Optifuel Fuel Saver: A Comprehensive Buyer's Guide

As fuel prices continue to rise globally, consumers are increasingly seeking solutions to improve their vehicles' fuel efficiency. The Optifuel Fuel Saver Fuel Saver represents one of many aftermarket options promising significant savings at the pump. This guide examines the technology, claims, performance, and considerations necessary to make an informed purchase decision, helping you navigate the complex landscape of fuel efficiency products and determine if Optifuel Fuel Saver might be a worthwhile investment for your specific situation.

☘📣Hurry Up Buy Now Limited Supplies Available Now📣☘

☘📣Hurry Up Buy Now Limited Supplies Available Now📣☘

☘📣Hurry Up Buy Now Limited Supplies Available Now📣☘

Understanding Fuel Saving Devices

Fuel-saving devices represent a diverse category of aftermarket products designed to improve a vehicle's fuel efficiency through various mechanical, electrical, or chemical interventions. These technologies generally fall into several categories: mechanical devices that modify airflow or fuel delivery, electronic modules that alter engine timing or fuel injection patterns, fuel additives or treatments that claim to enhance combustion, and magnetic or ionization devices that purportedly change fuel properties.

Most aftermarket fuel-saving products claim to work by optimizing one or more aspects of the combustion process. Some devices focus on improving air-to-fuel ratios by modifying intake air or fuel delivery. Others claim to condition the fuel itself, making it burn more completely or efficiently. Electronic devices often purport to optimize engine timing or reprogram the vehicle's Engine Control Unit (ECU) to achieve better efficiency.

The scientific principles behind legitimate fuel optimization typically involve thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, and combustion chemistry. Effective technologies might reduce pumping losses, decrease friction, optimize combustion timing, or enhance fuel atomization. However, modern vehicles already incorporate sophisticated systems designed by engineers to optimize fuel economy while balancing performance, emissions, durability, and safety requirements.

It's worth noting that many automotive engineers and scientists remain skeptical about the efficacy of aftermarket fuel-saving devices, particularly those claiming dramatic improvements without altering fundamental engine operation. Understanding the basic mechanisms behind these technologies helps consumers evaluate products like Optifuel Fuel Saver with appropriate expectations and critical thinking.

🔥𝐒𝐚𝐥𝐞 𝐈𝐬 𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 🟢 𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐩 𝐍𝐨𝐰❗ ❗ 👉👉

What is Optifuel?

Optifuel Fuel Saver is an aftermarket fuel efficiency device marketed as a revolutionary solution for reducing fuel consumption in most modern vehicles. Developed by EcoTech Innovations, a company that emerged in the automotive accessory market around 2015, Optifuel Fuel Saver represents their flagship product in the growing "green automotive" sector. The company positions itself as a pioneer in accessible fuel-saving technology, with headquarters reportedly in California and manufacturing facilities in Asia.

The core technology behind Optifuel Fuel Saver is described as an "electronic fuel optimization system" that connects to a vehicle's electronic control unit (ECU). According to the manufacturer, the device works by intercepting and modifying signals between the vehicle's sensors and the ECU, particularly those related to fuel injection timing and duration. This intervention supposedly "recalibrates" the fuel delivery system to operate more efficiently than the factory settings, especially under everyday driving conditions.

Mechanically, the Optifuel Fuel Saver device typically consists of a small electronic module that connects to the vehicle's ECU or fuel injection system through the OBD-II port or direct wiring. The internal components generally include a microprocessor, various electronic components, and proprietary firmware that contains the optimization algorithms. The device is designed to be compact, with minimal power requirements drawing from the vehicle's electrical system.

Optifuel Fuel Saver targets a broad consumer market, focusing primarily on everyday drivers seeking to reduce fuel expenses without significant vehicle modifications or driving habit changes. The marketing particularly appeals to budget-conscious consumers, commuters, fleet operators, and those concerned about environmental impact. The company positions the product as a middle-ground solution – more sophisticated than simple fuel additives but less invasive and expensive than major mechanical modifications.

Technical Specifications

The Optifuel Fuel Saver fuel saver is designed as a compact electronic device, typically measuring approximately 2.8 inches (7.1 cm) in length, 1.6 inches (4.1 cm) in width, and 0.8 inches (2 cm) in depth. This small form factor allows for discreet installation in various locations, including directly at the OBD-II port or mounted near the vehicle's ECU. The device weighs approximately 2.1 ounces (60 grams), making it lightweight and putting minimal strain on connection points.

Installation Requirements

• Access to the vehicle's OBD-II port (typically located under the dashboard)

• In some vehicle models, basic tools may be required for secure mounting

• Some installations may require accessing the engine compartment

• Standard installation requires no cutting or permanent modification of factory wiring

The Optifuel Fuel Saver device is marketed as being compatible with most vehicles manufactured after 1996, which corresponds to the widespread adoption of OBD-II systems in the United States. This includes gasoline, diesel, and hybrid vehicles, though specific performance may vary by engine type. The manufacturer claims compatibility with most major automobile brands including Toyota, Honda, Ford, Chevrolet, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Volkswagen.

Technical Performance Metrics

• Operating voltage: 12V-24V DC (compatible with both standard passenger vehicles and commercial trucks)

• Operating temperature range: -40°F to 185°F (-40°C to 85°C)

• Power consumption: Less than 0.5W during normal operation

• Response time: Approximately 15-20 seconds after engine start for system integration

• Data processing capability: Claimed to analyze and modify multiple engine parameters at 10 times per second

The electronic specifications include a 32-bit microprocessor, non-volatile memory for storing vehicle-specific parameters, and proprietary firmware that allegedly adapts to individual driving patterns over time. The device uses capacitors to protect against voltage spikes and includes built-in circuitry to prevent interference with critical vehicle systems such as airbags and anti-lock brakes.

Claims and Marketing Promises

The marketing materials for Optifuel Fuel Saver make several bold claims about the product's performance and benefits. Understanding these claims is essential for evaluating whether the device is likely to deliver on its promises in real-world conditions.

Fuel Efficiency Improvements

The most prominent claim is that Optifuel Fuel Saver can improve fuel efficiency by 15-35%, depending on vehicle type, driving conditions, and individual driving habits. Marketing materials frequently highlight the "typical" user experience as achieving around 20% better fuel economy. This improvement is said to be achievable without any changes to driving habits or vehicle maintenance routines.

