Bibliography

Anderson, J. (9 October 2018). Loneliness is bad for our health. Now governments around the world are finally tackling it. Quartz. Retrieved from https://qz.com/1413576/loneliness-is-bad-for-our-health-now-governments-around-the-world-are-finally-tackling-the-problem/

Blyth, C. S. (2014). Exploring the affordances of digital social reading for L2 literacy: The case of eComma. In Digital literacies in foreign language education: Research, perspectives, and best practices (Vol. 12).

Boechler, P., Dragon, K., & Wasniewski, E. (2015). Digital Literacy Concepts and Definitions: Implications for Educational Assessment and Practice. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 5(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdldc.2014100101

Broad, S. (2015). What is digital literacy? Education Technology. Retrieved from https://edtechnology.co.uk/comments/what-is-digital-literacy/

Bromley, P. (2017). Locating Canadian Writing Centres: An Empirical Investigation. Canadian Journal for Studies in Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 27, 24–41. Retrieved from http://journals.sfu.ca/cjsdw

Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269

Definition of Literacy in a Digital Age. (2019). National Council of Teachers of English. Retrieved from https://ncte.org/statement/nctes-definition-literacy-digital-age/print/

Deuze, M. (2011). Media life. Media, Culture & Society, 33(1), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203834077

Dimock, M. (2018). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/

Dowling, D. (2014). Escaping the Shallows: Deep Reading’s Revival in the Digital Age. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 8(2). Retrieved from http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/8/2/000180/000180.html

Evans, E. (2017). Learning From High School Students’ Lived Experiences of Reading E-Books and Printed Books. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 61(3), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.685

Fisher, D., Lapp, D., & Wood, K. (2011). Reading for Details in Online and Printed Text: A Prerequisite for Deep Reading. Middle School Journal, 42(3), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2011.11461767

Fortunati, L., & Vincent, J. (2014). Sociological insights on the comparison of writing/reading on paper with writing/reading digitally. Telematics and Informatics, 31(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2013.02.005

Gonzales, A. L., Calarco, J. M., & Lynch, T. K. (2018). Technology Problems and Student Achievement Gaps: A Validation and Extension of the Technology Maintenance Construct. Communication Research, (August), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218796366

Fry, R. & Parker, K. (2018). Early benchmarks show ‘post-millennials’ on track to be most diverse, best-educated generation yet: A demographic portrait of today’s 6- to 21-year-olds. Retrieved from https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2018/11/15/early-benchmarks-show-post-millennials-on-track-to-be-most-diverse-best-educated-generation-yet/

Goen-Salter, S., & Gillotte-Tropp, H. (2003). Integrating Reading and Writing: A Response to the Basic Writing “Crisis.” Journal of Basic Writing, 22(2), 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.CON.0000415441.11964.61

Hall, L. A. (2019). “I Didn’t Enjoy Reading Until Now”: How Youth and Adults Engage with Interactive Digital Texts. National Council of Teachers of English, 54(2), 109–130. Retrieved from www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Journals/RTE/0542-nov2019/RTE0542Nov19Didnt.pdf

Hermida, J. (2009). Strategies to promote a deep approach to reading. Tomorrow's Professor eMail Newsletter. Retrieved from https://commons.trincoll.edu/wp-content/blogs.dir/232/files/2013/08/WEEK-2-Strategies-to-Promote-a-Deep-Approach-to-Reading.pdf

Kazanci, Z. (2015). University Students’ Preferences of Reading from a Printed Paper or a Digital Screen ― A Longitudinal Study. International Journal of Culture and History (EJournal), 1(1), 50–53. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijch.2015.1.1.009

Littlejohn, A., Beetham, H., & Mcgill, L. (2012). Learning at the digital frontier: A review of digital literacies in theory and practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00474.x

McKenzie, L. (5 December 2018). Smartphones for All Students: An Academic Equalizer in an Era of Income Inequality? Retrieved January 14, 2020, from Inside Higher Ed website: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/12/05/college-profs-say-smartphones-can-help-low-income-students-have-academic-success

McMurtrie, B. (2018). The Future of Learning: How Colleges Can Transform the Educational Experience. The Chronicle of Higher Education.

Merchant, G. (2021). Reading with technology: The new normal. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 49(1), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2020.182470

Mizrachi, D. (2015). Undergraduates’ Academic Reading Format Preferences and Behaviors. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(3), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.03.009

N.a. (2018). NSSE data use in brief: The Experience of Specific Student Populations.

