How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
If you want a smarter all-round pair of open-ear earbuds with app control, dual-device pairing and a genuinely low-leakage design, choose QCY Crossky C50; if you need maximum battery life and the biggest driver in an open, foldable design, choose LICAEVEY Earbuds. That is the whole decision in one line. Both are Bluetooth 6.0, both carry an IPX5 waterproof rating, and both are built around ear-hook designs that keep your ears open to traffic and conversation — so the real split comes down to software smarts versus raw endurance and driver size.
• QCY Crossky C50 — biggest strength: a proper companion app (custom EQ, button remapping, battery info, firmware updates), dual-device connection, 4-mic AI call noise reduction rated up to 45dB, and reverse soundwave tech that cuts sound leakage by 90% versus standard open-ear buds.
• QCY Crossky C50 — biggest trade-off: less total battery than the LICAEVEY (7.5 hours per charge, 35 hours with the case) and a smaller 10.8mm dynamic driver.
• LICAEVEY Earbuds — biggest strength: serious stamina — up to 13 hours on a single charge and up to 60 hours total with the case — plus large 14.2mm air-conduction drivers and a dual-fold mechanism that collapses them into a very compact shape.
• LICAEVEY Earbuds — biggest trade-off: no app, no dual-device pairing, no stated sound-leakage control, and a shorter 90-day manufacturer warranty.
• Pick QCY Crossky C50 if you want call quality, customization and multi-device convenience in a slightly more premium-feeling package.
• Pick LICAEVEY Earbuds if you want to charge as rarely as possible and prefer the deeper, bass-forward sound that a bigger driver usually delivers.
The Crossky C50 is the more "engineered" of the two. The shell is a leather-look, anti-fingerprint finish over a plastic body, and the ear hooks combine soft silicone with a flexible titanium memory alloy — that combination is the reason it can clamp gently without pressing on your ear canal. If you run, cycle or lift, the anti-drop ergonomic shape is the part you'll actually notice: nothing goes into your ear, so you keep full awareness of cars, bikes and gym chatter.
Then there's the software layer. The QCY app gives you EQ modes, button-function remapping, real-time battery readouts and firmware updates, and you can connect two devices at once — watching something on a TV while still taking calls on your phone. It also has auto L/R correction so you never have to check which bud goes where. Battery is 7.5 hours per charge and 35 hours total from the 380mAh case, and the buds themselves are light at 45.6g for the pair, with a 10.8mm dynamic driver, 40-ohm impedance and a 20kHz frequency response.
Buy it if you want app control, strong call performance, dual-device pairing and low sound leakage. Skip it if you'd rather have the longest possible battery and the largest driver.
LICAEVEY Earbuds: Who It's For
The LICAEVEY pair takes a different route: it goes big on stamina and driver size, and adds a folding trick. Each bud weighs just 8.9 grams, and the dual-fold structure lets the earbuds collapse into a genuinely small shape inside the case — easy to drop into a jacket pocket, a gym bag or a backpack side pouch. The flexible ear hooks are designed to lock in without fatigue over long sessions, and the open design keeps you aware of your surroundings on runs and commutes, same philosophy as the QCY.
The headline numbers here are battery and drivers. You get up to 13 hours of playtime on a single charge and up to 60 hours total with the compact charging case — that's close to double the QCY's per-charge figure, and it's the reason this pair suits long travel days, full work shifts or multi-hour training blocks without hunting for a charger. The 14.2mm air-conduction drivers are substantially larger than the QCY's 10.8mm, and the spec sheet pairs them with active noise cancellation and an enhanced virtual bass effect. Bigger drivers generally move more air, so if you want a fuller, bass-heavier listen, this is the one to lean toward.
Connectivity is Bluetooth 6.0 with a stable link up to 10 meters and low-latency audio sync for video and gaming, and there's a universal Type-C port for charging. The trade-offs are real, though: no companion app is listed, so no custom EQ or button remapping; no simultaneous dual-device connection; no stated leakage-reduction figure; and the manufacturer warranty runs 90 days rather than the QCY's year. The item details also list the connectivity technology as ethernet, which is almost certainly a spec-sheet error — treat the Bluetooth 6.0 claim as the operative one.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best battery life → LICAEVEY Earbuds — up to 13 hours per charge and 60 hours total versus the QCY's 7.5 and 35 hours.
• Best call quality → QCY Crossky C50 — 4 microphones, wind-noise reduction and up to 45dB call noise cancellation.
• Best for quiet environments → QCY Crossky C50 — reverse soundwave technology cuts leakage by 90% compared with typical open-ear buds.
• Best for bass and big-driver sound → LICAEVEY Earbuds — 14.2mm air-conduction drivers against the QCY's 10.8mm dynamic driver.
• Best for multi-device users → QCY Crossky C50 — connect to two devices at once and switch between them without re-pairing.
• Best for tinkerers → QCY Crossky C50 — app EQ, button remapping, battery info and firmware updates; the LICAEVEY lists no app.
• Best for travel and tight storage → LICAEVEY Earbuds — the dual-fold mechanism collapses the buds into an ultra-compact case.
• Best for peace of mind → QCY Crossky C50 — a 1-year warranty versus the LICAEVEY's 90-day manufacturer warranty.
• Both are IPX5 waterproof — fine for sweat, light rain and daily splashes, but neither is built for swimming or full submersion.
In my opinion, the QCY Crossky C50 is the smarter buy for most people. The app control, dual-device pairing, 4-mic call handling and 90% leakage reduction are the features you feel every single day, and 35 hours of total playtime is still plenty for a normal week. I'd only steer you to the LICAEVEY Earbuds if battery anxiety is your main problem or you specifically want the bigger 14.2mm driver and that folding, pocket-friendly design — in that case the 60-hour total and the compact form factor are genuinely compelling. Whichever way you lean, check the current price on Amazon before deciding, since that's the one variable this comparison deliberately leaves to you.
FAQ
are headphones waterproof
Not usually — and neither of these is. Both the QCY Crossky C50 and the LICAEVEY Earbuds are rated IPX5, which covers sweat, light rain and everyday splashes but not immersion. If you need something you can swim in, look for a much higher water-protection rating.
Yes, in this case both are. An IPX5 rating is a water-resistance rating, so both pairs are designed to shrug off heavy perspiration and rain during workouts and commutes. That makes them suitable for running, gym sessions and outdoor use — just not for swimming or leaving them soaked.
No — the opposite. The QCY Crossky C50 offers 7.5 hours per charge and 35 hours total with its case, while the LICAEVEY Earbuds claim up to 13 hours per charge and 60 hours total. If long battery life is your priority, the LICAEVEY pair wins on the spec sheet.
Based on the specs, the QCY Crossky C50. It uses 4 microphones with wind-noise reduction, up to 45dB call noise cancellation and an AI voice algorithm, while the LICAEVEY sheet lists clear call quality but no comparable microphone or noise-cancellation figures. For calls in noisy places, I'd pick the QCY.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.
See also: Motorola Sound XT220 vs VINTEAM 3D, ZQZMZGS Mini vs Achifine Clip, TXHUTSOG Rose Gold Earbuds vs COOYA USB C Headphones, Fragolucyou Headphones-Colorful Light vs KERHAND Unicorn