Law in Holland on "human trafficking": a comparative study - from justicy (justitie / rechtvaardigheid) to 'religious' justice (gerechtigheid) 6/19

TITEL XVIII
Misdrijven tegen de persoonlijke vrijheid
Art. 273f

Claim:

5o degene die een ander ertoe brengt zich beschikbaar te stellen tot het verrichten van seksuele handelingen met of voor een derde tegen betaling of zijn organen tegen betaling beschikbaar te stellen dan wel ten aanzien van een ander enige handeling onderneemt waarvan hij weet of redelijkerwijs moet vermoeden dat die ander zich daardoor beschikbaar stelt tot het verrichten van die handelingen of zijn organen tegen betaling beschikbaar stelt, terwijl die ander de leeftijd van achttien jaren nog niet heeft bereikt;

Claim translated:

5o the person who induces another to make himself available to perform sexual acts with or for a third party in return for payment or to make his organs available in return for payment, or undertakes any act in relation to another of which he knows or should reasonably suspect that the other person thereby makes himself available to perform such acts or makes his organs available in return for payment, while the other person has not yet reached the age of eighteen years;

Response:

This closure beautifies the hidden reality of being vulnerable to the unforgivable sin of human trafficking, in the sense of ones rightfull existence. Ofcourse it is easy to say that new life guarantees existence. But what is hard to say is that this existence can be more easy to newly born women than to newly born men. The measurement for protection of not being robbed or even ripped from ones organs, should not be an efficient one, but one of existentiality. This means that generalising on the age of eighteen is as inefficient as not to make diffferences between vulnerability of young people, especially the boys. Not because of their potential or economic potentiality, but because of their essence, as babies so to speak, being more vulnerable than baby girls in their essence. What I am trying to say, is that newborn males are much less resilient than newborn girls, in their nursing period, in the spiritual sense.

At older age it might be different as to whom is more vulnerable, except if it comes to sexual acts, where women are more monetized than men. While men are more vulnerable to lose their organs. So we have to be honest. If women are exploited once in their lifetime, we can say it is afterwards some type of free choice to be sexually exploited, though differences in threat exists. This is an untold reality about women, and even when it comes to men, we are ignorant as to why the appendix organ, for example, gets disabled, removed so to speak.

So coercion to sexual acts is two-sided, men as well as women are coerced to it, hoping not to lose on their emotional balancing, with the outcome not to lose any organs. What I am trying to tackle here, is the door that should be closed to make it getting as far as prostitution versus the combination to organ theft. It would be crazy to say that one voluntarily would want to get rid of an organ, isn't it?

This closure gives us a choice, freely translated, between having sex or to compromise an organ. Only a lunatic would do this for fun, isn't it? This means it has to do with isolationism of people and with making them less knowledgable. The solution would be the opposite! For men as well as for women. Yes.