If you want a straightforward, lighter-spec open-ear pick for airplane travel, choose SHOKZ After OpenMove; if you need longer battery life, multipoint pairing, and stronger water resistance, choose Plufunex Bone Conduction Headphones. For most travelers, I’d lean SHOKZ for its simpler everyday feature set; Plufunex makes more sense if endurance and workout-ready protection matter more.
SHOKZ After OpenMove vs Plufunex Bone Conduction Headphones at a Glance
• Plufunex Bone Conduction Headphones: Bluetooth 6.0 multipoint, up to 13 hours of battery life, and IP68 resistance; the trade-off is a more activity-focused design that may be more than a casual listener needs.
• SHOKZ is for listeners who want a straightforward open-ear pair for daily listening, calls, and travel.
• Plufunex is for people who want longer listening sessions, two-device pairing, and a secure fit for active use.
The SHOKZ After OpenMove is the more uncomplicated choice. It uses open-ear bone conduction, so it does not seal the ear canal, and its Bluetooth 5.0 connection is suited to ordinary wireless listening from a compatible device. Three EQ settings give you a way to change the sound profile without adding a long list of controls or modes to learn. For a commute, a walk through an airport, or listening while keeping some awareness of nearby announcements, that simple setup is appealing.
Its listed battery life is six hours, with a two-hour charge time. That is enough to cover a listening block or a shorter travel day, but it leaves less margin than Plufunex for long stretches away from a charger. The 29-gram weight is a modest design detail, and the open-ear placement may suit people who dislike the feeling of earbuds sitting inside the ear. IP55 water resistance adds protection for ordinary sweat and splashes, though it is not the stronger water-resistance rating in this comparison.
I’d choose SHOKZ if I wanted a familiar, focused set of open-ear headphones and did not need multipoint pairing or all-day battery endurance. It is also the cleaner fit for a shopper who values the three EQ options more than a long feature list. Who should skip it: anyone who needs the longest stated battery life here, or who wants the higher IP68 rating for workouts in wet conditions.
Plufunex is the feature-heavy option for people whose headphones need to move between work, exercise, and daily errands. Its open-ear design is paired with a wraparound fit and adjustable 35-degree ear hooks. The product information also describes compatibility with everyday glasses and sports eyewear, which may matter if conventional earbuds compete with your frames. At 32 grams, it remains a lightweight design, though it weighs slightly more than the SHOKZ model.
The biggest practical advantage is battery endurance: Plufunex lists up to 13 hours of continuous use. Its two-device multipoint connection is another meaningful distinction. You can pair a phone and laptop at once, which is convenient if you listen from a computer and also want to stay connected to calls on your phone. Bluetooth 6.0 is specified, and the product lists a two-hour charge time plus a quick 10-minute magnetic charge intended to provide up to 75 minutes of listening.
For running, cycling, or workouts, the secure hook design and IP68 rating are more compelling than SHOKZ’s IP55 rating. The open-ear format is intended to keep environmental sounds audible, but it does not provide noise cancellation; neither product lists noise control. The water-resistance information is aimed at sweat and rain, not underwater swimming or immersion. Who should skip it: someone who wants the simplest possible feature set and has no use for multipoint pairing, extended runtime, or an activity-oriented fit.
• Best for longer listening between charges → Plufunex. Its listed battery life is up to 13 hours, compared with six hours for SHOKZ.
• Best for switching between a laptop and phone → Plufunex. Its multipoint connection supports pairing two devices at once; SHOKZ’s sheet does not list multipoint.
• Best for a simpler listening setup → SHOKZ. Three EQ settings give you a small amount of sound-profile choice without Plufunex’s larger collection of activity and connectivity features.
• Best for sweat and rainy workouts → Plufunex. It carries an IP68 rating, while SHOKZ is rated IP55. These are water-resistance specifications, not a promise that either headset is suitable for swimming.
• Best for a lighter listed weight → SHOKZ. It is listed at 29 grams; Plufunex is listed at 32 grams. The difference is small, but weight-sensitive buyers may prefer the lower figure.
• Best fit to consider with glasses → Plufunex. Its design information specifically discusses compatibility with everyday, prescription, cycling, sports, and smart glasses.
• Best for a basic travel listening block → SHOKZ. Its feature set is more direct, though six hours of stated battery life makes it less suited to an especially long day without charging.
