List of Papers Citing Packages

This page lists English and Japanese papers citing R packages for stated preference methods developed by Hideo Aizaki and his colleagues as of 31 July 2023.


2016 (2)

Mostafa M.M. (2016). Egyptian consumers' willingness to pay for carbon-labeled products: A contingent valuation analysis of socio-economic factors, Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 821–828. 

Mostafa M.M. and Al-Hamdi M. (2016). Kuwaiti consumers' willingness to pay for environmental protection in Failaka island: A contingent valuation analysis, Tourism Review, 71(3), 219–233.


2017 (2)

Lin Y., Wijedasa L.S. and Chisholm R.A. (2017). Singapore's willingness to pay for mitigation of transboundary forest-fire haze from Indonesia, Environmental Research Letters, 12(2), 024017. 

 岡田知也・三戸勇吾・高橋俊之・高濱繁盛・秋山吉寛・黒岩寛・渡辺謙太・棚谷灯子・杉野弘明・徳永佳奈恵・久保雄広・桑江朝比呂 (2017). 干潟健全度指数と経済的価値による干潟のサービスの統合的評価手法, 土木学会論文集B2(海岸工学), 73(2), I_1561–I_1566.


2018 (5)

Kadowaki H., Duc P.P., Sato K., Phuong P.T.M., Hagiwara K. and Makita K. (2018). Socio-economic factors associated with voluntary rabies control measures in Vietnam, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 157, 105–114.

Klimas C.A.and Webb E. (2018). Comparing stated and realized preferences for shade-grown vs. conventionally grown coffee, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42, 76–92.

Uehara T., Tsuge T. and Ota T. (2018). Long-term evolution of preferences for conservation projects in the Seto Inland Sea, Japan: A comprehensive analytic framework, PeerJ, 6, e5366.

Uehara T. and Ynacay-Nye A. (2018). How water bottle refill stations contribute to campus sustainability: A case study in Japan, Sustainability, 10(9), 3074.

Whitehead J.C. (2018). A comment on "Three reasons to use annual payments in contingent valuation", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 88, 486–488.


2019 (2)

Serra S., Goke A., Diako C., Vixie B., Ross C. and Musacchi S. (2019). Consumer perception of d'Anjou pear classified by dry matter at harvest using near-infrared spectroscopy, International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 54, 2256–2265.

Uehara T., Tsuge T. and Onuma A. (2019). Applying three distinct metrics to measure people's perceptions of resilience, Ecology and Society, 24(2), 22.


2020 (5)

Cooper S.L., Butcher L.M., Scagnelli S.D., Lo J., Ryan M.M., Devine A. and O'Sullivan T.A. (2020). Australian consumers are willing to pay for the health star rating front-of-pack nutrition label, Nutrients, 12(12), 3876.

Denstadli J.M. and Veisten, K. (2020). The flight is valuable regardless of the carbon tax scheme: A case study of Norwegian leisure air travelers, Tourism Management, 81, 104150.

Palmieri N., Suardi A. and Pari L. (2020). Italian consumers' willingness to pay for eucalyptus firewood, Sustainability, 12(7), 2629.

Qiu R.T.R., Park J., Li S. and Song H. (2020). Social costs of tourism during the COVID-19 pandemic, Annals of Tourism Research, 84, 102994.

Tokunaga K., Sugino H., Nomura H. and Michida Y. (2020). Norms and the willingness to pay for coastal ecosystem restoration: A case of the Tokyo Bay intertidal flats, Ecological Economics, 169, 106423.


2021 (9)

Antinori C.M. (2021). Eelgrass restoration in San Francisco bay: An interdisciplinary stated preference classroom experiment, Journal of Ocean and Coastal Economics, 8(1), Article 1.

González-Ramírez J., Cheng H. and Arral S. (2021). Funding campus sustainability through a green fee—Estimating students' willingness to pay, Sustainability, 13(5), 2528.

Kim D.-H., Lee J.-J. and Park H.-Y. (2021). Assessing economic value of local festivals for sustainable development: A case of Yeongju Korean Seonbi Culture Festival, Sustainability, 13(23), 13297.

Kim T., Shin J., Hyung J., Kim K., Koo J. and Cha Y. (2021). Willingness to pay for improved water supply services based on asset management: A contingent valuation study in South Korea, Water, 13(15), 2040.

Liordos V., Kontsiotis V.J., Koutoulas O. and Parapouras A. (2021). The interplay of likeability and fear in willingness to pay for bat conservation, Earth, 2(4), 781–796.