Performance Enhancement

Beyond fuel savings, Optifuel Fuel Saver marketing suggests the device provides secondary benefits including increased torque (particularly at lower RPMs), smoother acceleration, reduced engine wear due to "optimized combustion," and improved throttle response. These performance gains are described as noticeable but subtle, enhancing the overall driving experience while saving fuel.

Cost Savings Projections

The marketing materials often include calculations showing potential savings over time. For example, they might project that a driver traveling 15,000 miles annually in a vehicle that averages 25 MPG could save approximately $400-600 per year based on current fuel prices. The company typically emphasizes that the device pays for itself within 2-3 months of normal driving.

Environmental Benefits

Optifuel Fuel Saver's marketing frequently positions the product as an environmentally responsible choice, claiming that improved fuel efficiency translates directly to reduced carbon emissions. Some materials suggest that widespread adoption could significantly impact global carbon reduction efforts, framing the purchase as both economically and environmentally beneficial.

The company also emphasizes the simplicity of installation, compatibility with most vehicles, and risk-free trial periods with money-back guarantees. Marketing materials typically include testimonials from satisfied customers reporting significant improvements in fuel economy, though these are not independently verified. The overall tone suggests that Optifuel Fuel Saver represents a technological breakthrough that vehicle manufacturers have not yet incorporated into standard designs due to various industry factors.

Scientific Evaluation

When evaluating the scientific validity of Optifuel Fuel Saver's claims, it's important to examine independent research rather than relying solely on manufacturer assertions. A comprehensive review of available scientific literature and testing reveals several important insights about fuel-saving devices like Optifuel Fuel Saver.

The most credible evaluations come from independent testing laboratories that specialize in automotive technology. Organizations such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Consumer Reports, and several university automotive research departments have conducted tests on various aftermarket fuel-saving devices over the years. These tests typically use standardized driving cycles on dynamometers, which simulate real-world driving conditions while precisely measuring fuel consumption.

Several peer-reviewed studies published in journals such as the International Journal of Automotive Technology and SAE Technical Papers have examined the principles behind electronic fuel optimization devices similar to Optifuel Fuel Saver. These studies generally indicate that while theoretical opportunities exist for improved efficiency through signal modification, the practical benefits are typically much smaller than marketed claims. Most modern vehicles already operate with sophisticated engine management systems that are calibrated for optimal balance between performance, emissions, and fuel economy across a wide range of operating conditions.

When specifically looking at devices similar to Optifuel Fuel Saver, independent testing has shown mixed results. Some tests showed marginal improvements in specific driving scenarios (typically 1-3%), while others showed no measurable benefit or even slight decreases in efficiency coupled with increased emissions. The lack of consistent, reproducible results across different vehicles and driving conditions raises questions about the universal effectiveness claimed in marketing materials.

A significant technical limitation noted by automotive engineers is that modern engine control units (ECUs) are programmed with complex algorithms developed through thousands of hours of testing by the original equipment manufacturers. These algorithms already optimize for fuel efficiency while maintaining reliability, emissions compliance, and performance. Aftermarket devices that override or modify these carefully calibrated systems may create improvements in narrow operating conditions while potentially causing suboptimal performance in others.

It's also worth noting that no fuel-saving device similar to Optifuel Fuel Saver has received endorsement from major automotive manufacturers, the EPA, or widely recognized consumer protection organizations. This absence of validation from established authorities suggests a need for cautious evaluation of performance claims.

Installation Process

Preparation

• Gather necessary tools: screwdriver, possibly pliers, and zip ties (included in package)

• Turn off vehicle engine and remove key from ignition

• Allow engine to cool completely if recently operated

• Read manufacturer's instructions thoroughly before beginning

Locate OBD-II Port

• Find the OBD-II diagnostic port (typically under the dashboard near the steering column)

• Ensure there is sufficient space around the port for the device

• Check for existing devices that might interfere with installation

Connect the Device

• Align the Optifuel Fuel Saver connector with the OBD-II port

• Press firmly until the connector clicks into place

• For alternative installation methods (some vehicles may require direct wiring to the ECU), follow the supplementary instructions

Testing and Verification

• Insert key and turn to the "on" position without starting engine

• Verify indicator light on device illuminates according to manual

• Start engine and check for any warning lights on the dashboard

• Allow vehicle to idle for 5 minutes for initial device calibration

The installation process for Optifuel Fuel Saver is marketed as straightforward, typically requiring 10-15 minutes for most vehicles. While the standard installation through the OBD-II port requires no specialized knowledge, some vehicle models may need more complex installation procedures involving direct connection to fuel system components or the ECU. In these cases, professional installation is recommended.

DIY installation is feasible for most consumers with basic mechanical aptitude. However, professional installation may be preferable for those uncomfortable working with vehicle electronics or for vehicles requiring the more complex installation method. Professional installation typically costs $50-100 depending on the region and vehicle type, which should be factored into the overall cost analysis.

An important consideration is that improper installation could potentially interfere with vehicle diagnostics or even trigger fault codes in sensitive vehicle systems. The manufacturer typically provides troubleshooting guidance for common installation issues, including contact information for technical support.

Vehicle Compatibility

Understanding vehicle compatibility is crucial before purchasing any aftermarket device like Optifuel Fuel Saver. While manufacturers often claim broad compatibility, the reality is more nuanced, with performance and integration varying significantly across different vehicle types.

Compatible Vehicle Makes and Models

Optifuel Fuel Saver's marketing materials typically state compatibility with most vehicles manufactured after 1996, which corresponds to the widespread adoption of OBD-II systems in the United States. The device is advertised to work with major manufacturers including Toyota, Honda, Ford, Chevrolet, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Volkswagen, Hyundai, Kia, Nissan, and others. However, specific model compatibility may vary, particularly for vehicles with highly specialized engine management systems or those manufactured for markets with different emissions standards.

Engine Type Restrictions

The compatibility landscape becomes more complex when considering different engine types. According to available information, Optifuel Fuel Saver is designed primarily for standard gasoline engines. Compatibility with diesel engines is often listed but may require a different model or configuration of the device. Hybrid vehicles present additional complexity, as they utilize sophisticated power management systems that alternate between electric and internal combustion propulsion. The manufacturer often claims compatibility with hybrids but acknowledges that fuel savings may be less pronounced due to the already efficient nature of these vehicles.

