The words of Genesis have meanings that cross multiple levels of reality, from the universal to the particular. The symbols are neither metaphors nor similes, but signs that point to different scales of reality. The act of naming is a good example of this. A name is a symbol in scripture. To give someone a name means to define your relationship to them – whether it be a parent naming their child or a king renaming their newly conquered vassal – as Babylon's King Nebuchadnezzar renamed Mattaniah to Zedekiah when he conquered Judah. But a name also reveals character and destiny. When God establishes his covenant with Abram he changes his name to Abraham ("father of a multitude"). Jacob ("the supplanter") begins his story by stealing his brother's birthright, but the Angel of God renames him Israel ("contender with God") after wrestling with him. Jesus changes Simon's name to Peter ("rock") when he recognizes him as the foundation of the first Christian church. Names reveal fundamental realities.
The secret name of God was understood to have great power. Going back to the ancient priestly rituals of Solomon's First Temple, "the Name" was understood to be the bond that held Creation together, and it was said in Jesus's day that fallen angels had tried to learn it from the archangel Michael in order to gain power over Creation. This is why it was so unusual that Moses was given God's secret name at the burning bush. Divinities did not do this – they were usually known only by titles or attributes. This was a historically unique and unprecedented act of intimacy, establishing an equally unique kind of relationship. When Jesus reveals his real name as God's secret name, the soldiers who were there to arrest him "drew back and fell to the ground" (John 18:6). The importance of uttering the divine name was known and verboten. You could be stoned to death for claiming to be God on earth.
The Pharisees had so strictly policed taking even this name's placeholder ("Yahweh") in vain that people in Jesus's day had adopted the euphemisms “Kingdom of God” and “Kingdom of Heaven” to avoid slipups (these terms aren't found in the Hebrew Bible). Jesus politely followed the same practice — to do otherwise would have shocked his listeners more than he already did.
The connection between naming and existence is a foundational concept in ancient cosmologies. For something to be unnamed was for it to be, in a functional sense, non-existent. The Babylonian creation story opens with a statement about the absence of names: "When the sky above was not named, and the earth beneath did not yet bear a name." The act of naming is thus inseparable from the act of creation itself. This is why God's creative work in Genesis is repeatedly punctuated by acts of naming (calling the light "Day" and the darkness "Night"). We take these names and their being "very good" as a given, but they were statements of a unique divine communion and intimate love for Creation from a God who wanted the best for it. This was new. Far from being obvious, in such a violent and chaotic ancient world, it was almost unbelievable.
This is how to understand biblical identity. Naming constitutes a powerful bond of relationship and creation. Adam's naming of the animals is a parallel of the Order that God performs during creation. Heaven’s wind (the breath from God that brought Adam to life) becomes the vehicle with which Adam communicates this parallel ordering, bringing on earth what is in heaven.
But while God delegates the power of naming to humanity as a dignified act of co-creation, the fall introduces the potential for this gift to be corrupted. The human desire to be "like God" could twist the act of naming from one of faithful stewardship into one of prideful rebellion. This creates a central tension in the biblical narrative, where the act of naming becomes a test of whether humanity is acting as a humble partner with God or a prideful deserter. This will be seen both in Adam's initial misnaming of Eve as 'išhâ ("woman") – an initial misrecognition of her proper relationship to him – and also the portentous name of their firstborn son. Curiously, the text doesn't indicate who named him. Other children in the Bible are given names by parents or by others, but not Cain: "the acquirer."
"...and Eve conceived and bore Cain…"
Genesis 4:1
He is Cain; he embodies the word. Cain grounds himself not in his work as a farmer, but in his possessions – in what he can acquire without a relationship to Creation once "cursed from the earth" (Gen 4:11). And this lack of naming has an echo elsewhere in the story. Why didn't God tell Adam to name the fish of the sea?
“Why were not the fishes brought to Adam?” asked the English clergyman–scientist Alexander Ross in 1622, before proceeding to answer his own question: “Because they do not so much resemble man as the beasts: secondly, because they could not be such a help to man as the beasts: thirdly, because they could not live out of the water.”
These stories are simply not this simple. They are sacred liturgies and not scientific taxonomies. It wasn’t the level of analysis our ancestors engaged in. But it doesn’t mean the stories aren’t meant to be read closely. The reverend scientist’s application of Western logic to Eastern images may be too strictly applied in this case, but his third reason comes closest: you can't live with Chaos.
Understanding the fish as a symbol of Chaos means recognizing the symbolic weight of its habitat: the sea. Every ancient Near-Eastern creation story involves cosmic Order emerging from an act of violent divine struggle against the primordial Chaos, symbolized by the sea, and represented by serpents, dragons and sea monsters. This is known as a Chaoskampf, which was the dominant creation motif in the ancient Near-East, in which creation results from a violent battle between the gods. It is ubiquitous throughout the Middle East and North Africa, where the sea represents the formless, unpredictable and indefinite—a state of nameless, chaotic nothingness that stands in direct opposition to the identity, creation and order of "dry land."