Newman, T., & Beetham, H. (2017). Student digital experience tracker 2017: The voice of 22000 UK learners. Retrieved from http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6662/1/Jiscdigitalstudenttracker2017.pdf

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. (2018). Collecting personal information and consent. Retrieved from https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/privacy-topics/collecting-personal-information/

Peng, R. (2017). Promoting active learning of graduate student by deep reading in biochemistry and microbiology pharmacy curriculum. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 45(4), 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21038

Perrin, A. (2016). Book Reading 2016. In PewResearchCentre. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1218-8

Pew Research Center. (2012). In Changing News Landscape, Even Television is Vulnerable. Trends in News Consumption: 1991-2012, (202), 1991–2012. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2012/09/27/in-changing-news-landscape-even-television-is-vulnerable/

Province of Nova Scotia. (2017). Nova Scotia provincial literacy strategy. Retrieved from http://education.gov.mt/en/resources/Documents/Policy Documents 2014/A national Literacy Strategy2014eng_V2.pdf

The Ontario Curriculum: Secondary. (2012). Queen's Printer for Ontario. Retieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/secondary/english.html

Reed, M. (3 December 2018). Writing papers on phones. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/confessions-community-college-dean/writing-papers-phones

Roberts, J. C., & Roberts, K. A. (2008). Deep Reading, Cost/Benefit, and the Construction of Meaning: Enhancing Reading Comprehension and Deep Learning in Sociology Courses. Teaching Sociology, Vol. 36, pp. 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X0803600203

Rowsell, J., Morrell, E., & Alvermann, D. E. (2017). Confronting the Digital Divide: Debunking Brave New World Discourses. Reading Teacher, 71(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1603

Serebrin, J. (25 January 2012). More students balance school with jobs: New report shows surprising trends in Quebec. Macleans. Retrieved from https://www.macleans.ca/work/jobs/more-students-balancing-school-and-part-time-jobs/

Selingo, J. (2019). The new generation of students: How colleges can recruit, teach, and serve Gen Z. The Chronicle of Higher Education.

Shearer, E. (2017). Social media outpaces print newspapers in the U.S. as news source. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from Pew Research Center website: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/12/10/social-media-outpaces-print-newspapers-in-the-u-s-as-a-news-source/

Statista. (2020). Share of mobile internet traffic in global regions 2019. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/306528/share-of-mobile-internet-traffic-in-global-regions/

Sullivan, P., Tinberg, H., & Blau, S. (2017). Introduction. In P. Sullivan, H. Tinberg, & S. Blau (Eds.), Deep reading: teaching reading in the writing classroom (pp. xiii–xxvii). https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1537966

Wargo, J. M. (2018). Writing with wearables? Young children’s interactive authoring and the sounds of emplaced invention. Journal of Literacy Research, 50(4), 502–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X18802880

Watson, A., Kehler, M., & Martino, W. (2010). The Problem of Boys’ Literacy Underachievement: Raising Some Questions. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(5), 565–574. https://doi.org/10.1598/JA

Wilcox, K. C., Yagelski, R., & Yu, F. (2014). The nature of error in adolescent student writing. Springer, 27, 1073–1094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9492-x The

Wolf, M. (2018). Skim reading is the new normal. The effect on society is profound. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/aug/25/skim-reading-new-normal-maryanne-wolf

Coiro, J. (2011). Predicting reading comprehension on the internet: Contributions of offline reading skills, online reading skills, and prior knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research, 43, 352–392.

Dunkerly-Bean, J. M., & Crompton, H. (2014). The Role of Mobile Learning in Promoting Literacy and Human Rights for Women and Girls. In B. Guzzetti & M. Lesley (Eds.), Handbook of Research on the Societal Impact of Digital Media (Vol. 4, pp. 33–44). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8310-5.ch023

Fortunati, L., & Vincent, J. (2014). Sociological insights on the comparison of writing/reading on paper with writing/reading digitally. Telematics and Informatics, 31(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2013.02.005

Hall, L. A. (2019). “I Didn’t Enjoy Reading Until Now”: How Youth and Adults Engage with Interactive Digital Texts. National Council of Teachers of English, 54(2), 109–130. Retrieved from www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Journals/RTE/0542-nov2019/RTE0542Nov19Didnt.pdf

Kazanci, Z. (2015). University Students’ Preferences of Reading from a Printed Paper or a Digital Screen ― A Longitudinal Study. International Journal of Culture and History (EJournal), 1(1), 50–53. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijch.2015.1.1.009

