Skateboarding began in 1959 in Hawaii for surfers who saw the tides were too low or rough. Skateboarding made way for longboarding. Longboarding history comes from teenagers who wanted to surf when there were not safe waves, but were not comfortable with the short and narrow boards of skateboarding. If one is not comfortable on a skateboard, then it is a tenet of longboarding safety to find a board more suited. Any longboarding review should take into account the safety rating of brands. Longboards are wider and longer than skateboards meaning they can move more comfortably at faster speeds, but they are less able to do tricks.
There are a number of longboarding techniques which users can learn and perfect. Drifting is used when the longboard loses traction during a turn. The technique slows the board around a turn which would be too tight to make. Another braking technique is the foot brake. This is when the rider puts their foot on the road or sidewalk while riding. This slows the board or allows the rider to come to a full stop. Air braking is when the rider stands upright on their longboard and stretches out their arms. This catches the most possible wind resistance and slows them gradually. It works better with high speeds, but is not an effective stopping method.
Carving is used in longboarding when going at high speeds. The rider winds their board in S-shaped curves (moving left and right). This controls the speed and slows the rider down. Boardwalking is when the rider moves their feet up and down the deck. Riders can incorporate elaborate moves for show. Slide braking is when the rider turns the board to the side on a downhill ride. This is used for quick stops. The rider will sometimes put their hands down to stabilize. It is suggested the rider wear gloves for this reason.
Brick and mortar stores have certainly had to adapt to the fact that online shopping is more popular than ever. There was a time when people feared the online shopping process. Horror stories about identity theft and credit card fraud prevented many consumers from having the courage to go through the online checkout.
Today, most consumers are convinced that the millions of dollars that are spent on online security are enough to protect them. Combine that with the great deals that can be found online, and the convenience of shopping without leaving home, and online shopping has become a winner in the eyes of consumers worldwide.
Retail stores, which often have higher overhead costs than online only retailers, have struggled to find a way to remain competitive. Some have managed to do this by taking what was once a brick and mortar store only, online. Others have simply lost the battle, and been forced to either downsize or close.
What may seem bad on the surface may not be so bad when you consider all factors. There may be less retail positions available to brick and mortar stores, but there are new job opportunities created for those who work with internet retailers. There will always be the need for item pickers, packagers, and shippers.
Additionally, there is now a booming market for web designers, security specialists, programmers, and more. Those who are trained in these fields should find it quite easy to remain gainfully employed both now and well into the future. There is no way to truly no if the number of jobs lost and the number of jobs gained even out, or may tip the scale one way or another. We may not know this for several more years.
Jobs aside, those who refuse to shop online may find that their options are limited. Less stores means less products, and the products that are available may cost more, as the struggle to stay afloat will be necessary. For those who love nothing more that pursuing a physical store, the future will be quite uncertain.
All things considered, there is both a bright and dark side to the increasing trend of online shopping. Those who love to shop online will quickly tell you that the internet is the best thing that has ever happened to the retail world. Those who do not care for it may tell you online shopping is the enemy. Regardless of what side you are on, there is no denying that the way we shop for products has been forever changed, and will continue to evolve in the coming years.
The Pros and Cons of Older Drivers
"The amount of accidents and fatalities caused by elderly drivers has increased and will continue to increase as the baby boomers hit age sixty-five. What makes it more interesting is most cases are without citations or jail time. Even when a fatality has occurred, senior citizens don't seem to do any jail time. If it was you or me, you can pretty much count that we would be locked up. I can not understand why State Governments have not stepped up to change our current requirements for the privilege of driving a motor vehicle."
From the time you start reading this article until it's completion which is about one and half minutes about 88 auto accidents would have happened and 18 of them would be directly related to the elderly. That is just in the US if you factor in worldwide numbers then the numbers are astronomical. Also one motor vehicle death occurs every 15 minutes.
Elderly drivers account for a nearly 19% of all automobile accidents. This number is indeed staggering enough to have many people asking, should older drivers be allowed on the road? And if so, should they be retested more often than younger drivers? For some, the answers to these questions are quite clear. For others, they are subjects of much debate.
