Who Is This For?: Can art bridge political divides?

The artist holds many narratives via many voices equally, no choosing sides or moral ranking; this is a balanced approach to a tinderbox. Palestine Museum US produced the pre-October 7th version of the play; after October 7th, in response to the seeming celebration of the Hamas attack, Sandy rewrote to reflect her shock, grief, fear, and moral disorientation. Her American, Israeli, and Palestinian characters, including her own cousins, reflect their capacity to and incredulity at how they hurt each other before and after October 7. The audience is invited to hold all the truths, all the realities at once, so that peace may appear, even at a distance, as a possibility. 

The play traces an American Jewish woman's progress as she reconciles her loyalty to Israel and to the Jewish people, upholding Jewish values that sanctify every life, including Israel’s Palestinian and Arab neighbors. "Two peoples, one piece of land, no one's going anywhere."

_______________________________________________________________________________________

The Play's Ethical Stance

While refusing easy answers, the play ultimately argues for several principles:

The final image—Sisyphus pushing a rock containing a peace sign—captures the play's position: peace work is absurd, endless, and essential. "One must imagine Sisyphus happy."