Microstrip Patch Antenna
EEC 133 Final Project
EEC 133 Final Project
— PROJECT NAME
Microstrip Patch Antenna
— ASSOCIATED COURSE
EEC 133 – Electromagnetic Radiation & Antenna Theory
— DATE
Fall Quarter 2024
— KEYWORDS
Antenna Design, Ansys HFSS, Vector Network Analyzer (VNA), Scattering Parameters
This project involved designing a microstrip patch antenna to operate within the Bluetooth frequency band (2.402–2.480 GHz).
The project can be split into three distinct phases:
Calculation : Using the design parameters to determine the antenna's physical dimensions.
Simulation: Using the calculated geometry to simulate antenna performance and characteristics. This step is used to iteratively refine the calculated values before fabrication.
Validation: Measuring the S-parameters of the antenna with a VNA to evaluate performance.
Microstrip Antenna and Coordinate System [1, p.723]
Microstrip patch antennas are a class of low-profile antennas which are conducive to applications where size and weight are critical for performance (e.g. in aircraft, spacecraft, and missiles)
These antennas offer considerable flexibility in design parameters such as operating frequency, polarization, radiation pattern, and input impedance [1, p. 783].
However, the use of patch antennas comes with several trade-offs. They typically exhibit poor efficiency, power, scan performance, polarization purity, and a notoriously narrow bandwidth [1, p. 783].
(1) Calculating Antenna Geometry
Starting with a set of provided parameters, I calculated the basic microstrip geometry: Resonant Frequency: 2.44 GHz, Return Loss: < -10 dB, Relative Permittivity (Ɛr ) = 4.5, Dielectric Thickness: 1.6mm, Copper Thickness: 17 m, Feed Impedance: 50Ω.
In the dominant transverse-magnetic (TM) mode, the resonant frequency of the antenna is a function of its length. This relationship can be used to obtain L and W. [1,p. 790]
After the following calculations, I used the Cadence TX-LINE Calculator by Cadence to determine the approximate dimensions for an insert feed to match the patch antenna to a 50-ohm transmission line.
Once I had these values, I simulated them on HFSS, and iteratively obtained a set of final values:
(2) Simulating Antenna Performance
(3) Evaluation of Performance
The final step that remained after fabrication was to measure the input port voltage reflection coefficient, S(1,1). This can be used to evaluate the input return loss.
Note: Disregard S(2,1) graph. Nothing was connected to port 2 so noise is being displayed.
In conclusion, the project can be considered successful. Both the simulated and measured return losses at the resonant frequency of 2.44 GHz were below the commonly accepted threshold of -10 dB, with values of -10.14 dB and -15.92 dB, respectively.
Nonetheless, there are areas where performance could be improved:
The radiation efficiency at resonance was calculated to be 39.5% (-4.03 dB). While this falls within the typical range for consumer-grade antennas (20–70%), it lies toward the lower end of that spectrum and may be suboptimal for applications where efficiency is critical.
Impedance matching is another aspect requiring further refinement. The antenna was designed to interface with a 50 Ω transmission line. However, the simulated input impedance was 49.55 – j32.61 Ω. The presence of ~30 ohms of capacitive reactance leads to a non-negligible mismatch, resulting in increased reflections and reduced power transfer efficiency.
References
[1] C. A. Balanis, "Microstrip Antennas," in Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 2nd ed., Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 1997, ch. 14.
[2] R. C. Johnson and H. Jasik, “Microstrip Antennas,” in Antenna Engineering Handbook, 2nd ed., New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1984, ch. 7.