Embedded Files
This page introduces manuscripts that we are interested in.
This page will be regularly updated.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.11439
"Primordial black holes in loop quantum gravity: The effect on the threshold"
Theodoros Papanikolaou
https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.11619
"Analysis of a subsolar-mass black hole trigger from the second observing run of Advanced LIGO"
Gonzalo Morrás, José Francisco Nuño Siles, Alexis Menéndez-Vázquez, Christos Karathanasis, Katarina Martinovic, Khun Sang Phukon, Sebastien Clesse, Juan García-Bellido, Mario Martí nez, Ester Ruiz Morales, Mairi Sakellariadou
https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.02586
"Questions on calculation of primordial power spectrum with large spikes: the resonance model case"
Keisuke Inomata, Matteo Braglia, Xingang Chen
https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.03395
"Ruling Out Primordial Black Hole Formation From Single-Field Inflation"
Jason Kristiano, Jun'ichi Yokoyama
https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.06196
"Simulations of PBH formation at the QCD epoch and comparison with the GWTC-3 catalog"
Albert Escrivà, Eleni Bagui, Sebastien Clesse
https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.05959
"From inflation to black hole mergers and back again: Gravitational-wave data-driven constraints on inflationary scenarios with a first-principle model of primordial black holes across the QCD epoch"
G. Franciolini, I. Musco, P. Pani, A. Urbano
https://inspirehep.net/literature/2058343
"Machine learning primordial black hole formation"
Tomohiro Nakama
https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.09008
"A Note on the Abundance of Primordial Black Holes: Use and Misuse of the Metric Curvature Perturbation"
V. De Luca, A. Riotto
https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.13099
"Primordial black holes as a probe of strongly first-order electroweak phase transition"
Katsuya Hashino, Shinya Kanemura, Tomo Takahashi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.14584
"A new mechanism for primordial black hole formation during reheating"
Luis E. Padilla, Juan Carlos Hidalgo, Karim A. Malik
https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.12268
"Extreme-Value Statistics of the Spin of Primordial Black Holes"
Siri Chongchitnan, Joseph Silk
=============Comment=============
Can the critical behavior give a significant effect on their analisys? They are using the equation by De Luca etal, where the critical behavior is not taken into account.
=================================
https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.00039
"Black Hole Production of Monopoles in the Early Universe"
Saurav Das, Anson Hook
https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.01129
"Primordial Black Holes and r-Process Nucleosynthesis"
George M. Fuller, Alexander Kusenko, Volodymyr Takhistov
https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.08717
"Can Primordial Black Holes as all Dark Matter explain Fast Radio Bursts?"
Kimmo Kainulainen, Sami Nurmi, Enrico D. Schiappacasse, Tsutomu T. Yanagida
LVK:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toaBQwOmXbk
https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.00450
"GW200105 and GW200115 are compatible with a scenario of primordial black hole binary coalescences"
Sai Wang, Zhi-Chao Zhao
https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.11980
"Towards baryogenesis via absorption from Primordial Black Holes"
Antonio Ambrosone, Roberta Calabrese, Damiano F. G. Fiorillo, Gennaro Miele, Stefano Morisi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.09817
"μ-distortion around stupendously large primordial black holes"
Heling Deng
=============Comment=============
Yokoyama: Can we actually find the expansion of the surrounding underdense region in the numerical simulation of BH formation??
Kohri: I am not sure if this is correct.
=================================
https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05805
"Discriminating same-mass Neutron Stars and Black Holes gravitational wave-forms"
J.-F. Coupechoux, A. Arbey, R. Chierici, H. Hansen, J. Margueron, V. Sordini
https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.09328
"Cosmological black holes are not described by the Thakurta metric: LIGO-Virgo bounds on PBHs remain unchanged"
Gert Hütsi, Tomi Koivisto, Martti Raidal, Ville Vaskonen, Hardi Veermäe
https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.14908
"Comment on: Cosmological black holes are not described by the Thakurta metric"
Celine Boehm, Archil Kobakhidze, Ciaran A. J. O'Hare, Zachary S. C. Picker, Mairi Sakellariadou
https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.02007
"Reply to "Comment on: Cosmological black holes are not described by the Thakurta metric" "
Gert Hütsi, Tomi Koivisto, Martti Raidal, Ville Vaskonen, Hardi Veermäe
https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.06651
"Thakurta metric does not describe a cosmological black hole"
Tomohiro Harada, Hideki Maeda, Takuma Sato
https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.00521
"Who Ordered That? Unequal-Mass Binary Black Hole Mergers Have Larger Effective Spins"
Thomas A. Callister, Carl-Johan Haster, Ken K. Y. Ng, Salvatore Vitale, Will M. Farr
=============Comment=============
Yoo: How significant is it? Is it possible to explain the tendency with some PBH binary scenario or other interesting models?
Yokoyama: guess that PBH scenario has such a possibility. Please see attached rough sketch.
The point is the formation rate of the hierarchical 3-body system, I think. I remember that Suyama-san has discussed such a issue, but just in the private communication..
Yoo: Interesting! Maybe Suyama-kun is writing a paper now! In that case, we should have parent black holes. So in principle, we should be able to do a consistency check. Is it right?
Yokoyama: I think so. Naively, the formation rate of the simple 2-body system would be proportional to f_PBH, and that of 3-body one may be proportional to f_PBH^2. So, we should have a characteristic hierarchy between the merger rate of equal mass BHs and that of unequal maass BHs, in the PBH case. maybe, related; https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.10580
Yoo: Can we explain the tendency by introducing the correlation between the mass and angular momentum?
Yokoyama: I’m not sure, but I guess the correlation between the mass ratio and angular momentum should be more important.
Yoo: For example, dividing the BH population into larger mass and smaller mass classes, and setting the larger mass population smaller than the smaller mass population, if the larger mass class has more angular momentum, we would get such a tendency. Am I correct...? maybe too naive...
Yokoyama: My comment, "the correlation between the mass ratio and angular momentum should be more important.", sorry, this is not so correct, because even if the mass ratio is equal to 1, in this scenario, larger mass BH binaries should have larger spin. So, the correlation between mass and spin seems to be important as Yoo-san mentioned,
=================================
https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.11449
"The hunt for sub-solar primordial black holes in low mass ratio binaries is open"
Khun Sang Phukon, Gregory Baltus, Sarah Caudill, Sebastien Clesse, Antoine Depasse, Maxime Fays, Heather Fong, Shasvath J. Kapadia, Ryan Magee, Andres Jorge Tanasijczuk
https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.11139
"Can we distinguish astrophysical from primordial black holes via the stochastic gravitational wave background?"
Suvodip Mukherjee, Joseph Silk
https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03349
"Searching for a subpopulation of primordial black holes in LIGO/Virgo gravitational-wave data"
Gabriele Franciolini, Vishal Baibhav, Valerio De Luca, Ken K. Y. Ng, Kaze W. K. Wong, Emanuele Berti, Paolo Pani, Antonio Riotto, Salvatore Vitale
=============Comment=============
How is the result different from that can be given by our procedure shown in https://inspirehep.net/literature/1810373 and https://inspirehep.net/literature/1672506? These are not cited in the paper, but our procedure would give a different result. It could be similar or far different...
=================================
https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03648
"Primordial black holes in interferometry"
L. Stodolsky
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse