Averment of Jurisdiction and Assertion of Rights by Individual under International Law
Date: [26 February 2026]
To: State of New York Unified Court System [Court / Tribunal / Authority]
From: Shamsuddin A. Abdulhakim ELBey –
Subject: Averment of Jurisdiction and Assertion of Rights to Self-Determination under International Law and Constitutional Protections
I. Introduction
I, [Full Name], acting as a sovereign individual, submit this Averment of Jurisdiction to assert my inherent rights of self-determination, liberty, and protection from unlawful governmental overreach, pursuant to:
International Law – including customary international law and recognized treaties governing human rights and self-determination.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), 1948 – specifically Articles 1, 3, and 21 regarding individual dignity, liberty, and participation in governance.
United States Constitution – Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh Amendments, as they protect unenumerated rights, powers reserved to states or people, and limit federal judicial overreach, respectively.
This averment seeks formal recognition that my individual capacity grants jurisdictional authority over matters of personal self-determination, free from unlawful infringement.
II. Statement of Facts
I am a natural person, endowed with inherent rights under international human rights law and domestic constitutional guarantees.
I assert the principle of self-determination, recognized by:
United Nations Charter (Article 1, Paragraph 2) – affirming peoples’ right to freely determine their political status and pursue economic, social, and cultural development.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, Article 1) – guaranteeing the right of all peoples to self-determination.
I recognize the limitations of governmental jurisdiction over the unalienable individual rights retained by persons independent of state authority.
I submit this averment to invoke recognition and protection of my rights as recognized under international and domestic law, including:
UDHR, Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
UDHR, Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty, and security of person.
UDHR, Article 21: Everyone has the right to participate in governance and access just remedies.
III. Legal Authority
A. International Law
Customary International Law recognizes self-determination as a fundamental principle, binding on all states (e.g., ICCPR, ICESCR, UN General Assembly Resolutions 1514 (XV) & 2625 (XXV)).
International Human Rights Law obliges states to respect and protect the natural rights of individuals, including:
B. United Nations Instruments
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR, 1948)
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)
C. Constitutional Protections (U.S.)
Ninth Amendment: Protects rights not explicitly enumerated in the Constitution as retained by the people.
Tenth Amendment: Powers not delegated to the federal government are reserved to the states or the people.
Eleventh Amendment: Limits federal judicial power regarding suits against states, emphasizing individual and state sovereignty.
D. Jurisdictional Basis
This averment asserts jurisdiction arises from the natural, inherent rights of the individual, recognized both in domestic and international law, over matters of self-determination and protection from coercive state action.
Authority for adjudication or recognition of such rights derives from the combination of international human rights obligations and constitutional guarantees.
IV. Assertion of Rights
I assert that my individual personhood and sovereignty are protected under the aforementioned legal instruments.
I assert the right to make decisions regarding my own life, liberty, and governance, free from unlawful state interference.
I affirm that any exercise of state or federal jurisdiction over me must be limited to lawful authority explicitly granted under domestic and international law.
V. Prayer / Relief Requested
Accordingly, I respectfully request that the relevant authorities:
Acknowledge the jurisdiction of the individual over matters of personal self-determination.
Recognize and protect all unalienable rights under the UDHR, ICCPR, ICESCR, and constitutional amendments 9, 10, and 11.
Cease any unauthorized infringement on my sovereign rights as an individual.
Provide any legal remedy necessary to affirm my inherent jurisdiction and liberty under international law.
VI. Conclusion
This averment of jurisdiction is submitted in good faith and in accordance with:
International law principles of self-determination and human rights
United Nations declarations and covenants
Constitutional protections of unenumerated rights and state/individual sovereignty
Respectfully submitted,
[Signature]
[Shamsuddin A. Abdulhakim ELBey]
[26 February 2026]
Authorities Cited
United Nations Charter, Article 1, Paragraph 2
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), 1966
International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), 1966
U.S. Constitution, Amendments IX, X, XI
UN General Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV) – Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples
UN General Assembly Resolution 2625 (XXV) – Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SOVEREIGN JURISDICTION
By [Shamsuddin A. Abdulhakim ELBey], a Sovereign Individual
Date: [26 February 2026]
I. To Whom It May Concern
Recipient(s):
[State of New York Unified Court System Agency / Court / Officer]
Address: Commissioner of Jurors Office – 360 Adams Street, Rm 156 Brooklyn, NY 11201
Purpose: This Notice is a formal Declaration of Individual Sovereignty and Assertion of Rights under International Law, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), and the U.S. Constitution (Amendments IX, X, XI).
