A Satta King Record becomes more useful when daily entries are arranged clearly by date and market. Rather than viewing individual results in isolation, a monthly chart allows readers to see how information is added from one day to the next.
The October 2026 record already contains several completed dates, giving a clear example of how a monthly chart develops.
A current October chart lists published entries for October 1 through October 4, while the October 5 row is still largely unfilled at the time of checking.
For example, one chart records the following selected entries:
Date
Delhi Bazar
Faridabad
Ghaziabad
Gali
Disawar
October 1
76
42
67
93
--
October 2
25
05
81
01
52
October 3
25
58
95
68
18
October 4
91
36
98
80
15
October 5
--
--
--
--
70
These entries are presented as historical chart information from the cited source and should be read according to the date and market shown.
A monthly record gives each entry a fixed position.
If someone wants to review October 2, they can go directly to that row. If they want October 4 information, they can compare that specific date without mixing it with earlier entries.
This simple organization is one of the main benefits of maintaining a structured Satta King Record.
Large charts often contain many markets. One current record includes Delhi Bazar, Faridabad, Ghaziabad, Gali, Shri Ganesh and Disawar along with numerous additional market columns.
Because so many entries can appear together, reading the column heading before the number is important.
For example:
October 4 — Faridabad — 36
is a specific record, while simply writing 36 removes the information needed to identify the entry.
The October 5 row demonstrates how a current date can differ from completed dates.
At the time of checking, one chart displays Disawar 70 for October 5 while other major fields remain marked with --.
This means the row should be treated as an incomplete current-day record rather than a completed monthly entry.
Keeping pending fields visible is preferable to filling them with assumptions.
There is a useful distinction between completed historical rows and a developing current row.
For example, October 1 through October 4 contain multiple published entries in the checked chart, while October 5 has considerably fewer populated fields.
This difference is normal for a daily chart because entries may be published at different times.
A reader should therefore avoid comparing an incomplete current row with a completed previous row as though they contain the same amount of information.
Different websites can sometimes display different update states or values.
For this reason, a reliable record should keep the source identifiable rather than combining entries from multiple pages without explanation.
The purpose of a historical chart is to document what a particular source displays for a particular date and market.
This approach makes the information easier to review and reduces confusion when different websites show different data.
A useful Satta King Record should distinguish between:
Completed historical entries
Current published entries
Pending fields
Different market columns
Different dates
This structure makes a large chart easier to navigate.
It also prevents a value from one date being accidentally associated with another date.
Past chart entries are historical information. They should not be presented as a method for determining future results.
For example, the October 2 or October 3 values describe those specific dates. They do not establish what a future date will contain.
A record is most useful when it remains a record rather than being presented as a prediction tool.
As each October date is completed, another row becomes part of the monthly reference.
The structure is straightforward:
Date → Market → Published Entry → Record Status
Over time, these individual rows create a larger historical table that can be searched and reviewed more easily than scattered daily information.
The October 2026 chart demonstrates how a Satta King Record develops one date at a time. Earlier October rows contain multiple published market entries, while the October 5 row is still developing in the current chart.
Keeping dates, market names and publication status clearly separated makes the record easier to understand. It also provides a cleaner way to review historical information without confusing completed entries with current or pending data.