Cylinder seal depicting deity attacking
a Chaos⇆Dragon clearly with front legs
All Middle Eastern cultures used the sea to symbolize threat. Too much rain from above or flood from below threatened life just as earthquakes imperil California or hurricanes Texas. It was true in Babylon, the "land of the two rivers," which was dominated by flat plains and vulnerable to the encroaching of the waters of the Persian Gulf, and it was true in Israel, where flash floods could sweep everything away and where the sea pounded with awesome power against its Mediterranean shore. Israelites perceived the sea as a place of dread. Heathen nations were likened to the roaring sea (Isa 17:12). In Daniel, the satanic world powers take on the figure of beasts that rise up from the sea (7:3). The fearful association is what gives rise to John's vision in Revelation that "the Sea shall be no more" (Rev 21). Psalm 104 describes the primeval waters covering the earth, fleeing only at God's rebuke, after which God orders a boundary they cannot pass, lest they "return and cover the earth." Throughout scripture there is concern that the waters must be controlled to prevent a regression into the chaotic state they symbolize: the Flood.
In contrast, living water (mayim chaim)—flowing from a spring, river, or temple—signifies rebirth, grace, final restoration, and divine provision. This imagery finds its ultimate expression as the primary symbol for the Holy Spirit. Jesus offers this "living water" as a "spring of water welling up to eternal life" (John 4:14), which the Apostle John clarifies is a reference to the Spirit (John 7:38-39). The Bible begins with a world born from chaotic waters (Genesis 1) and ends with a new heaven and new earth in which "the sea was no more" (Revelation 21:1). The symbol of Chaos, rebellion, and separation is eliminated. In its place, the central feature is the "river of the water of life, bright as crystal, flowing from the throne of God and of the Lamb" (Revelation 22:1), signifying the perfect order, purity, and unending life of God's restored creation.
This association with a pre-creation, untamed, and hostile Chaos is a recurring scriptural motif. Any creature whose essential identity is defined by its existence within this symbolic domain is intrinsically connected to the semantic field of Chaos. Genesis contains a subtle but powerful polemic that connects sea creatures to these concepts. On the fifth day, "God created the great sea monsters (Heb. tannîn תַּנִּין, plural: tannînim, Gen 1:21), the term translated as serpent, sea monster, dragon or crocodile (this latter a symbol for the power of the Egyptian Pharaoh). It is often translated into English as “great fish” by the sometimes flattened Septuagint (the Greek translation of Hebrew scriptures that the Gospel writers would have been familiar with). The poetic personifications of these great "fish" make them discernable synonyms for the primordial Chaos⇆Dragons.
Significantly, the Chaos⇆Dragons of Genesis 1:21 are the only species expressly named in the creation account and the text here reverts back to use the special verb for divine creation – bārāʾ– for the first time since verse 1, specifically for these creatures. The emphasis is not accidental. The term tannîn is used elsewhere in the Old Testament to denote the other Chaos⇆Dragons named Leviathan and Rahab, who are often paired, substituted for and blurred together variously as "sea," "storm" and "serpent." These two were formidable enemies of God, defeated in the Chaoskampfs of Israel’s earlier, more polytheist days – the ones that predate even Genesis. These stories resemble other ancient Near-East Chaoskampfs and are made passing reference to in Isaiah 27:1; 51:9; Psalms 74:13 and Job 7:12.
But the creation in Genesis does not depict a Chaoskampf. Yahweh is depicted too powerful and transcendental in Genesis to stoop to such depths. This deliberate and polemical literary signal to an ancient audience that God simply "created" these great sea monsters, setting limits to their power and allowing them to live in Creation as subordinate animals, not gods. The author of Genesis intentionally evokes the imagery of the great Chaos-Goddess Tiamat only to then strip her of personality, divinity, and power. Chaos is transformed raw material for divine creativity by the effortless act of God’s speech alone. It is not destroyed, but integrated by its subjection to Order.
Cylinder seal depicting Marduk’s victory over Tiamat
In the Enuma Elish, the Babylonian redeemer god Marduk slays Tiamat (sometimes depicted as a walking serpent, sometimes as a sea serpent), chops her in half (“ripping her body apart like a clamshell") and forms the world out of her dismembered body. This reflected the status quo of the ancient world's religions of empire with their self-justifying myths of redemptive violence, which enshrined the power of violence to defeat evil and establish “peace.” But in Genesis 1:2, Tiamat the tannîn has been reduced to a related Hebrew cognate – tehôm (“the deep") – and stripped entirely of divine status. "The deep" is not a rival god, but an element subdued by word and spirit. It was now only an allusion to Sheol, the afterlife where all, good and bad, went after death ("heaven" and "hell" didn't develop in Judaism until after the Exile, post-538 BC). “The depths,” "the abyss" and “the pit” are other synonyms for Sheol throughout the Old Testament.
Serpent (Nāḥāš): The word for serpent (nāḥāš) is used in explicit connection to the Chaos⇆Dragon in Job 26:13, Isaiah 27:1 and Amos 9:3, linguistically linking it with the chthonic figure of the serpent from Eden. It can represent other principles as well, but in these and the Genesis verses the serpent is what it is in virtually all other cultures from around the world: the Chaos creature of Azi-Dahaka in Persia, Jörmungandr in Scandinavia, Shesha in India, the Python in Greece, Ronin of the Amazon, Quetzalcoatl in Mesoamerica, the Horned Serpent of the Cherokee and Ojibwe, Dan and Aidophedo in West Africa, Aida-Wedo in Benin and Haiti, Apophis in Egypt and Tiamat in Babylon.
Leviathan: Described in Job 41 as a fearsome, fire-breathing dragon that no human can tame, it is also identified as a "twisting serpent" whom God will slay on the last day (Isa 27:1). He is so identified with the sea that Job can ask, "am I the Sea, or the Dragon, that you must put me under guard?" (Job 7:12).