Be advised that any attempt to assert jurisdiction over me without my explicit, lawful consent is null, void, and of no effect, and any enforcement actions taken contrary to this notice constitute unlawful infringement upon sovereign rights.
II. Declarant / Sovereign Individual
Name: [Shamsuddin A. Abdulhakim ELBey]
Address:
Contact: [shams91055gov@gmail.com / 1.929.822.1586]
Status: Natural Person; Sovereign and Free Individual
III. Jurisdictional Assertion
I assert full personal jurisdiction over my person, property, and actions.
My rights derive from:
International Law: UN Charter, ICCPR, ICESCR, UNGA Resolutions 1514(XV) & 2625(XXV)
UDHR, 1948: Articles 1, 3, 21
U.S. Constitution: Amendments IX, X, XI
Case Law: Marbury v. Madison (1803), Talton v. Mayes (1896), Chisholm v. Georgia (1793), Reynolds v. United States (1878)
All authorities over me must be consented to by me in writing, and any failure to obtain such consent is considered ultra vires and void ab initio.
IV. Assertion of Rights
I hereby declare:
Sovereign Right to Self-Determination: Authority over my life, liberty, and property.
Immunity from Unauthorized Jurisdiction: No entity may impose authority without explicit consent.
Right to Legal Protection: Any violation of my sovereignty is actionable under domestic and international law.
Non-Waiver Clause: No prior interaction or communication may be construed as a waiver of my sovereign rights.
V. Notice to Authorities
Any act, law, regulation, order, or enforcement applied to me without my consent is invalid and unenforceable.
All agencies, officers, and representatives must acknowledge and respect this declaration.
Continued violation of these rights may result in remedies under domestic and international law, including claims for unlawful interference and damages.
VI. Reservation of Rights
I expressly reserve all rights, remedies, and privileges under:
International Law (treaties, covenants, UN resolutions)
U.S. Constitution, Amendments IX, X, XI
Common Law and Natural Law principles
VII. Certificate of Service
I, [Full Name], hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this Notice of Sovereign Jurisdiction has been delivered as follows:
Method of Delivery
Date 26 February 2026
Recipient Name & Position
Commissioner of Jurors
Address 360 Adams Street, Rm156 – Brooklyn, NYS 11201
Acknowledgment Received
Certified Mail / USPS
[Date]
[Name]
[Address]
[Yes / No]
Personal Delivery
[Date]
[Name]
[Address]
[Yes / No]
Electronic / Email
[Date]
[Name]
[Email]
[Yes / No]
Signature of Declarant: ________________________
Date: [26 February 2026]
VIII. Declaration of Effectiveness
This Notice is effective immediately upon delivery. Any action taken contrary to this declaration constitutes a willful infringement upon sovereign individual rights and is subject to remedies under:
Signature: __________________________
Name: [Shamsuddin A. Abdulhakim ELBey]
Date: [26 February 2026]
Authorities Cited
UN Charter, Article 1(2)
UDHR, Articles 1, 3, 21 (1948)
ICCPR & ICESCR, Article 1 (1966)
UNGA Resolutions 1514(XV) & 2625(XXV)
U.S. Constitution, Amendments IX, X, XI
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)
Talton v. Mayes, 163 U.S. 376 (1896)
Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. 419 (1793)
Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1878)
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
NOTICE OF SOVEREIGN JURISDICTION
By [Shamsuddin A. Abdulhakim ELBey], a Sovereign Individual
Date: [26 February 2026]
To: [Commissioner of Jurors - Authorities / Government Entities / Courts]
From: [Shamsuddin A. Abdulhakim ELBey
Shams91055gov@gmail.com – 1.929.822.1586
I. Declaration of Status
Be it known: I, [Shamsuddin Abdullah Abdulhakim ELBey], am a natural person, a sovereign and free individual, vested with inherent rights under international law, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), and the U.S. Constitution.