Lorber C., Dittrich R., Jones S. and Junge A. (2021). Is hiking worth it? A contingent valuation case study of Multnomah Falls, Oregon, Forest Policy and Economics, 128, 102471.

Lord N., Zhang B. and Neill C.L. (2021). Investigating consumer demand and willingness to pay for Fresh, local, organic, and "On-the-Stalk" Edamame, Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, 651505.

Maganga A.M., Chiwaula L.S. and Kambewa P. (2021). Parametric and non-parametric estimates of willingness to pay for weather index insurance in Malawi, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 62, 102406.

Okada T., Mito Y., Tokunaga K., Sugino H., Kubo T., Akiyama Y.B., Endo T., Otani S., Yamochi S., Kozuki Y., Kusakabe T., Otsuka K., Yamanaka R., Shigematsu T. and Kuwae T. (2021). A comparative method for evaluating ecosystem services from the viewpoint of public works, Ocean & Coastal Management, 212, 105848.


2022 (10)

Gunsmaa G., Price P.E., Potokar T. and Ichikawa M. (2022). Solution-oriented research for paediatric burn prevention in Mongolia: An assessment of prevention tools, Burns, 48(6), 1509–1515.

Gunsmaa G., Shono A., Price P.E., Kondo M., Hebron C., Potokar T. and Ichikawa M. (2022). Parental acceptance and willingness to pay for a newly designed kitchen rack to reduce paediatric burns, Burns, 48(2), 381–389.

Han K., Vitale J., Lee Y.-G., Ji I. (2022). Measuring the economic value of the negative externality of livestock malodor in South Korea, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9475.

Herring M.W., Garnett S.T. and Zander K.K. (2022). From boutique to mainstream: Upscaling wildlife-friendly farming through consumer premiums, Conservation Science and Practice, 4(7), e12730.

Herring M.W., Garnett S.T. and Zander K.K. (2022). Producing rice while conserving the habitat of an endangered waterbird: Incentives for farmers to integrate water management, Land Use Policy, 120, 106269. 

King P. (2022). Willingness-to-pay for precautionary control of microplastics: A comparison of hybrid choice models, Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, DOI:10.1080/21606544.2022.2146757.

Mekonnen A.A., Beza A.D. and Sipos T. (2022). Estimating the value of statistical life in a road safety context based on the contingent valuation method, Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2022, 3047794.

Pappalardo G., West G. H., Nayga R.M., Toscano S and Pecorino B. (2022). The effect of a UNESCO world heritage site designation on willingness to pay to preserve an agri-environmental good: The case of the dry stone walls in Mt. Etna, Land Use Policy, 114, 105972.

Schuermann H. and Woo J.R. (2022). Estimating consumers' willingness to pay for reusable food containers when ordering delivery food: A contingent valuation approach, Journal of Cleaner Production, 366, 133012.

Zander K.K., Burton M., Pandit R., Gunawardena A., Pannell D. and Garnett S.T. (2022). How public values for threatened species are affected by conservation strategies, Journal of Environmental Management, 319, 115659. 


2023 (8)

Aizaki H., Sato K. and Nakatani T. (2023). Hometown effect on consumer preferences for food products, International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 26(2), 309–323.

Ansong M., Ameyaw J.A.S., Boadu K.B., Kpikpitse S. and Acheampong E. (2023). Local communities' willingness to pay for increasing the status of a forest reserve in Ghana to a national park, Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100516.

Dushani S.N., Aanesen M. and Armstrong C.W. (2023). Willingness to pay for mangrove restoration to reduce the climate change impacts on ecotourism in Rekawa coastal wetland, Sri Lanka, Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 12(1), 19–32.

Fujii J.A., Colgan, C.S., Castelletto A., Michelle M.S., Wolfrum A.G. and Kyle S.V.H. (2023). The economic value of sea otters and recreational tourism in a California estuary, Journal of Ocean and Coastal Economics, 10(1), 1.

Kontsiotis V.J., Chrysopoulou D., Chrysopoulou P. and Liordos V. (2023). Economic valuation of northern white-breasted hedgehog conservation, Diversity, 15(4), 490.

Liordos V., Antoniadou M. and Kontsiotis V.J. (2023). Economic valuation of Balkan chamois conservation, Animals, 13(4), 691.

Nguyen H.T. and Nguyen A.Q. (2023). Willingness to pay for colorectal cancer screening in Vietnam: Policy implications from a contingent valuation survey, Value in Health Regional Issues, 38, 29–37.

Nielsen C.G. and Feddersen A. (2023). Willingness to pay for hosting the Tour de France, Sports Economics Review, 3, 100014.



