How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
If you want a lighter, simpler running earbud with physical buttons and a hook that stays put without fuss, choose Otium 5.3; if you need marathon-grade battery life, a charging case with a visible power readout, and a newer Bluetooth chip for fewer dropouts, choose Matast Earbuds. Those are genuinely different products solving slightly different problems, and the specs make the split pretty clear once you look past the marketing language.
• Otium 5.3 — biggest strength: A true all-in-one hook design with physical media buttons, IPX7 sweat protection, and a genuinely lightweight 20-gram build that disappears on your head during a run.
• Otium 5.3 — biggest trade-off: Battery life is the weak spot. Around 10 hours of average use per charge (up to 16 hours max, 15 hours talk time), and there's no charging case mentioned in the specs — just a carrying case.
• Matast Earbuds — biggest strength: A 75-hour total playtime figure thanks to the charging case, plus a dual LED display that shows exactly how much juice is left in the case and in each bud.
• Matast Earbuds — biggest trade-off: Touch controls instead of buttons. That's a real preference split — some people love the tap gestures, others fight with them mid-sweat.
• Who Otium 5.3 is for: Runners, gym-goers, and anyone who wants a grab-and-go headset with buttons they can find by feel.
• Who Matast Earbuds is for: People who hate charging, travel a lot, or want a case that doubles as a battery bank for their earbuds.
The Otium 5.3 (model U18) is built around one idea: keep it simple and keep it on your head. The earpiece shape is a hook, which means the silicon earhook wraps over your ear rather than relying purely on an in-ear seal. For running, jogging, hiking, or anything where you're bouncing around, that's the design that tends to stay put. Otium ships four ear tip sizes (XS, S, M, L) plus an optional wire clip, so you can dial in the fit rather than accepting whatever comes in the box.
Sound-wise, this is a Bluetooth 5.3 headset with a dynamic driver covering 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz — the standard full-range window. Otium leans into bass in its own description, and the CVC 8.0 chip is there to smooth out call quality and reduce audio delay. There's also active noise cancellation listed in the controls, along with a built-in mic and voice notification for incoming calls. Nothing exotic, but a complete feature set for the category.
Where the Otium genuinely stands out is weight. At 20 grams it's about as light as in-ear hook headphones get, and the IPX7 rating means sweat and rain aren't a concern — Otium specifically describes a nano-coating that keeps moisture out of the internals. The trade-off is battery. You get roughly 10 hours of average listening, up to 16 hours of music at full charge, and about 15 hours of talk time, with a 1.5-hour charge time. That's a single-day-of-use product for most people, not a weekender. There's no charging case in the spec sheet, just a carrying case, so you're plugging in rather than topping up on the go.
I'd point a runner who does 45-minute sessions and charges nightly at the Otium. I'd steer away anyone who travels, forgets to charge, or wants to leave the house for a full weekend without a cable.
The Matast Earbuds (model B02) attack the same problem from a different angle — the earhook fit is still there, but almost everything else is about endurance and convenience. The headline number is 75 hours of total playtime, built from up to 10 hours of music on a single charge plus a portable charging case that refills the buds multiple times over. The dual LED display on the case shows both the case's remaining power and the charging progress of the earbuds, which sounds like a small thing until you've owned a case with no indicator and you're guessing.
Matast also goes newer on the wireless side: Bluetooth 5.4 versus the Otium's 5.3. Matast claims roughly double the data transmission speed and about 30% lower power consumption compared to 5.3, with a connection range up to 15 meters. In practice that translates to fewer stutters when you set your phone down and walk across the gym, and it's the kind of spec that quietly matters more than any marketing buzzword. Codec support covers HFP, HSP, A2DP, and AVRCP, and Matast says it plays nicely with iOS, Android, tablets, and laptops.
For calls, there are four ENC noise-reduction mics that Matast says passively cancel around 80% of background noise, and the 13mm dynamic driver is a genuinely large speaker for this price class of earbud — large drivers usually mean more low-end presence, which lines up with the "deep bass" framing. Water protection is IP7 nano-coating, covering splashes, sweat, and rain. You get three ear cap sizes (versus four for the Otium), and controls are touch-based with the usual play/pause, track skip, call answer/reject, and Siri wake-up gestures. Charging is over USB-C and takes about 1.5 hours for a full charge.
The catch is the touch controls. If you sweat heavily or wear gloves, taps can be hit-or-miss compared to the Otium's physical buttons. And the case adds bulk compared to a bare headset. I'd recommend the Matast to someone who wants to charge once and forget about it for days — commuters, travelers, people who work out daily and hate cable management.
• Best for battery life → Matast Earbuds. 75 hours total with the case versus a single-charge figure on the Otium.
• Best for the lightest possible wear → Otium 5.3. 20 grams, hook fit, no case needed in your pocket.
• Best for charging convenience → Matast Earbuds. USB-C fast charge plus a dual LED display so you always know where you stand.
• Best for physical controls → Otium 5.3. Buttons you can find by touch beat tap gestures when your hands are wet or gloved.
• Best for newer wireless tech → Matast Earbuds. Bluetooth 5.4 with a claimed 30% power reduction versus 5.3.
• Best for fit options → Otium 5.3. Four ear tip sizes and an included wire clip versus three ear caps.
• Best for call clarity claims → Matast Earbuds. Four ENC mics aimed at cutting background noise on calls.
• Best for waterproofing → effectively a tie. Both are rated for sweat and rain (IPX7 vs IP7), which is more than enough for workouts.
If I were buying one of these today, I'd take the Matast Earbuds. In my opinion, the combination of a 75-hour total playtime, a charging case with a visible power readout, USB-C charging, and the newer Bluetooth 5.4 chip makes it the more useful product for the way most people actually live — charging rarely, moving between devices, and taking calls in noisy places. The Otium 5.3 is the better pick only if you specifically want physical buttons and the absolute lightest possible headset for short daily runs. For everyone else, the Matast is the one I'd recommend.
Both are hook-style, IP-rated, and designed for workouts, so either works for running. The Matast wins on battery and case convenience; the Otium wins on weight and physical buttons. If your runs are short and you want minimum bulk, the Otium is arguably the better fit.
How long do the Otium 5.3 and Matast Earbuds last on a charge?
The Otium 5.3 lists active noise cancellation among its controls. The Matast Earbuds use sound isolation plus four ENC microphones that Matast says passively cancel around 80% of background noise on calls. They're different approaches — one is ANC for listening, the other is mic-side noise reduction for calls.
Yes — prices on both change, and this page doesn't track them. Use the "Check latest price on Amazon" button to see the current cost, then weigh that against which feature set actually fits your routine.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.