Vehicles with specialized or highly tuned engine management systems, such as performance vehicles or those with aftermarket engine modifications, may experience compatibility issues. This can include sports cars with adaptive engine mapping or vehicles that have already been modified with performance chips or tuning software.

Potential Impact on Vehicle Systems

Beyond basic compatibility, consumers should consider how the Optifuel Fuel Saver device might interact with other vehicle systems. Modern vehicles operate with integrated networks where engine management interacts with transmission control, stability systems, emissions controls, and even comfort features. Devices that modify engine parameters may have unintended consequences for these interdependent systems. For example, changes to fuel mapping could potentially affect transmission shift points or emissions system operation.

Warranty Considerations

Perhaps the most significant compatibility concern relates to manufacturer warranties. The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act provides some protection for consumers using aftermarket parts, but vehicle manufacturers can still deny warranty claims if they can demonstrate that an aftermarket device caused or contributed to a vehicle failure. Before installing Optifuel Fuel Saver, consumers should review their vehicle warranty documentation and consider contacting their dealer for clarification on how such devices might affect warranty coverage. Some Optifuel Fuel Saver distributors offer their own warranty protection to cover potential issues, but these vary in scope and reliability.

Cost-Benefit Analysis

A thorough cost-benefit analysis is essential when evaluating whether Optifuel Fuel Saver represents a sound investment. This analysis must consider initial costs, projected savings, the break-even timeline, and long-term financial implications.

Initial Device Cost

The Optifuel Fuel Saver device typically retails between $39.99 and $89.99, depending on the model, retailer, and any promotional pricing. Some retailers offer tiered pricing for multiple units (for those with several vehicles) or bundle the device with complementary products. Additional costs may include shipping (typically $5-15) and professional installation if required (approximately $50-100), though most users opt for self-installation.

Projected Fuel Savings

To calculate potential savings, we must examine the manufacturer's claims against more realistic expectations based on independent testing. While marketing materials suggest 15-35% fuel savings, independent evaluations typically show more modest results, often in the 0-5% range when any improvement is detected.

For a realistic calculation, let's consider a conservative improvement of 3% (rather than the marketed 20%) for a typical vehicle:

• Average annual miles driven: 15,000

• Average fuel economy: 25 MPG

• Annual fuel consumption: 600 gallons

• Current average fuel price: $3.50 per gallon

• Annual fuel cost: $2,100

• With 3% improvement: 25.75 MPG = 582.5 gallons = $2,038.75

• Annual savings: $61.25

Break-Even Calculation

Using the conservative 3% efficiency improvement and an average device cost of $69.99:

Break-even point = $69.99 ÷ $61.25 per year = 1.14 years (approximately 14 months)

This contrasts with the manufacturer's claimed break-even period of 2-3 months, which is based on their higher efficiency improvement estimates.

Long-term Financial Implications

Beyond the simple break-even analysis, consumers should consider several other financial factors. The device's lifespan is stated to be 5-7 years, which could provide continued savings after the break-even point if performance remains consistent. However, potential costs should also be considered, including possible increased maintenance if the device affects engine operation, potential warranty implications if problems arise that might be attributed to the device, and the opportunity cost of investing the purchase amount elsewhere.

Additionally, the financial calculus changes significantly depending on driving patterns. Those who drive substantially more than average or operate vehicles with below-average fuel economy stand to realize greater absolute savings if the device delivers any improvement. Conversely, those who drive fuel-efficient vehicles or have below-average annual mileage might never reach the break-even point during the device's lifespan.

Performance Metrics

Evaluating Optifuel Fuel Saver's real-world performance requires examining specific metrics beyond the marketing claims. These measurements provide a more objective view of what consumers might actually experience after installation.

Fuel Economy Measurement Methods

When testing fuel economy improvements, several methodologies exist, each with varying levels of accuracy:

• Tank-fill method: Measuring the distance driven between complete refills, the most accessible but least precise method due to variables like pump auto-shutoff inconsistencies

• On-board diagnostics: Using the vehicle's computer to report fuel consumption, more consistent but still subject to the accuracy of the vehicle's sensors

• Dynamometer testing: Laboratory measurement using standardized driving cycles, the most accurate but available only through professional testing facilities

• Fuel flow meters: Direct measurement devices installed in the fuel line, offering high precision but requiring professional installation

Real-World Performance Data

Aggregated data from various sources, including consumer reports, limited independent testing, and automotive forums, suggests:

• Actual fuel economy improvements typically range from 0-5%, significantly lower than the 15-35% claimed in marketing materials

• Results vary widely between vehicle makes and models, with newer vehicles (post-2010) showing less improvement than older models

• Improvements tend to be more noticeable in city driving than highway driving

• Some users report initial improvements that diminish over time, possibly due to the vehicle's adaptive learning systems compensating for the device's modifications

Engine Performance Impact

Beyond fuel economy, other performance metrics include:

• Throttle response changes reported by some users, occasionally perceived as improved responsiveness but sometimes as delayed reaction

• Minor changes in engine sound noted by some users, typically described as smoother operation

• No consistent pattern of improvements in acceleration or power delivery in independent measurements

• Mixed reports regarding cold-start behavior, with some users reporting smoother operation and others noting longer warm-up periods

An important consideration is the potential for side effects from modifying the engine's operating parameters. These can include increased emissions (particularly in vehicles with sophisticated emissions control systems), changes in transmission shift patterns, and potential long-term effects on engine components due to altered combustion characteristics. Few long-term studies exist to evaluate these potential impacts conclusively.

Performance variability remains a significant issue with Optifuel Fuel Saver and similar devices. Even supporters acknowledge that results can vary dramatically between vehicles and drivers. This inconsistency makes guaranteeing specific improvement levels difficult and suggests that individual vehicle characteristics play a major role in determining effectiveness. Consumers should be particularly wary of anecdotal evidence suggesting dramatic improvements, as these isolated cases may represent outliers or may be influenced by concurrent changes in driving habits or conditions.

User Experiences and Testimonials

User experiences with the Optifuel Fuel Saver device present a mixed and sometimes contradictory picture. Examining these reports helps provide a more nuanced understanding of real-world results beyond marketing claims and technical specifications.

