Checking the Satta King record today, 23 October 2026, requires more than looking at a single number. Daily charts may display results at different times, use different date conventions, or leave markets marked as pending. Understanding these differences helps readers review the historical record without confusing an older entry with a newly reported result.
This guide covers the latest available chart information for Disawar, Faridabad, Ghaziabad, Gali, Delhi Bazar and Shree Ganesh, along with the previous day's records and important verification notes.
The following table summarizes the information reported in the available online charts. Some sources disagree, so the entries should be treated as reported chart data, not independently verified official results.
Market
Latest information reported for 23 October
Disawar
03 reported by one chart; another chart displays 47 in its current-date row
Faridabad
Pending (XX) in one chart; 26 appears in another chart's current-date row
Ghaziabad
Pending (XX) in one chart; 55 appears in another chart's current-date row
Gali
Pending (XX) in the available charts reviewed
Delhi Bazar
Pending (XX)
Shree Ganesh
Pending (XX)
The October chart published by Satta King Record Chart Result lists Disawar as 03 for 23 October, while the other listed markets remain marked XX. A separate chart displays 47, 26 and 55 in its 23 October row for Disawar, Faridabad and Ghaziabad, respectively. These entries do not fully agree and should not be merged into one confirmed result list.
Important: XX means a result is not displayed or is pending in that chart. It does not establish what the eventual result will be.
The previous day's chart is useful for distinguishing older entries from results reported for the current date.
Market
Reported record for 22 October
Disawar
47
Delhi Bazar
73
Shree Ganesh
99
Faridabad
26
Ghaziabad
XX
Gali
XX
These values appear in the October chart published by Badshah787. Another chart uses a different presentation for some entries, which reinforces the importance of checking the date and market labels before copying numbers into a historical record.
A result chart becomes easier to understand when each entry is checked against a few basic details.
Check whether the row is explicitly labelled 23-10-2026 or simply shows the most recently updated record. A result appearing near today's date is not necessarily a result declared today.
Disawar, Delhi Bazar, Shree Ganesh, Faridabad, Ghaziabad and Gali may have different reporting schedules. A completed entry for one market does not mean that all the other markets have published their results.
A number published on a website is evidence of what that website reports. When charts disagree, compare their date labels, update information and market-specific pages before treating an entry as confirmed.
Do not replace XX with a guessed number or copy a result from the previous day simply to complete a table. Leaving a market marked as pending is more accurate than presenting unconfirmed information as fact.
The following entries provide recent context for readers reviewing October's chart history.
Date
Disawar
Delhi Bazar
Shree Ganesh
Faridabad
Ghaziabad
Gali
19 Oct
23
44
11
72
23
47
20 Oct
64
29
95
29
16
96
21 Oct
72
86
64
12
86
09
22 Oct
47
73
99
26
XX
XX
23 Oct
Conflicting reports
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
The entries for 19–22 October are drawn from the published October chart. The 23 October row is intentionally qualified because the sources reviewed do not agree on the latest values.
Differences between charts can arise from several reporting and presentation issues:
Different update times: One page may update before another.
Different date conventions: A chart may show the latest completed market result alongside a new calendar date.
Pending entries: Some pages use XX or a dash until a result is published.
Data corrections: A website may revise an entry after its initial publication.
Different market coverage: Not every chart includes the same markets or follows the same layout.
These are possible explanations, not proof of the cause of any particular discrepancy. If two sources disagree, preserve the conflicting values and verify them later rather than choosing one without evidence.
For readers maintaining their own historical archive, a consistent record format is useful. Store the date, market name, displayed value, time checked and verification status separately.
For example:
Field
Example
Date checked
23 October 2026
Market
Disawar
Reported value
03
Verification status
Conflicting reports
Last checked
Record the actual checking time
This format makes it easier to identify changed entries and prevents unverified values from being mistaken for confirmed historical data.
One chart reports Disawar 03, while another displays different values in its 23 October row. The available sources do not establish a fully consistent set of results, so check the relevant market's latest chart before treating an entry as confirmed.
XX generally indicates that the chart has no result displayed for that market and date. It should not be interpreted as a numerical result or used to predict a future entry.
Some chart layouts may carry forward the latest completed result or use a different date convention. Check the row label and the market-specific page to determine which date the entry belongs to.
No. Historical records describe previously reported entries; they do not reliably establish future outcomes. Past values should not be treated as a guarantee or prediction.
Keep the source-reported values separate, note the date and time checked, and mark the entry as conflicting or unverified until better confirmation is available.
The Satta King record for 23 October 2026 contains a notable discrepancy between the charts reviewed. One source reports Disawar 03, while another displays a different set of values for the same date. The remaining market entries are not consistently reported across the sources.
For an accurate historical archive, always separate today's reported information from confirmed records, retain pending markers, and avoid filling gaps with assumptions. Historical charts are records of past reporting—not reliable tools for predicting future outcomes.