casidhe troyer


monday June 19 at 5.30pm (Paris time) 

Headquarters versus Subsidiary Management of R&D Subsidiaries: Evidence from the Introduction of Broadband Communication Technology

By Casidhe Troyer (London Business School) and Catherine Magelssen (London Business School)

Abstract


This study investigates the differential effects of headquarters versus subsidiary management of R&D subsidiaries. Using confidential data on the units that manage R&D subsidiaries and exploiting the staggered country-level introduction of broadband communication technology as a shock to the ability of the managing unit to communicate with the R&D subsidiary, we find that R&D subsidiaries managed by headquarters experience substantially smaller improvements in the quantity, quality, and market value of patents than R&D subsidiaries managed by another subsidiary. The effect of the introduction of broadband on co-invented patents and knowledge sharing between R&D subsidiaries and their managing unit is significantly larger for subsidiary- than headquarters-managed R&D subsidiaries. These patterns are more pronounced when the firm has recently undertaken an M&A at the time of broadband introduction, when the managing unit controls more R&D subsidiaries, when the R&D subsidiary is technologically distant from the managing unit, and for larger and more diversified firms. We employ a battery of analyses examining patenting patterns and heterogeneity in multinational firm characteristics to understand the mechanisms and rule out alternative explanations. Our findings are consistent with headquarters' relatively larger corporate-level demands than managing subsidiaries crowding out their attention to fostering innovation in the R&D subsidiaries they manage. This study highlights the importance of managing subsidiaries in the innovation performance of multinational firms.