If you want longer stated battery life and more ways to play audio, choose SOAR NFL; if you need semi-in-ear comfort, water resistance, and newer Bluetooth, choose Defunc True LITE II. For basketball, I’d lean toward Defunc for its IPX4 water resistance, while SOAR makes a stronger case if you prioritize its 32-hour total battery life and FM radio option.
SOAR NFL vs Defunc True LITE II at a Glance
• SOAR NFL’s biggest strength: 32 hours of stated battery life, plus FM radio and USB or AUX audio options. Trade-off: It has no listed water-resistance rating and no noise control.
• Choose SOAR NFL if battery life and flexible audio sources matter more than a water-resistance rating.
• Choose Defunc True LITE II if you want a semi-in-ear fit and a stated water-resistance rating for workouts and everyday wear.
• For basketball: Defunc’s IPX4 rating is a useful stated feature for a sweat-prone activity, while neither product’s listed design is specifically described as an ear clip.
SOAR NFL is an in-ear wireless earbud set with silicone in-ear gels and a charging case. Its listed total battery life is 32 hours, which makes it the more compelling choice for someone who wants to go longer between charging sessions. Bluetooth 5.0 and auto-pairing are intended to make connecting and reconnecting to a device straightforward. That combination suits a routine that moves between listening at home, on the go, and during a workout.
The audio options are a distinctive part of its feature set. Alongside Bluetooth, the earbuds offer FM radio and USB or AUX connections for additional audio sources. That flexibility may matter if you want to listen to live commentary or use a source beyond a typical Bluetooth connection. For basketball, the secure-fit silicone gels may appeal to someone who prefers an in-ear feel, but there is no stated rating to confirm protection from sweat or water.
Who should skip it: Skip SOAR NFL if a listed water-resistance rating, noise control, or semi-in-ear fit is central to your decision. Its data sheet does not provide those features.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Defunc True LITE II takes a different approach with a lightweight semi-in-ear ergonomic fit. That style is aimed at natural, comfortable wear for everyday listening, commuting, work, and travel. It uses a 13mm dynamic driver, and its feature description calls out bass, vocals, and balanced stereo sound. Those are manufacturer-described audio qualities, not a guarantee that every listener will prefer its tuning, but the driver size and intended uses help explain its general-purpose focus.
For exercise, the clearest practical distinction is IPX4 water resistance. That gives Defunc a stated resistance feature that SOAR does not list, making it the more straightforward pick for someone seeking a sweat resistant headset for basketball. The earbuds also list Bluetooth 6.0, ENC clear calls, low-latency performance, and AI app compatibility. Its total playtime is stated as 20 hours, so it offers less battery life than SOAR’s 32 hours.
Who should skip it: Skip Defunc if your first priority is the longest stated battery life or if you specifically want the FM radio and USB or AUX options listed for SOAR.
• Longer stated total battery life → SOAR NFL. Its 32-hour figure is higher than Defunc’s 20 hours. That difference may matter if you listen across several days or simply prefer fewer charging interruptions.
• A water-resistance rating for workouts → Defunc True LITE II. It lists IPX4 water resistance; SOAR’s sheet does not give a water-resistance rating. That makes Defunc easier to recommend for basketball when sweat is a consideration, though the rating is not a claim of protection from every kind of exposure.
• Semi-in-ear fit → Defunc True LITE II. Its design is described as lightweight and semi-in-ear. SOAR instead uses silicone in-ear gels, which may suit someone who prefers a more conventional in-ear fit.
• Silicone in-ear gels → SOAR NFL. SOAR’s listed fit includes rounded tips and silicone gels. That offers a clear design distinction for buyers who favor an in-ear shape over a semi-in-ear one.
• FM radio or additional audio sources → SOAR NFL. Its listed options include FM radio and USB or AUX. Defunc’s data sheet describes Bluetooth connectivity and does not list those alternatives.
• Newer listed Bluetooth version → Defunc True LITE II. Defunc lists Bluetooth 6.0, while SOAR lists Bluetooth 5.0. A newer version number is a specification difference; it does not by itself establish how either pair will perform with every device or in every setting.
• Call-focused listed features → Defunc True LITE II. Its feature sheet includes ENC clear calls. SOAR’s sheet does not list an equivalent call feature, so buyers who prioritize that stated capability have a clearer reason to choose Defunc.
• No noise-control feature listed → SOAR NFL. SOAR explicitly lists no noise control, while Defunc lists passive noise cancellation. Neither sheet describes active noise cancellation, so do not treat either as a confirmed active-noise-cancelling option.
My Verdict
In my opinion, I’d choose Defunc True LITE II for basketball because its IPX4 water resistance and semi-in-ear design make it the more exercise-oriented fit on the listed facts. I’d switch to SOAR NFL if my priority were longer battery life or the FM radio and USB or AUX options. For the best head phones for basketball, I would decide first whether water resistance or battery life matters more in my routine.
Think carefully about the workout environment, too. Defunc lists IPX4 water resistance, which is a concrete distinction for a sweat-prone activity. SOAR does not list a water-resistance rating. That absence does not establish how it will behave around sweat; it simply means the provided specifications do not offer the same stated protection feature. If sweat protection is a must-have, Defunc is the more supportable choice from these two sheets.
The battery comparison is straightforward, but total playtime figures do not tell the entire charging story. SOAR lists 32 hours, and Defunc lists 20 hours. Neither figure here breaks down listening time per charge versus the contribution from the charging case, so I would compare them as stated total playtime rather than assume a particular number of hours from one charge of the earbuds.
Finally, consider what you actually listen to. SOAR’s FM radio and USB or AUX options give it a broader list of audio sources. Defunc instead highlights ENC clear calls, low latency, and app compatibility. If you’re deciding between them for calls, commuting, or video as well as basketball, those different feature priorities can be more useful than treating one set as a universal winner. To compare current purchasing details, check the current price on Amazon using the page’s button.
Defunc True LITE II lists IPX4 water resistance, while SOAR NFL has no water-resistance rating listed. That gives Defunc the clearer specification-based case for a sweat-prone basketball session. SOAR lists longer total battery life, at 32 hours versus 20.
Does either pair have ear clips for basketball?
Neither product’s data sheet describes an ear clip. SOAR is listed with silicone in-ear gels, and Defunc with a semi-in-ear ergonomic fit. If an ear clip is essential, these specifications do not establish that either pair provides one.
SOAR NFL lists 32 hours of total battery life; Defunc True LITE II lists 20 hours of total playtime. The figures favor SOAR, though the sheets do not give a per-charge breakdown.
Defunc lists passive noise cancellation and ENC clear calls. SOAR lists no noise control and does not specify an equivalent call feature. Neither sheet lists active noise cancellation, so buyers should distinguish Defunc’s passive noise-control description from active cancellation.
• FosPower Kids Headphones vs BULYPAZY 2-Pack: Wireless Travel
• Xmenha Touchscreen TWS True vs UYRUREL Compatible
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.