Rahab: Like Leviathan, Rahab ("Arrogance") is explicitly historicized as a symbol for earthly powers hostile to God, particularly Egypt (Ps 87:4; Isa 30:7), defeated in Psalms 89:10, Job 26:12 and Isaiah 51:9. Interestingly, the word for "the helpers of Rahab,” has the very same Hebrew root (ʿāzar) whose noun forms ezer, the "helper" of Eve's description in relationship to Adam (Job 9:13). This is not to equate Rahab's minions with Eve, but to reinforce her vital function as Adam's defender and ally.
Was it not you who cut Rahab in pieces, who pierced the dragon [tannîn]? Did you not dry up the sea, the waters of the deep [tehôm]?
Isaiah 51:9
The tannîn can be understood as the cosmic creature that, in these myths, embodied chaotic threats to creation. When an explicit connection to Chaos is meant to be emphasized, this tannîn is always used. It is in this way that the connective imagery of Hebrew sacred poetry allows a "truer" depiction of Egypt's Caesar–godman to be depicted as the chaotic, aquatic monster he is to Israel – both as its political and spiritual adversary and embodiment of power and pride – and, ultimately, vulnerability – before God.
‘Thus says the Lord God: “Behold, I am against you, O Pharaoh king of Egypt, O great [tannîn] who lies in the midst of his rivers, Who has said, ‘My River is my own; I have made it for myself.’
Ezekiel 29:3
"Son of man, sing a lament for Pharaoh king of Egypt and say to him: 'You consider yourself a lion among the nations, but you are like a [tannîn] in the seas, thrashing about in your streams, churning the water with your feet and muddying the streams.'"
Ezekiel 32:2
The mythological imagery of the Chaos⇆Dragon informs a wider symbolic application where "fish" and the "sea" become synonymous with the disorder, danger and death that afflict human existence. The very symbols of cosmic threat and divine opposition in neighboring religions have, in Genesis, been demoted to the status of animals. The narrative transition from Genesis 1 to Genesis 2-3 that sees God change from transcendent to personal partner with humanity, mirrors the shifted locus of threat from the external, conquered cosmic force of the tannanim to the internal, seductive moral agent of the serpent. This is the symbolic framework for understanding any "great fish" as a potential avatar of this primordial threat of Chaos, even if "animalized" into a less cosmically threatening version. The fish is a denizen of the very element that represents the formless, disordered, primordial, and potentially destructive. But the serpent will prove to represent the very same, albeit in a different form and with different means. The narrative shift has relocated the primary conflict from the physical cosmos to the moral and intellectual realm. In this sense it is possible to interpret Adam as not yet having the developmental ability to understand, control or develop any kind of relationship with any form of the Chaos sea. The serpent's victory will represent a catastrophic inversion of the created hierarchy. In Genesis 1:28, humanity was given the mandate to "rule over... every living creature". In Genesis 3, a creature, through deception, comes to rule over humanity, leading them into rebellion against their Creator.
The earth as "formless and void / empty [tohu wabohu]" describes the initial state as undifferentiated Chaos—not a literal "void," but an uninhabited, unordered reality. Wider analysis of etymology and Biblical usage (Isaiah 34; 45:18, Jeremiah 4:23), points to a more accurate rendering of tohu wabohu as "desolate wasteland," "uninhabited Land" or "wilderness." Chaos has narrative equivalence with the ‘wilderness’ into which Adam and Eve were cast, describing a world unfit for life, not yet ordered with distinct times, spaces, and inhabitants. Robert Alter argues that the term is used to indicate the generally accepted understanding of tohu as “emptiness” or “futility” and the "trackless vacancy of the desert.” This "not yet" world is neither inhabited nor characterised by the productivity and fertility revealed in the story of creation that immediately follows.
The nature of human existence as contingent on God’s grace is presented as an existential reality through the introduction of ‘wilderness.’ Chaos persists as the ever-present possibility of "uncreation:" if God’s sustaining word and Order are withdrawn, the world could collapse back into Chaos. Exile and Flood are understood as temporary reversions to Chaos or "de-creation," from which God brings about renewal and new order. The theme of "Order-out-of-Chaos" is not only an abstract cosmological principle but a concrete lived experience — personal, social, and historical Chaos is always ready to reassert itself if God’s word/trust/structure fails. The "wilderness state" has been appropriated by certain Christian traditions almost as a technical theological term, to designate the recurrent periods of life lived in failure, depression, uncertainty, and defection. The same images are still invoked today when people talk of the "downfall" of civilization, the "chaos" of "disorder" or going back to the "dark ages." As the historian Susan Wise Bauer reminds, the Flood is “the closest thing to a universal story that the human race possesses.”
“Let my people go, that they may serve me in the wilderness!”
Exodus 7:16
Behold, I am doing a new thing; now it springs forth, do you not perceive it? I will make a way in the wilderness.
Isaiah 43:19
For the Israelites, though, the wilderness of Chaos was also a primary and frequently exclusive place of spiritual encounter and transformation. The expulsion from Eden is an Exodus into the ambiguity, danger, and the disorder of separation from God – of going it alone. "Wilderness" or "desert" are metaphors for this Chaos—lack of habitation, order, fertility, purpose. The movement from Eden (Order) to Exile (Chaos) and back to Order (covenant, Promised Land, new creation) is a recurrent biblical motif. Scripture suggests that the human vocation is to participate – as Order is never a given, but a gift – it must be continually maintained in partnership with God.
