Design of reinforced concrete transfer floors, although routinely performed by structural design engineers, is a very challenging task. The transfer floors are commonly used in multi-storey buildings, and they are major structural elements carrying a number of floors. Normally the entire building, 10 to 15 levels, is carried by a transfer slabs.
The major problem is the evaluation of the loading on the transfer slab, especially the columns and walls terminating at the transfer level. When a column terminates on a transfer beam, it will carry a smaller load since the beam supporting the column is acting as an elastic spring. The smaller the beam depth, the smaller the axial load in the transfer column. In this case the load is distributed to other columns which are continuous to the footing level. In an extreme case if we remove the support below the transfer column, the axial load will be reduced to zero, i.e. the column will be "hanging" on the floors above taking no load.
The other challenge is considering the method of construction. In any 3D frame static analysis we assume that the entire load is applied on the complete structure simultaneously. While in reality the load is gradually applied on several floors as they are constructed. For instance, if we imagine that the entire structure is propped and all the props are removed after the concrete is fully set, the static analysis will capture the structural behavior adequately. But if the props at each floor are removed before the floor above is constructed, the static analysis will not provide accurate results.
On the other hand, by using the Tributary Area method we assume that the entire load is applied on the transfer slab, ignoring the structure from above. This approach will produce the largest possible loading at the transfer column, at the expense of loading to the continuous columns. This approach is considered more conservative, however we may say that it is more conservative for the mid-spans, at the transfer columns it will under-estimate the loading at another location such as continuous columns, since the total load on the floor must remain the same.
Evaluation of the Transfer Floor Loading by Tributary Area Method
Traditionally we may evaluate the loading on the transfer floor by Tributary Area approach, ignoring the flexibility of the transfer slabs, and its influence on the load distribution. Also, the transfer slabs may be analyzed independently, separated from the rest of the structure and ignoring the flexibility of the supporting columns and their influence on the bending moment in the transfer beams and slab.
This approach is commonly used and it is considered more conservative. Its shortcoming is that the load distribution is uniform, ignoring the influence of the structure itself. The point loads on the transfer slab are internal forces in the columns above and their magnitude is affected by relative stiffness all structural elements. However, treating the transfer slab independently and ignoring the rest of the structure is a more conservative analytical approach.
We will follow through a numerical example to illustrate the major points. If we used R/C BUILDING software and if we set all columns on the transfer slab to have a "footing" support, we can obtain the same results as the tributary area method.
The recent earthquake in Turkey that struck on February 10th, 2023, has left many of us shocked and saddened. The earthquake, with a magnitude of 7.0 on the Richter scale, has caused significant damage and loss of life. Our thoughts and prayers are with those affected by this tragedy.
In the aftermath of such an event, it is essential to acknowledge the critical role played by structural engineers in ensuring the safety of our buildings and infrastructure. Structural engineers are responsible for designing, evaluating, and maintaining the structural integrity of buildings, bridges, and other structures. They play a crucial role in ensuring that our built environment can withstand the forces of nature and remain safe for use.
The importance of structural engineering cannot be overstated. Structural engineers work tirelessly to ensure that buildings and structures are designed and constructed to withstand the forces of nature, such as earthquakes, hurricanes, and floods. Without the expertise of structural engineers, the consequences of natural disasters would be even more catastrophic than they already are.
Unfortunately, the work of structural engineers often goes unnoticed, and their salaries are often lower than those of architects and interior designers. It is time for governments and private institutions to recognize the vital role of structural engineers and to pay them accordingly. They must also take steps to ensure that structural engineers are given the necessary resources and support to carry out their work effectively.
We must also acknowledge the importance of ongoing research and development in the field of structural engineering. Engineers must continually strive to improve their understanding of the behavior of materials and structures, as well as to develop new and innovative ways to ensure the safety and resilience of our built environment.
In conclusion, the recent earthquake in Turkey is a stark reminder of the importance of structural engineers in our world. We must continue to support their work and advocate for their recognition and proper remuneration. Together, we can work towards a safer and more resilient built environment.