Some have proposed that older drivers should be required to retake the driving test at age 65, and then again every few years. This proposal certainly seems reasonable, given the current accident statistics. Where problems may occur would be in the fact that there is a fee to take the driving test. This fee helps to pay the salary of the driving testers. It may not be fair to ask senior drivers to pay this fee more often than others.
Another problem may be that the number of individuals needing to take a driving test would increase. This could place extra burdens on testing spots that are already extremely busy. Wait times could increase, and even those who are for more frequent testing for senior drivers could very well find themselves inconvenienced. Some may be willing to endure longer wait times, while others would not.
Would this be some form of discrimination? Again, there are people on both sides. Laws are in place to protect people. However, not everyone will agree with the laws that are supposed to protect them. Seniors that cling to the ability to drive for their very survival will certainly consider any such law a form of discrimination.
The solution may actually lie somewhere in the middle. It may be possible to ask that any senior driver that has been involved in an accident to retake the driving test. Obviously, this possible solution also has flaws, as who is to say that the individual will survive a serious accident. This could also come to late to save the life of others that may be involved in the accident as well.
It is unclear as to whether or not the government will get involved in this debate. It may be that this decision will need to be made on a state or even local level. In a perfect world, seniors that realize that their driving skills are not up to par would relinquish their drivers license voluntarily. However, many do not realize that this is the case until it is too late. Clearly, there is no easy solution to this complex problem.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwfVoF3gwCo
Just To Stress The Point
As amusing as you might think the video is...the people that died, or were injured don't think it's all that funny. It is our responsibility as son's and daughters to take the keys away from our parents. Yes, they will hate you, they will get angry...but they will get over it.
Why Take a Driver Safety Course?
Because driving has changed since you first got your license, and doing so could save you money on your car insurance.
Many Organizations are stepping up and trying to educate people, especially the elderly about safe driving. AARP is one of those Organizations that offers these courses. Not only does it keep you current on new and changing road laws but after completion may lower your insurance premium. Read more athttp://www.aarp.org/home-garden/transportation/info-05-2010/why-take-a-driver-safety-course.html
Check out your options
It's better to prepare ahead of time for safety, than to wait for something unfortunate to happen first.
RESOURCES
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov
American Occupational Therapy Association
http://www.AOTA.org
Car Fit-- 12-point check list to ensure senior drivers are sitting properly in their own vehicle and that seat, seat belt, mirrors, steering wheel, head rest, gas/brake pedals, and other controls are positioned properly.
American Automobile Association AAA
http://www.aaa.com
Association for Driver Rehabilitation Specialists
http://www.driver-ed.org
Senior Drivers Organization
http://www.seniordrivers.org
AARP American Association for Retired Persons
Driver Safety Program
http://www.aarp.org
Comments 16 comments
Go to last comment
scarlet23 3 years ago
yes, definitely.. recently where i live an elderly woman, crashed and killed a 21 year old student, woman was basically blind.
nikashi_designs 3 years ago from Greenwich, CTHub Author
Thank You Scarlet23,
The story is becoming much to common and many people are paying the price. Nothing is being done because I believe seniors have a huge amount of voting power and it would be political suicide to touch the subject. 79% are registered voters and 71% voted during the last election. How many more lives are going to be lost? I agree other age groups and drunk drivers also kill and cause accidents. But we can remove some more statistic from the equation by simple re-testing. This also includes people that were involved in accidents. Driving is not a right, it is a privilege...Thanks again
-Nicolas
careers4 3 years ago
Interesting, especially since I turn 65 today. However: I have been driving for 49 years, and just had my first accident last month (a 22-year-old ran a red light and hit me). No, I don't confine my trips to the store and back. I have driven all over the eastern half of the country showing dogs. I have had exactly one speeding ticket, but lest you think I am a turtle -- my husband calls me "The Stealth Bomber" because I am heavy-footed and never get caught. I passed the eye exam without glasses on my last license renewal. Go ahead test me -- I dare you!