Chaos is not only a negative. It also constitutes all the material of possibility, creativity, and renewal. The Hebrew term for water, mayim, is a grammatical plural, a form that suggests vastness, multiplicity, and an encompassing totality. In this initial state, water is presented as an antecedent and prerequisite for creation, a formless receptacle for the divine creative spirit. Because it represents the matrix from which new acts of creation, deliverance and transformation emerge, the scriptures see both threat and hope in the Chaos waters and their wilderness equivalent.
The wilderness Chaos in Second Temple Judaism was a complex symbol that held in tension the possibilities of punishment and divine presence, barrenness and provision through the trials of suffering, purification, and revelation. This connection is epitomized at Mount Sinai, where God gives the 10 Commandments and makes the covenant with Israel. This cements the wilderness as the preeminent space for direct, unmediated, and transformative divine encounter. The 40-year post-Egypt sojourn in the desert becomes not only a national testing for Israel (see: golden calf) but a proof of God’s faithfulness to a repeatedly faithless people. It teaches Israel spiritual dependence, and rewards them with the miracle of manna in their darkest hour – an example of God's personal aid to a people mired in Chaos. The wilderness is thus not merely a transitional space on the way from Egypt to Canaan; it is the foundational space where the Israelites are constituted as a nation and bound to God by a sacred pact.
The wilderness symbol was adapted widely. Prophetic literature, especially Isaiah, will later envision a New Exodus where the barren wilderness of a fallen world is miraculously transformed into a New Eden, spurred from "the voice of one crying in the wilderness" (Isaiah 40:3). For the holy warrior Maccabees, the wilderness became a physical refuge from persecution and a strategic base for war against their colonizers. In Alexandria, the philosopher Philo allegorized the wilderness as the soul's inner journey from the "Egypt" of inner slavery to the "Promised Land" of virtue — an intermediate state of ascetic discipline and contemplation. In apocalyptic literature, the wilderness served as a metaphor for both the desolation of a destroyed Jerusalem and the remembered site of God's foundational faithfulness, grounding hope for future redemption.
In Jesus's day wilderness theology fueled revolutionary movements seeking liberation from Rome. The historian Josephus reports that prophets (like John the Baptist) led followers into the desert, promising miracles that re-enacted the Exodus and conquest. These movements reveal a popular belief that the wilderness was the necessary stage for God's final intervention. The New Testament Gospels present John the Baptist and Jesus as the authentic fulfillment of these hopes, while reframing them spiritually. John is the archetypal wilderness prophet of Isaiah 40:3, calling for repentance. Jesus’s 40-day temptation in the wilderness is a typological re-enactment of Israel’s 40-year trial in the wilderness, succeeding through obedience where Israel had failed. While the crowds who follow him into the wilderness seek a political king, Jesus rejects this, reinterpreting the New Exodus as liberation from sin and death, not Rome.
John baptized in the wilderness Chaos, as future Christians did, because water precedes every form and sustains every creation. This is why the exemplary image of creation in Genesis is the island that suddenly "manifests" itself amidst the waves. Immersion in the waters symbolises a dissolution of forms while emergence repeats God's manifesting creation. Water includes death as well as re-birth. In whatever religious context we find them, water dissolves the forms of things, washes away sins, purifies and regenerates. It precedes the Creation and re-absorbs. Everything that has form manifests itself above the waters by detaching itself from them.
Cyril of Jerusalem saw this baptismal descent into the water of death as inhabited by the Chaos Dragon reflected in John's baptism of Jesus in the Jordan River in order to break the power of the dragon. "The dragon Behemoth, according to Job," writes Cyril, "was in the waters and received the Jordan in its maw. But, as the heads of the dragon had to be broken, Jesus, after descending into the waters, bound him fast, so that we might acquire the power of walking over scorpions and serpents… The dragon lurks by the side of the road, watching those who pass by; take care that he bite thee not! Thou goest to the Father of spirits, but must needs pass by this dragon."
Baptism is the "anti-type" of the Flood. According to Irenaeus, it was "an image that baptism came to realise. Even as Noah had faced the sea of death in which sinful humanity had been annihilated, and had come out of it, so has the newly baptised descended into the baptismal font to confront the dragon of the sea in a supreme combat and to emerge victorious."
The wilderness wandering in Exile can be understood similarly as a Chaos state, with its distinct lack of water understood through water's dual aspect. It is a lack of the waters of life, of Eden. For the Israelites, the wilderness motif shows a gradual internalization, moving from a physical place and historical memory toward a spiritual state. It became a symbolic sanctuary for the counter-cultural ascetic Essenes at Qumran, an inner landscape for Philo, and a revolutionary stage for the messianic prophets. The New Testament culminates this trend, using the wilderness as the site of messianic testing while defining ultimate renewal as the regeneration of the human heart. The enduring power of the wilderness is its function as a liminal space for breaking from a corrupt order, depending wholly on God, and beginning anew. This is part of the call of the biblical story: to bring Order out of Chaos ("rule over the fish of the sea" Gen 1:26, 28; “you must rule [sin]” Gen 4:7) by continually participating as God’s image-bearers with faith, justice and creativity in repairing the world. Chaos persists as both a threat (uncreation, wilderness, moral disorder) and a creative possibility. The Genesis narrative situates humanity as crucial actors in this drama of perpetual re-creation.
Israel's first temple, built by King Solomon, is hiding in the story of the Garden. Solomon designed his temple to be a microcosm of Eden based on God's instructions to Moses on how to build the Tabernacle – Israel's traveling sanctuary in the desert wilderness after leaving Egypt. The concept of the cosmos as a temple is deeply rooted in the ancient Near East, where temples were universally considered microcosms of the universe, houses of the deity and the origin point for all of the deepest realities.
