FAQ's

Frequently Asked Questions

Does No Vote advocate not voting in local, state, and federal elections? 

No Vote adovocates civic duty when morality is not at stake. No Vote's position is that morality and ethical conduct is more important than

voting. If a candidate has positions that cause moral conflict and the support of their campaign would provide the opportunity for those beliefs to garner attention and popularity, then voting would not be appropriate. No Vote belives that choosing a lesser evil would still be evil. 

What party does No Vote affiliate with?

If No Vote had to choose a political party, it would choose neither. Both parties within the United States have demonstrated that they have the propensity to be unethical and at times evil. The latter is often observed through lies, criminal conduct, contradictory positions, and or previous decisions, rhetoric, and personal conduct.

If someone doesn't vote... isn't that action similar to casting a vote? 

No Vote believes this statement / phrase to be accurate. By not voting, one candidate may have a greater advantage at winning an election. Still, if both candidates hold positions that cannot be justified, morally by one's conscience then it doesn't matter. Morality and ethical conduct are preeminent positions to hold. No Vote believes that one's conscience should never be sacraficed. 

What does No Vote hope to gain or accomplish?

No Vote hopes to shift the perspective of citizens across the United States to view civic duties as secondary to moral conscience. Fervent political discouse, or swaying another's opinion is often a waste of time and energy. The latter is rarely fruitful. Investing time, energy, and capital into churches, private businesses, and other communal efforts is more effecient and shifts the spotlight back on people and communities which government has forgotten or have been unable to help. 

Additionally, starving the political systems across the local, state, and federal landscape sends a strong message to politicians and the system itself. No more easy votes. Conscience matters. No Vote believes that this grassroot movement will reshape the political playing field and also the caliber of individual politicians. 

How Does No Vote define a morality or a moral choice in general?

No Vote uses the following definition of morality: a set of objective, divinely ordained truths rather than subjective opinions. It is rooted in the belief that God is the ultimate source of moral law, and that humans—created in the "image of God". This is a Judeo-Christian position on morality.

The core principles are:

• Sanctity of Human Life

• Moral Accountability

• Justice & Compassion

• The Ten Commandments

Distinct principles that No Vote espouses are:

• Heterosexual Couple Family Structures 

• Sanctity of Heterosexual Marriage

A moral choice in Judeo Christian can be defined as: a moral choice is defined by actions that align with the will of God, respect the sanctity of human life, and uphold objective standards of truth, justice, and compassion. Rather than being purely subjective, these choices are anchored in absolute, God-given moral laws 

References: Dennis Prager (PragerU-YouTube), What is the Judeo-Christian ethic? | GotQuestions.org, 

Does No Vote advocate violence or vigilantism?

No Vote categorically denounces any and all forms of violence and or vigilantism. No Vote simply asks that each person place morality and moral decision making above any and all social, cultural, or civic expectations and mandates. 

How can I support No Vote?

No Vote needs your support. There are many ways to be part of our bold mission and vision. Here are some options:

• Join or organize a No Vote rally in your community

• Subscribe to our quarterly newsletter

• Subscribe or Like Us on YouTube, Facebook, and X

• Donate to our mission

Direct links to our social media have been provided in our footer below.