A Satta King Record is not simply a collection of two-digit entries. When daily information is arranged consistently throughout a month, it becomes a structured historical reference that can be revisited later. The September 2026 chart provides a current example of how this type of information can be organized across multiple markets and dates.
The current archive contains September entries for markets including Disawar, Amritsar, Bihar King, Shalimar, Old Taj, Delhi Bazaar, Meerut, Ganganagar, Faridabad, Ghaziabad, Haryana and Gali. The displayed table currently extends through September 21, 2026.
Every monthly chart begins with a simple calendar structure. The date provides the reference point, while the market columns identify where each entry belongs.
For September 2026, the first recorded row is dated September 1. The table shows 27 for Amritsar, 01 for Bihar King, 20 for Shalimar, 33 for Old Taj and 33 for Chotu Taj. Other sections record 58 for Delhi Bazaar, 23 for Meerut, 45 for Faridabad, 86 for Ghaziabad and 81 for Gali.
This format creates an important relationship between date, market and recorded entry.
A monthly chart keeps a limited period together. Instead of searching through an entire year, readers can focus on one calendar month and move chronologically from the first date to the latest available date.
The September archive illustrates this clearly. The first table moves from September 1 through September 21, with each row maintaining the same market order. The other market groups follow the same date sequence.
Consistent ordering makes it easier to locate information without repeatedly learning a new layout.
The opening part of September already demonstrates how much information can accumulate in a multi-market record.
On September 10, the first table records 93 for Disawar, 54 for Amritsar, 28 for Bihar King, 15 for Shalimar, 13 for Old Taj and 13 for Chotu Taj. The second table shows 52 for Delhi Bazaar, 24 for Meerut, 75 for Ganganagar, 40 for Delhi Gold, 12 for Shri Ganesh and 52 for UP-Bazaar.
The third table records 65 for Kashipur, 93 for Delhi Super, 15 for Faridabad, 96 for Rampur and 72 for Ghaziabad, while the Haryana and Gali section shows 70 and 40.
One date therefore provides a substantial historical snapshot across many markets.
By September 15, the monthly record contains fifteen days of information.
The first group records 89 for Disawar, 18 for Amritsar, 98 for Bihar King, 75 for Shalimar, 47 for Old Taj and 47 for Chotu Taj. In the second group, the same date contains 46 for Delhi Bazaar, 69 for Meerut, 51 for Ganganagar, 29 for Delhi Gold, 28 for Shri Ganesh and 57 for UP-Bazaar.
The third group records 23 for Kashipur, 67 for Delhi Super, 24 for Faridabad, 25 for Rampur and 19 for Ghaziabad. Haryana and Gali are shown as 41 and 83.
This demonstrates how a monthly archive grows without changing its basic structure.
September 20 provides another useful point in the current record.
The first section shows 32 for Disawar, 68 for Amritsar, 12 for Bihar King, 44 for Shalimar, 87 for Old Taj and 87 for Chotu Taj. The second section contains 47 for Delhi Bazaar, 72 for Meerut, 49 for Ganganagar, 14 for Delhi Gold, 80 for Shri Ganesh and 27 for UP-Bazaar.
The third section lists 17 for Kashipur, 61 for Delhi Super, 84 for Faridabad, 29 for Rampur and 24 for Ghaziabad. The final section shows 50 for Haryana and 66 for Gali.
Because the same date appears across all sections, September 20 can be treated as one consolidated historical snapshot.
The current September archive continues through September 21.
For that date, the first group contains 01 for Disawar, 76 for Amritsar, 27 for Bihar King, 03 for Shalimar, 04 for Old Taj and 04 for Chotu Taj. The second group shows 62 for Delhi Bazaar, 84 for Meerut, 70 for Ganganagar, 23 for Delhi Gold and 67 for UP-Bazaar, with Shri Ganesh currently blank.
The third group records 08 for Kashipur, 73 for Delhi Super, 71 for Faridabad, 10 for Rampur and 70 for Ghaziabad. Haryana is listed as 35, while the Gali field is blank in the main table.
These blank fields demonstrate why a historical archive should preserve the information exactly as recorded rather than filling gaps with assumptions.
A historical chart becomes more useful when every entry can be identified without ambiguity.
For example, the value 71 appears in the September 21 row under Faridabad. A future reader can identify the complete reference as:
Faridabad — September 21, 2026 — 71
The market and date provide the context that the number alone does not provide.
This principle applies throughout a large historical archive.
Once individual monthly records are maintained, they can eventually form a yearly archive.
January provides one monthly dataset, February another, and so on. When these are retained in a consistent structure, a complete annual record can be assembled without changing the underlying information.
Dedicated 2026 chart pages for individual markets follow this broader yearly approach, while the main page provides a multi-market monthly view.
This creates two useful levels of historical organization:
Monthly record → Yearly archive
Both can serve as references for locating past information.
A historical record should describe what has already been documented.
The September 2026 chart records entries for dates that have already been populated. It does not establish what a future date will contain. Treating historical information as a record rather than a forecast keeps the purpose of the archive clear.
This is particularly important when a chart contains a mixture of completed entries and blank fields.
Anyone reviewing a Satta King Record can use a straightforward framework:
Identify the year.
Select the month.
Locate the date.
Identify the market.
Read the recorded entry.
Check whether the field is populated or blank.
This approach works whether the reader is looking at one market or a multi-market table.
The September 2026 archive demonstrates how daily entries can gradually become a structured historical reference. From September 1 through September 21, the current table connects individual records with dates and market names, while separate table sections keep the large dataset manageable.
The value of a Satta King Record is therefore not only in the individual entries. Its usefulness also comes from organization, consistency and historical context.
When a record clearly identifies the date, market, month and year, it becomes much easier to revisit later. A monthly chart can then become part of a larger yearly archive, preserving historical information in a format that is straightforward to search and understand.