I assert my inherent sovereignty, self-determination, and immunity from unauthorized jurisdiction, and hereby put all government entities, officers, or agents on formal notice that any attempt to exercise authority over me without my explicit, lawful consent is null, void, and of no effect.
II. Jurisdictional Assertion
I assert that my personal jurisdiction arises from my natural personhood and unalienable rights, not from statutory law or delegated powers.
Any claims of authority over me by domestic or federal entities must demonstrate lawful, voluntary consent and conformity with:
International law recognizing the right to self-determination (e.g., ICCPR, ICESCR, UN Charter Article 1(2))
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Articles 1, 3, 21
U.S. Constitution, Amendments IX, X, XI
All unauthorized jurisdictional acts are considered trespass against the sovereignty of the individual and are therefore actionable.
III. Statement of Rights
By this notice, I formally declare that I retain and will exercise the following rights:
Right of Self-Determination: To govern my personal affairs and make decisions regarding my life, liberty, and property.
Right to Freedom from Coercion: No government, court, or agent may impose jurisdiction or enforce laws against me without explicit, lawful consent.
Right to Equal Treatment and Due Process: Any action against me must conform to international human rights standards and constitutional safeguards.
Right to Protection from Unlawful Jurisdiction: Any attempt to assert authority over me outside lawful jurisdiction is considered void ab initio.
IV. Legal Authorities Supporting Individual Sovereignty
International Law
United Nations Charter, Article 1(2): Affirming the right of peoples to self-determination.
ICCPR and ICESCR, Article 1: Establishing inalienable rights of self-determination for all peoples.
UNGA Resolutions 1514(XV) & 2625(XXV): Reaffirming rights to independence, freedom, and self-governance.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR, 1948)
Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty, and security of person.
Article 21: Right to participate in governance and receive equal protection under the law.
United States Constitution
Ninth Amendment: Recognition of unenumerated rights retained by the people.
Tenth Amendment: Limitation of federal powers; powers not delegated are reserved to the states or people.
Eleventh Amendment: Limits federal judicial authority over sovereign entities, emphasizing individual and state sovereignty.
V. Notice to All Authorities
Be advised that:
No individual, government entity, or officer may exercise jurisdiction over me without my express consent.
All actions taken in violation of my sovereignty are null and void.
All agencies and officials must acknowledge and respect my rights to self-determination, liberty, and personal jurisdiction.
Failure to recognize this Notice constitutes continued violation of international law and human rights law, subject to remedies under law and international accountability.
VI. Reservation of Rights
I expressly reserve all rights, privileges, and remedies available under:
International law, treaties, and conventions
Constitutional protections under Amendments IX, X, XI
Common law and natural law principles
This Notice is non-negotiable and effective immediately upon delivery.
Signature: ________________________
Name: [Shamsuddin A. Abdulhakim ELBey]
Date: [26 February, 2026]
⚖️ Summary
This document is a direct, assertive declaration of personal sovereignty, designed to:
Establish jurisdiction as inherent to the individual
Demand recognition of rights under international and domestic law
Serve as a formal warning to authorities that unauthorized jurisdiction is invalid
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
NOTICE OF SOVEREIGN JURISDICTION:
By [SHAMSUDDIN A. ABDULHAKIM ELBEY], a Sovereign Individual
Date: [26 February 2026]
I. To Whom It May Concern
Recipient(s):
Name/Title: Commissioner of Jurors
Agency / Court / Office: State of New York, Unified Court System
Address: 360 ADAMS STREET, RM. 156, BROOKLYN, NY 11201
Email (if applicable): __________________________
Purpose: This Notice serves as a formal Declaration of Individual Sovereignty and Assertion of Rights under:
International Law (UN Charter, ICCPR, ICESCR, UNGA Resolutions 1514(XV) & 2625(XXV))
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR, 1948), Articles 1, 3, 21
U.S. Constitution, Amendments IX, X, XI
Notice: Any attempt to assert jurisdiction over me without explicit, lawful consent is null, void, and unenforceable.
