The critics argue that the social problem targeted by Senate Bill 323 violates the real nature of the problem instead of effectively addressing it. The study authors dismiss claims about life devaluation to reveal that systemic healthcare inequality and poor access to full reproductive healthcare represent the central problems. Scientists working in this area have discovered that limiting access to abortion leads to substantial detrimental effects on pregnant individuals. The implementation of abortion limitations at the state level results in fewer safe abortion choices available to patients who experience complications including increased use of harmful methods and more maternal health problems (Jones & Jerman, 2021). Protective groups of people are most impacted by these negative results because these groups already experience many barriers to obtaining proper healthcare service.

Abortion laws which restrict options generate consequences that spread across society even past maternal health outcomes. The implementation of such laws threatens to increase social disputes by fueling conflicts among different communities and escalating ongoing cultural fights present during American political history. Opponents argue that Senate Bill 323 fails to acknowledge health-related factors beyond morality when deciding abortion cases because abortion should be viewed from a multidimensional health perspective. The medical outcomes for women depend on three key societal dimensions including financial security and educational access and communal support services. Women's denied access to reproductive control causes widespread social effects that damage economic performance and destabilize families and harm community foundation.