Embedded Files
Religion is an extensive and fluid idea that can shift accordingly from person to person. America is often considered a melting pot and this surely should include religion; America should follow a pluralistic model rather than exclusive. Religious pluralism is an idea of all religions being equal in truth, with none situated or idolized above the rest - unlike exclusivism which holds an idea of being intolerant of other faiths besides "their" own, that other faiths are false because they reject the ‘true’ faith; similar to inclusivism which believes that while their religion is the truly the right one, other faiths are valid in their ideals.
America is suppose to be a place of pluralism, yet dissenting beliefs, places of worship, and people are attacked and brutalized on the basis of being different, of being wrong for not following the ‘true’ religion. Exclusivity is hurtful for not only casting away different sets of beliefs, but also for condemning different people for their paths to reach a certain sense of betterment. Politically - America drastically ranges in how it deals with this idea of a separation of religions, and the impact it has on everyday lives is something I wish to outline in this website.
Alternatively, pluralism could instead lead to a higher, more connected, and empathetic society with a better understanding of life and perhaps a shift away from the traditional setbacks caused by remaining isolated and ignorant. Pluralism could lead to achieving cohesion not only politically but, culturally and religiously as well.
The Issue:
The Issue:
Pluralism and Politics
Pluralism and Politics
Restricting religion is an, “extremely counter-cultural [regression,] especially for departments of theology and religious studies that laud pluralism” (Strange)
Religious pluralism is a hotly debated subject within politics. There is a strong divide between allowing a sense of pluralism (or civil religion) within politics and being completely secular in government affairs.
Politicians and devote religious followers rationalize religious pluralism for many reasons; not limited to selfish self-preservation ones, or actually believing in the theory. The contention mainly seems to be if religious pluralism should be left for show, to claim to be accepting of all, or if they should actually implement cohesion in their respected areas (religion and politics).
Located on the Left is link to a website that features an example of just some of the many arguments and rationalizations people contend with in favor for and against religious pluralism.
I link the website to further outline my intention and provide similiar context with my information. I hopefully spark curiosity with my research here while I provide my own voice on a very mixed issue.
Google Sites
Report abuse