II. Declarant / Sovereign Individual
Name: SHAMSUDDIN A. ABDULHAKIM ELBEY
Address:
Contact: 1.929.822.1586 – shams91055gov@gmail.com
Status: Natural Person; Sovereign and Free Individual
III. Jurisdictional Assertion
I hereby assert:
Personal jurisdiction over my person, property, and actions.
My rights derive from:
International Law – UN Charter Article 1(2), ICCPR & ICESCR Article 1, UNGA Resolutions 1514(XV) & 2625(XXV)
UDHR, 1948 – Articles 1, 3, 21
U.S. Constitution – Amendments IX, X, XI
Case Law: Marbury v. Madison (1803), Talton v. Mayes (1896), Chisholm v. Georgia (1793), Reynolds v. United States (1878)
All authorities over me must be consented to in writing; unauthorized jurisdiction is ultra vires and void ab initio.
IV. Assertion of Rights
I declare:
Sovereign Right to Self-Determination: Authority over my life, liberty, and property.
Immunity from Unauthorized Jurisdiction: No entity may impose authority without explicit consent.
Right to Legal Protection: Any violation is actionable under domestic and international law.
Non-Waiver Clause: No prior interaction constitutes waiver of my sovereign rights.
V. Notice to Authorities
Any act, law, regulation, order, or enforcement applied without my consent is invalid and unenforceable.
All agencies, officers, and representatives must acknowledge and respect this declaration.
Violations constitute a breach of international law, human rights law, and constitutional protections.
VI. Reservation of Rights
I expressly reserve all rights, remedies, and privileges under:
International Law – Treaties, covenants, UN resolutions
U.S. Constitution, Amendments IX, X, XI
Common Law and Natural Law principles
VII. Certificate of Service
I, [SHAMSUDDIN A. ABDULHAKIM ELBEY], certify that a true and correct copy of this Notice of Sovereign Jurisdiction has been delivered as follows:
Method of Delivery
Date
Recipient Name & Position
Address
Acknowledgment Received (Yes/No)
Certified Mail / USPS
_______
_______
_______
_______
Personal Delivery
_______
_______
_______
_______
Electronic / Email
_______
_______
_______
_______
Declarant Signature: ________________________
Date: 26 February, 2026
VIII. Declaration of Effectiveness
This Notice is effective immediately upon delivery. Any action taken contrary to this declaration is a willful infringement upon sovereign rights.
Signature: ________________________
Name: SHAMSUDDIN A. ABDULHAKIM ELBEY
Date: 26 February 2026
Authorities Cited (Reference Section)
UN Charter, Article 1(2)
UDHR, Articles 1, 3, 21 (1948)
ICCPR & ICESCR, Article 1 (1966)
UNGA Resolutions 1514(XV) & 2625(XXV)
U.S. Constitution, Amendments IX, X, XI
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)
Talton v. Mayes, 163 U.S. 376 (1896)
Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. 419 (1793)
Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1878)
✅ Instructions for Use:
Fill in all blanks for personal info, recipient info, dates, and delivery methods.
Make copies for each recipient.
Use certified mail, personal delivery, or email with read receipt to ensure proof of service.
Keep the original signed document for your records.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
**PROPOSAL FOR AN INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL PETITION
Regarding Violations of the Right of Self-Determination of Afrodescendant Peoples in the United States**
I. Introduction
This proposal seeks the establishment of an international tribunal or inquiry mechanism to examine alleged violations of international law committed by the United States of America against Afrodescendant peoples asserting their collective Right of Self-Determination.
The Right of Self-Determination is recognized under international law as a fundamental principle, including in:
Article 1 of the Charter of the United Nations
Article 1 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
Article 1 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV) (Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples)
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)
This proposal alleges that the United States has unlawfully constrained and criminalized the political expression of Afrodescendant peoples seeking self-determination by applying domestic Civil Rights laws to suppress collective political autonomy claims that fall under international jurisdiction.
II. Statement of Facts
Afrodescendant peoples in the United States assert that they constitute a distinct people with historical, cultural, and territorial ties arising from enslavement, segregation, and ongoing systemic exclusion.
When Afrodescendant activists and organizations seek to assert political self-determination, they are often subjected to domestic civil, criminal, and administrative sanctions.
The United States treats such claims exclusively as domestic civil-rights or constitutional issues rather than recognizing them as international self-determination claims.
Petitioners argue that this constitutes illegal recognition of colonial independence and continued colonial domination, contrary to international law.
III. Legal Basis
A. The Right of Self-Determination in International Law
The Right of Self-Determination is a jus cogens norm (a peremptory norm from which no derogation is permitted). Peoples have the right to:
Freely determine their political status
Freely pursue economic, social, and cultural development
Establish autonomous governance structures
B. Afrodescendant Peoples as a “People” Under International Law
International law recognizes that a “people” may be defined by shared history, culture, language, or common experience of oppression. Afrodescendant peoples meet these criteria due to:
Shared historical experience of transatlantic slavery
Common socio-political marginalization
Shared cultural and identity markers
C. Prohibition on Colonial Domination
UN Resolution 1514 declares that subjection of peoples to alien subjugation, domination, and exploitation constitutes a denial of fundamental human rights.
Petitioners argue that systemic racial governance structures in the United States amount to internal colonialism, and that continued denial of political self-determination constitutes a violation of international law.
IV. Alleged Violations by the United States
1. Jurisdictional Suppression of International Self-Determination Claims
The United States addresses Afrodescendant political autonomy claims under domestic Civil Rights frameworks, rather than recognizing them as international self-determination claims. Petitioners argue this is an unlawful denial of international legal status and jurisdiction.
2. Criminalization and Surveillance of Self-Determination Movements
Historical and contemporary state surveillance, repression, and criminal prosecution of Afrodescendant political movements (e.g., COINTELPRO and subsequent programs) are alleged to violate Articles 19, 20, and 21 of the UDHR (freedom of expression, assembly, and association).
3. Failure to Provide Mechanisms for Political Autonomy
The United States has not provided institutional mechanisms for Afrodescendant peoples to exercise collective political autonomy, contrary to obligations under the ICCPR and ICESCR.
V. Request for International Tribunal or Inquiry Mechanism
Petitioners request that the United Nations or a competent international body:
Establish an independent international tribunal or commission of inquiry to investigate these allegations.
Determine whether Afrodescendant peoples in the United States qualify as a “people” under international self-determination law.
Assess whether U.S. domestic legal frameworks unlawfully suppress international self-determination rights.
Recommend legal, political, and institutional remedies consistent with international law.
VI. Requested Remedies
Petitioners request the tribunal to recommend:
Recognition of Afrodescendant peoples’ collective political identity under international law
International monitoring of U.S. compliance with self-determination obligations
Legal frameworks for autonomous governance, territorial autonomy, or political self-governance consistent with international law
Reparations for historical and ongoing violations of human rights
Guarantees of non-repetition
VII. Conclusion
This proposal asserts that the Right of Self-Determination is a fundamental and non-derogable right, and that the United States’ failure to recognize and implement this right for Afrodescendant peoples constitutes a violation of international law.
Petitioners seek international adjudication to ensure compliance with the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and binding human rights treaties.
Shams. Sovereign Indigenous
Nuwaubian /// Nuwaupian
~ Government ~
Dr. Shamsuddin A. Abdulhakim El-Bey, S., Ord., D.D.
