Frequently Asked Questions

Probably not. Employers surveyed in Cisco’s 2025 Global Hybrid Work Study reported that requiring a set number of in-office days was actually less likely to have a positive impact on collaboration and innovation than a fully flexible model. 

Will the policy save the Vermont taxpayers money?

Buying or leasing sufficient office space, plus furnishing and maintaining it, will cost Vermont taxpayers tens of millions of dollars every year. And the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics finds that remote work is associated with decreased labor costs. 

Will RTO improve service delivery or outcomes?

Doubtful. Given the large number of qualified and capable staff who will be forced to quit as a result of this policy, service delivery is likely to suffer. And the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics finds that remote work is actually associated with increased productivity. 

Will this strengthen Vermont's economy?

No. A flexible hybrid work policy allows employees to remain in rural, affordable areas, which supports local economies statewide — not just in the cities where state offices are located. 

Will it make the State more resilient?

No. State workers help their neighbors as volunteer firefighters and EMTs. Requiring them to drive into the office, even when they don’t need to, reduces the number of hours that they are available to volunteer.

Wait... why is the Governor doing it then?

Good question! The evidence suggests that any potential improvements in collaboration or culture will be outweighed by significant new costs to Vermonters, higher employee turnover, slower response times, and weakened rural communities.

Okay, so what can I do?

Let Governor Scott know how you feel about this policy. Ask him to assess how much the return-to-office mandate is going to cost taxpayers before moving ahead with the policy.