nikashi_designs 3 years ago from Greenwich, CTHub Author
Happy Birthday Careers4,
This Hub is really only to bring awareness to the growing problem. As mentioned, when the baby boomers hit 65-70 in in few more years the statistics go way up. Will it be to late to save a life if we only test after an accident. I recently took my mothers keys away from her, she is 74 and she thinks she drives perfectly and never understood why all the cars were honking and yelling at her to get off the road. Until last year she drove okay, slow but steady. Then I started noticing a lot of dings and scratches on her car from concrete barriers, paint from other cars. She always said it was from other people until one day she was leaving my driveway which slopes up hill, she accelerated right into the wall of our neighbors house. I made the choice to stop her from driving before something major happened. It is also true that I was involved in one accident in my life that involved a youngster, guess around 20 also.
The main differences between a younger driver and a someone in there 70's is response time, ability to adapt to changing road conditions, and usually better depth perception. Another factor is younger drivers know when they are have caused an accident and stop. So many older drivers, don't even realize what has happened and continue on driving. Insurance companies also know these facts and have always had in place an age cap of sorts, when you hit 75 your premium goes up, it's a numbers and statistics game, not discrimination, not anything against older drivers. Truthfully, I don't care if a lot of people get upset, think its discrimination, or a conspiracy of some sort. As long as lives are saved and entire families are not wiped out, dads or moms can go home to there kids. Then that is what matters.
We already have in place policy's for drunk drivers, pretty severe, So now we have to worry about making teens better drivers and make sure that older drivers are safe also. Doesn't seem to unreasonable.
Enjoy Your Birthday and send me a slice of cake.
-Nicolas
careers4 3 years ago from Cheshire, MA
Cake on its way to you! I truly do understand the need for retesting, but I think all drivers should be retested on some kind of regular schedule -- even if it is only every ten years for the younger ones. if you worry about seniors behind the wheel, don't ever be admitted to a hospital. There are many, many nurses over 65, and even into their 70s, who are working full-time. How about response (to a code) time, ability to adapt to changing patient conditions, and the kind of perception that tells us a "perfectly fine" patient may be circling the drain?
Here's a thought: my Dad was a judge, and Massachusetts had a mandatory-retirement-at-70 policy. Then, they would call back individual judges whom they still wanted on the bench. My father was called back, at 70, 72, and 74 -- but retired at 75 to move south for a longer golf season! Perhaps licenses could be reissued person-by-person after a certain age (though I would think not 65). Families, too, bear a responsibility to report parents or others who are clearly no longer able (for whatever reason) to drive. Some of the very people who are demanding this retesting might be the ones who would be too afraid to offend their parent to demand the car keys when necessary.
Many thanks for the birthday wishes.
nikashi_designs 3 years ago from Greenwich, CTHub Author
Thank You Career4,
Yes, I agree that ALL drivers should be retested, lets say every 5 years or so. I don't particularly worry about seniors behind the wheel, lets just say that I know what people are going to do before they do. As it turns out, I work in a very busy hospital on the 9th floor ICU and down in emergency...many dedicated and very capable group of people. Another point is, people are living much longer and age is a strange thing. People don't look or act what there physical age is. Me, 46 years old look around 30ish. I do notice that people that stay active and exercise the brain seem to stay sharp and healthy. Once again Happy Birthday and thanks for the cake...
-Nicolas
Dim Flaxenwick 3 years ago from Great BritainLevel 3 Commenter
Very interesting article. Depending on where you live, you may find drivers of all ages driving as though they´ve never taken a test.!!!! l do see your point , though. Many elderly drivers are a danger to themselves.
nikashi_designs 3 years ago from Greenwich, CTHub Author
And to be fair Dim Flaxenwich,
All drivers should go and be re-tested every 10 years or so, but the article was focusing on the elderely. Thanks for your comment.
