How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
If you want a low-latency in-ear pair that keeps late-night TV audio locked to the picture with an IP7 sport build and a 40-hour charging case, choose SGNICS Samsung Galaxy Z; if you need an open-ear, featherweight design you can wear for hours while still hearing the room around you during TV watching, choose Conyat Open-Ear Headphones.
• SGNICS Samsung Galaxy Z — biggest strength: Bluetooth 5.3 with a quoted 4 ms audio latency and a 40-hour total battery system (8 hours per charge plus a 32-hour case with a dual LED display). That low-latency figure is the single most TV-relevant spec on either sheet.
• SGNICS Samsung Galaxy Z — biggest trade-off: It's a sealed in-ear over-ear-hook design with no noise control, so it blocks some of the room and there's no ambient mode when you want to hear what's going on around you.
• Conyat Open-Ear Headphones — biggest strength: A genuinely open-ear fit — about 6.7 g per earpiece, ear canal left unobstructed — plus environmental noise cancellation on the mic and a longer 10-hour single-charge rating.
• Conyat Open-Ear Headphones — biggest trade-off: It runs Bluetooth 6.0 but the sheet lists no latency figure, no charging-case capacity, and the open design leaks sound both ways — you hear the room, and the room can hear you.
• Who each pick is for: SGNICS for people who want immersive, sync-tight TV and workout audio; Conyat for people who want all-day, barely-there comfort with one ear on the living room.
The C16 is built around two numbers that matter more than most spec sheets admit: Bluetooth 5.3 and a quoted 4 millisecond audio latency. In practice that's the anti-lip-sync figure. If you've ever watched a show and felt the dialogue arrive a beat late, that's the problem this design is aimed at, and the manufacturer explicitly frames the low-latency mode as roughly three times faster than conventional noise-cancelling earbuds with less signal loss on calls. For TV watching — especially streamed dialogue-heavy series and sports — that's the spec I'd weigh first.
Who should buy it: anyone who wants one pair for the couch and the gym, values a concrete latency number, and prefers a snug in-ear seal. Who should skip it: if you need to hear a doorbell, a kid, or a partner while the TV is on, the sealed fit and the absence of any noise-control mode make this the wrong tool — and the over-ear hook is more hardware on your head than some people want for a two-hour movie.
Conyat Open-Ear Headphones: Who It's For
The X5S takes the opposite approach. Instead of sealing your ear canal, it sits outside it, contoured to the shape of your ear and held by adjustable hooks. At roughly 6.7 g per earpiece it's about as light as a wearable speaker gets, and the whole pitch is that you forget it's there — the sheet is explicit that the ear canal stays completely unobstructed and that extended wear stays comfortable. That's a real, defensible design choice, not a marketing flourish.
The connectivity is Bluetooth 6.0, audio is a dynamic driver spanning 20 Hz–20 kHz, and battery is quoted at 10 hours per charge with a 1.5-hour charge time. The mic side uses environmental noise cancellation, and the build is plastic with silicone — the silicone being the part that matters, since it's what makes the hooks sit softly against skin. Controls are touch-based and the model is the X5S.
Who should buy it: people who wear earbuds for hours — commuting, running, working around the house — and who want TV or podcast audio layered over the room rather than walled off from it. It's also the better pick if in-ear tips have never sat right for you. Who should skip it: if you want to sink into a movie with nothing but the soundtrack, or if you need a documented low latency, the sheet gives you no such number — and open-ear designs trade bass depth and isolation for that openness.
• Best for TV lip-sync accuracy → SGNICS Samsung Galaxy Z. It's the only one of the two with a stated latency figure (4 ms).
• Best for long single-charge sessions → Conyat Open-Ear Headphones. 10 hours per charge versus 8 on the SGNICS.
• Best for total battery with the case → SGNICS Samsung Galaxy Z. 40 hours combined (8 + 32) with a dual LED readout.
• Best for all-day comfort and awareness → Conyat Open-Ear Headphones. ~6.7 g per side and an unobstructed ear canal.
• Best for workouts and sweat → SGNICS Samsung Galaxy Z. IP7 waterproof plus ear hooks and three tip sizes; the Conyat is also IP7, so this is close, but the SGNICS is sold as sport-first.
• Best for calls in wind → SGNICS Samsung Galaxy Z. The mics are specifically described as reducing moderate wind noise.
• Best for hearing your surroundings → Conyat Open-Ear Headphones. Open-ear by design; the SGNICS has no noise-control mode at all.
• Best for a sealed, immersive listen → SGNICS Samsung Galaxy Z. In-ear seal and a bass-forward 6 mm driver.
For TV watching, I'd buy the SGNICS Samsung Galaxy Z. That 4 ms latency figure is the one spec that directly solves the thing that ruins TV audio — dialogue drifting out of sync — and the 40-hour case means you're not hunting for a charger mid-binge. The IP7 build and ear-hook fit make it a genuine two-for-one with your workouts. The Conyat is the better wear-it-all-day earbud and I'd recommend it without hesitation to anyone who wants to stay aware of the room, but for the specific job of watching TV, I'd take the pair with the documented low latency. Either way, check the current price on Amazon before you commit — the numbers move, and the button on this page will show you where each one stands today.
For sync-critical viewing, the SGNICS. It's the only one of the two with a quoted latency spec (4 ms), which is what keeps audio lined up with mouths on screen. The Conyat is better if you want to keep one ear on the room while the TV plays.
Not necessarily — neither sheet lists multipoint pairing, so don't buy either expecting to juggle a phone and a TV at once. If you'll be switching between a TV, a tablet and a phone, plan on re-pairing manually and check the product page for any pairing features before you buy.
It's comfortable enough for long sessions and the open fit keeps you aware of your surroundings, but the sheet lists no latency figure, and low latency is what matters most for gaming. For competitive TV gaming I'd lean SGNICS; for casual viewing the Conyat is fine.
On paper, the Conyat — roughly 6.7 g per earpiece with an unobstructed ear canal and silicone hooks. The SGNICS relies on an in-ear seal plus ear hooks, which some people find fatiguing after a couple of hours. If in-ear tips have never worked for you, the Conyat is the safer bet.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.
See also: PowerLocus Over-Ear Headphones vs StudioMan PM1-X, LANDIBO Earbuds Neckband，V5.2 vs Rinsmola 5.4, Phiaton BonoBeats Lite vs Xinnun 50, ZIOCOM Open Ear Headphones vs sprtoybat Earbuds