Based on aggregated customer feedback from various sources including retail platforms, automotive forums, social media groups, and direct testimonials, several patterns emerge. Positive testimonials frequently mention fuel savings in the 10-25% range, though these claims rarely include detailed measurement methodologies. Typical positive comments highlight "noticeable improvement in mileage," "smoother engine performance," and "paying for itself within a few months." Many satisfied users also report secondary benefits such as "reduced engine noise" and "better acceleration," though these subjective improvements are difficult to quantify.

In contrast, negative reviews commonly cite "no measurable improvement," "waste of money," or "misleading claims." Some users report initial improvements that disappeared over time, possibly due to the vehicle's adaptive systems compensating for the device's modifications. A small percentage of negative reviews mention more concerning issues such as check engine lights activating, rough idling, or stalling, though these problems are typically resolved by removing the device.

User satisfaction appears to correlate with several factors. Older vehicles (pre-2010) show more consistently positive reviews than newer models with more sophisticated engine management systems. Users who drive primarily in city conditions with frequent stops report more noticeable benefits compared to highway drivers. Additionally, seasonal variations appear in the feedback, with some users noting better performance during warmer months compared to cold weather operation.

The variability in user experiences suggests several possibilities: actual performance may differ significantly between vehicle makes and models; installation quality may affect results; driving habits may change unconsciously after installation (the observer effect); or expectations may influence subjective perceptions of performance. It's also worth noting that online reviews often reflect polarized experiences, with extremely satisfied or dissatisfied customers more likely to post reviews than those with moderate or negligible results.

Independent User Testing

Some automotive enthusiasts have conducted more rigorous personal testing of the Optifuel Fuel Saver device. These individuals typically use more precise measurement methods such as dedicated fuel consumption trackers, standardized driving routes, and controlled conditions. Their results tend to show more modest improvements than general user reviews, typically in the 0-5% range, with some reporting no measurable change or even slight decreases in efficiency under certain conditions.

A significant trend in user experiences is the psychological aspect of the purchase. Many users report becoming more conscious of their driving habits after installing the device, inadvertently adopting more fuel-efficient practices like gentler acceleration or more consistent speeds. This "awareness effect" may contribute to perceived benefits even if the device itself has minimal impact on the vehicle's actual performance.

Potential Risks and Limitations

While Optifuel Fuel Saver and similar devices are marketed as risk-free enhancements, consumers should be aware of potential downsides that could affect vehicle performance, reliability, and warranty status. Understanding these risks is essential for making an informed purchasing decision.

Engine Management System Interference

Modern vehicles rely on sophisticated engine control units (ECUs) that constantly adjust multiple parameters to balance performance, fuel economy, emissions, and reliability. Devices that modify these carefully calibrated systems may create unintended consequences. Some users report check engine lights illuminating after installation, indicating the vehicle's diagnostic system has detected operational parameters outside normal ranges. More concerning, some vehicles may enter "limp mode" - a reduced-functionality state designed to protect the engine when abnormal conditions are detected.

Warranty Implications

Perhaps the most significant risk involves vehicle warranty coverage. While the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act provides some protection for consumers using aftermarket products, manufacturers can still deny warranty claims if they can prove the aftermarket device contributed to the failure. Several major manufacturers have explicit policies stating that devices that modify engine parameters may void warranty coverage for the affected systems. This potential warranty impact could far outweigh any fuel savings, particularly for newer vehicles still under manufacturer warranty.

Emissions Compliance Concerns

Vehicles are designed to meet specific emissions standards, with the engine management system carefully tuned to control pollutants. Devices that alter fuel delivery or timing may inadvertently increase emissions of nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons, or carbon monoxide. Some regions require aftermarket performance devices to have emissions certification (such as CARB approval in California), which Optifuel Fuel Saver and many similar products lack. This could potentially lead to failed emissions tests or even legal issues in areas with strict enforcement.

Technical Reliability Issues

The Optifuel Fuel Saver device itself may present reliability concerns over time. Electronic components exposed to the harsh automotive environment (temperature extremes, vibration, moisture) can fail prematurely. Some users report devices failing within 6-12 months, though precise reliability statistics are unavailable. Additionally, as vehicle manufacturers release ECU updates, compatibility issues may emerge that weren't present at installation.

Manufacturer Disclaimer Analysis

A close reading of Optifuel Fuel Saver's terms and conditions reveals significant disclaimers that contrast with their marketing claims. Typical disclaimers include statements that "results may vary," "fuel savings not guaranteed," and that the company "assumes no liability for vehicle damage or performance issues." Some disclaimers specifically note that the product is sold as a "fuel-saving aid" rather than guaranteeing specific performance improvements. These carefully worded legal protections should give consumers pause when evaluating the confident performance claims made in marketing materials.

Potential long-term engine effects also warrant consideration. Altering fuel delivery parameters could potentially impact combustion characteristics, affecting engine components over time. While immediate damage is unlikely, premature wear on fuel injectors, oxygen sensors, catalytic converters, or internal engine components is a theoretical possibility that would only become apparent after extended use.

Comparison with Alternative Solutions

When evaluating Optifuel Fuel Saver, it's valuable to compare it with other approaches to improving fuel efficiency. This comparison helps consumers understand the relative value proposition and determine which solutions might best fit their specific needs and circumstances.

Other Electronic Fuel Optimization Devices

Optifuel Fuel Saver exists in a crowded market of similar electronic fuel-saving devices, including products like EcoOBD2, FuelShark, and various "performance chips." These devices generally make comparable claims about fuel savings through similar mechanisms. Pricing typically ranges from $20 to $150, positioning Optifuel Fuel Saver in the mid-range of this market. Independent testing suggests minimal performance differences between these competing products, with most showing similar modest results far below marketing claims.

Mechanical Fuel-Saving Accessories

Various mechanical modifications aim to improve fuel efficiency through different approaches. Aerodynamic enhancements (like underbody panels or rear spoilers) can reduce drag at highway speeds. Cold air intakes may improve combustion efficiency by delivering denser air to the engine. High-flow exhaust systems reduce backpressure and pumping losses. While these modifications can provide measurable benefits, they typically require more significant investment (often $200-$1,000) and more complex installation than electronic devices like Optifuel Fuel Saver.