-Nicolas
Angela Kane 3 years ago from Las Vegas, Nevada
There have been a lot of crashes involving elderly people in my city last year and one even caused the death of a little girl. However, most of the crashes involved drivers who were not elderly. I don't agree with seniors having to take a test again because not all elderly drivers are bad, but I think some physical or response test should be taken when they get a certain age to avoid potential crashes.
nikashi_designs 3 years ago from Greenwich, CTHub Author
Hi Angela Kane,
Could the little girls life have been spared if the driver was tested? I agree, not all elderly drivers are horrible and many accidents involve young drivers. It is more about taking some measures to control the possible outcome. By re-testing or at least as you mentioned, some physical or response test should be in place. Thanks for your comment.
tillsontitan 3 years ago from New YorkLevel 7 Commenter
Your article makes many valid points. I think the biggest problem is response time and being aware of those around you. I'm 64 and still pretty good on the road ;) However, I have an 89 year old relative who thinks he should still be driving. Retesting might be an expense the elderly cannot afford and as far as discrimination goes that just doesn't apply when you're talking about safety issues. Maybe they could institute a type of physical the older person's doctor could perform to denote whether or not they need to be tested or to say flat out their reflexes are too slow and they shouldn't be driving. My parents asked DMV to take my 92 year old grandfather's license away and they complied. Well written hub and great videos. Voted up. Thanks for SHARING.
nikashi_designs 3 years ago from Greenwich, CTHub Author
Thanks for your comment Tillsontitan,
Complicated topic and one with no wonderful answer. I like the idea that doctors should give the green light on elder drivers or not. But I see patient confidentiality issue's with this. The burden and responsibility should fall on the family, son's and daughters should follow your parents lead...
sgbrown 2 years ago from Southern OklahomaLevel 2 Commenter
Great hub. I understand that the seniors feel like we are taking away their freedom, however, they don't realize how dangerous they are. I had to take the keys away from my mother years ago. I believe they should be re-tested every 2-5 years after a certain age. Would you want to put your children's life at risk. We wouldn't let anyone else drive that was driving impaired in any way. I think it is the families responsibility to do what ever they can to keep dangerous relatives off the road.
nikashi_designs 2 years ago from Greenwich, CTHub Author
Thank You for your comment Sgbrown,
Exactly right on all your points, family members have the responsibility to make sure dangerous relatives stay off the road. Just yesterday an elderly couple came into our job site looking for someone and they could barely walk or navigate entering the front door, really think they were blind. The scary thing is, they drove to the shop...
sallybea 23 months ago from NorfolkLevel 6 Commenter
I think the idea is flawed, especially when it comes to the elderly picking up the tab for a re-test. The bus service in this area is almost non existent and does not even run on a Sunday!! Pensioners I know are living on the breadline already, can hardly afford to buy a car, never mind insure one. Petrol prices are now in the £1.40 per liter region and many soon may not even be able to put fuel in a car, problem solved. I would hate to see things get even more difficult for them especially with rising costs of heating and food.
nikashi_designs 23 months ago from Greenwich, CTHub Author
Thank you Sallybea,
for your comment...we as a society can not discriminate against the elderly and the solution would be to formulate a reflex and eye test and administer it to everyone every 5-7 years. People that can't afford the test, the state would have to pick up the small fee. In comparison to the cost of damage and possible death the expense is minimal. As mentioned, it is the family that really needs to determine if mom and dad can still drive safely. Thanks again.
The reasons why some women seek horrible men will vary. It could be one reason, or a combination of several. Unfortunately, the outcome of these relationships can be disastrous, and will certainly do more harm than good to the self-confidence of women. Those who take the time to understand why they continue to wind up with bad men may be able to finally break the cycle.
One of the top reasons women draw in horrible men is that they see the man as a project of sorts. Women mistakenly assume that they can magically transform a bad man into a good man, a man that is compassionate . The truth is, no matter how much time and effort is invested, there is no way to change the core of a person. They must do this on their own.
Bad men may seem more exciting than a nice guy. This excitement is often enough to draw women in, at which point they may realize that this person is exciting because he is not mentally stable. Even worse, the fun excitement can quickly turn into the unwanted type, which could be verbal, mental, and physical abuse. Women may stay in these situations for the previous reason. They believe that they can change this, and stop it from happening.