LaRusso, M., Kim, H. Y., Selman, R., Uccelli, P., Dawson, T., Jones, S., … Snow, C. (2016). Contributions of Academic Language, Perspective Taking, and Complex Reasoning to Deep Reading Comprehension. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2015.1116035

Mizrachi, D. (2015). Undergraduates’ Academic Reading Format Preferences and Behaviors. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(3), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.03.009

Nobles, S., & Paganucci, L. (2015). Do Digital Writing Tools Deliver? Student Perceptions of Writing Quality Using Digital Tools and Online Writing Environments. Computers and Composition, 38, 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.001

Peng, R. (2017). Promoting active learning of graduate student by deep reading in biochemistry and microbiology pharmacy curriculum. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 45(4), 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21038

Spiegelberg, B. D. (2014). A focused assignment encouraging deep reading in undergraduate biochemistry. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 42(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20744

Roberts, J. C., & Roberts, K. A. (2008). Deep Reading, Cost/Benefit, and the Construction of Meaning: Enhancing Reading Comprehension and Deep Learning in Sociology Courses. Teaching Sociology, Vol. 36, pp. 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X0803600203

Sullivan, P., Tinberg, H., & Blau, S., Eds. (2017). Deep reading: teaching reading in the writing classroom. Urbana, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English. DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1537966

Coiro, J. (2011). Predicting reading comprehension on the internet: Contributions of offline reading skills, online reading skills, and prior knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research, 43, 352–392.

Alderman, N. (2013, July 12). How interactive technology is transforming storytelling. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www .theguardian.com/culture-professionals- network/culture-professionals-blog/2013/ jul/12/interactive-technology-transform- storytelling-fiction

Archer, A., & Richards, R. (Eds.). (2011). Changing spaces: Writing centres and access to higher education (Vol. 12). Sun Press. https://doi.org/10.7748/mhp.12.3.14.s20

Bell, S. (2019a). The contours of learning in digital writing projects. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/view/inside-digital-composing/home

Bell, S. (2019b). Learner-created podcasts: Fostering information literacies in a writing course. Canadian Journal for Studies in Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 29, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.31468/cjsdwr.747

Bell, S. & Hotson, B. (2019). Defining our digital identities. WLN: A Journal of Writing Center Scholarship (forthcoming).

Dimock, M. (2018). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/

Fry, R. & Parker, K. (2018). Early benchmarks show ‘post-millennials’ on track to be most diverse, best-educated generation yet: A demographic portrait of today’s 6- to 21-year-olds. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2018/11/15/early-benchmarks-show-post-millennials-on-track-to-be-most-diverse-best-educated-generation-yet/

García, R. (2019). Unmaking Gringo-Centers. The Writing Center Journal, 36(1), 29–60. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/44252637

Geller, A. E. (2005). Tick-Tock, Next: Finding Epochal Time in the Writing Center. The Writing Center Journal, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbi047

Huang, C. W., & Archer, A. (2017). ‘Academic literacies’ as moving beyond writing: Investigating multimodal approaches to academic argument. London Review of Education, 15(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.15.1.06

Kellner, D. (2000). New technologies/new literacies: Reconstructing education for the new millennium. Teaching Education, 11(2), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/713698975

Lea, M. R. (2013). Reclaiming literacies: Competing textual practices in a digital higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(1), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.756465

Littlejohn, A., Beetham, H., & Mcgill, L. (2012). Learning at the digital frontier: A review of digital literacies in theory and practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00474.x

Mirra, N., Morrell, E., & Filipiak, D. (2018). From Digital Consumption to Digital Invention: Toward a New Critical Theory and Practice of Multiliteracies. Theory into Practice, 57(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2017.1390336

Moeggenberg, Z. C. (2018). Keeping safe (and queer). In J. Alexander & J. Rhodes (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Digital Writing and Rhetoric (pp. 225–236). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315518497

Nobles, S., & Paganucci, L. (2015). Do Digital Writing Tools Deliver? Student Perceptions of Writing Quality Using Digital Tools and Online Writing Environments. Computers and Composition, 38, 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.001

Sekloča, P. (2018). The centre and the periphery: Productivity and the global networked public sphere. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 17(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v17i1.1062

van Rensburg, W. (2011). Changing Spaces: Writing Centres and Access to Higher Education (first, Vol. 12; A. Archer & R. Richards, eds.). https://doi.org/10.7748/mhp.12.3.14.s20

Why Reading on Mobile is Different (And What Course Designers Can Do About It). (2020) Shift: Disruptive Elearning. Retrieved from https://www.shiftelearning.com/blog/mobile-vs-desktop-reading-elearning

Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5