Research
Papers
(If only published version is linked, it's because it is freely available)
Metalinguistic Gradability (with Alexander Kocurek)
Accepted pending revisions at Semantics and Pragmatics
Metalinguistic gradable constructions express speakers' relative commitments to different linguistic interpretations
Contested Metalinguistic Negotiation
Synthese (2023)
published version | preprint | Using public discussion about the 1619 Project as a case study, I explore how to account for disagreements about the status of a dispute as metalinguistic or factual
Acquaintance and evidence in appearance language
Linguistics and Philosophy (2023)
published version | preprint | Appearance sentences look like they have two different types of acquaintance inferences; an expressivist approach can predict both without building perception into the semantics
Differences of Taste: An Investigation of Phenomenal and Non-phenomenal Appearance Sentences
Perspectives on Taste (2022), edited by Jeremy Wyatt, Julia Zakkou and Dan Zeman. Routledge.
published version | preprint | Is the apparent ambiguity with 'taste good' (and similar sensory-evaluative predicates) due to features of 'taste' or 'good'? The latter answer has more going for it than previously recognized
Conceptual Exploration
Inquiry (2021)
published version | preprint | We explore our concepts in lots of ways, including supposing alternative concepts and comparing conceptual choices; recognizing this gives a new perspective on conceptual engineering and how to respond to its skeptics
Comparing Conventions (with Alexander W. Kocurek)
Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 30 (2020)
published version | Metalinguistic comparatives are more expressions of comparative linguistic commitments than anything else
Against Conventional Wisdom (with Alexander W. Kocurek and Ethan Jerzak)
Philosophers' Imprint (2020)
published version | We argue against the conventional wisdom that truth is always evaluated using our actual linguistic conventions
Talking about appearances: the roles of evaluation and experience in disagreement
Philosophical Studies (2020)
published version | preprint | I illustrate relativists effects, like faultless disagreement, in discourse about appearances and argue that such disagreement about matters of taste is due to experiential rather than evaluative language
A closer look at the perceptual source in copy raising constructions
Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 23 (2019)
published version | Experimental work shows that perceptual requirements on appearance sentences depend on the verb, predicate, and context; this leads to theoretical reevaluation and comparison of appearance reports and evidentials
The acquaintance inference with seem-reports
Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (2019)
preprint | Not all copy raising 'seem'-reports (e.g., "Tom seems like he's cooking") require perception of the subject; experimental work suggests this requirement depends on whether the predicate is stage-level or individual-level
Miscellaneous
Analytic Entailment (with Alexander W. Kocurek and Ethan Jerzak)
Task contributed to: A. Srivastava, et al. Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models (2022)
arXiv preprint | our task
Review of Wylie Breckenridge's Visual Experience: A Semantic Approach
The Philosophical Review (2021)
published version | preprint
Manuscripts
[Redacted] (with Elay Shech and Mike Tamir; under review)
Philosophers have worried a lot about the feasibility of conceptual engineering; machine learning can help, especially thanks to de-biasing tools
Social Generics in Context
When are generics about social groups problematic? I argue that QUD gives us the answer
Engineering Conceptual Prototypes
Conceptual engineering that targets prototypes has many advantages over more traditional conceptual engineering, including opening up fruitful connections with machine learning
(Drafts available upon request)
Presentations (recent and upcoming)
TBD, Summer School on Philosophy and AI, University of London (Paris Branch), July 2024
Engineering Conceptual Prototypes, Monash University, May 2024
Engineering Conceptual Prototypes, Conceptual Engineering Online Seminar, October 2023
Social Generics in Context, Alabama Philosophical Society, Pensacola FL, September 2023
Bias, Machine Learning, and Conceptual Engineering (with Elay Shech and Mike Tamir), CEIC Workshop: Conceptual Engineering, Changing the Subject, and Continuity of Communication and Inquiry, Uppsala University, June 2023
Social Generics, Social Kinds, and Context, Metaphysics Conference, Inter-University Center, Dubrovnik, June 2023
Bias, Machine Learning, and Conceptual Engineering (with Elay Shech and Mike Tamir), Nature of Bias Conference, Claremont McKenna College, April 2023
Contested Metalinguistic Negotiation, Central APA, Denver CO, February 2023
Social Generics in Context, Eastern APA, Montreal QC, January 2023
Contested Metalinguistic Negotiation, Experiments and Ordinary Language Philosophy, Berlin, June 2022
Metalinguistic Gradability and Semantic Expressivism (with Arc Kocurek), Expressivist Approaches to Meaning, University of Amsterdam/ILLC, May 2022
Metalinguistic Gradability (with Arc Kocurek), National University of Singapore, March 2022
Differences of Taste: Analyzing Epistemic and Phenomenal Appearance Sentences, Pacific APA, April 2021
Conceptual Exploration, Eastern APA, January 2021
Comparing Conventions (with Arc Kocurek), Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 30 (poster session), Cornell University/Virtual, August 2020
Against Conventional Wisdom (with Arc Kocurek and Ethan Jerzak), Eastern APA, Philadelphia PA, January 2020
Dissertation
Talking about Appearances: Experience, Evaluation, and Evidence in Discourse
When we talk about appearances -- for instance, saying that a stick in water looks bent, or that a drink tastes sweet -- we seem to communicate both about the objective world and about our subjective experience. This comes out in two puzzling features of claims about appearances. First, they generate faultless disagreement: cases where two speakers disagree, as if over an objective fact, and yet neither seems to be mistaken, given that each has a different perceptual experience of the subject matter. Second, they license the acquaintance inference: the inference that the speaker has first-hand acquaintance with the subject matter of the claim. I account for these two features through an expressivist analysis of experiential language, and argue that the analysis also illuminates the evaluative language of personal taste.
You can find the full text here.