People 39;s Turf Plc Magazine Free Download VERIFIED

We all know at least some of the momentum driving the transition to battery electric OPE is as much about noise reduction as it is about the environment. But just how much does the sound of landscaping equipment bother people? And just how much does it affect neighbor relations?

Turf Magazine advances the growth, environmental outreach and profitability of the turf and landscape industry by providing green industry company owners and other industry professionals with cutting-edge information.

People 39;s Turf Plc Magazine Free Download

DOWNLOAD 🔥 https://geags.com/2y4Pkr 🔥

In response, stadium managers tried a new option: they resurfaced the field with Chemgrass, a carpet of half-inch thermoplastic fibers attached to a rubber mat and laid on top of an asphalt base. Chemstrand, the Monsanto subsidiary that had developed the synthetic turf, saw a marketing opportunity and renamed it AstroTurf.

Ironically, artificial turf was designed to make people healthier. The idea came from the Educational Facilities Laboratory, a nonprofit corporation established by the Ford Foundation in 1958 to help schools modernize and create environments that supported learning. Spurred by research showing that military recruits from rural areas were more physically fit than their urban counterparts, lab director Harold Gores urged Monsanto to create a grasslike surface that could be laid down on city lots to provide more places to play. Chemgrass was the result.

Synthetic turf made even bigger inroads at football stadiums, where surfaces took more punishment. By 1984, 17 out of 28 National Football League (NFL) teams were playing on artificial turf. Many NFL players argued that these surfaces caused more strains, abrasions, and concussions than playing on grass. They also contended that artificial-turf abrasions exposed them to staph infections.

In the 1970s the NFL Players Association repeatedly called for moratoriums on the installation of synthetic turf until these issues were addressed. A 1973 study commissioned by the NFL from the Stanford Research Institute found no significant difference in the total number of injuries that occurred on synthetic turf compared with natural grass. Another study, published in 1992, concluded that linemen were more likely to suffer knee sprains during passing plays on AstroTurf than on grass.

According to industry estimates, covering a single football field with synthetic turf consumed the infill equivalent of 20,000 to 40,000 tires. But using crumb rubber to cushion playing surfaces raised new concerns. Tire manufacturers add oils that contain hazardous chemicals, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to make the rubber stronger and more pliable, and treat the rubber with zinc oxide (which can contain lead and cadmium compounds) during vulcanization to make it more elastic and durable.

Many communities see synthetic turf as a good investment. Although it costs roughly twice as much to install as a grass field, manufacturers say that artificial turf costs less to maintain and provides more hours of playing time, which adds up to greater cost savings over time. According to the Synthetic Turf Council, an industry group, more than 1,200 synthetic-turf playing fields were installed in the United States in 2013.

Natural-grass advocates argue that improved strains of grass need less water, fertilizer, pesticides, and mowing than sods did 10 or 20 years ago, reducing maintenance costs. They also point out that natural grass absorbs rain, reducing storm-water runoff, and transpires water, which cools playing surfaces. Some synthetic-turf manufacturers are introducing alternative fill materials, such as coated sand, ground cork, coconut fiber, and rice husks, in response to health and environmental concerns about crumb rubber.

No independent agency has produced an authoritative life-cycle analysis of the costs and impacts of artificial turf, which leaves local governments wrestling with conflicting information. Most municipalities conclude that synthetic turf will provide more playing time and so is a good investment.

But some communities have bucked the trend. Since 2007 more than a dozen towns in Massachusetts have voted against installing artificial-turf fields. The Los Angeles Unified School District, the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation, and Montgomery County, Maryland, all ban the use of crumb rubber in any fields built going forward. Although artificial turf looked like a winner when it was introduced, the contest between synthetic and grass fields has become a hard-fought race.

No Mow May is just one small way to deal with problems created by grass lawns. Many people go further, replacing all of their grass with native plants, says Rost. Read on to learn more reasons why people are ditching their lawns to help people, pollinators, and the planet

So grass lawns can create problems. No Mow May is just one small way to deal with them. Many people go further. They replace all their grass with native plants, says Rost. There are many reasons people choose to ditch their lawns. Read on to see how this helps people, pollinators, and the planet.

Hi there. I\u2019m Yolanda Edwards. a longtime magazine editor based in New York. For years I\u2019ve worked in travel editorial\u2014in my 20s as a photo editor at Cond\u00E9 Nast Traveler, then as the travel & lifestyle editor at Cookie (RIP) and later as the creative director of Cond\u00E9 Nast Traveler. I\u2019ve always gotten the best advice from people who travel a lot, and have great taste\u2014not necessarily writers. I first decided to start my quarterly print magazine, Yolo Journal, because I\u2019m passionate about photography, travel, and collecting great ideas, and a forever lover of the printed page.

But then people would keep DM\u2019ing me on @YoloJournal for my personal advice\u2014for my lists in places I\u2019ve been, or for food and packing tips. Information that doesn\u2019t feel like an overwhelming city guide (created with search algorithms in mind), and speaks to the way most like to travel (connecting to the feelings/wants people experience when they aren't on their home turf). So I decided to start Yolo Intel on Substack to address their questions and to share insights and ideas both from me and from different creative and curious people I admire who share similar views on travel.

I started Yolo Journal in print because I wanted to put something out there that was really an inspiration starting point, knowing that everyone has endless search tools once they have the idea in their mind. I purposely don\u2019t put in all the info for all the places we include in the magazine, because all that intel would junk up the pages, and then it wouldn\u2019t be pretty and inspiring anymore. Yolo Intel is the place where all that info will live. If you\u2019re a subscriber to the magazine, you get a Yolo Intel 3 month free trial.

Maybe you are planning a new garden bed. But what about your lawn? Most people spend more time, money and effort on their lawns than on all of their other plants combined. By now, we are aware of the ecological implications of a perfect lawn, whether it be exhaust from lawn equipment or runoff from the fertilizers and chemicals required to maintain that perfect green hue. Then comes summer, when most lawns are off-color and crunchy. Perhaps this is also the time of year when we should rethink the need for the sprawling lawns many of us have. Maybe there are other, more imaginative and ecologically sound options.

In all but the most highly traveled areas of your yard, turf can be used to create winding pathways between planting beds. Using lawn in this way can help slow down and absorb water runoff, making it more environmentally friendly than concrete or asphalt. Whereas the standard width of a sidewalk is 4 or 5 feet, think about going wider, perhaps 8 or even 10 feet, with a turf path. Doing so will allow you to create pleasing curves that will pull the eye through the space. When the eye goes to something pleasant, the body will certainly follow. SP e24fc04721