Location: Chippenham, Wiltshire
Dedication: St. Andrew
Denomination: Church of England
Features of Interest: C13 parish chest, C14 incised slab
Useful External Links:
Historic England Listing (Grade II*)
The exterior of the church from the northwest. | Taken 16/07/24
Chippenham is a fairly large market town in Wiltshire with its core nestled into a bend in the River Avon. The town is a strange place, lacking the custom of a touristic or community settlement, but still retaining a fairly large amount of historic architecture and fabric, and this includes the parish church of St. Andrew. Although a substantial amount of the current fabric of the building dates only from the Victorian rebuilding of the church, there is much contained within its walls to capture the interest of any ardent church-crawler. A Saxon foundation, the site has constantly developed over the centuries and, as is often the case, each era has left calling cards within the building's fabric and furnishings.
There has been a church on this site since at least the 9th century, with the initial Saxon church building being a small wooden chapel where Æthelswith of Wessex (the sister of King Alfred the Great) was wed to King Burgred of Mercia. It is known that the building had been replaced in stone by around 1120, from which time the oldest surviving fabric of the church dates. Admittedly, said fabric has been greatly chopped and changed by the Victorians, but what remains is still indomitably Norman Romanesque. Firstly, the round arch which leads to the vestry to the left of the chancel was originally the chancel arch before its rebuilding in the 1870s, at which point the arch was moved to its present position. Secondly, there is a Norman window to the right of this arch which was moved from the original north wall during the same period of rebuilding, and contains the church's only surviving medieval glass.
Of course, the church could not escape the hands of the Victorian restorers and underwent a major period of rebuilding and reordering from 1875 to 1878 by R. Darley, including the rebuilding of the nave and chancel, and the addition of a north aisle in a sympathetic Perpendicular style, in keeping with the remainder of the building. The organ was moved to its present position from the west gallery which was removed at this time, and many memorials were also moved. The clerestory in the nave was inserted in this period, and the chancel was extended by some 6m to the east, as well as the aforementioned repositioning of the chancel arch and Norman window.
The south side of the main body of the church contains much Perpendicular architecture, including the Lady Chapel (rebuilt in 1442 by the Hungerford family), the south aisle, and the St. Katherine's chapel. The latter was built in the late 15th century by the Fraternity of St. Katherine, a cloth workers' guild local to the area, and consisted of a guild meeting room on the ground floor with a still extant spiral staircase giving access to a chapel on the since removed floor above. The area is now used as the baptistery and as such contains the font (I am not sure of the date, but it looks to be late 15th/early 16th century). The former St. Andrew's chantry chapel (which now houses the organ) dating from 1322 does not seem to have been rebuilt in the Victorian restoration but is sandwiched between later material in such a way that there is little to separate it from this 19th century reconstruction.
The tower is currently in its third iteration, which is often surprising for a church; needless to say, building a tower has always been something of a large undertaking, and as a general principle it can be taken for granted that no matter how often the rest of the church is rebuilt and extended, the church's first tower will usually remain its tower throughout due to the excessive and unnecessary difficulty involved with any potential rebuilding and can often be the oldest surviving part of the building. However, at St. Andrew's, the first tower was built in the 14th century and rebuilt after a relatively short period in the 15th century, at which point the spire was added. The third, Gothic Survival style rebuilding dates from 1633 and involved lowering the height by fifteen feet (perhaps for safety reasons, as the oversized clasping buttresses seem to date from this period too). The lower stage was not rebuilt in either case and as such retains its 14th century lancet windows.
The information here has been taken variously from the church guide (leaflet available from the church), the church website, and the Historic England listing.
