If you want over-ear noise cancellation and up to 22 hours of listening time, choose Beats Studio3; if you need compact, sweat- and water-resistant earbuds for running, choose Raycon Everyday. For a runner choosing between these two, the key distinction is the format: Beats covers the ears, while Raycon sits in them and is specified as IPX4 sweat- and water-resistant.
• Beats Studio3 strength: Over-ear design with active noise cancellation and real-time audio calibration. Trade-off: It is not an in-ear running earbud, and its stated battery life is up to 22 hours.
• Raycon Everyday strength: In-ear fit, IPX4 sweat- and water-resistance, and up to 32 hours of playtime when the case is included. Trade-off: The earbuds provide up to 8 hours per charge, with the additional 24 hours coming from the case.
• Choose Beats Studio3 if you want over-ear headphones for focused listening and long stretches between charges.
• Choose Raycon Everyday if you want true wireless earbuds for running, workouts, or a compact everyday setup.
Beats Studio3 is an over-ear wireless headphone with active noise cancellation. Its Pure ANC is designed to block external noise, while real-time audio calibration is intended to preserve the listening experience. That combination makes it a more natural fit for listening in a noisy indoor setting, during a commute, or at a desk than for someone prioritizing a small running earbud.
The stated listening time is up to 22 hours. That offers a long stretch of wireless playback before recharging, though it is less total stated playtime than Raycon claims when its charging case is included. Beats also works with iOS and Android devices and uses Bluetooth. A 3.5 mm headphone jack is listed, giving this model a wired connection option as well as wireless listening.
The over-ear format is the central compromise for exercise. The supplied information does not specify a sweat- or water-resistance rating, so I would not choose it over Raycon on the basis of workout protection. It may suit someone who wants noise cancellation and over-ear coverage for listening away from workouts, but the form factor is less tailored to running than a compact in-ear pair.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Who should skip this: Skip Beats Studio3 if your priority is an in-ear fit with a stated sweat- and water-resistance rating for runs.
Raycon Everyday is a Bluetooth in-ear model designed around a compact fit. It comes with multiple ear-tip sizes, which gives buyers options for adjusting how the earbuds sit. The listed IPX4 sweat- and water-resistance makes it the more exercise-oriented choice here, including for running and other workouts. That rating is a specific protection detail, not a reason to treat the earbuds as suitable for every water-related activity.
Its battery figures need a little unpacking: Raycon lists up to 8 hours of playtime without the case and up to 24 extra hours from the case, for up to 32 hours combined. That makes the case part of the battery plan. If you often carry it, the extra charge capacity can help keep the earbuds going across a full day of listening; the earbuds themselves are not specified to run for 32 hours on one charge.
Raycon also includes active noise cancellation and works with iOS and Android devices over Bluetooth. Its in-ear design, included case, and resistance rating make it the more practical match for a runner who wants earbuds rather than headphones. The trade-off is that the stated single-charge listening time is shorter than Beats Studio3’s up-to-22-hour figure, and the overall playtime depends on having the case available.
Who should skip this: Skip Raycon Everyday if you specifically want over-ear headphones or need a listed 22-hour listening stretch from the headphones themselves.
• Best fit for running → Raycon Everyday. Its in-ear format and IPX4 sweat- and water-resistance align more directly with workouts than Beats Studio3’s over-ear design.
• Best for over-ear listening → Beats Studio3. The ear placement is explicitly over-ear, which may appeal if earbuds are not your preferred fit.
• Best stated total playtime with a case → Raycon Everyday. It offers up to 32 hours combined, made up of up to 8 hours from the earbuds and 24 additional hours from the case.
• Best for a longer stated headphone listening stretch → Beats Studio3. Its listed battery life is up to 22 hours, without a separate case-based total in the supplied details.
• Best if you want a wired option → Beats Studio3. It lists a 3.5 mm headphone jack alongside Bluetooth.
• Best for adjusting an in-ear fit → Raycon Everyday. Multiple ear-tip sizes are included, letting you choose among the provided fit options.
• Best if you want active noise cancellation in either format → Tie. Both list active noise cancellation; the bigger practical distinction is over-ear Beats versus in-ear Raycon.
• Best for a runner looking for true wireless earbuds → Raycon Everyday. Its in-ear design and charging case suit that use case more directly than an over-ear wireless headset.
For running, start with fit and resistance rather than treating battery life as the only deciding factor. Raycon is the direct match if you want an in-ear design with a stated IPX4 rating. Its multiple ear-tip sizes may help you find a more comfortable fit, but the supplied details do not guarantee that every ear shape will find the earbuds secure. Fit is personal, so the included options matter more than a broad claim that an earbud will suit everyone.
Beats Studio3’s strongest distinction is its over-ear format. That can make sense for home, work, or travel listening when you prefer headphones that sit around the ears. Its active noise cancellation and real-time audio calibration are relevant features for focused listening, but those details do not change the fact that it is not the in-ear, sweat- and water-resistant option in this comparison.
Think carefully about what each battery number represents. Beats lists up to 22 hours of listening time. Raycon lists up to 8 hours from the earbuds and up to 24 additional hours from the case. The combined Raycon figure is useful if you will carry and recharge from the case; it should not be confused with the runtime of a single earbud charge.
Finally, consider how you plan to connect. Both products use Bluetooth and are compatible with iOS and Android. Beats also lists a 3.5 mm jack, while Raycon lists no headphone jack. If wired listening is important to you, that difference points clearly to Beats. If your priority is a compact Bluetooth setup for running, Raycon is the more relevant design.
I would choose Raycon Everyday for running because its in-ear design and IPX4 sweat- and water-resistance fit that use better.
The 8-hour earbud runtime is the figure I would plan around between case charges, not the 32-hour combined total.
I’d choose Beats Studio3 instead for over-ear listening, active noise cancellation, and a listed 3.5 mm connection.
For a runner specifically looking for true wireless earbuds, Raycon is my pick.
Raycon Everyday is the more running-oriented option in this comparison: it has an in-ear design and a stated IPX4 sweat- and water-resistance rating. Beats Studio3 is over-ear, and no sweat- or water-resistance rating is provided in its listed details.
Beats lists up to 22 hours of listening time. Raycon lists up to 8 hours from the earbuds and up to 32 hours total when the case’s additional 24 hours are included. The figures describe different setups, so consider whether you want a long headphone session or case-supported charging.
Yes. Both list active noise cancellation. Beats describes Pure ANC and real-time audio calibration; Raycon also lists active noise cancellation.
Neither product’s supplied details specify USB-C charging, so I would not choose between them on that basis. For running, Raycon has the relevant stated design features: an in-ear fit and IPX4 sweat- and water-resistance. Check the current product details for the charging connector before buying.
• fiio jt7 or ft1 pro: which is better
• Generic B39 vs HQYWDSMQE 5.4: Bluetooth Foldable Headphones
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.