with neural but not physiological synchrony in naturalistic mother-infant interactions. NeuroImage, 244, 118599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118599 

• Nguyen, T., Schleihauf, H., Kayhan, E., Matthes, D., Vrtička, P., & Hoehl, S. (2021). Neural synchrony in mother–child conversation: Exploring the role of conversation patterns. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(1-2), 93-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa079 

• Nguyen, T., Schleihauf, H., Kayhan, E., Matthes, D., Vrtička, P., & Hoehl, S. (2020). The effects of interaction quality on neural synchrony during mother-child problem solving. Cortex, 124, 235-249.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.11.020 

• Nguyen, T., Zimmer, L., & Hoehl, S. (2023). Your turn, my turn. Neural synchrony in mother–infant proto-conversation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 378(1875), 20210488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0488 

• Wass, S. V., Smith, C. G., Clackson, K., Gibb, C., Eitzenberger, J., & Mirza, F. U. (2019). Parents mimic and influence their infant’s autonomic state through dynamic affective state matching. Current Biology, 29(14), 2415-2422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.016 

• Wass, S. V., Noreika, V., Georgieva, S., Clackson, K., Brightman, L., & Nutbrown, R. (2018). Parental neural responsivity to infants’ visual attention: How mature brains influence immature brains during social interaction. PLoS Biol, 16(12), e2006328. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2006328 

• Wass, S., Phillips, E., Smith, C., Fatimehin, E. O., & Goupil, L. (2022). Vocal communication is tied to interpersonal arousal coupling in caregiver-infant dyads. Elife, 11, e77399. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77399 

• Wass, S. V., Whitehorn, M., Marriott Haresign, I., Phillips, E., & Leong, V. (2020). Interpersonal Neural Entrainment during Early Social Interaction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(4), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.006

MORE CITATIONS COMING SOON

• Bornstein, M. H., & Tamis‐LeMonda, C. S. (1989). Maternal responsiveness and cognitive development in children. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1989(43), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219894306 

• Bornstein, M. H., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Hahn, C. S., & Haynes, O. M. (2008). Maternal responsiveness to young children at three ages: longitudinal analysis of a multidimensional, modular, and specific parenting construct. Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 867. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.867 

• Fourtassi, A. (2023). Understanding Children’s Multimodal Conversational Development: Challenges and Opportunities. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4f3ny 

• Gergely, G. (2004). The role of contingency detection in early affect-regulative interactions and in the development of different types of infant attachment. Social Development, 13(3), 468-478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2004.00277.x 

• Gergely, G., & Király, I. (2019). Natural pedagogy of social emotions. In D. Dukes & F. Clément (Eds.), Foundations of Affective Social Learning: Conceptualizing the Social Transmission of Value (Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction, pp. 87-114). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108661362.005 

• Gergely, G., Koós, O., & Watson, J. S. (2010). Contingent parental reactivity in early socio-emotional development. The embodied self: Dimensions, coherence and disorders, 141-169.

• Gergely, G., & Watson, J. S. (1999). Early socio–emotional development: Contingency perception and the social-biofeedback model. In P. Rochat (Ed.), Early social cognition: Understanding others in the first months of life (pp. 101–136). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

• Keller, H., Lohaus, A., Völker, S., Cappenberg, M., & Chasiotis, A. (1999). Temporal contingency as an independent component of parenting behavior. Child Development, 70, 474–485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00034 

• Luchkina, E., & Xu, F. (2022). From social contingency to verbal reference: A constructivist hypothesis. Psychological Review, 129(4), 890–909. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000320 

• Masek, L. R., McMillan, B. T., Paterson, S. J., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2021). Where language meets attention: How contingent interactions promote learning. Developmental Review, 60, 100961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2021.100961

• Nikolaus, M., & Fourtassi, A. (2023). Communicative feedback in language acquisition. New Ideas in Psychology, 68, 100985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.100985 

• Schatz, J. L., Suarez‐Rivera, C., Kaplan, B. E., & Tamis‐LeMonda, C. S. (2022). Infants' object interactions are long and complex during everyday joint engagement. Developmental Science, 25(4), e13239. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13239 

• Suarez‐Rivera, C., Schatz, J. L., Herzberg, O., & Tamis‐LeMonda, C. S. (2022). Joint engagement in the home environment is frequent, multimodal, timely, and structured. Infancy, 27(2), 232-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12446

• Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Kuchirko, Y., & Song, L. (2014). Why is infant language learning facilitated by parental responsiveness? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(2), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414522813

• Zmyj, N., & Marcinkowski, N. (2017). The relationship between infants’ interest in feedback of self-performed actions with different latency and their parents’ temporally contingent behavior. Cognitive Development, 41, 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.01.002 

MORE CITATIONS COMING SOON