2014 (1)

Ares G., Mawad F., Giménez A. and Maiche A. (2014). Influence of rational and intuitive thinking styles on food choice: Preliminary evidence from an eye-tracking study with yogurt labels, Food Quality and Preference, 31, 28–37.


2015 (4)

Bullinger B. and Treisch C. (2015). Herding cats—Future professionals' expectations of attractive employers, German Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(2), 149–177.

Gassler B. (2015). How green is your `Grüner'? Millennial wine consumers' preferences and willingness-to-pay for eco-labeled wine, Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Agrarökonomie, 24, 131–140.

Mawad F., Trías M., Giménez A., Maiche A. and Ares G. (2015). Influence of cognitive style on information processing and selection of yogurt labels: Insights from an eye-tracking study, Food Research International, 74, 1–9.

Thaiyotin P., Ujiie K. and Shuto H. (2015). An evaluation of consumers' preference on food safety certificate and product origins: A choice experiment approach for fresh oranges in Metropolitan Bangkok, Thailand, 農業情報研究, 24(2), 74–80.


2016 (4)

Franzén F., Dinnétz P. and Hammer M. (2016). Factors affecting farmers' willingness to participate in eutrophication mitigation—A case study of preferences for wetland creation in Sweden, Ecological Economics, 130, 8–15.

Garcia-Dominguez J.M., Muñoz D., Comellas M., Gonzalbo I., Lizán L. and Sánchez C.P. (2016). Patient preferences for treatment of multiple sclerosis with disease-modifying therapies: A discrete choice experiment, Patient Preference and Adherence, 10, 1945–1956.

Javier J.M., Rapera C.L., Rañola Jr. R.F. and Alcantara A.J. (2016). Valuing public preferences for Ludong (Cestraeus plicatilis Valenciennes 1836) conservation program in Cagayan River systems, Philippines, Journal of Environmental Science and Management, Special Issue No. 2, 30–38.

Shideler G.S. and Pierce B. (2016). Recreational diver willingness to pay for goliath grouper encounters during the months of their spawning aggregation off eastern Florida, USA, Ocean and Coastal Management, 129, 36–43.


2017 (8)

Cirillo C., Liu Y. and Maness M. (2017). A time-dependent stated preference approach to measuring vehicle type preferences and market elasticity of conventional and green vehicles, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 100, 294–310.

de Andrade J.C., Nalério E.L., Giongo C., de Barcellos M.D., Ares G. and Deliza R. (2017). Consumer perception of dry-cured sheep meat products: Influence of process parameters under different evoked contexts, Meat Science, 130, 30–37.

Hoek A.C., Pearson D., James S.W., Lawrence M.A. and Friel S. (2017). Healthy and environmentally sustainable food choices: Consumer responses to point-of-purchase actions, Food Quality and Preference, 58, 94–106.

Ku Y.C., Chiang T.F. and Chang S.M. (2017). Is what you choose what you want?—Outlier detection in choice-based conjoint analysis, Marketing Letters, 28, 29–42.

Kühl S., Gassler B. and Spiller A. (2017). Labeling strategies to overcome the problem of niche markets for sustainable milk products: The example of pasture-raised milk, Journal of Dairy Science, 100(6), 5082–5096.

Perni Á. and Martínez-Paz J.M. (2017). Measuring conflicts in the management of anthropized ecosystems: Evidence from a choice experiment in a human-created Mediterranean wetland, Journal of Environmental Management, 203(1), 40–50.

Pham H.T.T., Peyre M., Trinh T.Q., Nguyen O.C., Vu T.D., Rukkwamsuk T. and Antoine-Moussiaux N. (2017). Application of discrete choice experiment to assess farmers' willingness to report swine diseases in the Red River Delta region, Vietnam, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 138, 28–36.

Raes L., Speelman S. and Aguirre N. (2017). Farmers' preferences for PES Contracts to adopt Silvopastoral Systems in Southern Ecuador, revealed through a choice experiment, Environmental Management, 60, 200–215.


2018 (7)

Just A., Wellmann R. and Bennewitz J. (2018). Estimation of relative economic weights and the marginal willingness to pay for breeding traits of Brown Swiss cattle using discrete choice experiments, Journal of Dairy Science, 101(6), 5207–5213.

Monroy-Sais S., García-Frapolli E., Mora F., Skutsch M., Casas A., Gerritsen P.R.W. and González-Jiménez D. (2018). Exploring how land tenure affects farmers' landscape values: Evidence from a choice experiment, Sustainability, 10(11), 4321.