Often women wind up with horrible men simply because the man pursued her. Often times, aggressive men are also aggressive in their pursuit of women. This can be quite flattering at first, as everyone wants to be wanted. This is not to say that every man that comes on strong will be an abuser, but this is a red flag that women can watch out for when considering their next relationship.
The Cycle Continues
One of the saddest reasons why women may seek a horrible man is that they wish to replicate the relationship they had with their father. Women may do this without even realizing it. If the relationship with the father was abusive in any way, women may seek a man that provides this, as it is familiar behavior to them. This may be the hardest pattern to break, as on the surface, no woman realizes that they are actually doing this.
The most common reason is most likely low self-confidence. When self-confidence is low, women may not feel that they are worthy of being loved by a good man, and will automatically seek out men that they feel are on the same level as they are. Positive affirmations and a change in how a woman views herself will go a long way in correcting this behavior.
What is most important is that this cycle is broken as soon as possible. Mental and physical damage can result while in a relationship with a horrible man. The longer this goes on, the harder it can be to recover. Those who find themselves in one bad relationship after another should take the action that is required to break the pattern. There are many self-help books that may be helpful. Therapy is yet another option, as it may help women get to the root cause of why they are allowing these relationships to continue.
Once upon a time there was a city in America, whose mayor believed in order and organization, and above all in planning, especially in all things relating to his municipality. He recognized that a healthy city must tend to grow, just like a biological tissue, but he differentiated between the sound, organized and controlled growth of normal tissues and the uncontrolled and chaotic growth of cancerous tissues, and wished to ensure that his city be more like the former than the latter.
Accordingly, he caused his city to be divided into zones corresponding to all forms of human activity. There were zones for manufacturing, for light industry, for office buildings, for theaters, concert halls and restaurants, for apartments, for townhouses, and finally for ordinary single family dwellings. The rules were rigorously enforced and the mayor was persuasive enough and in office long enough for his sensible plan to approach completion.
On the whole, his efforts were regarded as outstandingly successful and Freetown, his city, was held up to the world as a model for others to aspire to and emulate, if they could. Still, there persisted some nagging problems. When the entire visible population had been assigned to their appropriate spaces, there remained a significant residue that did not seem to fit in anywhere.
Some had no source of income which they were willing to disclose, some lived by renting their bodies to strangers, and some depended completely on the generosity of passersby. It was characteristic of this group that they were difficult to enumerate and indeed their numbers seemed to fluctuate erratically from time to time as individuals drifted in and out.
Some called them street people, some called them derelicts, and some called them miscreants; no one knew what to do with them. They cumbered the earth. It was not a historical period noted for generosity to those unwilling or unable to work and, while the government made available work- training programs designed to prepare the indigent for a wide range of entry level jobs, the results were disappointing. Typically, the potential trainee would begin hopefully and then lose interest and eventually drop out.
More draconian procedures were no more successful. It was not practical to throw all the street people into jail, as the jails were already filled with genuine criminals. The idea of paying them to go away was briefly considered and then discarded as too expensive and difficult to enforce.
Finally the mayor and his staff sighed and decided to evade the problem, enabling them to declare a victory. A somewhat rundown section of the central city was designated facetiously
"The Demilitarized Zone" and set aside for people who were not readily accommodated by organized society. While it was never codified into law, it was widely understood that no one would be bothered by police within the Zone, provided that he confined himself to non-violent activities, which would not be too closely monitored.
The new policy was instantly successful. All those regarded as misfits in the more upscale parts of town migrated in a body to the Zone, as to a natural haven. Here one might find people catering to every form of sexual proclivity; here migrated sidewalk artists, street musicians, as well as individuals who improvised performances of all kinds; here were encountered retailers of T-shirts stamped with colorful legends, adult books and videos, as well as all manner of goods of questionable ownership. One might also find drug peddlers here, although custom confined them to certain blocks. And finally there were many beggars and panhandlers as well, people who had nothing to sell or do which could command a price. A subcategory of these were derelicts who did not actively solicit money, being dependent upon remittances from outside the Zone.