I’m a Moorish American Nuwaubian Nuwaupian Muslim Indian
1.929.822.1586 - 1.917.500.1699 - 1.718.373.2680
shams91055gov@gmail.com
Identification - Information - Registration
NotHelpfulUSALegislationsPeople.Bravesites.com
A Moorish American Nuwaupian Muslim Indian - Identification Card
25 ~ MHK ~ 48
~ Holy * Qur’an ~
109
3:102 - 104 ~ 13:11 ~ 23 ~ *63* ~ 91
2:223, 2:224 & 2:186 & 2:145 & *2:178* & 2:255
Holy Bible
John 8:32
Name: Shamsuddin A. Abdulhakim ELBey Sign_________________________________________
Ph.: 1.888.999.6530
Address:
Self - Determination Statement of Total and Complete Secession by InterNational Laws
New Jerusalem(s) City - Brooklyn, N.Y.S. - Moorish American Moroccan Empire(s) State of these American Territories - Rev. 21:5 Thru the U.N. and UNalienable Birthrightls of (my) Propia Persona Sui Juris a Status I have Proclaimed my FREE NATIONAL CLAIM AND STATUS as a MOORISH AMERICAN CITIZEN of SHAMS GOVERNMENT - I AM a Citizen hereby (my) STATUS and Right to SELF DETERMINATION by INTERNATIONAL LAWS and HUMAN RIGHTS hereby STATE by AUTHORITY and RIGHT (my) CLAIMS of MOORISH AMERICAS - SHAMS GOVERNMENT. - ORDAINED as a GOVERNMENT prepared in due time by THE GREAT GOD - (Allah Subhana Wa Ta’ Ala) EMPOWERED as a LEGAL Clean, Pure SOVEREIGN INDIGENOUS GOVERNMENT by the U.N. Here In the CONTENENTAL AMERICAN TERRITORIES - I AM in accord withn ALL NATIONAL LAWS of Our God’s (Allah Subhana Wa ta’ ala) by OUR DIVINE - CONSTITUTION and POSTED LAWS in (OUR Websites). I agree to BEAR POTENTIALLY always (by) being PROTECTED (by website - NotHelpfulUSALegislationsPeople.Bravesites.com) to the Highest of Principles POTENTIALLY of JUSTICE, LOVE, TRUTH, PEACE, FREEDOM & JUSTICE with Equality and UNity among Our Own People and Race First, backed by (my) agreed Love of Knowledge(s) to LIFE, LOVE and OUR LAWS (on websites). We honor ALL (Rev.21:5) of the DIVINE PROPHETS - JESUS - MUHAMMAD - BUDDAH and CONFUCIUS (or) thru OUR PROPHET - SHAMS. - (or) - EL HAJJ SHARIFF ABDUL - ALI - Amin ~ ? With the PROCLAMATION {by, UNited Nations LEGAL RIGHTS - I have NOW Hereby PRESENTATION of this I.D.Card by {MHK25 & 48} to be linked with the FAMILIES OF NATIONS {U.N.} I DO HEREBY DECLARE I AM - A MOORISH AMERICAN - NUWAUPIAN - MUSLIM - INDIAN. IN THE OLDEST {REV. 22:13 & 16} ORDER OF ISLAMISM(S) by the same (H.Q. 109 & 2:145} THE WORLD’S FIRST RELIGIOUS CREED. Founded by ALL of my {OUR} ANCIENT - FOREFATHERS - FOR THE REDEMPTION(S) of ALL {John 8:32} Man and Kind(s) on EARTH at LEAST & islam - {ISLAM = PEACE. PEACE = ISLAM - 112 - H.Q.} - WITNESSED BY AUTHORITY - U.N.I.A.-A.C.L. I.D.# 1719 A.E.O. 4167 A M.A.N. GOVERNMENT.
NotHelpfulUSALegislationsPeople.Bravesites.com
Afrodescendants the Plaintiffs
Tribunal Against the United States by an Afrodescendant against Taxation
Being that Our Rights are being Violated Worldwide this Afrodescendant is Proposing to Stop Taxation of Our Afrodescendant People, and Oppressed Others if possible. We are being denied Human Rights, Reparations, and the only U.S. Representation is Violating us, Misleading us as a People to continue Oppressing us. Being that we are a People facing Worldwide Genocide here in North Central America, by the neighboring United States we feel that we Must Not be taxed for these reasons. If we can for any reason get benefits from the United States we deem it as due us for histories of Slavery, Murder, Abuse, Denial of Rights and Other Atroscities !
