Commonly due to assaults, motor vehicle crashes, falls and sports
Mandible more sensitive to lateral impact than frontal impact
Forced occlusions often results in fracture to condyle vs. mechanism of lateral blow results in fracture to body or angle
Pathoanatomy
Injury at the site of impact
Classic teaching: >2 sites fractured with second injury on opposite side of the ring
However, case study found 42% of mandibular fractures unifocal
Associated injuries
Intraoral, dental, tympanic, nerve, vessel
2. Classification
One study reported location of mandibular fractures:
Favourable vs. unfavourable
Depends if musculature reduces or opens fracture
Most fractures of the angle are unfavourable
Fractures of the coronoid alone usually no intervention
3. Presentation
Symptoms
Dental malocclusion, trismus
Pain, worse with movement
Intraoral bleeding/deformity
Ear pain
Physical Exam
Inspection
Swelling
Widened or displaced to one side
Intraoral examination
If blood in mouth or small breaks in mucosa, suspect open fracture
Sublingual or buccal ecchymosis considered pathognomonic for mandibular fracture
Examine for dental or alveolar ridge fractures
Examine tympanic membrane to rule out perforation or hemotympanum
Palpation
Irregular contours, step-off, along mandible
Crepitus
Tenderness intraorally and externally
Check for CN V3 function, leading to anesthesia/paresthesia to the lower lip, due to injury to the inferior alveolar or mental nerve
Palpate in and around the external auditory canal, while asking patient to open and close mouth, to palpate for condylar injury
Tongue blade test
Ability to maintain the bite on a tongue blade being twisted with enough force that it cracks
Negative predictive value of 95% for mandibular fracture
Positive if patient complains of pain before the depressor can be broken on either side
4. Investigations
Radiographs
Initial imaging study for low clinical suspicion of injury
Simple radiographs less sensitive and tend to miss condyle fractures
If available, panorex radiographs good for isolated mandibular, dental or alveolar ridge fractures, but CT often preferred
CT
1st choice for all patients with suspected fracture
Obtain facial bone CT with coronal and axial sections and reconstructions
CT also helpful to assess associated injuries and with surgical planning
Interpretation requires close attention to bones, sinuses, orbital contents and soft tissue. Better handled by radiologists
MRI
Not an optimal imaging choice as fractures better seen on CT
5. Treatment
Consult Plastics/OMFS/ENT, especially if unstable
e.g. mobile bone segments, unable to open and close mouth effectively, significant pain and unable to eat
Keep NPO until otherwise instructed by specialist
Airway management
If tenuous airway due to mouth/tongue swelling, consult anesthesia. May require nasal intubation over flexible bronchoscope
If patient unconscious, remove material from mouth which can be aspirated (e.g. teeth, blood clots, road debris)
Frequent serial airway checks
Stabilization
If stable airway, can place Barton bandage (ace wrap over top of head and underneath mandible) to help stabilize fracture and decrease pain
Operative
Open fractures require admission for operative repair
For open mandibular fractures:
Antibiotics
Pen G 2-4 million units IV
If pen-allergic, Clindamycin 600-900mg IV
Tetanus booster
Analgesia
May require early splinting with arch bars, or “wiring the jaw”, to achieve interdental fixation by specialist
If adequate stabilization with closed fractures, elective operative repair can be done as an outpatient in 3-5 days
Blunt cerebrovascular injury screening
CTA head & neck indicated for high-energy mechanism with complex mandibular fracture to rule out vertebral and carotid artery dissection
May be appropriate to discharge patients home if closed, non-displaced fractures and reasonably aligned teeth. If so, discharge with:
Appropriate analgesia
Modified soft diet x 4-6 weeks
Outpatient follow-up with Plastics/OMFS/ENT
6. Complications
Monitor for airway compromise from intraoral swelling or lack of tongue support in multi-focal fractures (flail mandible)
Less common in conscious patient, but may occur in unconscious patient
If mechanism was due to forced occlusion, consider hyperextension injury to cervical spine for fracture or vascular injury
If high-energy transfer with complex mandibular fracture, consider screening for blunt cerebrovascular injury with CTA neck
7. Pediatrics
In one study, 17-22% of pediatric patients aged 4-11 years old developed facial growth disturbances after a fractured mandible and later required operative correction.
As a result, children with a blow to the chin and have trismus or tenderness in the TMJ should be assessed carefully with panorex imaging with appropriate referral
8. References
Blok, Barbara; Cheung, Dickson; and Platts-Mills, Timothy. First Aid for the Emergency Medicine Boards 2/E. US : McGraw-Hill Medical, 2012.
Escott EJ, Branstetter BF: Incidence and characterization of unifocal mandible fractures on CT. Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29:890.
J. Neiner, et al. Tongue Blade Bite Test Predicts Mandible Fractures. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2016
Marx, J. A., & Rosen, P. (2014). Rosen's emergency medicine: Concepts and clinical practice (8th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Saunders.
O Ceallaigh, P & Ekanayake, Kumara & J Beirne, C & W Patton, D. (2007). Diagnosis and management of common maxillofacial injuries in the emergency department. Part 2: Mandibular fractures. Emergency medicine journal : EMJ. 23. 927-8. 10.1136/emj.2006.035956.
Stapczynski, J. S., & Tintinalli, J. E. (2011). Tintinalli's emergency medicine: A comprehensive study guide (7th ed.). New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill Education LLC..