From the point of view of its inhabitants, the Zone had many advantages over the more traditional slum, ghetto, or barrio, from which it differed substantially. The violent types, the thugs and street bandits, who infested the latter institutions had been rounded up relentlessly and shipped out to jail. The non-violent resident or transient was safe from molestation by either his fellows or the police. An individual who bothered others was very apt to be reported to the police and subsequently exported, often in damaged condition. The absence of violence made it feasible to maintain a multitude of very cheap flophouses, as well as free public shelters, where one might sleep without qualms. Here and there a church group had established a center for free meals. While religious services were available at these, attendance was strictly voluntary.
Although formal rules and regulations were minimal, the people of the Zone were by no means in a state of anarchy. Early in the history of the Zone, they recognized that the various money-raising activities prevalent there were often not altogether compatible, so that the presence of a particular type might tend to inhibit practitioners of a second type. Conversely, there was sometimes a synergistic effect between two different categories. This stemmed from the fact that the cash flow into the Zone relied entirely upon casual visitors from other parts of the city or the suburbs and, if these were attracted, or repelled, by a certain kind of street activity, other entrepreneurs in the vicinity were likely to be influenced.
With this in mind, the inhabitants of the Zone, without coercion from outside, voluntarily organized themselves so as to achieve the most satisfactory distribution of activities. The drug dealers, whose clientele tended to specialize, were confined to one or two blocks on the periphery, as well as a nearby shelter, and were never seen by the bulk of the visitors to the Zone. Prostitutes of various kinds were also restricted to row houses within a somewhat larger area, with discreet coded signs indicating their specialties. The performing artists were spread out over a wide area, with never more than one to a block, which they might share with a sidewalk artist or a retailer of souvenirs or imitation Rolexes. Beggars, who were stationary, and panhandlers, who were mobile, could also be fitted in with the performing artists, although never more than one to a block. In their own interest, these were urged to avoid aggressive soliciting and could be forcibly expelled if they failed to comply; also, the desirability of silence was impressed upon them.
Although the system had its critics, there was general agreement that, on the whole, it worked amazingly well. Far from being an eyesore and a liability, the Zone had become an asset to Freetown and a major tourist attraction, putting to shame the more conventional art galleries, museums, and concert halls, which were the city's pride. This was so much the case that several upscale restaurants had relocated to the Zone, where they were accepted with a shrug by the city government, as well as a warning that they must adapt themselves to the local customs rather than vice versa.
With time, the people of the Zone came to take such pride in their quarter that they kept it spotlessly clean of their own accord, rendering the municipal sanitation department redundant. Flower beds were planted in the dirt strips between street and sidewalk in such a way that each block acquired a brilliant color at its own particular season, so that, from April to November, there were always blocks of spectacular beauty. The flowers were supplemented by blossoming fruit trees, which had been planted at regular intervals along the strips in such a way that their colors contrasted with and accentuated those of the flowers. Freetown had always been famous for its flowers and the two parts of town now complemented each other nicely.
The quasi-gentrification of the Zone was further promoted by the rehabilitation of a large vacant lot in its center, where a fire had destroyed a group of dilapidated row houses. This was planted with grass and flowerbeds and also equipped with brick crosswalks and a small brick plaza in its center. The city did not look too closely at where the bricks came from, as there was general agreement that the park completed the evolution of the Zone by providing a much-needed center, which could also accommodate a half-dozen or so of its artists, mendicants, and performers.
The only group (apart from the drug peddlers, who did not count) who tended to be dissatisfied with the new system were the beggars, who now felt conspicuous and out of place, as if they were somehow lowering the tone of the locality. Perhaps this was because they were the only ones who did not provide any commodity or service in exchange for the donations they received.
The Zone is of course history now. This is largely a consequence of the wave of super-prosperity which swept over late 20th century America. Urban developers were drawn to the area and proceeded to put up expensive stores, hotels, and office buildings, in the process commonly known as gentrification or urban renewal. As the Zone came to be populated more and more by conventional urban types, its former inhabitants, while not exactly encouraged to leave, felt increasingly uncomfortable and gradually drifted away of their own accord, until the area largely lost its unique characteristics and became indistinguishable from the rest of the city.