The church's setting is a relatively pleasant one - much of the architecture on the historic market square which adjoins the church precinct is wholly complimentary and imbues the building with a sense of integration into the built environment and historic fabric of the town, which is more than can be said for many urban churches in the modern era. Despite the sensitivity of its setting, the aspect is not one of the more picture-perfect in the country, with it being difficult to achieve an unbroken line of sight which encapsulates the effect of the building as a whole, and, as such, the aesthetic impact of the church is not as powerful as it might otherwise be. No matter - the spire is visible from afar, and the main attractions of this church lie within its walls anyway.
The church is entered from the west end through the tower's lower stage which acts as a porch. Passing through some glass doors will take you into the main body of the church, which gives the impression of being wider than it is long, despite this not being the case. This is mainly down to the relative daintiness of the nave arcade pillars which have the effect of opening up the aisles which join with the nave to form a large, lateral unit, and combining this with the strongly articulated chancel screen, the layout is transformed into a space with almost hall church-like proportions. The congregation's side of the building therefore feels spacious and open, with the chancel almost situated like another world beyond.
As a whole, the building is relatively dark, despite the Victorian clerestory windows battling against the gloom. The area surrounding the organ is especially dim, but the contrast between this area and the baptistery, lit by multiple large windows with clear glass, is enormous. Nevertheless, the church mostly maintains unity and sanctity in its feel, and aptly encloses the space in an atmospheric manner. The modern fittings, including the toilet and kitchen area of 2012, the moveable chairs, and the wooden areas of the floor, prevent the space from having the ancient and hallowed ambience common to many medieval churches, but show that the church is active and well-used.
Chippenham St. Andrew's contains two principal treasures in my eyes. Whilst the celebrated Prynne memorial is a noteworthy piece of craftsmanship (and I will of course discuss it), the standout pieces of heritage which align with my own particular priorities of interest are a mysterious and rustic incised effigial slab of the 14th century, and the remarkable and charming 13th century parish chest. Also of note are the rare 18th century Bryce Seede organ and, a personal inclusion, the amusing selection of less than anatomically-inspired skull carvings of the late 17th & early 18th centuries.
Upon entering the Lady Chapel, one is greeted with an excellent collection of memorial stonework at the back wall. Of note are the unique chain of 17th century memorial tablets commemorating past worshippers and the 1570 table tomb of Andrew and his son Sir Edward Baynton, but the single piece which inevitably caught my eye and immediately superseded these other memorials (which are all fine memorials in their own right) is an incised effigial slab mounted on the wall above the Baynton tomb, a somewhat severe and mournful figure which is rather evocative in its crudeness. The effigy, which is thought to date from the 13th or 14th century depicts a recumbent lady with her hands linked in prayer (in a manner which is, in all honesty, anatomically improbable at best), is life-size and carved in light relief into the slab, with a canopy above her head and the remnants of a Norman French inscription running down the left hand side.
The woman's face is solemn and doleful, and despite the centuries of wear and damage, manages to express a kind of soulful penitence, with her glassy-eyed (stony-eyed?) stare being both chilling and communicating the warmth of her humanity across the centuries; a stare from the mortal realm into the transient. The way in which this monument captures both the spirits of the carver and the commemorated piqued my curiosity, especially as the monument's situation raises a lot of questions about its identity and story. The information board in the Lady Chapel does not so much as mention the slab, and there is little in the church guide to shed any light on the situation. Even the Historic England listing glosses over it, going only so far as to mention the 'repositioned medieval relief carving of [a] figure (origin unknown).' The church website has a more satisfying account, but many uncertainties still remain.
The effigial slab mounted on the east wall of the Lady Chapel. It is difficult to photograph, as the Baynton tomb beneath does not allow getting physically closer, and its position in the corner of the wall causes half of it to be significantly shaded. | Taken 16/07/24
A closer look at the effigy's upper half, showing the detail of her headdress and facial features. Here it can be seen just quite how awkwardly the hands have been designed and positioned, but equally how the canopy above her head is rather ornate and well-executed in relation to the rest of the monument. | Taken 16/07/24
The figure was discovered under the floor in 1847 during a reordering of the church when the box pews were removed. The churchwardens thankfully did not follow the surprisingly common course of action of simply disposing of it, and instead it was mounted in its present position. The inscription is now severely damaged, but the website implies that it was legible at the time of discovery and suggests that the surviving portion read '...Clerk and his wife Alis, founders of a chantry.' A notable landowner by the name of John Clerk is recorded during the reign of Edward III (1327-1377) and the website suggests that he and his wife were founders of the 1322 St. Andrew's chantry chapel (now housing the organ). Of course, 1322 lies outside of Edward III's reign, but it is possible that they founded the chantry before the aforementioned record was made.
