BLOCK A – DATA ABOUT THE TEACHER
Teacher code
Sex
In which Autonomous Community (or Autonomous City) is your educational center located?
At what educational stage do you primarily teach?
How many years of teaching experience do you have?
Before participating in the "School of Computational Thinking and Artificial Intelligence" (EPCIA) 2020/2021, had you used Scratch in your teaching?
Before participating in the "School of Computational Thinking and Artificial Intelligence" (EPCIA) 2020/2021, had you used Machine Learning for Kids (ML4K) in your teaching?
BLOCK B – DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DIDACTIC UNIT
How many sessions did your teaching unit consist of, as you initially designed it?
How many sessions have you finally managed to implement with your students?
Approximately, what percentage of what you initially planned in your teaching unit have you finally managed to implement?
In which subject(s) or area(s) have you mainly carried out the implementation of the teaching unit? (you can check multiple options)
Give a brief description of what the teaching unit that you have implemented with the students consisted of:
What difficulties and/or resistance have you encountered when implementing the teaching unit?
If you were to start again now with the implementation of the teaching unit, what changes and/or improvements would you introduce?
Finally, please remember: did you carry out any type of activity with Scratch and ML4K with your students, prior to the research pre-tests (Computational Thinking Test and Artificial Intelligence Test)?
BLOCK C – RATING SCALES
To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
The students found it EASY/EASY to carry out the teaching unit with Scratch and ML4K
The students have been MOTIVATED during the completion of the teaching unit with Scratch and ML4K
The students had FUN during the teaching unit with Scratch and ML4K
The students have DEVELOPED their COMPUTATIONAL THINKING as a consequence of the teaching unit with Scratch and ML4K
The students have LEARNED fundamentals of ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE as a result of the teaching unit with Scratch and ML4K
The teacher training received during the first phase of the EPCIA 2020/2021 has been USEFUL to carry out the implementation of the teaching unit with Scratch and ML4K
Developing COMPUTATIONAL THINKING is relevant for the PROFESSIONAL FUTURE (as workers) of your students
Developing COMPUTATIONAL THINKING is relevant to the PERSONAL FUTURE (as citizens) of your students.
Learning fundamentals of ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE is relevant for the PROFESSIONAL FUTURE (as workers) of your students
Learning fundamentals of ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE is relevant for the PERSONAL FUTURE (as citizens) of your students
In general terms, in what way do you consider it most appropriate to integrate computational thinking and artificial intelligence in the classroom?
Beyond what was answered in the previous question, and after passing through the EPCIA 2020/2021, indicate to what extent you consider that the following subjects or areas are suitable for integrating the teaching-learning of computational thinking and artificial intelligence (From "0=Not at all suitable" to "10=Completely suitable")
Looking ahead to the next academic year 2021/2022, do you plan to re-apply what you learned throughout the EPCIA 2020/2021 in your teaching?
BLOCK D – GLOBAL ASSESSMENT
What POSITIVE aspects would you highlight about the EPCIA 2020-2021?
What NEGATIVE aspects would you highlight about the EPCIA 2020-2021?
What SUGGESTIONS and/or PROPOSALS for improvement would you highlight for future editions of the EPCIA?
Globally, how do you value the experience of having participated as a teacher in the EPCIA 2020-2021?