Olveira G., Ángel Martínez-Olmos M., de Bobadilla B.F., Ferrer M., Virgili N., Vega B., Blanco M., Layola M., Lizán L. and Gozalbo I. (2018). Patients' and professionals' preferences in terms of the attributes of home enteral nutrition products in Spain. A discrete choice experiment, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 72, 272–280.

Plöthner M., Schmidt K., Schips C. and Damm K. (2018). Which attributes of whole genome sequencing tests are most important to the general population? Results from a German preference study, Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, 11, 7–21.

Rakatama A., Pandit R., Iftekhar S. and Ma C. (2018). Heterogeneous public preference for REDD+ projects under different forest management regimes, Land Use Policy, 78, 266–277.

Rakatama A., Pandit R., Iftekhar S. and Ma C. (2018). How to design more effective REDD+ projects—The importance of targeted approach in Indonesia, Journal of Forest Economics, 33, 25–32.

Wildenbos G.A., Horenberg F., Jaspers M., Peute L. and Sent D. (2018). How do patients value and prioritize patient portal functionalities and usage factors? A conjoint analysis study with chronically ill patients, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 18, 108.


2019 (7)

Campbell D. and Erdem S. (2019). Including opt-out options in discrete choice experiments: Issues to consider, The Patient, 12, 1–14.

Chawala A.R., Banos G., Peters A. and Chagunda M.G.G. (2019). Farmer-preferred traits in smallholder dairy farming systems in Tanzania, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 51, 1337–1344.

Gautam B., Sapkota V.P. and Wagle R.R. (2019). Employment preferences of obstetricians and gynecologists to work in the district hospitals: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Nepal, Human Resources for Health, 17, 96.

Hamadou I., Moula N., Siddo S., Issa M., Marichatou H., Leroy P. and Antoine-Moussiaux N. (2019). Valuing breeders' preferences in the conservation of the Koundoum sheep in Niger by multi-attribute analysis, Archives Animal Breeding, 62, 537–545.

黒川哲治・矢部光保・野村久子・高橋義文 (2019). 認定地からの距離と生物多様性認証が贈答品の消費者評価に及ぼす影響, 農林業問題研究, 55(2), 81–88.

Krueger R., Rashidi T.H. and Dixit V.V. (2019). Autonomous driving and residential location preferences: Evidence from a stated choice survey, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 108, 255–268.

Traoré B., Govoeyi B., Hamadou I., Geda F., Touré A., Ouologuem B., Leroy P., Antoine-Moussiaux N. and Moula N. (2019). Analysis of preferences of agro-pastoralists for the attributes of traction dromedaries in harness cultivation: A case study of the Koro district of Mali, Pastoralism, 9, 19.


2020 (10)

Abe R., Kita Y. and Fukuda D. (2020). An experimental approach to understanding the impacts of monitoring methods on use intentions for autonomous vehicle services: Survey evidence from Japan, Sustainability, 12(6), 2157.

Bisello A. (2020). Assessing multiple benefits of housing regeneration and smart city development: The European project SINFONIA, Sustainability, 12(19), 8038.

Curtin P. and Papworth S. (2020). Coloring and size influence preferences for imaginary animals, and can predict actual donations to species-specific conservation charities, Conservation Letters, 13, e12723.

de Andrés-Nogales F., Casado M.Á., Trillo J.L., Ruiz-Moreno J.M., Martínez-Sesmero J.M., Peralta G., Poveda J.L., Ortiz P., Ignacio E., Zarranz-Ventura J., Udaondo P., Mur C., Álvarez E., Cervera E., Martínez M., Llorente I., Zulueta J., Rodríguez-Maqueda M., García-Layana A. and Martínez-Olmos J. (2020). A multiple stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis in diabetic macular edema management: The MULTIDEX-EMD study. PharmacoEconomics Open, 4, 615–624.

Kim M.-A., Yoo H.-J., Ares G. and Lee H.-S. (2020). Effect of thinking style and consumption purpose on food choice: A case study with yogurt using a discrete choice experiment and eye-tracking, Food Quality and Preference, 86, 104025.

Melo-Guerrero E., Hernández-Ortiz J., Aguilar-Lopez A., Rodríguez-Laguna R., Martínez-Damián M. Á., Valdivia-Alcalá R. and Razo-Zarate R. (2020). Choice experiments for the management of Los Mármoles National Park, Mexico, Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente, 26(2), 257–272.

Meressa A.M. and Navrud S. (2020). Not my cup of coffee: Farmers' preferences for coffee variety traits—Lessons for crop breeding in the age of climate change, Bio-based and Applied Economics, 9(3), 263–282.