So, mystery solved then? Whilst this translation of the inscription may be able to place the figure in time and provide an explanation of her link with the church here in Chippenham, the slab itself still presents more mysteries. The most ubiquitous question raised is, of course: what happened to her husband? The effigy is clearly supposed to be paired; the canopy above her head peaks at the edge of the slab and is obviously supposed to continue symmetrically over the head of another figure on the right; the inscription only covers the left hand side and base of the slab, implying its intended continuation on a now lost right hand side; and, of course, the inscription actually mentions two people. Of course, monuments such as these get damaged over the centuries, especially incised and relief slabs which are particularly susceptible to weathering, but it stands to reason that, had John's effigy been similarly hidden, it would have been found in 1847 along with Alis, so their separation must date to some time before their sequestration beneath the church floor. The circumstances of such a separation, along with the artistic artifact of John Clerk's effigy, may never be known. Another intriguing aspect lies in the placement of the inscription itself. Whilst mostly located on a border at the edge of the slab, the inscription does actually clip over the edge of her arm, which presents a number of possibilities. Firstly, that the inscription was added later, after the figure carving had been made and the slab cut to size; secondly, that the inscription is contemporary, but the carver clipped the arm due to either ineptitude in measurement, consciously with dearth of artistic vision, or apathy. Regarding the first possibility, this puts the veracity of the inscription under scrutiny, as the addition of time creates significant room for error as stories become garbled and memories fade. The second possibility is potentially the more likely one; one look at the fingers of the figure shows us that we are not looking upon the work of a master craftsman, although the canopy above her head shows a slightly more refined touch. Perhaps a carver more comfortable working in tracery than with the human form?
Of course, much of the above is purely speculation; countless effigies with similar questions attached exist across the country and often simply aren't significant enough to prompt serious and professional discussion and research. What we are left with is a physical record of a person, an indisputable bookmark in the annals of history which attempts to ground the human behind it amidst the unconquerable sands of posterity. Yet even stone must erode and even the mighty must be forgotten. However much one ponders these questions, it may be that we must simply accept that the story of Alis Clerk is lost to time.
This notable piece of heritage is not exactly displayed in pride of place; the toilet and kitchen area installed in 2012 tightly flanks the chest and many of my photos are awkward and involved me moving several information boards and crouching half under a table in order to properly see the detail. At any rate, the contortionist efforts are worth it for any visitor as this 13th century parish chest is a beautiful and rare example of medieval woodwork, adorned with unique carvings which combine geometric patterns with allegorical scenes lifted from the medieval bestiary.
The remarkable front panel of the chest in all its glory, complete with obtrusive table leg. The main body of the chest and its pin hinges are all original, whilst the lid is a replacement. (As a side note, one would think that placing it directly in front of a radiator wouldn't be the best idea for its physical conservation!) | Taken 16/07/24
Originally the chest would have been used to store vestments and other precious items, and in an era where the vast majority of the congregation would have been illiterate, even a functional item such as this provided an opportunity not to be missed to teach Christian values through pictorial means. In between the three geometric components of the front panel, there are six scenes depicting various symbolic combinations of animals. These are described by the church website as 'the Lamb of God between two doves bearing olive branches; a pair of unicorns; a fox preaching to fowls; a pair of leopards; a hound chasing a stag; and an owl mobbed by small birds.' The geometric designs themselves are precise and attractive, striking a pleasing balance between intricacy and simple harmony. Not only is the composition and execution of the chest charming and accomplished, it is also in a commendable state of preservation and has found a second life as toy storage for the church's active children's clubs. It is an excellent piece of authentic medieval craftsmanship; if only it were situated in a place where it would be easier to appreciate!
