Identify the major etiological agents of skin cancer
Describe the molecular mechanisms by which Human Papillomaviruses (HPV) promote skin carcinogenesis
Explain the role of Merkel Cell Polyomavirus in Merkel Cell Carcinoma
Distinguish the biological effects of UVA, UVB, and UVC radiation
Analyze biological, genetic, iatrogenic and phenotypic risk factors
Evaluate environmental and lifestyle risk factors
Skin cancer arises from numerous sources. Viruses (human papillomaviruses and Merkel cell polyomavirus) can act as causative agents for skin malignancies.¹ Intermittent, intense sun exposure and pigmented nevi are primary etiological factors of cutaneous malignant melanoma, and lifelong cumulative sun exposure is linked to non-melanoma skin cancers.² But skin cancer is much more than that, it is a complex interplay of various biological, genetic, environmental, iatrogenic and phenotypic factors.²
Epidermodysplasia Verruciformis (EV) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by deficiency in the TMC6 and TMC8 genes, which prevents the body from clearing beta HPV infections.¹ As a result, affected individuals develop widespread wart-like lesions that progressively transform into malignant skin tumors, particularly in sun-exposed areas, making EV patients especially high-risk for non-melanoma skin cancers.¹
The mechanisms by which beta HPV drives this malignant progression are multifaceted. HPV E6 proteins trigger the degradation of BAK, a proapoptotic protein responsible for inducing cell death following UV-induced damage.¹ The loss of this response means that cells carrying extensive DNA damage and oncogenic mutations are able to survive rather than undergo apoptosis. Compounding this, HPV E6 proteins also inhibit the repair of UV-induced damage and double-strand DNA breaks, allowing mutations to accumulate and facilitating malignant progression.¹
HPV E6 proteins further contribute to oncogenesis by inhibiting both NOTCH signalling and TGF-beta signalling, two pathways that ordinarily perform tumor suppressor activities in the skin.¹ The suppression of these pathways therefore removes an additional layer of protection against malignant transformation.
Importantly, HPV can contribute to cancer initiation by starting the oncogenic process, however sustained viral gene expression is not required to maintain the malignant transformed state. Taken together, human papillomavirus is a contributing factor in the development of both basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.¹
Merkel Cell Polyomavirus serves as the primary etiological agent responsible for Merkel cell carcinoma, an aggressive and highly metastatic form of skin cancer.¹ In affected individuals, viral sequences become integrated into the genome, and it is the virus's small T antigen alongside a truncated version of its large T antigen that act as the primary drivers of tumorigenicity.¹ The small T antigen in particular functions as a potent oncogene, capable of inducing cellular growth independent of the constraints that normally regulate proliferation.¹
The fact that Merkel cell carcinoma is more commonly observed in immunosuppressed patients highlights the critical role the immune system plays in this disease.¹ Merkel Cell Polyomavirus is a common infection, and it is the immune system's failure to adequately control it that represents a key factor in the development of these otherwise rare cancers.
Ultraviolet radiation is a physical hazard responsible for carcinogenesis, photoaging, and immune suppression.² It is broadly categorized into three types based on wavelength, each with distinct properties and biological effects.² In terms of carcinogenic risk, cumulative chronic exposure to ultraviolet radiation, such as that experienced through prolonged professional outdoor work, is associated with the development of basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.² Melanoma, by contrast, is more strongly associated with intermittent exposure and a history of sunburns.²
UVA radiation, spanning 315 to 400 nm, consists of the longest wavelengths and is capable of penetrating deep into the skin as far as the epidermal junction where melanocytes are located. It is primarily responsible for premature skin aging.²
UVB radiation, ranging from 280 to 315 nm, carries shorter wavelengths that stimulate increased melanin production and are responsible for the characteristic signs of sunburn, including erythema, oedema, and pain.²
UVC radiation, spanning 100 to 280 nm, represents the shortest and most dangerous wavelengths, though under normal circumstances it is absorbed by the ozone layer and atmosphere before reaching the skin's surface.²
Ultraviolet radiation plays a meaningful role in the development of cancer of the lower limbs. This is illustrated by epidemiological data from Sweden, where the incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the lower limbs is 1.74 times higher in the southern part of the country compared to the northern part, a difference attributable to the more extensive UV radiation exposure in the south.³
