We created a novel change detection dataset for peri-urban Hyderabad and analyzed the efficiency of various
unsupervised change detection algorithms using evaluation metrics like Kappa Value and Overall Accuracy
Change detection is the method of detecting variations in the condition of an object or phenomena
by watching it at distinct periods. In this research he compared three different machine learning
algorithms to create change maps. We used various evaluation metrics including Kappa value,
Error metrics and the overall accuracy. We also created a novel machine learning data set for the
entire peri urban Hyderabad. This dataset includes 702 images of the entire Hyderabad region.
This is the state-of-the-art database of the entire Peri-Urban Hyderabad. This dataset consists of
images of 10 m per pixel resolution. We compared our results and we concluded that DSFA gave
the worst results out of all the three models. PCA and DCVA gave highly similar results.
We also created a data set for the Jawahar Nagar dump yard region. The pollution over Jawahar
Nagar dump yard is analyzed using satellite data. We concluded that the pollution levels of the
Jawahar Nagar Dump yard were significantly higher in the months with high levels of heat and
moisture.
Peri urban Hyderabad has an important area in terms of land cover and land use changes. In
recent days change detection has become important in making various policy changes. There has
been an increase in the various kinds of change detection methods, and there is a need to
compare them against a benchmark metric and a good dataset. It was imperative to create our
own dataset which could be used to assess the land cover changes in this area. Moreover, recent
changes in landscape use and land cover have resulted in a reduction of vegetation cover, which
has indirectly led to increased pollution levels of areas.
In this study, we created a novel change detection dataset. This dataset includes 702 images of
117 different locations. Each of the images is initially taken in the dimension of (100,106). These
images are scaled into a dimension of (256,256). Each of the images has a spatial resolution of
1KM2
. The images are taken over three consecutive years of 2019, 2020, and 2021. The cloud
cover of each of these images is less than 5%. This ensures that we don’t get high atmospheric
variations in the images. The higher variation in the atmosphere significantly affects the change
maps. Hence, 5% is a suitable value for the cloud cover percentage of these images.
In this study, we also analyze various testing methods to evaluate each of the machine learning
models. Because of the ever-expanding variety of methodologies, algorithms, and procedures,
state-of-the-art remote sensing change detection assessments are becoming increasingly
sophisticated and divergent. We used the kappa coefficient and the error matrix to test our results.
A labeled dataset is imperative for any machine learning problem. In the research we created our
own ground truth data set. This involved comparing four different methods for creating the ground
truth change maps. The results of all of the methods to create the ground truth change maps are
discussed in the later sections.
Contact errijuldahiya(at)gmail.com to get more information on the project