Protiere C., Arnold M., Fiorentino M., Fressard L., Lelièvre J.D., Mimi M., Raffi F., Mora M., Meyer L., Sagaon-Teyssier L., Zucman D., Préau M., Lambotte O., Spire B., Suzan-Monti M. and the APSEC Study Group. (2020). Differences in HIV cure clinical trial preferences of French people living with HIV and physicians in the ANRS-APSEC study: A discrete choice experiment, Journal of the International AIDS Society, 23(2), e25443.

白井康裕・日向貴久・松本匡祐・錦織正智 (2020). 農業新技術の定着に向けた消費者調査, 農業経営研究, 58(3), 45–50.

Wu X., Hu B. and Xiong J. (2020). Understanding heterogeneous consumer preferences in Chinese milk markets: A latent class approach, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71, 184–198.


2021 (19)

Aizaki H., Furuya J., Sakurai T. and Mar S.S. (2021). Measuring farmers' preferences for weather index insurance in the Ayeyarwady Delta, Myanmar: A discrete choice experiment approach, Paddy and Water Environment, 19, 307–317.

Aruga K., Bolt T. and Pest P. (2021). Energy policy trade-offs in Poland: A best-worst scaling discrete choice experiment, Energy Policy, 156, 112465.

Boncinelli F., Piracci G. and Casini L. (2021). Understanding the role of information and taste heterogeneity in consumer preferences for functional beef: The case of the omega-3 enriched burger, Meat Science, 181, 108614.

de Andrés-Nogales F., Cruz E., Calleja M.Á., Delgado O., Gorgas M.Q., Espín J., Mestre-Ferrándiz J., Palau F., Ancochea A., Arce R., Domínguez-Hernández R., Casado M.A. and on behalf of the FinMHU-MCDA Group. (2021). A multi-stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis for the reimbursement of orphan drugs (FinMHU-MCDA study), Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 16, 186.

Gijsbers M., Keizer I.E., Schouten S.E., Trompert J.L., Groothuis-Oudshoorn C.G.M. and van Til J.A. (2021). Public preferences in priority setting when admitting patients to the ICU during the COVID-19 crisis: A pilot study, The Patient, 14, 331–338.

Hotaling C., Bird S. and Heintzelman M.D. (2021). Willingness to pay for microgrids to enhance community resilience, Energy Policy, 154, 112248.

Igarashi A., Bekker Hansen B., Langer J., Tavella F., Collings H., Davies N. and Wyn R. (2021). Preference for oral and injectable GLP-1 RA therapy profiles in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A discrete choice experiment, Advances in Therapy, 38, 721–738.

岸本華果・佐藤赳・鈴木宣弘 (2021). 選択型コンジョイント分析によるフェアトレードバナナの消費者選好分析, フードシステム研究, 27(4), 201–207.

Lerusse A. and Van de Walle S. (2021). Public managers' valuation of secondary policy objectives in public procurement—Results from a discrete choice experiment, Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 4(1), DOI:10.30636/jbpa.41.206. 

McPhedran R. and Toombs B. (2021). Efficacy or delivery? An online discrete choice experiment to explore preferences for COVID-19 vaccines in the UK, Economics Letters, 200, 109747.

Nishimura T. (2021). The effect of greenhouse pollination methods on consumers' willingness to pay for tomatoes in Japan, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 53(2), 186–208.

Pan X. (2021). Investigating college students' choice of train trips for homecoming during the Spring Festival travel rush in China: Results from a stated preference approach, Transportation Letters, 13(1), 36–44.

Phuchongpravech T. and Chaiwat T. (2021). Barriers to prisoners' re-entry into formal and informal labour market, International Journal of Business and Society, 22(1), 479–495.

Phuchongpravech T. and Chaiwat T. (2021). Beauty premium through cosmetic surgery for prisoners: Choice experiment with asymmetric information, Thailand and The World Economy, 39(1), 39–57.

Syahid A., Tareq M.A. and Nahar A. (2021). Preference modelling in R: A trial on home buyers' willingness to pay, Journal on Innovation and Sustainability, 12(2), 154–173.

Tobin K., Maguire S., Corr B., Normand C., Hardiman O. and Galvin M. (2021). Discrete choice experiment for eliciting preference for health services for patients with ALS and their informal caregivers, BMC Health Services Research, 21, 213.

Velázquez A.L., Alcaire F., Vidal L., Varela P., Næs T. and Ares G. (2021). The influence of label information on the snacks parents choose for their children: Individual differences in a choice based conjoint test, Food Quality and Preference, 94, 104296.