The first scene, showing the Lamb (sausage dog?) of God between two doves (ducks?) of peace holding olive branches (shamrocks!). The symbolism conflating the doves of peace with the Lamb of God is overt and strong. | Taken 16/07/24
The second scene is possibly my favourite, with this majestic pair of slightly saurian looking unicorns squaring up to one another. | Taken 16/07/24
The third scene shows a (dubious) fox with a crozier, preaching to a group of fowls and ducks who listen attentively. A scene with these animals in similar roles can be found at Brent Knoll in Somerset and represents the devil leading astray unwary souls.| Taken 16/07/24
The fourth scene; the church website identifies these as leopards, but they look more like lions to me, which are more common in medieval English art. | Taken 16/07/24
The fifth scene is the most dynamic, with the hunting hound on the left in hot pursuit of the stag. Evidently, these two animals are the only ones with which the carver seemed to be able to operate with any anatomical confidence! | Taken 16/07/24
The sixth scene; I'm not sure quite how much the owl is being 'mobbed' by the birds either side of it, as all three of them seem quite sedate. This is the panel which has received the most damage, but is still entirely complete in its composition. | Taken 16/07/24
This wall-mounted memorial to Sir Gilbert Prynne and his family dates from 1628 and is mounted on the wall of the south aisle. The memorial depicts Sir Gilbert and his wife, Mary (née Davies) kneeling in prayer under an illustrious canopy, with their seven children lined up beneath them. The two central daughters are larger and project forward on a pedestal, while the remaining five flank them at the wall and hold skulls. This composition indicates that the central two were the only ones to survive to adulthood; a grim reminder of the child mortality rate of their day, and how no family, no matter how wealthy, could reliably shield themselves from tragedy. However, their inclusion in the memorial in itself signifies an enduring hope that the family would be reunited in heaven, a bittersweet belief which the family must have held on to throughout their lives. The monument was originally installed in the Lady Chapel where it blocked the westernmost window, but was moved to its present position during the Victorian restoration of 1875-78 and the window reopened. The inscription at the base of the monument would probably have been legible for the most part had I the time to pore over it, but as it is, the text is in too poor a condition to be interpreted casually.
The Prynne memorial mounted on the south wall. The canopy surrounding Sir Gilbert and Mary is splendidly decorated with pilasters, obelisks, cherubs, scrolls, and heraldry, with a solitary skull placed deep in the central spandrel, reminding those who gaze upon this fine work of funerary art that they will soon follow these glorious dead.| Taken 16/07/24
Detail of the Prynne child furthest to the right, dressed in fine clothes and cradling a skull, displaying a stark symbol of their premature mortality. | Taken 16/07/24
The organ is located in what used to be St. Andrew's chantry chapel prior to the Reformation, and is remarkably dimly lit, its lurking presence evoking the dark and ancient sounds of church organ music established in the public mind. Once your eyes have adjusted to the gloom, however, you will be able to see that the organ case is in fact a finely crafted piece of work, harmonious and well-proportioned. The case dates from the original building of the organ in 1752 by Bryce (or Brice) Seede of Bristol, regarded as one of the finest West Country organ builders of his time, and is one of only two such examples by Seede to survive to the present day, the other being a chamber organ of 1769 located at Powderham Castle in Devon. Originally located in the now vanished west gallery, the inauguration of the organ was celebrated by a ball at the nearby Angel Hotel. By 1860 it had fallen into disrepair, and during the 1870s restoration it was moved to its present location when the west gallery was removed, and rebuilt by Gray & Davidson in 1879 with three manuals, reusing much of the original pipework. It was rebuilt again by Percy Daniel & Co. of Cleveden in 1965 and the console is now located in the Lady Chapel.