What I now relate occurred during the heyday of the Zone, when its raffish population coexisted with affluent tourists, from whom it drew its livelihood. Ralph, Sam and Max, who were graduate students at a nearby university, had taken advantage of the spring vacation to visit the Zone, which Ralph and Max had never seen, although they knew it well by reputation.
Ralph, a blond, rather willowy young man and an aspiring artist, had just returned from an exhibition in a nearby city inaugurating a major new gallery, while Max, an older student and a potential writer, who was dark and heavyset, had recently visited a publishers' convention, where many new books were displayed. Sam, a tall and athletic biochemistry major, who looked older than his age, was showing the others around. Having time to spare, they decided to include the Zone in their schedule. Both Ralph and Max had heard of it and wanted to compare the actuality with its colorful reputation, which Sam did not attempt to embellish. It was early May and the flowers and blossoms, for which the Zone, as well as the more conventional parts of Freetown, were famous, were at their height. The cherry blossoms were mostly gone now, but the dogwood trees were at their height, while the flower beds were full of red tulips, yellow daffodils, blue violets, and a multitude of others.
It was mid-morning and the sidewalks of the Zone were relatively not crowded. Most of the tourists came in the afternoon or evening and the residents moved in synchrony with them. No prostitutes were to be seen and only a handful of artists, performing or creative, were about. However, the latter category included several sidewalk artists of significant talent, who worked in pastels, as well as one who, employing chalk, used the sidewalk as an easel.
The only outdoor Zone activities occurring at anything like their usual intensity were begging and peddling. The three men had many opportunities to have their shoes polished, as well as to buy a wide range of colorfully decorated T-shirts and many other dubious goods. However, in deference to the customs of the Zone, the peddlers did not prolong their sales pitch and a simple shake of the head sufficed to shake them off. The three were left in sufficient peace to continue the conversation Ralph and Max had begun earlier, which centered about the dearth of originality in both their fields.
"It's as if the contemporary artist has no place left to go, "said Ralph. "The local exhibition is full of material, which is both very conventional and dull, or else attempts to shock in a primitive way by violating some taboo. When a crucifix immersed in urine gets only a shrug, the artist moves on to blood-stained tampons arranged in patterns and enclosed in cellophane, or else to freeze-dried dog turds sprinkled with imitation gold dust. Either there is no originality or it takes a grotesque form."
"It's much the same in my field. Most of the fiction published today is the most amazing garbage; nearly all the good books are non-fiction. I think the trouble is that, when one has followed a trend to the end, it is impossible to retrace one's steps without appearing dated. To avoid this, it is necessary to make a sharp break, either into a fresh new approach or outlook, or else into a novel form of rubbish. Unfortunately, there is no known systematic way of choosing the first alternative. The only way to do so is to fall back on the quality we call creativity, which no one can summon up by an act of will. Perhaps you either have it or you don't."
"It's different in science," said Sam. "At least for the last century or so, there's been one breakthrough after another. When one seems to have been completely exploited, another comes along which changes everything. Individual scientists may bog down and be mired in the same habits of thought, but science as a whole, never. I suppose that's because science is both truly progressive and accumulative. It always renews itself and can never go backwards."
"What is creativity?" said Max. "If I knew what it was, I would go look for it."
"Me too," said Sam.
Their conversation was interrupted at this point by their passing a beggar, who was sitting on the sidewalk with his back against the wall of a store selling psychedelic posters. He was missing an arm. He had leaned a placard saying "Vietnam vet" against the wall. He was lean, with a sallow complexion and a resentful, hangdog look. Max, who had been in Viet Nam himself, wondered idly if the man were really a veteran. Certainly his impairment seemed real enough, but surely he could qualify for disability payments.
Noticing that there was nothing in his plate, Ralph gave him a dollar. "God bless you," he said mechanically. Max now felt obligated to give him a dollar too and received the same formula. Sam, who had nothing smaller than a ten dollar bill, silently averted his eyes. "It's a gorgeous day," said Max. "And those flowers are...spectacular." The beggar stared, as if the idea were novel to him. "Yeah, they sure are," he said finally. As they walked away, Max and Ralph noticed that he had removed their two dollar bills, so that the plate looked empty again. They returned to the thread of their conversation.