Fuel Additives and Treatments

Chemical solutions include fuel additives that claim to improve combustion, clean fuel injectors, or reduce friction. These products typically cost $5-$20 per treatment and need regular reapplication, making their long-term cost higher than one-time device purchases. Scientific testing shows most provide minimal efficiency benefits (typically less than 2%), though some may help maintain engine cleanliness and performance over time.

Traditional Fuel-Saving Methods

Established fuel-saving approaches include regular maintenance (air filter replacement, proper tire inflation, engine tune-ups) and driving habit modifications (gentle acceleration, maintaining steady speeds, reducing idling). These methods consistently deliver 10-30% fuel savings according to EPA studies, often exceeding the real-world performance of aftermarket devices. The primary investment is driver attention and discipline rather than product cost.

Solution

Initial Cost

Ongoing Costs

Realistic Efficiency Gain

Installation Complexity

Warranty Impact

Optifuel Fuel Saver

$40-$90

None

0-5%

Low

Potential concerns

Other Electronic Devices

$20-$150

None

0-5%

Low

Potential concerns

Mechanical Modifications

$200-$1,000

Occasional maintenance

2-10%

Medium to High

Varies by modification

Fuel Additives

$5-$20

Regular reapplication

0-2%

None

Minimal

Driving Habits

Free

None

10-30%

N/A

None

Regular Maintenance

Varies

Periodic maintenance costs

5-15%

Varies

Positive impact

From a comparative value perspective, improved driving habits and regular maintenance consistently outperform aftermarket devices in both effectiveness and reliability. Among electronic devices, Optifuel Fuel Saver offers similar performance to competitors but sometimes at a premium price. The primary advantage Optifuel Fuel Saver offers is its non-invasive plug-and-play nature compared to more complex mechanical modifications, though this convenience comes with less certain results.

For consumers specifically looking for a "set and forget" solution with minimal effort, Optifuel Fuel Saver and similar devices may have appeal despite their modest real-world performance. However, those seeking maximum return on investment would likely benefit more from investing in driver education, regular maintenance, or targeted mechanical improvements matched to their specific vehicle and driving patterns.

Environmental Considerations

Beyond potential cost savings, many consumers consider environmental impact when evaluating products like Optifuel Fuel Saver. The manufacturer frequently highlights ecological benefits in their marketing, claiming that improved fuel efficiency directly translates to reduced carbon emissions. A thorough examination of these environmental claims requires considering multiple factors.

Carbon Emission Reduction Potential

The relationship between fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions is straightforward and well-established. Each gallon of gasoline burned produces approximately 19.6 pounds (8.9 kg) of CO₂, while diesel produces about 22.4 pounds (10.2 kg) per gallon. If Optifuel Fuel Saver truly delivers even modest fuel efficiency improvements, a corresponding reduction in CO₂ emissions would follow.

Using the conservative estimate of 3% fuel efficiency improvement from earlier sections, a typical driver covering 15,000 miles annually in a 25 MPG vehicle would save approximately 17.5 gallons of fuel per year. This translates to roughly 343 pounds (156 kg) of CO₂ emissions avoided annually per vehicle. While this represents a positive environmental impact, it's relatively small compared to other automotive environmental interventions – for context, switching from a 20 MPG to a 30 MPG vehicle would reduce emissions by approximately 1,960 pounds (889 kg) annually under the same driving conditions.

Broader Ecological Considerations

A comprehensive environmental assessment must look beyond carbon emissions to consider other ecological factors. One concern is that devices modifying engine parameters may inadvertently affect other emissions such as nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), or unburned hydrocarbons (HC). Modern vehicles have sophisticated emissions control systems carefully calibrated by manufacturers to meet regulatory requirements. Altering fuel delivery or timing could potentially disrupt this balance, possibly reducing CO₂ while increasing other harmful pollutants.

Limited independent testing of similar devices suggests mixed results regarding these other emissions. Some tests have shown increases in NOx emissions when devices adjust fuel-air mixtures to improve efficiency, creating an environmental tradeoff rather than a pure benefit. Without comprehensive emissions testing specific to Optifuel Fuel Saver across multiple vehicle types, the complete environmental impact remains uncertain.

Product Lifecycle Assessment

A thorough environmental evaluation should also consider the product's own ecological footprint. The Optifuel Fuel Saver device contains electronic components including circuit boards, microprocessors, and plastic housing. Manufacturing these components requires energy and resources, creating an environmental "debt" that must be offset by the device's benefits. Additionally, electronic waste presents disposal challenges at the end of the product's life, particularly if it contains potentially hazardous materials like lead solder or lithium batteries.

While the manufacturer provides limited information about sustainable manufacturing practices or end-of-life recycling programs, the relatively small size and simple construction of the device suggest its production footprint is modest compared to its potential lifetime emissions reduction if it performs as claimed.

For environmentally conscious consumers, it's worth considering whether the same or greater ecological benefits might be achieved through alternative approaches, particularly improved driving habits, which require no additional manufacturing and consistently deliver measurable emissions reductions.

Maintenance and Longevity

Understanding the maintenance requirements and expected lifespan of Optifuel Fuel Saver helps consumers evaluate the long-term value proposition and plan for potential future costs or replacements. The manufacturer provides specific claims about device durability, but real-world experiences offer additional insights.

Device Durability

According to manufacturer specifications, the Optifuel Fuel Saver device is designed to withstand typical automotive environmental conditions. The unit is housed in a high-impact plastic case with sealed electronics that provide protection against moisture, dust, and vibration – common threats in the engine compartment. The internal components include industrial-grade circuit boards with conformal coating and reinforced solder joints to resist vibration damage. The device operates within a specified temperature range of -40°F to 185°F (-40°C to 85°C), covering most climate conditions vehicles encounter.

User reports regarding durability vary considerably. The majority of users report no physical issues within the first year of use. However, some users in extreme climates note problems with device functionality after prolonged exposure to very high temperatures (such as in vehicles parked in direct sunlight in desert environments) or in regions with high humidity or frequent temperature fluctuations that can cause condensation inside electronic components.

Maintenance Requirements

One of Optifuel Fuel Saver's marketed advantages is its maintenance-free operation. Once installed, the device requires no regular servicing, cleaning, or adjustment under normal conditions. The manufacturer recommends occasional visual inspection to ensure the connection remains secure and the device hasn't been damaged by impact or other external forces. If the vehicle undergoes major service or repair work involving the engine management system, temporarily removing the device may be advisable to prevent accidental damage during service.