The temple served as the concentrated place of God’s presence, a concept linguistically linked to Eden in the verb hithallek – describing God "walking back and forth" in the Garden (Gen 3:8)— which is also used for God’s presence in the Tabernacle (Lev 26:12). Even the seven-day creation account, which culminates in God’s rest, mirrors the seven-day dedication ceremonies for temples across the ancient Near-East. This rest signifies the cosmos has reached its perfect, operational state, allowing God to rule from his new headquarters. Thus, the cosmos itself is conceived as sacred space, with Eden as the original Holy of Holies. A retelling of the Eden story, the Book of Jubilees (160-150 BC), explicitly identifies Eden with the Temple, as "the Holy of Holies, and the dwelling of the Lord," recognizing its status as a prototype for all subsequent temples. Its sacred status is not conferred by the structure itself but by it being the point of contact between God and human. When God planted "the tree of life... in the middle of the garden" it marks out the Garden⇆Temple as the cosmic navel, the fixed point around which the world is organized.
It was thought that the Temple foreshadowed a future worldwide sanctuary where God's presence would fill all creation. This microcosm explains one of the strangest images in John's last vision in Revelation where the new heavens and earth are a universal Temple, symbolized by a massive descending golden cube — the shape of the Temple's inner sanctum, the Holy of Holies, which was where God’s presence dwelled (1 Kgs 6:20; Rev. 21:9–21).
The three sections of the Temple represented the earth (outer court), the Sea (inner court), and heaven (Holy of Holies). The Temple's outer veil symbolized the sky separating earth from the heavenly realm; the High Priest's blue, purple, and scarlet vestments represented the cosmic elements (sky, sea, earth); the Temple's curtains were decorated with elaborate representations of cherubim, palm trees and floral motifs – the same elements described in Genesis – and woven to reflect the four elements (earth, air, water, fire) while the tapestry at the entrance depicted the universe, with colors and designs resembling the heavens. This was the veil that was torn from top to bottom at Jesus's crucifixion – a signal that heaven was accessible to all, not just the priests.
The seven-branched arboreal lampstand represented the Tree of Life, the life-essence of the entire world. The Temple was the cosmic center of the universe, the place where heaven and earth converged. The full biblical representation is that of a huge Cosmic Tree atop a holy mountain. Solomon's Temple, echoing Mount Sinai, was known as this “holy mountain” (Ps. 48:1), the “mountain of the Lord’s house” (Isa. 2:2), and Israelites spoke of “ascending the mountain of the Lord” (Ps. 24:3).▼Its height reached heaven, its branches encompassed the earth, and its roots sank down to the lowest parts of the earth – a common ancient understanding for the center of the universe. This was the fixed point around which the world was organized – in every sense.
▲ "mountain of God" “Mt. Zion” Ps 48:2; Isa 4:5; Mic 3:12; “the mountain of God” in Ezekiel (28:14,16) and Isaiah (14:13); Solomon’s temple as “the Mountain of the Lord” in Isaiah 2:3; Joel 2:1; Micah 4:2; cf. Exodus 15:17).
Similarly, the bronze ‘Sea’ basin in the Temple courtyard was an artificial replica of the Sea, symbolizing both the forces of Chaos subdued by God and the waters of life at the cosmic center. Temples throughout the ancient Near-East were understood as cosmic mountains representing the original hill of dry land that emerged from the primordial Chaos waters at the beginning of creation. All Egyptian temples, for example, had a small pyramid stone called the Benben to represent this primeval hill. The typical form of Babylonian temples was the ziggurat – an architectural representation of this mountain as a stairway to heaven – the idea was reflected in the temple's names as well, at E-kur (“mountain house’) and Duranki (“bond of heaven and earth”).
Stone panel from North Palace, built in 646 BC by King Ashurbanipal of the Assyrian Empire. Shows his garden with waters flowing through it and a prominently featured shrine.
Ezekiel’s vision of the cherubim – each with four faces: human, lion, ox, and eagle – perfectly exemplifies the symbolic structure of ancient cosmology. They represent the four corners of the created world and the four primary categories of life. The lion and ox at the base represent the "earthly" foundations as the king of wild animals and the exemplar of domesticated animals. The eagle at the top is a "heavenly" principle, too abstract to grasp without tangible form, as the king of the birds of the air. And the human at the center unites spiritual and corporeal realities as the mediating knower. Though these images may seem arbitrary, they reflect the logical structure of this cosmology. Ezekiel uses this symbolic language to describe the process of acquiring divine knowledge. Deciphering such symbols also involves understanding their dichotomies, like the lion-bull opposition.
When reading Genesis, try and notice whether characters, places, and actions make more sense as microcosms of cosmic patterns (not just “literary devices”). Notice the symbolic "architecture" being depicted, like water imagery – crossings, wells, floods, and seas—as thresholds of transformation or creation. Fire and light imagery can often be a marker of divine presence, purification or discernment. Watch for pairs or triads that resolve tension (Abraham – Isaac – Jacob; prophet – king – people) as signs of ordered relationship. Look for temple patterns (orientation, measurements, entrances) embedded in narratives of creation, covenant, or restoration. If you notice a name change it might indicate a new identity and mission. East–west movements, centers, verticals, horizontals, numbers, ascents and descents can all be instances of imagery suggesting sacred orientation (exile and return, garden to city). Generally speaking, notice whenever you see a noun. Some of the most fundamental biblical symbols are unassuming precisely because modern eyes fail to track the earthy simplicity of their associative meanings. Seeds aren't just seeds: they are patterns. Jesus explicitly says that "the seed is the word of God:" they embody potential, self-replicating growth and transformation.
