Abstract: Information campaigns are widely used to promote preventive health behaviors. Yet the beliefs they change may not persist, and it is unclear whether these changes drive behavior. I study this question in the context of condom demand in Ghana, where condoms are widely available but underused. In a randomized experiment with 2,151 unmarried male students in Ghana, I estimate the effects of health risk information on beliefs and revealed demand through voucher redemption and examine whether adding information about peers’ views changes these effects. Health risk information raises condom redemption by 4 percentage points immediately and 7 percentage points eight weeks later relative to the control mean of 13 percent, while its effect on beliefs about condom safety is no longer statistically detectable after eight weeks. Correcting peer misperceptions moves beliefs toward the truth but does not increase demand. The persistence of the health information effect is consistent with experiential learning, whereby an initial information shock induces demand and subsequent experience may sustain it even as the initial belief change is no longer statistically detectable.
Effect of Health Risk Information on Actual Condom Demand
Abstract: Understanding what drives people to get tested for HIV is essential for designing effective communication strategies that promote test uptake. In this study, I use a randomized experiment to examine whether and how the format of information affects HIV testing behavior among university students in Ghana. Providing factual information on HIV incidence and the availability of nearby testing services increased actual testing rates by about 1 percentage point from a near-zero baseline. In contrast, adding a story about the testing experience to this statistical information did not generate any additional effect. Financial incentives, introduced non-randomly, raised testing rates to 11 percent. Interestingly, the impact of the original information treatments diminished when a financial incentive became available. Analysis of belief outcomes indicates that the information treatment primarily worked by increasing awareness of local testing services and correcting misperceptions about peer testing behavior, rather than by heightening perceived risk. However, stories did not enhance the treatment effect on beliefs or information recall beyond the impact of simple statistical facts. These results suggest that factual information can effectively address informational barriers to HIV testing in this context, while narrative elements offer no measurable added benefit for influencing this high stakes health behavior.
Effects of HIV Information on HIV Testing Behavior
From Knowledge to Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of Health Risk Information Interventions for Sexual Health
(Draft available upon request)
Abstract: While some studies find that health risk information changes sexual behavior, others find no effect. I synthesize 2,027 treatment effect estimates from 107 randomized controlled trials conducted across low- and middle-income countries to systematically assess the effects of these interventions on sexual health outcomes. A random-effects meta-regression yields an average effect of 0.12 standard deviations (95 percent CI[0.11, 0.13]), which remains statistically significant after correcting for publication bias. This average effect masks a clear gradient along the knowledge-attitude-behavior pathway. Effects are largest for knowledge (0.21 SD), smaller for attitudes (0.12 SD), and smallest for behavior (0.08 SD). The weaker behavioral effects reflect, in part, differences in how much individuals can act on information. Information has larger effects on behaviors individuals can undertake unilaterally, but no detectable effects on behaviors requiring partner cooperation. Effects also attenuate over time, with most of the decline occurring within six months before stabilizing at a smaller but persistent effect. Finally, the magnitude of these effects varies systematically across populations and intervention settings. Overall, the results show that health risk information reliably changes what people know and believe, but its effects on behavior depend critically on whether individuals can act on that information themselves.
Forest Plot of Effect Sizes Across Outcome Type and Information Moderators
Abstract: Despite growing evidence that HPV causes a range of cancers affecting both men and women, HPV vaccination campaigns have historically emphasized cervical cancer prevention, possibly contributing to lower vaccination rates among boys. In the Czech Republic, HPV vaccination coverage remains nearly 20 percentage points lower for boys than for girls despite being covered by health insurance for both genders. This project examines whether providing pediatricians with peer-comparative feedback on their HPV vaccination performance and specifically on gender disparities within their patient panels can increase vaccination uptake and reduce the gender gap. In collaboration with the Czech Institute of Health Information and Statistics (ÚZIS), we plan to implement a randomized controlled trial in which treated pediatricians receive benchmarking reports based on administrative data, while control pediatricians receive no information or delayed feedback. Outcomes will be measured using nationwide administrative records after 12 months and complemented by a survey of pediatrician attitudes. By leveraging existing administrative data, the intervention aims to offer a cost-effective approach to improving preventive healthcare delivery from the demand side.