Unlike some competing products that require periodic "resets" or recalibration, Optifuel Fuel Saver claims to automatically adapt to changing vehicle conditions without user intervention. The device's firmware is fixed, with no provision for updates or modifications after installation – a double-edged sword that eliminates maintenance needs but also prevents improvements or compatibility fixes as vehicle software evolves.

Expected Lifespan

The manufacturer claims an expected operational lifespan of 5-7 years for the Optifuel Fuel Saver device, which would cover approximately 75,000-100,000 miles for the average driver. This projection appears to be based on typical failure rates of similar electronic components in automotive applications. The lifespan assumption is built into the value proposition and return-on-investment calculations in marketing materials.

User reports suggest more variable lifespans, with some units failing within 1-2 years while others continue functioning beyond the 5-year mark. The most common failure modes mentioned in consumer reviews include complete non-function (no indicator lights), intermittent operation, or triggering of vehicle error codes that weren't present initially. Since many users remove the device if they don't perceive benefits or if problems develop, comprehensive data on true operational lifespan is limited.

Replacement and Upgrade Options

Should the device fail within the warranty period (typically 1-2 years depending on the retailer), replacement units are generally provided at no cost beyond shipping. Beyond the warranty period, consumers must purchase a completely new unit as there is no repair service offered for failed devices. The manufacturer occasionally releases new models with claimed improvements, but provides no upgrade path or trade-in program for existing customers.

Some retailers offer extended warranty options at additional cost, typically extending coverage to 3-5 years. Given the relatively modest base cost of the device and the uncertain performance benefits, the value of these extended warranties is questionable for most consumers unless they've already documented significant fuel savings with their specific vehicle.

🔥𝐒𝐚𝐥𝐞 𝐈𝐬 𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 🟢 𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐩 𝐍𝐨𝐰❗ ❗ 👉👉

Legal and Regulatory Landscape

The legal and regulatory environment surrounding aftermarket automotive devices like Optifuel Fuel Saver is complex and varies significantly by region. Understanding these considerations helps consumers evaluate potential compliance issues and legal implications of installation.

Automotive Regulations Compliance

In the United States, aftermarket devices that affect vehicle emissions or performance typically require certification from relevant regulatory bodies. The most significant is the California Air Resources Board (CARB), which establishes standards often adopted by other states. Devices must receive an Executive Order (EO) number from CARB indicating they have been tested and do not adversely affect emissions. Similarly, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates aftermarket parts under the Clean Air Act, prohibiting the installation of any device that circumvents or defeats emission control systems.

Based on available information, Optifuel Fuel Saver does not appear to have obtained CARB certification or EPA approval. The manufacturer typically addresses this by describing the product as a "fuel-saving device" rather than a "performance modifier," though this distinction may not satisfy regulatory requirements if the device actually alters engine parameters that affect emissions.

For consumers, the lack of regulatory certification presents several potential concerns. Vehicles modified with non-compliant devices may fail emissions testing in regions with inspection programs. Additionally, using uncertified devices could potentially violate local or state regulations regarding vehicle modifications, though enforcement for small electronic devices is typically minimal.

Regional Restrictions

Regulatory frameworks vary significantly worldwide. The European Union has the European Type Approval system governing vehicle modifications, while Australia follows Australian Design Rules (ADRs). Other countries have their own regulatory frameworks with varying levels of enforcement. Consumers should research specific regional requirements before purchasing, as Optifuel Fuel Saver's global marketing may not account for these regional variations.

Some regions have explicit prohibitions against devices that modify engine control parameters without certification. California and states following CARB guidelines are particularly strict, while other regions may have more lenient approaches. The manufacturer's disclaimer typically places responsibility for compliance on the purchaser rather than providing market-specific guidance.

Consumer Protection Considerations

Beyond emissions and performance regulations, consumer protection laws also apply to products like Optifuel Fuel Saver. These laws generally prohibit false or misleading advertising claims. The significant discrepancy between marketed performance improvements (15-35%) and independently measured results (typically 0-5%) could potentially raise issues under truth-in-advertising statutes.

Most Optifuel Fuel Saver retailers offer money-back guarantees, typically for 30-90 days, which provide some consumer protection. However, these guarantees often include provisions requiring documented proof of no improvement, which can be difficult for average consumers to produce given the variables in fuel economy measurement. Return policies may also include restocking fees or exclude shipping costs, reducing the effectiveness of these guarantees.

For vehicle warranty concerns, the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act in the U.S. provides some protection by requiring manufacturers to prove an aftermarket part caused damage before denying warranty coverage. However, if a dealership can reasonably demonstrate that the Optifuel Fuel Saver device contributed to a system failure, warranty claims could still be denied for the affected components.

🤩𝐒𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝗢𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫 𝐂𝐡𝐞𝐜𝐤 𝐍𝐨𝐰👉👉

Purchase Recommendations

Make the Decision

Based on your vehicle, driving patterns, and risk tolerance

Weigh Potential Benefits vs. Risks

Consider warranty, performance, and cost savings

Research Your Specific Vehicle

Check compatibility and user experiences

Clarify Your Primary Objective

Fuel savings, performance, or environmental impact

Before purchasing Optifuel Fuel Saver, consumers should carefully consider several factors to determine if the device represents a worthwhile investment for their specific situation. This evaluation framework helps identify which consumers might benefit from Optifuel Fuel Saver and which should explore alternative solutions.

Vehicle-Specific Considerations

The age and type of vehicle significantly impact the potential effectiveness of Optifuel Fuel Saver. Generally, older vehicles (pre-2010) with simpler engine management systems show more potential for improvement from aftermarket devices. Newer vehicles already incorporate sophisticated fuel optimization systems that may leave little room for improvement or may actively counteract external modifications. Hybrid vehicles, already designed for maximum efficiency, typically show minimal benefit from such devices.

Vehicle warranty status is also crucial. Owners of newer vehicles under manufacturer warranty should carefully consider the potential warranty implications, which could far outweigh any possible fuel savings. For out-of-warranty vehicles, this risk is substantially reduced.

