A Satta King Record is more than a simple list of numbers. When results are arranged by date and month, the chart becomes a structured historical reference that allows readers to locate information from different periods of the year.
The format becomes especially interesting when a complete year is displayed in a single table. Instead of opening a separate page for every month, a yearly chart can place January, February, March and the following months alongside one another. This makes it easier to identify the entry associated with a particular date.
For example, a currently published 2026 Gali record chart displays monthly columns from January through December. September contains published entries, while October and later months are still unfilled.
A daily result page focuses on one particular date. A monthly chart concentrates on one period. A yearly record takes a wider view.
A typical yearly structure looks like this:
Date
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
1
Result
Result
Result
Result
Result
Result
Result
Result
Result
--
2
Result
Result
Result
Result
Result
Result
Result
Result
Result
--
3
Result
Result
Result
Result
Result
Result
Result
Result
Result
--
The advantage of this format is that the date remains constant while the month changes.
Someone researching the 1st day of different months, for example, can locate those entries in the same row rather than searching through several unrelated pages.
The value of a historical chart becomes clearer when actual published entries are considered.
The Satta King Records website currently shows September 2026 information across multiple market columns. Its September table includes markets such as Disawar, Amritsar, Bihar King, Shalimar and Old Taj. For September 1, the published entries include 27 for Amritsar, 01 for Bihar King, 20 for Shalimar and 33 for Old Taj, while some fields are empty.
The same page shows how the entries develop from one date to another.
For September 2, for example, the table records 69 for Disawar, 42 for Amritsar, 16 for Bihar King, 34 for Shalimar and 33 for Old Taj.
These examples demonstrate an important characteristic of historical records: each number has meaning only when it is connected with its date and market.
When reading a large chart, the date should be checked before the result.
Consider a row labelled 10.
That row does not represent one universal result. It may contain separate entries for January 10, February 10, March 10 and so on.
The Gali 2026 chart demonstrates this clearly. On the 10th day, the recorded values differ by month: January shows 52, February 00, March 64, April 11, May 56, June 31, July 35, August 57 and September 40. October is currently unfilled.
Therefore, writing down only “40” without mentioning September 10, 2026 — Gali removes important context.
A yearly record may contain multiple tables or multiple markets.
The September 2026 data currently published by Satta King Records includes a separate table containing Delhi Bazaar, Meerut, Ganganagar, Delhi Gold, Shri Ganesh and UP-Bazaar.
Another table contains Kashipur, Delhi Super, Faridabad, Rampur, AXBY and Ghaziabad.
This structure shows why readers should never copy a number without identifying its column heading.
For historical reference, the complete identification should ideally include:
Date + Month + Year + Market + Recorded Entry
That creates a much clearer record.
Current October 2026 charts provide a useful example of how an incomplete month appears inside a yearly record.
The Gali chart currently shows September values through the available dates, while the October column begins with --.
The Faridabad yearly chart has the same general structure: January through September contain historical entries for the displayed dates, while October is not yet populated in the table.
This is normal for an ongoing calendar year.
A yearly record is therefore not necessarily “complete” throughout the year. It gradually develops as additional dates are recorded.
A blank field should not automatically be replaced with an assumed value.
Historical tables can contain empty cells for different reasons, including an unavailable entry, a market that did not have information displayed for that date, or a chart that has not yet been updated.
The September data on Satta King Records contains several examples where one market has an entry while another field remains empty. For September 1, for instance, Disawar is blank while several other markets contain values.
For accurate documentation, retaining the empty status is better than inserting an unverified number.
One useful feature of a yearly chart is the ability to locate the same calendar date across different months.
Take the 4th day as an example.
The Gali 2026 chart lists:
January 4: 23
February 4: 95
March 4: 90
April 4: 75
May 4: 14
June 4: 16
July 4: 39
August 4: 27
September 4: 26
October 4: currently unfilled
These are historical entries associated with different dates and months, not a sequence that should be treated as a prediction or formula.
The example shows the organizational benefit of the yearly format without assigning predictive meaning to historical numbers.
A historical chart tells us what has been recorded.
It does not establish what a future entry will be.
For example, seeing the values associated with September 1, September 2 and September 3 does not provide a reliable method for determining an October result. Historical records should therefore be treated as documentation rather than a guaranteed forecasting tool.
This distinction is particularly important when large tables contain many numbers. A dense table can create an impression of patterns even when the individual entries are simply separate historical observations.
Not every market necessarily has the same number of completed entries.
The September table on Satta King Records illustrates this: some markets contain entries through September 27, while some columns may have missing information on particular dates.
This means a reader should not assume that every row must contain a value in every column.
A good historical record preserves the information that is actually available.
When reviewing a large yearly chart, the following method keeps the information organized:
Make sure the chart belongs to the correct year.
Find the specific monthly column being researched.
Move to the correct day within that month.
If several markets are displayed, verify the exact column heading.
Copy only the value actually displayed by the source.
Do not replace blank, -- or otherwise unavailable fields with assumptions.
This process makes historical research considerably easier.
A properly structured chart reduces the amount of manual searching required.
Instead of checking dozens of individual pages, a yearly table can provide a single reference point for multiple months.
For SEO and information architecture, this type of structure is also useful because individual market pages can connect to monthly and yearly records. Readers can move from a specific result page to a broader historical chart without losing the date and market context.
The main purpose of a historical record is preservation.
A result that was published several weeks or months ago can become difficult to locate when websites continuously update their current pages. A structured chart provides a way to keep older information accessible alongside newer entries.
The 2026 charts demonstrate this progression: September entries are already populated across multiple markets, while October is gradually being added as the month progresses.
This creates a chronological reference that can be reviewed later.
A Satta King Record becomes much easier to understand when it is treated as organized historical information rather than a collection of isolated numbers.
The 2026 charts show how a yearly table can combine different months, dates and markets in one structured format. September already contains numerous published entries, while October is still developing.
The key is context. Every entry should be connected to its date, month, year and market. Missing fields should remain clearly identified, and historical values should not be treated as guarantees about future outcomes.
Used this way, a Satta King Record serves as a straightforward reference for locating and understanding previously published result information.