The finely crafted case itself is carved in the Baroque style from oak, richly decorated with Corinthian capitals and ornamented cornice moulding, and is crowned by two angels with golden trumpets.
The organ case of 1752; despite the best efforts of my digital phone camera (which automatically switched to night mode at this point), the lighting conditions remain unkind, but the design and craftsmanship can still be appreciated. | Taken 16/07/24
My best attempt at capturing the fine detail at the top of the case. The intricacy of the carving is remarkably well executed, with the gilded angel standing resplendent at the top, although the whole thing could use a bit of a dust by the looks of the cobwebs! | Taken 16/07/24
It is somewhat astounding, the disparity in craftsmanship which can be found within church buildings. Some of the more... rustic contributions which can be found are reminders that bodgers, incompetents, and simply average people have always existed and worked in our towns and villages, which is perhaps a reassuring thought. In particular, a field in which the work of these people survive is the execution of funerary monuments and grave slabs. The less eminent and the more rural you were, the less likely you were to be able to employ a master mason to produce a beautiful monument to you or a loved one, and so many examples from the oeuvres of less than masterful local craftspeople survive, especially from around the end of the 17th century and the beginning of the 18th when gravestones and memorials began to become more universal. A popular motif in memorials at this time was that of a skull, a powerful and explicit memento mori, designed to remind the onlooker of their own mortal transience, but it is evident that many local engravers had a less than fully accurate grasp of the actual anatomy of a skull. One can usually find one or two such examples in your average town or country church, but here at Chippenham there are no fewer than ten instances of a laughably executed skull motif on a memorial, and there may be yet more which I missed when exploring the building. Many of these commemorate members of the Scott family, and one can infer that they were not exactly poor, and not the most rural either, but still the craftsmanship provides ample hilarity to modern eyes.
Skull 1: This first example is found on the west wall of the nave. The volume of decoration is ambitious in relation to the artist's proficiency, but as a whole still manages to be satisfactory. The skull itself, however, is gormless and cartoonishly designed. | Taken 16/07/24
Skull 3: Alice Gouldney's tablet of 1670 is of a similar design to Skull 2, although it dates from some 40+ years prior. It is located above Skull 2 in the west wall and is rather high up and difficult to photograph, but the skull can still be appreciated (or rather, ridiculed). | Taken 16/07/24
Skull 5: This example of 1664 has a strong claim to being the worst. Poor old Eleanor Scott has the indignity of being commemorated here, with an inscription beneath two crude rosettes and a skull which appears to belong to Beaker from the Muppets. | Taken 16/07/24
Skull 7: This stone commemorates the 'young man of best hope' John Scott who died in 1702 aged only 17. The skull is damaged and is missing its jaw, giving it a distinctly Zorro-esque look, but the addition of the missing lower half would not, unfortunately, in any way boost the artistic quality of the carving. | Taken 16/07/24
Skull 9: This more colourful example is located on the back wall of the Lady Chapel and commemorates Mary Chappell (appropriate name!) who died in 1689. The composition is slightly bizarre, not least the strange red faces peeking out from either side of the base of the oculus containing the main skull, and the skull itself is reminiscent of a peat bog mummy's skin. | Taken 16/07/24
Skull 2: This early 18th century tablet commemorating one Walter Scott is also located on the west wall of the nave. It features a skull (apparently) between two rosettes and seems to have been produced on bring your child to work day. | Taken 16/07/24
Skull 4: Skulls 4 to 8 are located in a row on the west wall of the baptistery, and were unfortunately partially obscured by stacks of chairs. Of these, Skull 4 from 1666 is the most elaborately ornamented and commemorates Maria Brookes, with the skull itself peering through an oculus at the top of the stone.| Taken 16/07/24
Skull 6: Dating from 1694, this stone commemorates Jonathan Scott. The fact that this is one of the better examples relative to the others really puts into context the quality we are dealing with here. | Taken 16/07/24