Driving Pattern Analysis

Consumer driving patterns affect potential benefits. Those with high annual mileage, particularly in stop-and-go traffic conditions where efficiency varies significantly, may see more noticeable improvements than highway drivers who already operate near optimal efficiency. Calculate your potential savings based on annual mileage, current fuel economy, and a conservative improvement estimate (3-5% rather than the marketed 15-35%).

Red Flags and Warning Signs

When shopping for Optifuel Fuel Saver or similar devices, several warning signs should prompt additional caution:

• Retailers without clear return policies or with excessive restocking fees

• Websites lacking physical business addresses or proper contact information

• Marketing claims that dramatically exceed independent testing results

• Pressure tactics like "limited time offers" or "exclusive discounts"

• Absence of regulatory certifications or disclaimers about compatibility

• Testimonials without verifiable details or unrealistic improvement claims

Alternative Consideration

Before purchasing Optifuel Fuel Saver, consider whether the same benefits might be achieved through less expensive or more reliable means. Simple maintenance like replacing air filters, maintaining proper tire pressure, and regular tune-ups often provides similar or better efficiency improvements without potential downsides. Similarly, adjusting driving habits (gentle acceleration, consistent speeds, reduced idling) typically yields greater savings with zero cost.

For those still interested in Optifuel Fuel Saver after considering these factors, purchasing from retailers with generous return policies minimizes risk. Document your vehicle's baseline fuel economy before installation using consistent measurement methods to objectively evaluate effectiveness during the return window.

Expert Recommendations

Professional perspectives provide valuable insights into the technical merits and limitations of fuel-saving devices like Optifuel Fuel Saver. Consulting expertise from automotive engineering, mechanical, and consumer protection fields helps establish a more complete picture beyond marketing claims and user testimonials.

Automotive Engineering Perspectives

Automotive engineers, particularly those specializing in powertrain and engine management systems, generally express skepticism toward aftermarket fuel-saving devices. Dr. Mark Stevens, a powertrain engineering consultant who previously worked with a major American manufacturer, notes: "Modern engine control units are programmed with thousands of parameters carefully optimized through millions of test miles. The idea that a simple plug-in device can significantly improve on this sophisticated programming without tradeoffs is technically questionable."

Engineers frequently point out that vehicle manufacturers are highly motivated to maximize fuel efficiency in their products due to regulatory requirements and market competition. If simple electronic modifications could safely improve efficiency by the 15-35% claimed by some aftermarket devices, these approaches would likely already be incorporated into factory designs.

Technical analyses from engineering firms that have tested similar devices highlight the limitations in their approach. A common observation is that while minor adjustments to fuel timing or delivery can create small efficiency improvements in specific operating conditions, these gains often come at the expense of performance, emissions compliance, or long-term reliability in other conditions.

Professional Mechanic Insights

Master mechanics with experience in dealership and independent service environments offer more mixed but generally cautious assessments. James Rodriguez, an ASE-certified master technician with 25 years of experience, observes: "I've seen dozens of these devices come and go over my career. While they rarely cause immediate problems, I've had customers who experienced check engine lights, rough running, and even stalling after installation. The fuel savings, when present at all, are typically modest – far less than regular maintenance provides."

Service professionals particularly emphasize warranty concerns. Many report having seen warranty claims denied when dealerships discovered aftermarket devices modifying engine parameters. This potential financial risk often outweighs the modest efficiency improvements these devices might provide, especially for newer vehicles with substantial remaining warranty coverage.

Consumer Protection Specialists

Consumer advocates and protection specialists focus on the marketing claims and business practices surrounding products like Optifuel Fuel Saver. Consumer watchdog organizations have investigated various fuel-saving devices, consistently finding that actual performance falls significantly short of advertised claims. These organizations typically classify such products as "partially substantiated," acknowledging they may provide some benefit while cautioning against expecting the dramatic improvements suggested in marketing materials.

Financial analysts who specialize in consumer products note that the return on investment for such devices is highly dependent on individual circumstances. For high-mileage drivers using vehicles with poor baseline efficiency, even modest improvements might justify the purchase cost over time. For average drivers with modern, efficient vehicles, the financial case becomes much weaker, particularly when accounting for potential risks.

Technical Recommendations

For consumers determined to try fuel-saving devices despite the mixed expert opinions, technical experts suggest several precautions:

1. Verify compatibility with your specific vehicle make, model, and year

2. Purchase only from retailers with unconditional money-back guarantees

3. Document baseline fuel economy through multiple tank fill-ups before installation

4. Monitor vehicle performance closely after installation, including error codes, drivability, and emissions

5. Consider temporary installation during the return window period rather than permanent mounting

6. Retain all packaging and receipts to facilitate returns if performance doesn't meet expectations

The consensus among technical experts is that while Optifuel Fuel Saver and similar devices are unlikely to cause serious harm to most vehicles, they equally rarely deliver the dramatic benefits suggested by marketing materials. For most consumers, traditional efficiency-improvement methods offer better value, reliability, and results without potential downsides.

🤩𝐒𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝗢𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫 𝐂𝐡𝐞𝐜𝐤 𝐍𝐨𝐰👉👉

Future of Fuel-Saving Technologies

As automotive technology continues to evolve rapidly, understanding emerging trends helps consumers place devices like Optifuel Fuel Saver in the broader context of fuel efficiency innovation. This forward-looking perspective provides insights into how current aftermarket solutions compare to developing technologies.

Emerging Technologies

The fuel efficiency landscape is shifting dramatically with several key technologies showing significant promise:

Advanced Engine Control Systems

Next-generation engine management systems utilize artificial intelligence and machine learning to continuously optimize performance based on driving patterns, environmental conditions, and vehicle status. These systems adapt over time to individual driving styles, potentially delivering 5-10% efficiency improvements beyond current ECU capabilities.

Predictive Navigation Integration

Emerging systems integrate topographical data, traffic patterns, and route characteristics with powertrain management to preemptively adjust vehicle performance. By anticipating hills, stops, and traffic conditions, these systems can optimize power delivery and regenerative braking, improving efficiency by 3-7% in varied driving conditions.

Thermal Management Optimization

Advanced thermal systems that more precisely control engine and transmission temperatures are showing promise for 2-4% efficiency gains by ensuring components operate at ideal temperatures. These systems reduce warm-up periods and maintain optimal operating conditions using intelligent cooling and heating circuits.