Though grammatically singular, the Hebrew zera ("seed") almost always refers to a collective group – an entire line of descendants. This inherent oscillation between the collective and the singular meaning allows Genesis to use "seed" to mean both a people (Israel) and a single, representative individual (the Messiah). This tension becomes the primary engine for all subsequent theological development. Jesus uses seed imagery to illustrate how small beginnings can yield extraordinary results, and compares the Kingdom of God to a mustard seed that grows into a large tree (in the Middle East the 'mustard tree' could grow surprisingly tall). Seeds represent the potential for harvest and abundance, and their agricultural context emphasizes God's provision and blessing. Additionally, seeds symbolize spiritual reproduction - believers are called to plant seeds of faith that will grow and multiply in others' lives.
The seed was a very important symbol in ancient cosmology, being the closest tangible example of a purely spiritual or "heavenly" principle. Peter alludes to this in being "born again, not of perishable seed, but of imperishable," of the living Word of God (1 Peter 1:23). The ancients didn't think of the seed as containing a coded language, like DNA, with detailed theological instructions to build eternal life forms. It was this foundational spiritual principle that only expressed minimal information. The ‘seed’ is a self-evident principle that implicitly contains every potential in a point-like form. It represents the Word or promise of God—a concentrated point of meaning that manifests in the world. This is the importance of God separating dry land from the seas. The land is the power that expands and expresses a seed into something knowable. Establishing the "Order" of dry land makes possible the manifestation of the seed's heavenly principle in everyday reality. Genesis's assertion that heaven can't land in unprepared land is echoed by Jesus repeatedly.
Seed denotes the fundamental principle of life and continuity. This literal meaning is quickly given covenantal significance in the promise to Abraham concerning his "seed," referring collectively to his descendants. Paul sees Jesus as the ultimate fulfillment of this promise in the individual sense: "The Scripture does not say, 'and to seeds,' meaning many, but 'and to your seed,' meaning One, who is Christ" (Galatians 3:16). Jesus uses the seed to represent the Word of God, whose fruitfulness depends on the soil of the human heart (Matthew 13).
This is one of the most important images Jesus uses to describe the kingdom of God: as that which begins in a person’s life as something seemingly small and insignificant but through a process of growth becomes a mighty power; the reality in a person’s life that causes the whole personality to achieve completeness. Just as a tree is rooted in the earth but reaches up to heaven, so the unfolding of personality includes both our earthy and our spiritual natures. Thus, the seed symbolizes promise, potential, the Word of God, and the principle of new life itself.
The Tree often stands for the center of the world (axis mundi), a sanctuary, and the point of connection between heaven and earth (symbolically synonymous with the Cosmic Mountain. If the seed is potential, the Tree is realized potential as it rises out of the waters of Chaos. It is one of the most powerful and universal of cosmic symbols. As a world axis and image, the Tree personifies the universe, its roots in the underworld and its branches reaching to the heavens, symbolizing differentiation emerging from unity.
The righteous person is poetically described as a stable, fruitful "tree planted by streams of water" (Psalm 1:3). Proverbs 3 says that Wisdom is a "tree of life," suggesting that the path back to paradise is ethical, achieved through its pursuit. Prophets used trees to symbolize empires and kings. Ezekiel 31 depicts the cedar as the hubris of a pagan empire (Assyria/Egypt) that God will cut down. Isaiah 11:1 promises that the Davidic dynasty, reduced to a dead "stump of Jesse," will produce a humble, new shoot—the "Branch" who will be the Messiah.
This imagery is central to the biblical narrative, which opens with two specific trees: the Tree of Life, a literal and metaphorical wellspring of vitality, and the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, representing a choice between obedience and rebellion. Specific trees carry nuanced meanings: the palm is a symbol of eternal life, the cedar of majesty and sanctity, and the fig tree of fertility and place.
Humanity's exile from the first Tree of Life sets the stage for the entire redemptive story, which climaxes with Christ. The instrument of his crucifixion is a "tree" (Acts 5:30), transforming the symbol of the curse into the ultimate source of salvation. The cross becomes the redemptive antitype to the tree of the curse, granting access to the eschatological Tree of Life in the New Jerusalem (Revelation 22:2). This connection from the first and last books of the Bible forms a metanarrative: the promise of a "seed" (Genesis 3:15) is fulfilled in Christ the Seed (Galatians 3:16), whose death on a "tree" allows humanity to be reborn and grow into trees of life.
This idea was propagated in early Christian folklore, where it was said that the wood of the Genesis Tree was preserved to become the cross on which the Messiah was to be crucified. This understanding developed into medieval Christian legends such as the "Legend of the True Cross" or "Legend of the Holy Rood Tree." These accounts were popular in Christian Europe and were used to stress typological links between Adam and Christ.