• Best for active use with a secure hook design → Plufunex. Adjustable ear hooks and a wraparound structure are designed to stay put during movement.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-18 · 14 min read · Independent comparison
Neither pair is a conventional sealed headset. Both use bone conduction and open-ear placement, so they may appeal to someone who wants to remain more aware of nearby sounds than they would with closed earbuds. That can be useful in a terminal or during a walk, but it also means neither model promises isolation from cabin noise. For airplane travel, think of these as personal listening options rather than a replacement for noise-canceling headphones if reducing engine or cabin sound is your priority.
The phrase “gaming headset 7.1 surround sound” points to a different category. Neither product sheet lists surround sound, gaming-specific features, or a 7.1 audio mode, so I would not choose either on that basis. The same goes for a search for “open ear headphones rgb lighting”: neither sheet specifies RGB lighting. Their strongest differences are instead battery life, device switching, fit, and water resistance.
If you are looking for the “best ipx7 waterproof head phones for webinars,” note that these two products do not carry an IPX7 designation. SHOKZ is listed as IP55, and Plufunex as IP68. Plufunex’s higher rating and multipoint pairing may make it the more practical of the two for someone moving between a laptop meeting and a phone, but the product information still says it is not intended for underwater use. For webinars, also consider whether an open-ear listening style suits your room and whether you need a microphone feature: the supplied information does not specify microphone performance for either model.
The choice comes down to what you will actually use. If your routine is mostly occasional listening and you want a lighter, simpler pair, SHOKZ has a coherent case. If you routinely exercise, connect two devices, or spend long days away from charging, Plufunex offers more of the features that address those needs. Check the current price on Amazon using the page’s button if cost is part of your decision; the specifications alone do not establish which is the better value.
I would buy the Plufunex Bone Conduction Headphones for airplane travel if I expected long listening sessions, because its 13-hour stated battery life and multipoint pairing give me more flexibility between a laptop and phone.
For a shorter trip or simpler daily use, I’d choose SHOKZ instead: it is lighter on the listed specifications and keeps the feature set straightforward.
My overall pick is Plufunex, but only for the buyer who will use its extra runtime, device switching, or IP68 rating.
Plufunex lists up to 13 hours of continuous battery life, while SHOKZ lists six hours. Both list a two-hour charge time; Plufunex also specifies a 10-minute magnetic charge for up to 75 minutes of listening.
Plufunex is rated IP68 for sweat and rain resistance, but its product information says it is not intended for underwater swimming or immersion; SHOKZ is rated IP55.
Plufunex lists Bluetooth multipoint pairing for two devices at once, which is intended to make switching between a laptop and phone easier. SHOKZ’s specifications do not list multipoint pairing.
For a longer travel day, Plufunex has the stronger battery-life specification and can pair with two devices. SHOKZ may suit a shorter listening block, but neither product lists noise cancellation, so neither is specified as a way to block cabin noise.
READY
If you want a straightforward, lighter open-ear option for airplane travel, choose SHOKZ After OpenMove; if you need longer battery life, multipoint pairing, and stronger water resistance, choose Plufunex Bone Conduction Headphones. For most travelers, I’d lean SHOKZ for its simpler everyday feature set. Plufunex makes more sense if endurance and workout-ready protection matter more.
• SHOKZ After OpenMove: Bluetooth 5.0, three EQ settings, and a six-hour battery; the trade-off is shorter stated runtime and IP55 rather than IP68 water resistance.
• Plufunex Bone Conduction Headphones: Bluetooth 6.0 multipoint, up to 13 hours of battery life, and IP68 resistance; the trade-off is an activity-focused design that may offer more features than a casual listener needs.
• SHOKZ is for listeners who want a straightforward open-ear pair for daily listening, calls, and travel.
• Plufunex is for people who want longer listening sessions, two-device pairing, and a secure fit for active use.
SHOKZ After OpenMove: Who It's For
Its listed battery life is six hours, with a two-hour charge time. That can cover a listening block or a shorter travel day, but leaves less margin than Plufunex for long stretches away from a charger. The listed weight is 29 grams, and the open-ear placement may appeal to people who dislike earbuds sitting inside the ear. IP55 water resistance adds protection for sweat and splashes, though it is not the higher rating in this comparison.
I’d choose SHOKZ if I wanted a focused set of open-ear headphones and did not need multipoint pairing or extended battery life. It is also a good fit for someone who values three EQ settings more than a long feature list. Who should skip it: anyone who needs the longest stated runtime here, or who wants the higher IP68 rating for workouts in wet conditions.
