The Satta King Record for 22 October 2026 shows why date-specific updates need to be checked carefully. Online charts currently display different information for today's entries: one website lists a Disawar value of 47, while another marks all six main markets as having no declared result. These differences make it important to distinguish reported entries from information that remains unconfirmed.
This report organizes the available information by market and date, with a separate reference to the previous day's published chart.
The following table reflects the information available in the sources checked for this article. It is not an independently verified or official result announcement.
Market
Today's displayed entry
Status
Disawar / Desawer
47
Conflicting reports
Delhi Bazar
Not listed
Pending or unconfirmed
Shree Ganesh
Not listed
Pending or unconfirmed
Faridabad
Not listed
Pending or unconfirmed
Ghaziabad
Not listed
Pending or unconfirmed
Gali
Not listed
Pending or unconfirmed
Kabir Bhai Satta displays Disawar as 47 in its 22 October chart, whereas Badshah787 shows XX for all six listed markets. The Disawar entry should therefore be treated as reported by one source, not independently confirmed.
For comparison, sattakingrecords October chart lists the following entries for 21 October 2026. These are historical values displayed by that source, not predictions for today's outcomes.
Market
21 October record
Disawar
72
Delhi Bazar
86
Shree Ganesh
64
Faridabad
12
Ghaziabad
86
Gali
09
Keeping the previous day's record separate from today's status helps prevent historical values from being mistaken for newly published information.
The following table summarizes the five dates immediately preceding 22 October, using the market order published by Badshah787.
Date
Disawar
Delhi Bazar
Shree Ganesh
Faridabad
Ghaziabad
Gali
17 Oct
97
16
55
78
15
69
18 Oct
44
74
19
78
16
73
19 Oct
23
44
11
72
23
47
20 Oct
64
29
95
29
16
96
21 Oct
72
86
64
12
86
09
These entries provide a historical reference only. Different websites can use different market labels or publish conflicting values, so readers should retain the source name when archiving a chart.
When reviewing a daily result page, three details deserve attention.
A website may refresh its chart at a different time from another publisher. Check the displayed update timestamp before comparing entries.
A blank field, dash, or XX should not automatically be interpreted as a result. In the Badshah787 chart, XX is explicitly described as meaning that no result was declared.
Confirm that both pages refer to the same market and the same calendar date. Similar names and different table layouts can make comparisons misleading.
If the sources still disagree, report the discrepancy rather than presenting an uncertain entry as confirmed.
A useful historical record should include more than the displayed value. For each entry, retain:
The full date.
The market name as shown by the source.
The displayed value or publication status.
The source website.
The date and time the page was checked.
A note about any unresolved disagreement.
This approach creates a clearer record of what was published and makes later corrections easier to identify.
Kabir Bhai Satta lists Disawar as 47, but Badshah787 marks all six markets as XX. The Disawar entry is therefore conflicting and should not be described as independently confirmed.
Badshah787 lists Disawar 72, Delhi Bazar 86, Shree Ganesh 64, Faridabad 12, Ghaziabad 86, and Gali 09.
A source may not yet display an entry, or it may use a placeholder to indicate that no result has been declared. Check the site's own status definitions and updates.
No. Historical entries do not provide a reliable way to predict future outcomes. A chart should be treated as a record of previously reported information, not as a forecasting method.
The Satta King Record for 22 October 2026 illustrates the importance of separating reported entries from confirmed information. Although one source lists Disawar as 47, another shows no declared result for that market or the other five markets covered in its chart.
For accurate historical documentation, compare dates and market labels, retain source details, and clearly identify unresolved differences. This makes daily updates easier to understand without overstating what the available information establishes.