Proposal for an International Legal Tribunal Against the United States of America
To: The United Nations Human Rights Council From: Bro. Rev., Dr. Shamsuddin A. Abdulhakim ElBey, S., Ord., D.D. Date: January 7, 2026
Subject: Request for an International Legal Tribunal Against the United States of America for Forced Taxation of Afrodescendant Peoples, Denial of Human Rights, Denial of Self-Determination, Colonial Occupation, and Failure to Provide Full Reparations
I. Executive Summary
This proposal formally requests the establishment of an international legal tribunal against the United States of America. It outlines profound and systemic human rights violations experienced by Afrodescendant peoples within the U.S., specifically focusing on allegations of forced taxation, the denial of fundamental human rights, the suppression of self-determination, an enduring form of colonial occupation, and the persistent failure to provide comprehensive and just reparations. This submission aims to secure international accountability for these historical and ongoing injustices and to facilitate the provision of full and effective remedies for the affected communities.
II. Introduction
This document is respectfully submitted to the esteemed United Nations Human Rights Council in its capacity as a crucial guardian of international human rights and fundamental freedoms. It articulates a grave concern regarding the protracted and systemic human rights abuses perpetrated against Afrodescendant peoples within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States of America. Authored by Bro. Rev., Dr. Shamsuddin A. Abdulhakim ElBey, S., Ord., D.D., this proposal seeks to illuminate a pattern of violations that necessitate international legal intervention. The grievances presented herein challenge the United States' adherence to international human rights norms and call for an independent, impartial tribunal to adjudicate these critical matters.
III. Background of Argument
The historical trajectory of Afrodescendant peoples in the United States is fundamentally shaped by over four centuries of systemic oppression, beginning with the brutal transatlantic slave trade. This foundational injustice was followed by generations of state-sanctioned racial subjugation through Jim Crow laws, which enforced segregation and denied basic civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights. Even after the formal dismantling of Jim Crow, Afrodescendant communities have continued to face pervasive systemic racism, discrimination, and structural disadvantages in every facet of life, including economic opportunity, housing, education, healthcare, and the criminal justice system.
Afrodescendant peoples in the U.S. represent a distinct demographic group whose unique history of enslavement, racial terror, and sustained marginalization sets them apart. This history has created a persistent racial wealth gap, disproportionate incarceration rates, segregated communities, and ongoing exposure to state violence, all of which are direct legacies of past and present systemic injustices. This proposal argues that these cumulative historical and contemporary realities constitute a continuous violation of international human rights and a denial of their collective rights, including the right to self-determination.
IV. Legal Arguments and Allegations
Important
THIS SECTION REQUIRES COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL EXPERTISE. This section must be developed by qualified legal professionals to present specific legal arguments, cite relevant international treaties, conventions, customary international law, and judicial precedents, and provide detailed factual evidence. The following subsections are placeholders for the legal content.
A. Forced Taxation of Afrodescendant Peoples:
Legal Claim: [Insert detailed legal argument asserting that the taxation of Afrodescendant peoples, without equitable benefit, representation, or redress for historical economic exploitation, constitutes a form of forced extraction inconsistent with international human rights standards. This claim should draw parallels to historical forced labor and economic subjugation.]
International Law Basis: [Cite specific articles and principles from international human rights instruments (e.g., UDHR, ICESCR) related to economic rights, non-discrimination, protection against exploitation, and the right to property, explaining their applicability.]
Evidence (Placeholder): [Provide specific economic data, historical financial analyses, and statistical evidence demonstrating the disproportionate economic burden and lack of commensurate benefits for Afrodescendant communities compared to the general population, supported by expert reports or studies.]
B. Denial of Human Rights:
Legal Claim: [Present a comprehensive legal argument detailing the systematic denial and violation of a broad range of human rights for Afrodescendant peoples, including but not limited to: civil and political rights (e.g., right to life, freedom from arbitrary detention, right to fair trial, voting rights), economic, social, and cultural rights (e.g., right to adequate standard of living, housing, education, health, employment), and freedom from discrimination.]
International Law Basis: [Reference specific articles from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD), and other relevant international instruments, linking each alleged violation to specific legal provisions.]
Evidence (Placeholder): [Include specific examples of discriminatory laws and policies, documented instances of police brutality and racial profiling, data on disparities in housing, education, healthcare, and criminal justice outcomes, expert testimonies, and reports from human rights organizations.]