Skull 8: Elizabeth Scott's 1718 memorial follows the favoured composition of most of the previous stones, with a skull floating between two rosettes. Again, whilst on the better end of the spectrum, it is hardly able to hold its own among any other company. | Taken 16/07/24
Skull 10: The final skull is found at the cusp of one of the string of memorial tablets underneath the east window of the Lady Chapel, with this simian instance of a skull crowning the monument above a fleur-de-lys. The monument commemorates Grace and William Pew (more appropriate names!) who died in 1635 and 1648 respectively. | Taken 16/07/24
There's something perverse about the way in which these attempts at poignant reminders of mortality have been so poorly executed that they cannot exist as anything other than hilarious in our eyes today. The souls commemorated in this way cannot have intended this to be the effect of their memorials, but equally cannot possibly have seen the products as remotely serious works of art. The societal and personal role of death and its relation to art is an enormous and nuanced topic, and these individual memorials have a societal and personal context which can only be imagined in the present day, but being able to laugh with these people across the gap of hundreds of years is a valuable, if macabre, experience.
The exterior of the church as viewed from the north. The aisle visible on the right is Victorian with the 1633 tower visible behind. The vestry in the foreground dates from 1907. | Taken 16/07/24
The churchyard, facing the south side of the church, featuring some of the large collection of table tombs in the grounds. | Taken 16/07/24
The interior of the church facing east, showing the war memorial screen of 1921 and flexible nave seating. | Taken 16/07/24
The font, situated in the former St. Katherine's chapel on the south side of the church. The glass behind dates from 1907. | Taken 16/07/24
The interior facing west taken from the chancel. The slate and limestone chequered floor in the centre dates from the early 18th century. | Taken 16/07/24
An intriguing recess in the south wall of the chancel. This is not mentioned by the church either in its website or in the guide, and the Historic England listing only goes as far as speculation: 'an arched recess, the moulding articulated by bosses, possibly housing a former tomb.' To me, it doesn't look quite long enough to fit an effigy, and the wooden panelling behind seems like an unnecessary insert. The floating panel of tracery above the recess also receives no explanation, but seems to be related. Whatever it is, it seems to have survived the Victorian rebuilding of the chancel. | Taken 16/07/24
The Norman former chancel arch now framing the entrance to the vestry. Only the inner two courses of chevron decoration are original; the rest of the carving, including the jambs, is Victorian. The screen, now with additional modern inserts of blind panels and a door, was formerly the chancel screen and seems be late C16/early C17. | Taken 16/07/24
The Norman window in the north wall of the chancel, moved here during the Victorian restoration. This contains the church's only remaining medieval glass, depicting the church's dedicated saint, St. Andrew. I am not sure of the exact date, and I am by no means an expert so will not attempt to date it myself, but the delicate linework and grainy appearance cement it as medieval work. | Taken 16/07/24
The church seems to be well-resourced and home to an active community; the very fact that it is kept open is testimoney to this. Generally in a town of Chippenham's size, the parish church will be kept locked as a rule in order to prevent heritage crime, but St. Andrews is regularly open from 8am till 5:30pm which adds so much to the ability of the town to be experienced as a historical and cultural location. The fabric of a settlement's history and the story of its people are invariably found within the walls of its church, and the access to St. Andrew's is a welcome asset of Chippenham. The fittings in the church also belie an active congregation and community, with a recently installed toilet and kitchen area (2012) and moveable seating ensuring the flexibility of the space, and a dedicated children's area in the south aisle being a nice touch in terms of engagement, if not in terms of aesthetics. The church clearly values this involvement of young people, and this attitude is aptly summed up on the information board for the parish chest: 'Chests of this period were used to store vestments and other valuables... It is now home to far more precious things - toys for our children's clubs.'