One of the most extensive studies of the relationship between the cosmic tree and Christian cross ▼ found that a whole new set of meanings had become available for early Christians with the identification of the cosmic tree with the cross. The Tree of Life was to become associated with Christian initiation, redemption, life and community experience, representing newly baptized individuals planted by God as holy gardener of a garden that prefigured a future paradise. Christians received the life-giving waters of baptism through the streams of the gospels and sacraments (with Christ sometimes also interpreted as the Tree, yielding spiritual fruits for the faithful). The cross-as-Genesis's Tree of Life becomes the Christian's cosmic center, linking heaven and earth with its "first fruit" as Christ and subsequent fruits as Christians. Set opposite the "center" is the Tree of Knowledge through which humanity first knew evil. The Tree of Life thus becomes at once soteriological (symbol of Christ, source of Redemption), sacramental (individuals redeemed through baptism), and ecclesiological (denoting the relationship between Christ and Church), while the Tree of the Cross becomes anthropological (the crucified Christ and the Catholic Catechism's "four dimensions of love": faith, worship, ethics, and prayer), typological (symbolic of the instrument of redemption), mythological (complete human story from Adam to Christ), cosmological (redemption's universal scope), and eschatological (symbol of the Resurrection).
▲ One of the most extensive studies of the relationship between the cosmic tree and Christian cross Reno, S. The Sacred Tree as an Early Christian Literary Symbol (Saarbrücken: Home et Religio, 1978). A good number of other nineteenth and twentieth-century scholars have studied the relationship as well, including: Jacob Grimm, Germanic Mythology, 4th ed. (Gütersloh: Verlag von C. Bertelsmann, 1876), 664–666; Arturo Graf, Myths, Legends, and Superstitions of the Middle Ages, 2 vols. (Turin: Loescher, 1892); Hugo Rahner, Greek Myths in Christian Perspective (Zürich: Rhein-verlag, 1945), 77–89.
...there is hope for a tree: if it is cut down, that it will grow green again, that its tender shoots will not cease. Though its root grows old in the ground and its stump dies in the dust: yet at the scent of water it shall spring, and bring forth leaves like a new plant.
Job 14:7–9
Pillars and axles represent connection, stability, and the world's center, functioning as supports for heaven and earth. In Jewish legend the pillar is symbolically synonymous with the Tree, and the ladder as well, which in the Midrash Konen appears as the Tree of Life that is "five hundred years high" where righteous souls ascend and descend. Jacob’s pillar at Bethel and the two massive bronze pillars at Solomon's temple, Jachin ("He will establish") and Boaz ("In Him is strength"), stood as symbolic monuments to the permanence of God's covenant. These cosmic pillars and axles center and organize reality. The most prominent examples of pillars as symbols of divine presence are the pillars of cloud and fire that guide the Israelites out of Egypt – dynamic manifestations of God's immanence. This symbolism extends later to the Christian church's foundational leaders, who are called "pillars" (Galatians 2:9), and to the church itself as "the pillar and foundation of the truth" (1 Timothy 3:15).
In contrast, wheels symbolize divine mobility, freedom, and sovereignty. It first enters the narrative as a symbol of human hubris – the zenith of Egyptian military technology: Pharaoh’s chariot force. God clogs Pharaoh’s chariot wheels in the Red Sea, demonstrating that divine mobility is superior to human power. This is seen again vividly in Ezekiel's vision of God's chariot-throne (Ezekiel 1, 10). This vision revealed to the Exiles that God was not confined to the Temple in Jerusalem but was the sovereign Lord of all creation. Its 'wheels within wheels' allows for movement in any direction, symbolizing God's omnipresence; their rims, "full of eyes all around," God's omniscience; the entire apparatus's movement by divine will, God's omnipotence. The juxtaposition of the pillar/axle and the wheel reveals the paradox of a God who is at once the stable, unchanging Pillar of covenant faithfulness and the radically mobile, transcendent Wheel of sovereign freedom. The Epistle of James warns of the fallen wheel – the “wheel of our birth” – which is corrupted by sin, a destructive, cyclical causality of the weary treadmill life apart from God. This shows a sharp dichotomy between Ezekiel’s purposeful wheel and James’s fallen wheel of Nature.
But Ezekiel’s mobile throne is also the synthesis of the Wheel and Pillar symbols, showing them not to be the true theological center, but the axle: the still point of stability and will, provides the immutable stability necessary for the rational, dynamic motion of God’s providential action in time. The existential question is whether our reality is ruled by Ezekiel's purposeful Wheel or James's destructive Wheel of Nature. The contemporary quest is thus the search for the axle—the divine "spirit in the wheels" – of a true center from which to commence our journey.
Stones represent permanence, foundation, and the unyielding aspects of reality or divine law, as exemplified by the stone tablets of Moses. They serve as tangible memorials and witnesses to God's faithfulness, as when Joshua commanded twelve stones to be set up as a perpetual memorial of the Jordan crossing (Joshua 4:7). In some narratives, stones can be antithetical to life-giving water and dynamic transformation; for instance, Egypt and the hard-hearted Pharaoh are sometimes allegorized as "stone." Metaphorically, God is the "Stone of Israel" (Genesis 49:24), and Christ is the "cornerstone" rejected by the builders but made the foundation of God's redemptive plan (Ephesians 2:20). In a remarkable transformation of this symbolism, believers in the New Testament are called "living stones" built into a "spiritual house," signifying their part in a dynamic, Spirit-filled community (1 Peter 2:5). Conversely, a "heart of stone" represents a rebellious disposition that God promises to replace with a "heart of flesh" (Ezekiel 36:26).