C. Denial of Self-Determination:
Legal Claim: [Argue that Afrodescendant peoples in the United States constitute a distinct 'people' whose right to self-determination, as enshrined in international law, has been consistently denied. This argument should articulate how their historical experience and distinct cultural and social identity meet the criteria for a 'people' under international law, and how their collective will and aspirations have been suppressed.]
International Law Basis: [Refer to Article 1 of both the ICCPR and ICESCR, which assert the right of all peoples to self-determination. Additionally, discuss relevant resolutions, declarations (e.g., UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples by analogy or direct claim if applicable), and scholarly interpretations of self-determination in the context of internal populations.]
Evidence (Placeholder): [Provide historical evidence of collective identity, efforts towards self-governance or autonomy (e.g., historical movements, cultural distinctions), and the systematic suppression of these efforts by state actors.]
D. Colonial Occupation:
Legal Claim: [Advance the argument that the relationship between the United States government and Afrodescendant peoples constitutes a form of internal colonial occupation. This claim should detail how systemic control, economic exploitation, political subjugation, and cultural suppression operate in a manner analogous to traditional colonial relationships, even within the borders of a sovereign state.]
International Law Basis: [Draw upon principles of decolonization, the illegality of occupation, and the right of peoples to full sovereignty over their natural wealth and resources under international law. Explain how these principles, typically applied to external colonies, are relevant to understanding the internal dynamics of power and control over Afrodescendant communities.]
Evidence (Placeholder): [Include historical accounts of land dispossession, resource extraction from Afrodescendant communities without benefit, the imposition of external governance structures, and the systemic undermining of economic and political autonomy.]
E. Failure to Provide Full Reparations:
Legal Claim: [Detail the legal argument that the United States has failed to provide full, effective, and comprehensive reparations for the cumulative and intergenerational harms stemming from enslavement, Jim Crow, and ongoing racial discrimination. This claim should analyze existing remedies (or lack thereof) against international standards for reparations.]
International Law Basis: [Cite international principles regarding the right to a remedy and reparations for gross violations of human rights, such as the Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law. Explain the components of full reparations (restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, guarantees of non-repetition) and how the U.S. has fallen short.]
Evidence (Placeholder): [Provide an analysis of the inadequacy of existing U.S. policies or programs (e.g., affirmative action, limited settlements) in addressing the scale of historical and ongoing harms, contrasting them with international best practices for comprehensive reparations.]
V. Request for an International Legal Tribunal
Given the systemic, widespread, and enduring nature of the alleged human rights violations and the demonstrated inadequacy of domestic remedies to address these profound injustices, this proposal formally requests the United Nations Human Rights Council to establish an international legal tribunal. Such a tribunal is deemed essential to ensure impartial adjudication, accountability, and the effective implementation of justice that has been historically denied. The proposed tribunal should possess the necessary scope and jurisdiction to investigate thoroughly, adjudicate claims, determine accountability for the alleged violations, and formulate comprehensive, legally binding schemes for reparations and redress. Its objectives would include establishing a factual record of injustices, ensuring accountability of state and non-state actors, adjudicating claims of victims, and ultimately, guiding the implementation of restorative justice measures.
VI. Demands and Recommendations
Based on the foregoing, the author respectfully submits the following demands to the United States government and recommendations to the United Nations Human Rights Council:
VII. Conclusion
The injustices detailed within this proposal represent a protracted and profound assault on the fundamental human rights and dignity of Afrodescendant peoples in the United States. The historical legacies of enslavement and Jim Crow, coupled with ongoing systemic discrimination and the denial of collective rights, necessitate an urgent and robust response from the international community. The failure of domestic mechanisms to provide adequate redress underscores the critical need for international intervention. This submission serves as an earnest appeal to the United Nations Human Rights Council to exercise its mandate, uphold its commitment to universal human rights, and take decisive action by establishing the requested international legal tribunal. Only through such a mechanism can justice finally be pursued, accountability ensured, and comprehensive reparations secured for Afrodescendant peoples.
Respectfully submitted, - https://NotHelpfulUSALegislationsPeople.Bravesites.com
Bro. Rev., Dr. Shamsuddin A. Abdulhakim ElBey, S., Ord., D.D.