Anatomical distribution of these cancers also reflects patterns of UV exposure. In females, the lateral side of the leg is more frequently affected than the medial side, which is explained by differences in clothing styles between sexes that result in greater UV exposure to the outer surface of the leg compared to males.³
Looking beyond current trends, the depletion of the ozone layer and the expansion of the Antarctic ozone hole are allowing greater amounts of UV radiation to reach the Earth's surface, suggesting that the risk of UV-related skin cancers of the lower limbs is likely to increase as a consequence of climate change.³
Certain host-related factors significantly influence an individual's susceptibility to skin cancer. Those with light skin, blond or red hair, and light-coloured eyes possess a lower degree of natural protection against UV damage.⁴ Related characteristics such as a tendency to freckle, a low ability to tan, and a high propensity to burn further compound this vulnerability.⁴ Family history of melanoma is also a well-established risk factor, with a strong genetic correlation between familial history and increased risk of developing the disease, particularly in the context of familial genetic syndromes.⁴
The presence of moles represents another important risk factor. Having a high number of pigmented moles or large congenital moles increases the likelihood of melanoma developing either within the skin or within pre-existing moles. There is a consistent and clear relationship between the total number of pigmented moles and the risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma. Notably, the distribution of moles in children closely mirrors the distribution of melanoma in adults, suggesting that strong, intermittent sunlight exposure during childhood serves as a common etiological factor underlying both mole distribution and subsequent cancer development.⁴
Age is also a relevant consideration in non-melanoma skin cancers, with basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma occurring most commonly after the fifth decade of life.
Artificial UV exposure from tanning beds and lamps presents a significant risk, as these devices expose users to UV levels 4 to 13 times more intense than natural sunlight.² Frequent use at a young age in particular is associated with a higher risk of melanoma. Beyond UV radiation, a broader range of factors also contribute to skin cancer risk, including environmental pollutants, chemical carcinogenic agents, ionizing radiation, smoking, and diet.²
The cumulative impact of lifestyle changes is reflected in the fivefold to sixfold increase in melanoma incidence observed over the last 40 years, largely attributed to behaviours such as more frequent tanning bed use and increased sunbathing.⁴ This is further reinforced by occupational and volitional exposure patterns, whereby jobs requiring extensive time outdoors and deliberate lifestyle choices to spend prolonged periods in the sun have collectively contributed to greater cumulative UV exposure across populations.²
Immunosuppression is a well-recognised risk factor for skin cancer, with individuals who have received organ transplants or are living with AIDS/HIV facing a significantly increased risk.² Additionally, certain medical treatments themselves carry carcinogenic potential. Radiotherapy, phototherapy, and PUVA therapy, which combines psoralen with ultraviolet A radiation, are all associated with an increased risk of basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.²
Several treatments historically used for psoriasis, a chronic autoimmune inflammatory condition affecting the joints and skin, have also been implicated in skin cancer development. Arsenic and tar-based treatments represent a major risk factor for squamous cell carcinoma, while X-ray therapy carries well-documented long-term carcinogenic effects.² Dithranol, another agent used in the management of psoriasis, is capable of interacting with DNA, has been shown to cause mutations in yeast, and acts as a potent co-carcinogen in animal models, further highlighting the carcinogenic risk associated with certain therapeutic interventions.²
A combination of physical trauma, underlying skin diseases, and past medical treatments can contribute to the development of squamous cell carcinoma in the lower extremities. Notably, malignant transformation in old burn scars and sites of prior mechanical trauma can occur after a latency period of over 20 years, underscoring the long-term carcinogenic potential of these forms of tissue injury.²
The most common form of skin cancer of the lower limbs is ulcerating squamous cell carcinoma, which typically arises in skin that is already damaged or abnormal.³ Several underlying conditions are recognised as predisposing factors for its development.
Acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans is one such rare disease, characterised initially by red-blue inflammation and swelling, usually affecting the limbs, which eventually progresses to severe skin atrophy producing a thin, tissue paper-like appearance. The resulting chronic ulcers and hypostatic ulcers associated with this condition create a tissue environment conducive to malignant transformation.³
Chronic perforating osteomyelitis, an infection-induced inflammation of the bone commonly caused by bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus and capable of leading to progressive bone destruction, also carries a well-established association with squamous cell carcinoma development, particularly in cases where the infection has persisted for over 20 years.³
Malignant melanoma is becoming increasingly common in young adults, with intermittent, intense exposure to sunlight representing a major risk factor.⁴ Recreational activities such as boating, sunbathing, and fishing are particularly relevant in this context.⁴ Sun exposure and sunburns occurring during childhood are considered especially harmful, carrying a significant influence on the likelihood of melanoma development later in life.⁴
Regarding non-melanoma skin cancers, the relationship with sun exposure differs somewhat between the two main subtypes. Basal cell carcinoma is more closely associated with a tendency to sunburn, while squamous cell carcinoma is linked to high cumulative sun exposure over time, reflecting the differing ways in which UV radiation drives each distinct cancer type.⁴
(Open in preview)
1. Which genes are deficient in Epidermodysplasia Verruciformis, preventing the clearance of beta HPV infections?
A) BRCA1 and BRCA2
B) TMC6 and TMC8
C) NOTCH1 and TGF-beta
D) BAK and E6
2. In Merkel Cell Polyomavirus, which viral components are considered the primary drivers of tumorigenicity?
A) Large T antigen and E6 protein
B) Small T antigen and E6 protein
C) Small T antigen and a truncated large T antigen
D) BAK protein and small T antigen
3. Which type of UV radiation is primarily responsible for premature skin aging and penetrates deepest into the skin?
A) UVC
B) UVB
C) UVA
D) Infrared radiation
4. The incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the lower limbs in southern Sweden is how many times higher than in the northern part?
A) 1.25 times higher
B) 1.50 times higher
C) 2.00 times higher
D) 1.74 times higher
5. Which of the following best explains why the lateral side of the leg in females is more frequently affected by squamous cell carcinoma than the medial side?
A) Greater lymphatic drainage on the lateral side
B) Differences in clothing styles resulting in greater UV exposure to the outer surface
C) Higher density of melanocytes on the lateral surface
D) Greater accumulation of chemical carcinogens on the lateral side
6. Artificial tanning devices such as tanning beds expose users to UV levels how many times more intense than natural sunlight?
A) 1 to 3 times
B) 4 to 13 times
C) 15 to 20 times
D) 20 to 30 times
7. Which of the following treatments used historically for psoriasis is described as capable of interacting with DNA and acting as a potent co-carcinogen in animal models?
A) PUVA therapy
B) Arsenic treatment
C) Dithranol
D) Tar treatment
8. Malignant transformation arising in old burn scars or sites of mechanical trauma can occur after a latency period of how long?
A) 5 years
B) 10 years
C) Over 20 years
D) Over 50 years
9. Which of the following conditions is characterised by red-blue inflammation and swelling that eventually leads to thin, tissue paper-like skin atrophy, predisposing patients to squamous cell carcinoma?
A) Chronic perforating osteomyelitis
B) Acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans
C) Epidermodysplasia Verruciformis
D) Merkel cell carcinoma
10. Which of the following correctly pairs each non-melanoma skin cancer subtype with its primary pattern of sun exposure?
A) Basal cell carcinoma with high cumulative exposure; squamous cell carcinoma with tendency to sunburn
B) Both basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma are associated with intermittent intense exposure
C) Basal cell carcinoma with tendency to sunburn; squamous cell carcinoma with high cumulative exposure
D) Squamous cell carcinoma with childhood sun exposure; basal cell carcinoma with occupational exposure
B
C
C
D
B
B
C
C
B
C
Meyers JM, Munger K. The Viral Etiology of Skin Cancer. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2014 Oct;134:E29–32.
Mihaela Crăescu, Rebegea L, Niculeț E, Bobeica C, Tatu AL. Environmental factors’ contribution in skin cancer etiology. Annals of the ”Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati Fascicle II Mathematics Physics Theoretical Mechanics. 2020 Dec 26;43(2):165–9.
Swanbeck G, Hillstrom L. ANALYSIS OF ETIOLOGICAL FACTORS OF SQUAMOUS CELL SKIN CANCER OF DIFFERENT LOCATIONS [Internet]. Semantic Scholar. Swedish Cancer Socicty. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden; 1969. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/537b/4d1a3fb1b5b7d95295344da20d09958fbd95.pdf
oSsterlind, Anne MD. Etiology and epidemiology of melanoma and skin neoplasms. Current Opinion in Oncology 3(2):p 355-359, April 1991.