Workneh W.A., Ujiie K. and Matsushita S. (2021). Farmers' agricultural tractor preferences in Ethiopia: A choice experiment approach, Discover Sustainability, 2, 11.

Yang S.-H. and Nugraha W.S. (2021). What makes consumers purchase fresh eggs in supermarkets: The effect of unrealistic choice set matters, Animals, 11(12), 3542.


2022 (18)

Ahmed A., Amin S.B., McCarthy G., Khan A.M. and Nepal R. (2022). Is blended learning the future of education? Students perspective using discrete choice experiment analysis, Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 19(3), 06.

Alajärvi L., Lehtimäki A.-V., Timonen J. and Martikainen J. (2022). Willingness to pay for implementation of an environmentally friendly pharmaceutical policy in Finland—A discrete choice experiment study, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11), 6535.

Cárdenas-Álvarez J.P., España J.M. and Ortega S. (2022). What is the value of peer-to-peer energy trading? A discrete choice experiment with residential electricity users in Colombia, Energy Research & Social Science, 91, 102737.

Esztergár-Kiss D., Tordai D. and Lizarraga J.C.L. (2022). Assessment of travel behavior related to e-scooters using a stated preference experiment, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 166, 389–405.

Eyster H.N., Olmsted P., Naidoo R. and Chan K.M.A. (2022). Motivating conservation even for widespread species using genetic uniqueness and relational values, Biological Conservation, 266, 109438.

Gómez-Peralta F., Mareque M., Muñoz Á., Maderuelo M. and Casado M.A. (2022). Patient preferences for pharmacological diabetes treatment among people with diabetes in Spain: A discrete choice experiment, Diabetes Therapy, 13, 75–87.

Hamadneh J. and Esztergár-Kiss D. (2022). The preference of onboard activities in a new age of automated driving, European Transport Research Review, 14, 15.

Hernandez D. and da Costa P. (2022). The economic value of ecosystem conservation: A discrete-choice experiment at the Taravo Wild River in Corsica, France, Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, 423, 16.

Jang D. and Bottom W.P. (2022). Tactical anger in negotiation: The expresser's perspective, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 35(1), e2246.

Johnston B.M., Daveson B., Normand C., Ryan K., Smith M., McQuillan R., Higginson I., Selman L. and Tobin K. (2022). Preferences of older people with a life-limiting illness: A discrete choice experiment, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 64(2), 137–145.

中島亨・橋本瞳美 (2022). 海外消費者の柑橘に対する支払意思額の推計, フードシステム研究, 28(4), 316–321.

大串浩暉・中島亨 (2022). 地場食品に対する消費者評価, フードシステム研究, 28(4), 274–279.

Papworth S. and Curtin P. (2022). Information about conservation status is more important than species appearance in the species preferences of potential conservation donors, Environmental Conservation, 49(3), 146–154.

Petry T., Treisch C. and Peters M. (2022). Designing job ads to stimulate the decision to apply: A discrete choice experiment with business students, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(15), 3019–3055.

Saito Y., Aizaki H. and Saito H. (2022). Assessing the consumer acceptability of vaccine rice, Japanese Journal of Agricultural Economics, 24, 1–13.

Shubrook J.H., Radin M., Ali S.N., Chubb B., DiPietrantonio K., Collings H., Wyn R. and Smith M. (2022). Preference for type 2 diabetes therapies in the United States: A discrete choice experiment, Advances in Therapy, 39, 4114–4130.

Tang S., Sato T., Suzuki N. and Kawasaki K. (2022). Impact of visualization system on WTP of agricultural products in Japan, フードシステム研究, 28(4), 292–297.

Ulahannan A. and Birrell S. (2022). Designing better public transport: Understanding mode choice preferences following the COVID-19 pandemic, Sustainability, 14(10), 5952.


2023 (10)

Bovenkerk O., Darr D. and Vale E.M.G. (2023). A discrete choice experiment to measure the Malawian potential market for Baobab fruit shell briquettes: Evidence from consumer preferences in Mzuzu City, Energy for Sustainable Development, 73, 144–151.

Chakraborty R. and Chakravarty S. (2023). Factors affecting acceptance of electric two-wheelers in India: A discrete choice survey, Transport Policy, 132, 27–41.

Gottselig V., Wuppermann A. and Herrmann C. (2023). Effects of green nudges on consumer valuation of sustainable food: A discrete choice experiment, GAIA, 32(2), 233–240.

Hu J., Pan X. and Zhong M. (2023). On effects of personality traits on travelers' heterogeneous preferences: Insights from a case study in Urumqi, China, Sustainability, 15(10), 8186.