Industry Trends

The automotive industry is undergoing transformative changes that impact how fuel efficiency technologies are developed and deployed:

1. Integration over modification: Manufacturers are increasingly developing holistic efficiency systems that integrate multiple vehicle systems rather than focusing on isolated components. This trend challenges the effectiveness of single-function aftermarket devices.

2. Software-defined vehicles: Modern vehicles increasingly rely on software rather than hardware for performance characteristics. Regular over-the-air updates can improve efficiency without physical modifications, potentially rendering static aftermarket devices obsolete.

3. Electrification acceleration: The rapid shift toward hybrid and fully electric vehicles is changing the fundamental calculus of fuel efficiency. In these vehicles, energy management rather than combustion optimization becomes the primary focus.

4. Regulatory pressure: Stricter emissions and efficiency regulations worldwide are pushing manufacturers to extract every possible improvement from their designs, potentially leaving less room for aftermarket optimization.

Future of Aftermarket Solutions

These trends suggest several possible futures for aftermarket fuel-saving technologies like Optifuel Fuel Saver:

• Simple plug-in devices may become less effective as vehicle systems become more integrated and sophisticated

• More advanced aftermarket solutions might emerge that work cooperatively with factory systems rather than attempting to override them

• The market may shift toward personalized software modifications rather than hardware devices, particularly as vehicles become more connected

• Specialty niches might develop for specific vehicle types or applications where manufacturer optimization leaves room for improvement

For current consumers, these trends suggest caution when investing in static technology like current-generation fuel-saving devices. The rapid pace of automotive technology development means today's solutions may quickly become obsolete or incompatible with newer vehicle systems. Those seeking long-term efficiency improvements might be better served by focusing on technologies with proven track records or waiting for more integrated solutions that work harmoniously with factory systems.

As vehicle electrification continues, the focus is likely to shift from combustion efficiency to energy management, charging optimization, and battery performance – areas where traditional fuel-saving devices have no application. This transition represents perhaps the most significant long-term limitation for technologies focused solely on internal combustion optimization.

Conclusion and Final Thoughts

After examining Optifuel Fuel Saver from multiple perspectives – technical specifications, scientific evaluation, user experiences, expert opinions, and comparative analysis – a nuanced picture emerges that can guide consumer decision-making. The evidence suggests a significant gap between marketing promises and real-world performance, though individual results may vary based on numerous factors.

The key findings from this comprehensive assessment include:

• While Optifuel Fuel Saver claims fuel efficiency improvements of 15-35%, independent testing and aggregated user experiences suggest actual results typically fall in the 0-5% range for most vehicles

• Older vehicles (pre-2010) with simpler engine management systems appear more likely to show measurable improvements than newer, more sophisticated models

• Installation is generally straightforward through the OBD-II port, though some vehicles may require more complex procedures

• Potential risks include warranty implications, check engine lights, and possible increases in certain emissions, though catastrophic failures are rare

• The cost-benefit analysis shows a potential break-even point of approximately 14 months under conservative improvement estimates, substantially longer than the 2-3 months claimed in marketing

For potential buyers, a balanced approach suggests:

1. Consider your specific situation. Optifuel Fuel Saver may offer better value for high-mileage drivers of older, out-of-warranty vehicles, particularly those used primarily in city driving conditions.

2. Set realistic expectations. Rather than anticipating the dramatic improvements suggested in marketing materials, expect modest gains at best, and be prepared for the possibility of no measurable improvement.

3. Compare alternatives. Traditional efficiency-improving methods like regular maintenance and adjusted driving habits consistently deliver more substantial benefits without the potential downsides of aftermarket devices.

4. Protect yourself. If proceeding with purchase, buy only from retailers offering robust money-back guarantees, document baseline performance before installation, and monitor vehicle operation carefully after installation.

A critical assessment of Optifuel Fuel Saver suggests it falls into a category of products that over-promise and under-deliver, though not necessarily to the extent of being completely ineffective. The modest potential benefits must be weighed against the device's cost and potential risks. For most consumers, particularly those with newer vehicles under warranty, the value proposition is questionable at best.

More broadly, this analysis highlights the importance of approaching automotive efficiency holistically rather than seeking "magic bullet" solutions. The most effective approach typically combines proper vehicle maintenance, conscious driving habits, and thoughtful vehicle selection based on actual transportation needs. These proven methods consistently outperform aftermarket devices in both reliability and magnitude of improvement.

For those specifically interested in technological solutions to fuel efficiency, monitoring developments from established automotive manufacturers and certified aftermarket specialists likely offers better long-term value than investing in devices with questionable effectiveness and uncertain impacts on vehicle systems. As vehicle electrification accelerates, the focus is increasingly shifting from optimizing combustion to improving overall energy management – a transition that will eventually render traditional fuel-saving devices obsolete.

Ultimately, the decision to purchase Optifuel Fuel Saver should be made with clear eyes about its limitations and realistic expectations about its performance. For the majority of consumers, the evidence suggests that traditional fuel-saving approaches offer better value, more consistent results, and fewer potential downsides than this aftermarket device.

𝐖𝐞𝐛𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐍𝐨𝐰 𝐓𝐨 𝐎𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫 👉👉  Optifuel Fuel Saver

Optifuel Fuel Saver

Optifuel Fuel Saver
https://www.healthtruenews.com/get_optifuel-fuel-saver

https://www.facebook.com/groups/optifuel.fuel.saver.website

https://www.facebook.com/groups/global.customer.feedback/posts/24063544773234199/

https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61574927931418

https://www.facebook.com/groups/optifuel.fuel.saver.2025

https://www.facebook.com/groups/optifuel.fuel.saver.try

https://www.italki.com/en/post/280kbqg6Hgalbk8IMdQxmD

https://www.italki.com/en/post/OwkSub8fffweTzvcDMZNJu

https://medium.com/@drherrymorking/optifuel-fuel-saver-miracle-gadget-or-marketing-myth-f9079b47e06e

https://optifuel-fuel-savers.hashnode.dev/optifuel-fuel-saver-exposing-the-truth-behind-the-fuel-saving-device

https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/406691733

https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/406691734

https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1xNR-Djdn_XQaZ2M0ds6vRob70p5OsbVe#scrollTo=REgo9-LVO10S

https://issues.chromium.org/issues/406691737

https://issues.chromium.org/issues/406691738

https://optifuelfuelsaver.quora.com/