Mountains are consistently portrayed as sacred, liminal spaces—places of encounter where heaven and earth meet. Analogous to the Cosmic Tree, the mountain functions as an axis mundi or "Cosmic Mountain," a pivotal center for law, vision, and foundation. The Garden of Eden is described as being on the "mountain of God" (Ezekiel 28:13-14), the primordial site of divine communion. Key revelatory events occur on mountains: Abraham's test on Moriah, the giving of the Ten Commandments on Sinai, and Jesus' Transfiguration. By delivering his most famous sermon from a mountain, Jesus framed himself as a new and greater Moses. This pattern culminates in the prophetic vision of the "mountain of the house of the LORD," which will draw all nations to God (Isaiah 2:2).
The symbolic tension between bread and stone is resolved in Christ. In the wilderness, Satan tempts Jesus to turn stones into bread, a challenge to define His mission in purely physical terms. Jesus refuses, establishing the primacy of spiritual sustenance—the Word of God. He thereby fulfills the typology of both symbols: He is the true life-giving Rock (a type established at Horeb and identified in 1 Corinthians 10:4) from which the living waters of the Spirit flow, and He is the true Bread of Life who provides eternal nourishment.
Bread (lehem), as a staple food, links the earthly and the sacred. It is a symbol of the created order, human work and effort, and God’s provision. In a deeper symbolic sense, bread represents "space" or "dry land"—the stable, ordered world shaped by human labor. "Daily bread" in the Lord's Prayer thus refers not just to physical food but to the spiritual nourishment that sustains life in this ordered space. The quintessential example of divine provision is the manna from heaven, which pointed to a greater reality. In Israel's worship, the Temple’s twelve loaves of the Bread of the Presence symbolized the perpetual fellowship of the twelve tribes with God. At the Last Supper, Jesus gives this symbol its ultimate meaning: "Take, eat; this is my body" (Matthew 26:26). Christ is the true Bread from heaven, the living Word whose body is broken to provide eternal life. The use of unleavened bread is significant, as leaven often symbolizes sin and corruption, making the bread a symbol of Christ's purity.
Wine carries a powerful dual symbolism and acts as a counterpart to bread. Where bread represents stable space, wine symbolizes "time," fermentation, transformation, and the mysterious influence of decay and renewal. On one hand, it represents joy, abundance, and divine blessing that "gladdens the heart of man" (Psalm 104:15). Jesus' first miracle of turning water into wine affirms this association with messianic joy and transformation. On the other hand, wine has connotations of danger—of intoxication, blood, and the terrifying power of divine wrath, as seen in the prophetic image of the "cup of the wine of wrath" (Jeremiah 25:15).
At the Last Supper, Christ resolves this duality. He takes the cup and declares, "This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins" (Matthew 26:28). On the cross, he drinks the cup of God's wrath on behalf of his people, transforming that same cup into the cup of blessing and covenant. In the Eucharist, the breaking of the bread and the pouring of the wine proclaim how Christ takes the negative pole of these symbols (death and wrath) to give the positive pole (eternal life and joy).
They are not a simple opposition but a "theology of limits," where work finds its meaning only in the culmination of holy rest. The rhythm is established in Genesis and subsequently distorted by human error, redefined by covenantal law, and continually reinterpreted across history. The Bible presents work not as a curse but as a dignified vocation and calling intrinsic to God's original creation. Adam's role to "cultivate and keep" the Garden (Genesis 2:15) was more than agriculture; it was the archetypal priestly activity of serving, guarding, and maintaining cosmic order. The Fall distorts human-divine relationship and corrupts the nature of work, shifting ideal creative work (melakhah) to the exploitative human reality of burdensome labor (avodah). "Remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt:" the Sabbath commands rest for the people and the land and the end of this reality (Ex 20; Deut 5).
The principle of rest is established by God, who ceases from creative work on the seventh day, consecrating a portion of time for communion. This pattern becomes the Sabbath command, a sign of the covenant. Rest signifies the return to grace and balance after struggle, and it is the aim and fulfillment of work. Its rhythm confronts our modern 'workism' where identity and worth are defined by professional achievement. By commanding rest, the paradigm asserts that human value is a received divine gift, not a product of labor. The name Noah means "rest" or "repose," associating him with this peace. The New Testament reveals the Sabbath "belongs to Christ" (Colossians 2:17) who offers a deeper, spiritual rest—a cessation from the futile work of trying to earn salvation (Matthew 11:28). Rest in Christ is a foretaste of the eternal "Sabbath rest" that remains for the people of God (Hebrews 4:9). This frames the modern "work-life balance" as a spiritual issue of worship and trust. The failure to rest is a form of idolatry. True Sabbath-keeping is a deliberate act of faith, declaring that one's identity is found not in what is produced, but in relationship with God.
This way of reading scripture and interpreting its symbols can help restore an original context of meaningful participation within a world thick with correspondence to higher orders of signification. It points back to us and to our own mediation of meaning into matter and the raising of matter toward meaning. This is religion as meta-knowledge – maps for aligning life with reality’s deepest structures. These are ancient orientations towards the sacred, not to be misinterpreted with modern eyes as primitive fictions or scientific explanations.
For similar analysis on Genesis:
⠀⠀➢ Mircea Eliade's The Sacred and the Profane
⠀⠀➢ Matthieu Pageau’s The Language of Creation: Cosmic Symbolism in Genesis
⠀⠀⠀⠀ ↳ a highly recommended simplified version of Eliade
⠀⠀➢ G.K. Beale’s The Temple and the Church’s Mission: A Biblical Theology of the Dwelling Place of God
⠀⠀➢ Paul Ricoeur's Thinking Biblically and Essays on Biblical Interpretation