Jaber A., Hamadneh J. and Csonka B. (2023). The preferences of shared micro-mobility users in urban areas, IEEE Access, 11, 74458–74472.

Maer Matei M.M., Zamfir A.-M. and Mocanu C. (2023). Criteria weights in hiring decisions—A conjoint approach, Mathematics, 11(3), 728.

Pan X., Feng T. and Chen Y. (2023). Assessing the impacts of stay-in-place policy of COVID-19 pandemic during the Chinese Spring Festival: A stated preference approach, Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2023, 9662990.

Ruiz-Frau A. (2023). Impacts of jellyfish presence on tourists' holiday destination choices and their willingness to pay for mitigation measures, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 66(10), 2107–2125.

Toiba H., Noor A.Y.M., Rahman M.S., Hartono R., Asmara R. and Retnoningsig D. (2023). Consumers' preference and future consideration toward organic instant noodles: Evidence from Indonesia, AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 15(1), 127–137.

Yang T., Li Z., Bai Y., Liu X. and Ye T. (2023).Residents' preferences for rural housing disaster insurance attributes in central and western Tibet, International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 14, 697–711.



2016 (2)

西原是良・中嶋康博・木村匡臣・飯田俊彰 (2016). 農業用水の多面的機能に対するサービス科学的考察, 農業経済研究, 87(4), 371–376.

Aizaki H., Onimaru T., Katayama C. and Ishida K. (2016). Non-farmers' preference for assisting with farm tasks as a method of health promotion, Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly, 50(2), 135–142.


2017 (0)


2018 (1)

Uehara T. and Ynacay-Nye A. (2018). How water bottle refill stations contribute to campus sustainability: A case study in Japan, Sustainability, 10(9), 3074.


2019 (3)

古安理英子・赤沢克洋 (2019). ベスト・ワースト・スケーリングによる温泉地への期待に関する定量分析—玉造温泉宿泊者を対象として—, 温泉地域研究, 33, 25–36.

丸山優樹・氏家清和・入江光輝・AHMED Cherif・AHMED Bouya Ould (2019). モーリタニアにおける消費者のコメ選好評価, 農業経済研究, 91(4), 478–483.

Rankin L., Fowler C.J., Stålnacke B.-M. and Gallego G. (2019). What influences chronic pain management? A best–worst scaling experiment with final year medical students and general practitioners, British Journal of Pain, 13(4), 214–225.


2020 (1)

赤沢克洋・古安理英子 (2020). コンテンツツーリズムの取り組みの重要度に関する定量分析, 地域地理研究, 25(2), 1–14.


2021 (5)

村上智明・中谷朋昭・伊藤暢宏・安部晃司・北恵実・中嶋康博 (2021). COVID-19パンデミック下で食に求める価値はどのように変化したのか？, フードシステム研究, 28(3), 211–216.

Uehara T., Hidaka T., Tsuge T., Sakurai R. and Cordier M. (2021). An adaptive social-ecological system management matrix for guiding ecosystem service improvements, Ecosystem Services, 50, 101312.

Woolway T., Elbe A.-M., Barkoukis V., Bingham K., Bochaver K., Bondarev D., Hudson A., Kronenberg L., Lazuras L., Mallia L., Ntovolis Y., Zelli A. and Petróczi A. (2021). One does not fit all: European study shows significant differences in value-priorities in clean sport, Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 3, 662542. 

Yang S.-H., Panjaitan B.P., Ujiie K., Wann J.-W. and Chen D. (2021). Comparison of food values for consumers' preferences on imported fruits and vegetables within Japan, Taiwan, and Indonesia, Food Quality and Preference, 87, 104042.

Yang Y., Thapa R. and Lewis F.M. (2021). Using best–worst scaling to determine the most burdensome menopausal symptoms in Cambodian women living With HIV, Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 32(2), 174–187.


2022 (5)

Chang S.-H.-E., Yi X.-Y., Sauer J., Yin C.-B. and Li F.-D. (2022). Explaining farmers' reluctance to adopt green manure cover crops planting for sustainable agriculture in Northwest China, Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 21(11), 3382–3394.

Gunsmaa G., Price P.E., Potokar T. and Ichikawa M. (2022). Solution-oriented research for paediatric burn prevention in Mongolia: An assessment of prevention tools, Burns, 48(6), 1509–1515.

