A Satta King Record can appear in several different formats depending on how the information is presented. One page may show many markets together in a single daily table, while another page may organize one market across the months of an entire year. Although the layouts are different, the underlying purpose is similar: keeping previously published information available for reference.
The current Satta King Records website provides both types of presentation. Its September 2026 table places numerous markets side by side, while dedicated 2026 pages provide market-specific yearly charts.
Historical information does not have to use one fixed layout.
A multi-market table usually places the date in the first column and different markets across the remaining columns. The September 2026 table on Satta King Records follows this approach, covering markets such as Disawar, Amritsar, Bihar King, Shalimar, Old Taj, Delhi Bazaar, Faridabad, Ghaziabad, Haryana and Gali.
A dedicated yearly chart takes a different approach.
The Faridabad 2026 chart places January through December across the top and the dates of the month down the left side. September entries are currently populated, while later months contain placeholder fields.
Both formats can be useful, but they require slightly different methods of checking information.
Imagine finding the same historical entry in two different tables.
In a daily multi-market chart, you might locate the information by:
Date → Market → Value
In a yearly market chart, the process becomes:
Market → Month → Date → Value
The information may be equivalent, but the route to finding it changes.
Understanding this distinction can prevent simple mistakes when historical records are copied, referenced or reorganized.
The date is the foundation of a historical record.
For September 2026, the combined chart identifies entries using dates such as 01-09-2026, 02-09-2026 and continuing through the currently published dates.
A yearly chart can shorten the same information to a simple day number such as 1, 2, 3 and so on because the month is already represented by the column heading.
When transferring data between formats, the month and year should therefore never be lost.
For example:
01 + September + 2026 = 01 September 2026
Keeping that complete relationship intact makes the record easier to verify later.
A value without its market name is incomplete historical information.
The combined September table uses separate headings for each market, allowing every displayed value to be associated with a specific column.
For example, the September 21 row contains:
Disawar — 01
Amritsar — 76
Bihar King — 27
Shalimar — 03
Old Taj — 04
Delhi Bazaar — 62
Meerut — 84
Ganganagar — 70
Delhi Gold — 23
UP-Bazaar — 67
Faridabad — 71
Ghaziabad — 70
Haryana — 35
The same row also contains fields where no value is displayed, demonstrating why the market heading must remain attached to the information.
Historical record preservation becomes more important when a table contains incomplete fields.
The September 21, 2026 table currently has no displayed value for Shri Ganesh and Gali, while other markets have entries for that date.
A missing value should not be converted into a guessed value simply to make the table look complete.
Instead, it can be represented as:
Not available
or retained as a blank field, depending on the original chart format.
This preserves the distinction between an actual historical entry and unavailable information.
Another small detail can make a major difference when historical data is copied.
Some entries are displayed using two digits, including:
01
02
03
08
09
For example, the September chart contains entries such as 01, 03 and 08.
When creating a separate reference table, keeping these values in their original two-digit format makes the new record visually consistent with the source.
This is particularly important when the information is being transferred into spreadsheets or databases where leading zeros can sometimes disappear automatically.
A useful way to verify a historical entry is to compare the combined chart with a dedicated market page when one is available.
For Faridabad, the dedicated 2026 chart shows September 1 as 45, September 2 as 19, September 3 as 08 and September 4 as 02.
The combined September table displays the same Faridabad entries for those dates.
This type of cross-check can help confirm that the market, date and value have been transferred correctly.
When reviewing a historical Satta King Record, a four-part verification process can be useful.
Check the exact day, month and year.
Make sure the entry belongs to the intended market column.
Compare the displayed value with the source chart.
Check whether leading zeros, blank fields or other formatting details have been preserved.
This method is especially useful when historical information is being moved from one table structure into another.
Preserving historical information is different from attempting to predict future results.
A record tells us what has previously been displayed. It does not establish what a future result will be.
The current Satta King Records pages include historical charts alongside other gambling-related material, so readers should distinguish the record itself from claims or material concerning future outcomes.
A clean historical reference should therefore concentrate on documentation rather than presenting previous entries as a guarantee of what comes next.
A historical database becomes easier to maintain when every entry follows the same basic structure:
Date + Market + Value + Source
For yearly charts, the structure can be represented as:
Year + Month + Date + Market + Value
Using a consistent structure helps prevent common errors such as:
Mixing values from different markets
Losing the month when copying a date
Removing leading zeros
Treating blank fields as recorded values
Confusing a current entry with an older one
These may look like small issues, but they can make a large historical table difficult to verify.
A record becomes more valuable as additional historical information is added.
The important part is not simply increasing the number of entries. The information should remain organized so that an older entry can still be located years later.
The 2026 Faridabad chart illustrates this long-term structure by keeping all months within a single yearly table. January through September currently contain historical information, while October through December remain future sections of the calendar.
This structure can eventually provide a complete year in one location without requiring separate pages for every month.
A Satta King Record is not defined only by the values it contains. The way those values are dated, labelled, formatted and preserved is equally important.
A combined market table provides a broad daily view, while a dedicated yearly chart provides a market-specific chronological view. The two formats can complement each other when historical information needs to be checked or organized.
The most reliable approach is straightforward: preserve the original date, retain the correct market name, keep displayed values in their original format, identify missing fields clearly and cross-check important entries against the relevant source chart.
In this way, a Satta King Record can remain a clear historical reference even as more information is added over time.