If you want immersive listening with adjustable noise cancellation, choose Bose QuietComfort 35; if you need open-ear awareness and a clip-on fit, choose Shokz OpenDots ONE Open-Ear. For swimming, though, neither is described as a swimming headphone: the Shokz earbuds are water resistant, while the Bose headphones are designed to cover your ears and reduce outside noise. For actual laps, I would look for a product specifically intended for swimming rather than assume either of these is suitable.
Bose QuietComfort 35 vs Shokz OpenDots ONE Open-Ear at a Glance
• Bose QuietComfort 35: Its over-ear design offers three levels of active noise cancellation and up to 20 hours of battery life. The trade-off is that its noise-blocking approach is the opposite of open-ear awareness.
• Shokz OpenDots ONE Open-Ear: Its lightweight clip-on design leaves the ears open, with IP54 water resistance and up to 40 hours of listening when used with the charging case. It does not offer noise cancellation.
• Choose Shokz if you want to hear more of your surroundings while listening, or prefer a compact earbud that clips onto the ear.
• For swimming: neither product’s listed features establish that it is intended for use in a pool.
The Bose QuietComfort 35 is an over-ear Bluetooth headphone built around active noise cancellation. It provides three noise-cancellation levels, so you can adjust how much outside sound it reduces. That makes it the more suitable choice of these two for listening in a noisy workspace, during travel, or at home when you want fewer distractions. Its dual-microphone system is designed to reject noise and pick up voices, and Alexa voice access is also included.
Battery life is listed at up to 20 hours. The headphones can also connect by Bluetooth or NFC, and there is a 3.5 mm audio jack for wired listening. The Bose Connect app handles pairing and settings, including the noise-cancellation level, and provides access to software updates. Those details point to a conventional over-ear listening experience, with a carrying case and cables included.
I would consider the Bose if your priority is a more enclosed listening setup, noise reduction, or voice control. I would skip it if you want to stay aware of nearby sounds or need something designed for exercise in wet conditions. Its over-ear cups and active noise cancellation are meaningful differences from Shokz, not minor variations in fit. The data provided does not describe the Bose as water resistant or suitable for swimming.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-19 · 7 min read · Independent comparison
The Shokz OpenDots ONE takes a different approach: each earbud clips onto the ear rather than sitting inside it or covering it. Its flexible nickel-titanium plate and silicone grip are intended to hold the earbud securely, while each one weighs 6.5 grams. Because the design leaves the ears open, it is the more natural fit for someone who wants to listen while remaining aware of surrounding activity. That can matter on a walk, around the house, or during a workout where hearing nearby sounds is useful.
The Shokz does not provide noise cancellation. Instead, its open-ear design is paired with Dolby Audio and Bassphere Technology, and DirectPitch technology is intended to minimize sound leakage. The earbuds have touch controls, microphones, multipoint pairing for two devices, and app controls for EQ modes and customization. Their listed battery life is up to 10 hours on a single charge and up to 40 hours with the charging case. A 10-minute quick charge is described as providing two hours of listening; quick charging is not available through wireless charging.
The IP54 water-resistance rating is a useful detail for everyday exposure, but it is not proof that these are suitable for swimming. I would choose Shokz for open-ear listening, a light clip-on fit, and the flexibility to connect to two devices. I would skip it if your first priority is blocking noise. The product lists no noise control, so it cannot serve the same purpose as the Bose active noise cancellation.
• Best for reducing outside noise → Bose QuietComfort 35. Its active noise cancellation has three levels, while the Shokz has no noise control.
• Best for staying aware of your surroundings → Shokz OpenDots ONE Open-Ear. Its open-ear clip-on design is specifically different from Bose’s over-ear, noise-cancelling setup.
• Best listed battery life with the case → Shokz OpenDots ONE Open-Ear. It offers up to 40 hours with the charging case, compared with Bose’s listed 20 hours.
• Best for a headphone jack option → Bose QuietComfort 35. It has a 3.5 mm jack as well as Bluetooth and NFC connectivity; Shokz has no headphone jack.
• Best for switching between two devices → Shokz OpenDots ONE Open-Ear. Multipoint pairing is listed as a feature in the Shokz app.
• Best for voice access to Alexa → Bose QuietComfort 35. Alexa voice control is part of the Bose feature set, alongside its noise-rejecting microphone system.
• Best for quick charging details → Shokz OpenDots ONE Open-Ear. A 10-minute charge is listed as providing two hours of playtime, though not through wireless charging.
• Best choice for swimming → Neither, based on the listed information. Shokz is IP54 water resistant, but that alone does not establish suitability for swimming; no water-resistance rating is provided for Bose.
The phrase “bluetooth headphones for swimming” can lead shoppers toward very different products, so it is worth separating pool use from general water resistance. Bluetooth connectivity alone does not tell you whether a headphone is designed for swimming. Here, the Shokz rating supports a narrower claim: it is water resistant to IP54. The available details do not say that it can be submerged or used for laps.
The same distinction matters when comparing descriptions like “best sweat resistant sleep headphones for swimming.” That phrase combines several separate needs: sweat exposure, comfort while sleeping, and pool use. The Shokz sheet gives an IP54 rating and a lightweight clip-on design, but it does not establish sleep comfort or swimming use. Bose’s features focus on noise cancellation and over-ear listening, not water resistance or sleep use. For any of those more specific scenarios, I would want product information that addresses the exact activity rather than infer suitability from a general feature.
Some shoppers may also search for the “best rotatable ear cups in ear headphones for swimming.” Neither product is described with rotatable ear cups. Bose has over-ear cups, while Shokz has clip-on earbuds. If rotating cups are a must-have, or if you need headphones explicitly suited to swimming, these two do not match that requirement based on the details available.
The main decision is therefore not which one has more features overall. It is whether you want to reduce outside noise or keep your ears open to it. Bose makes more sense for focused listening; Shokz makes more sense when surrounding awareness and a clip-on form matter more. Their battery figures also describe different usage setups: Bose lists up to 20 hours, while Shokz lists up to 10 hours from the earbuds alone and up to 40 hours with the case.
In my opinion, I would choose the Shokz OpenDots ONE for everyday listening when open-ear awareness and a lightweight clip-on design matter most. Its listed 40 hours with the charging case and multipoint pairing make it the more flexible fit for moving between routines and devices.
The Shokz IP54 rating is not a swimming-use claim, and Bose’s listed strengths are noise cancellation and over-ear listening. If swimming is your main use, I would look specifically for headphones whose documented features cover pool use.
FAQ
Bose is the clear choice for noise cancellation. The QuietComfort 35 has three active noise-cancellation levels, while the Shokz OpenDots ONE has no noise control and uses an open-ear design.
Bose lists up to 20 hours of battery life. Shokz lists up to 10 hours from the earbuds and up to 40 hours when used with the charging case, so its longer total figure includes the case.
The supplied details do not establish that either product is intended for sleep or swimming. Shokz is described as lightweight and water resistant, but those facts do not confirm comfort for sleeping or suitability for pool use.
• Phenyx Pro UHF Mono vs Mackie CR3.5 comparison
• Joso USB Unilateral Headset vs TruVoice VoicePro 20
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.