Holyer J., Taylor W.J., Gaffo A., Hosie G., Horne A., Mihov B., Su I., Gamble G.D., Dalbeth N. and Stewart S. (2022). Which attributes are most and least important to patients when considering gout flare burden over time? A best-worst scaling choice study, The Journal of Rheumatology, 49(2), 213–218.

Maruyama Y., Ujiie K., Ahmed C., Diagne M. and Irie M. (2022). Farmers' preferences of the agricultural inputs for rice farming in Senegal River Basin, Mauritania: A best-worst scaling approach, 沙漠研究, 32(S), 61–65.

相馬拓宜・氏家清和・柏木健一 (2022). 国産オリーブ事業体の生産及び販売に対する経営者意識, 農業経営研究, 60(4), 35–40.


2023 (7)

Aizaki H. and Takeshita H. (2023). Comparing consumer preferences for sustainable dairy activities among countries, Behaviormetrika, 50, 653–677.

大學寛和・氏家清和・納口るり子 (2023). COVID-19パンデミック下において農家民宿経営者が抱える不安要素, 農業経営研究, 61(2), 85–90.

林瑞穂・丸山優樹・八木浩平・佐野友紀 (2023). ブラジル大豆生産者の大豆栽培に係る選好調査—ベスト・ワースト・スケーリング分析の活用—, 農業経営研究, 61(2), 79–84.

Min A., Baek W. and Choi S. (2023). What are the key factors influencing newly graduated nurses' preference for choosing their workplace? A best–worst scaling approach, Journal of Nursing Scholarship, DOI:10.1111/jnu.12920.

佐野友紀・佐藤赳・川崎賢太郎・鈴木宣弘 (2023). 野菜の取引における卸売市場の買手業者の選好分析—仲卸業者・売買参加者を対象としたベスト・ワースト・スケーリング—, 農業経済研究, 95(1), 35–40.

Sato M., Minamoto T. and Ushimaru A. (2023). An interdisciplinary approach to environmental conservation policy: A case of Satoyama redevelopment in the peri-urban area, International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, 17, 403–419. 

Zander K., Burton M., Pandit R. and Garnett S. (2023). The Australian public worries more about losing species than the costs of keeping them, Environmental Conservation, 50(2), 116–124.



2020 (1)

Aizaki H. and Sato K. (2020). Consumer preferences for three dimensions of country of origin of a processed food product, British Food Journal, 122(11), 3361–3382.


2021 (1)

Alpert J.M., Wang S., Bylund C.L., Markham M.J., Bjarnadottir R.I., Lee J.-H., Lafata J.E. and Salloum R.G. (2021). Improving secure messaging: A framework for support, partnership & information-giving communicating electronically (SPICE), Patient Education and Counseling, 104(6), 1380–1386.


2022 (3)

De Valck J., Rolfe J., Rajapaksa D. and Star M. (2022). Consumers' preferences and willingness to pay for improved environmental standards: Insights from cane sugar in the Great Barrier Reef region, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 66, 505–531.

Tatar O., Haward B., Zhu P., Griffin-Mathieu G., Perez S., Zimet G. and Rosberger Z. (2022). Using best-worst scaling to investigate younger adult Canadians' preferences for COVID-19 vaccination and public health measures: An observational study, Preventive Medicine Reports, 26, 101755.

Zhu P., Tatar O., Haward B., Griffin-Mathieu G., Perez S., Smith L., Brotherton J., Ogilvie G. and Rosberger Z. (2022). Assessing Canadian women's preferences for cervical cancer screening: A brief report, Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 962039.


2023 (3)

Rolfe J., De Valck J., Rajapaksa D., Flint N., Star M. and Akbar D. (2023). Willingness to pay for higher environmental standards for avocado production in Great Barrier Reef catchments, Food Quality and Preference, 110, 104940.

Rolfe J., Rajapaksa D., De Valck J. and Star M. (2023). Will greenhouse concerns impact meat consumption? Best-worst scaling analysis of Australian consumers, Food Quality and Preference, 104, 104755.

Tatar O., Abdel-Baki A., Dyachenko A., Bakouni H., Bahremand A., Tibbo P.G., Crockford D., Roy M.-A., Copeland J., Fischer B., Lecomte T., Côté J., Ouellet-Plamondon C., L'Heureux S., Villeneuve M. and Jutras-Aswad D. (2023). Evaluating preferences for online psychological interventions to decrease cannabis use in young adults with psychosis: An observational study, Psychiatry Research, 326, 115276.



2023 (1)

Sato M., Minamoto T. and Ushimaru A. (2023). An interdisciplinary approach to environmental conservation policy: A case of Satoyama redevelopment in the peri-urban area, International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, 17, 403–419.