Plufunex is the feature-heavy option for people whose headphones need to move between work, exercise, and daily errands. Its open-ear design is paired with a wraparound fit and adjustable 35-degree ear hooks. The product information also describes compatibility with everyday glasses and sports eyewear, which may matter if conventional earbuds compete with your frames. At 32 grams, it remains lightweight, though it is slightly heavier than SHOKZ by the listed figures.
The biggest practical advantage is battery endurance: Plufunex lists up to 13 hours of continuous use. Its two-device multipoint connection is another meaningful distinction. You can pair a phone and laptop at once, which is convenient if you listen from a computer and also want to stay connected to calls on your phone. Bluetooth 6.0 is specified, along with a two-hour charge time and a quick 10-minute magnetic charge intended to provide up to 75 minutes of listening.
For running, cycling, or workouts, the secure hook design and IP68 rating are more compelling than SHOKZ’s IP55 rating. The open-ear format is intended to keep environmental sounds audible, but neither product lists noise control or noise cancellation. The water-resistance information is aimed at sweat and rain, not underwater swimming or immersion. Who should skip it: someone who wants the simplest feature set and has no use for multipoint pairing, extended runtime, or an activity-oriented fit.
• Best for longer listening between charges → Plufunex. Its listed battery life is up to 13 hours, compared with six hours for SHOKZ.
• Best for switching between a laptop and phone → Plufunex. Its multipoint connection supports pairing two devices at once; SHOKZ’s sheet does not list multipoint.
• Best for a simpler listening setup → SHOKZ. Three EQ settings offer a small amount of sound-profile choice without Plufunex’s larger collection of activity and connectivity features.
• Best for sweat and rainy workouts → Plufunex. It carries an IP68 rating, while SHOKZ is rated IP55. These ratings do not make either headset a swimming model.
• Best for lower listed weight → SHOKZ. It is listed at 29 grams; Plufunex is listed at 32 grams. The difference is small, but weight-sensitive buyers may prefer the lower figure.
• Best fit to consider with glasses → Plufunex. Its design information specifically discusses compatibility with everyday, prescription, cycling, sports, and smart glasses.
• Best for a basic travel listening block → SHOKZ. Its feature set is direct, though six hours of stated battery life makes it less suited to an especially long day without charging.
• Best for active use with a secure hook design → Plufunex. Adjustable ear hooks and a wraparound structure are designed to stay in place during movement.
Neither pair is a conventional sealed headset. Both use bone conduction and open-ear placement, which may appeal to someone who wants to remain more aware of nearby sounds than they would with closed earbuds. That can be useful in an airport terminal or during a walk, but it also means neither model promises isolation from cabin noise. For airplane travel, think of these as personal listening options rather than replacements for noise-canceling headphones if reducing engine or cabin sound is your priority.
The phrase “gaming headset 7.1 surround sound” points to a different category. Neither product sheet lists surround sound, gaming-specific features, or a 7.1 audio mode, so I would not choose either on that basis. The same goes for a search for “open ear headphones rgb lighting”: neither sheet specifies RGB lighting. Their clearest differences are battery life, device switching, fit, and water resistance.
The choice comes down to what you will actually use. If your routine is mostly occasional listening and you want a lighter, simpler pair, SHOKZ has a coherent case. If you routinely exercise, connect two devices, or spend long days away from charging, Plufunex offers more features aimed at those needs. If cost is part of your decision, check the current price on Amazon using the page’s button; the specifications alone do not establish which is the better value.
My Verdict
I would buy the Plufunex Bone Conduction Headphones for airplane travel if I expected long listening sessions: its 13-hour stated battery life and multipoint pairing offer more flexibility between a laptop and phone.
My overall pick is Plufunex, but only for a buyer who will use its extra runtime, device switching, or IP68 rating.
FAQ
Plufunex lists up to 13 hours of continuous battery life, while SHOKZ lists six hours. Both list a two-hour charge time; Plufunex also specifies a 10-minute magnetic charge for up to 75 minutes of listening.
Plufunex is rated IP68 for sweat and rain resistance, but its information says it is not intended for underwater swimming or immersion; SHOKZ is rated IP55.
Plufunex lists Bluetooth multipoint pairing for two devices at once, which is intended to make switching between a laptop and phone easier. SHOKZ’s specifications do not list multipoint pairing.
For a longer travel day, Plufunex has the stronger battery-life specification and can pair with two devices. SHOKZ may suit a shorter listening block, but neither product lists noise cancellation, so neither is specified as a way to block cabin noise.
• Monster Open Ear AC510 vs OLLSPAKER Sport Earbuds
• our 1Mii B03S vs Avantree Audikast 4T: APTX Ada pick
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.