"I don't think there is any mystery about what creativity is," said Ralph. "It's the ability to solve a problem in an original and elegant way, like cutting the Gordian knot. I think it is elegance which is the true hallmark of creativity. There is always a discontinuity associated with a creative solution to a problem; it is never approached gradually. Artists struggled for centuries with the problem of perspective, and then it was solved within a short time by the introduction of vanishing points, which was not a refinement of earlier methods, but an entirely new departure. One could say the same for the rise of impressionism and abstract art."
"I see what you mean," said Max. "George Eliot introduced in her books the idea, very novel
in her day, that men and women could interact in many ways which had nothing to do with sexuality; this was certainly creative."
"Your point about discontinuity," said Sam, "certainly holds true in science. Copernicus made a clean break with the past, replacing a system which was grotesquely complicated with one which was simple and elegant. The transition from classical to quantum physics did not occur by gradual stages which progressively refined the subject, but by an abrupt jump which changed everything. In my own field, Pauling was able to solve the structure of the alpha-helix by dropping the requirement, which seemed graven in stone, that a helix must have an integral number of residues per turn."
The next block was empty, except for a street violinist, who played indifferently well. They each gave him a quarter, Sam borrowing from Max, and walked on. The following block contained a beggar, who, like the Viet Nam vet, had a placard, which was so placed that they could not read it until they were quite close to him. However, they had noticed that passersby tended to choose a circuitous route around him. The reason for this became clear when they had come close enough to read his placard, which read simply "AIDS."
At this period, the early-80's, a diagnosis of AIDS was equivalent to a death sentence and they accordingly looked at the man with a mixture of macabre interest and pity. A glance was enough to dismiss any thoughts that he might be shamming. He was extremely emaciated and he had acquired the semi-translucent look sometimes seen in very old people. Unlike the first beggar, he had made no effort to conceal what he had collected, which was not very substantial. Ralph and Max each gave him a dollar and received a muttered "Thank you" in exchange; Sam, who disliked people prone to acquire AIDS, walked past without looking at him. As they walked past, Max glanced briefly back at the man, to find that he was being regarded with a look of such intense hatred that he felt a pulse of something akin to pain.
After a minute or two, they put aside depressing thoughts and resumed the conversation. Max began: "I suspect that creativity is more widely distributed than we think. Most people have at least a little and it's always struggling to get loose. If you have more than a little and don't use it, it will drive you crazy."
"I tend to agree," said Ralph. It's unfortunate that most occupations have so little scope for it. Maybe that's why we have so many bitter old people. What chance do these people, for example, have to be creative?" "They're a special case, surely," said Sam. "I doubt if creativity could appear here. But I think that it can arise in very ordinary jobs. The prison warden that controlled rebellious inmates by feeding them baby food, instead of bread and water, showed creativity of a sort."
They were now approaching the small plaza in the center of the Zone. To their surprise, and in contrast to the blocks they had passed through, they saw a bustle of activity, which was centered about a particular point, where a small crowd appeared to be milling around. People seemed to be walking past and then returning, as if they had unfinished business there. However, having returned, they did not linger, but soon resumed walking.
The crowd was sufficiently dense that they had had to wedge their way through it before they could see what the center of attraction was. They were surprised to see that it was only another beggar. This one was unexceptional in appearance, looking in fact perfectly ordinary, except for being blind. Like the other two, he had set up a placard. He had received so many donations that a plate did not suffice to hold the money he had collected, so that he was forced to use a basket. People would often pass by, pause, and then walk back to drop something in the basket.
However, our three men did not have to hesitate. Upon reading the beggar's placard, all three gave a two-digit sum. Even Sam contributed his 10-dollar bill. Moreover, as they walked on afterwards, they all felt a curious sense of exaltation, as if they had done something noble and beautiful. They were silent for some time, until they were stopped some distance from the crowd by an elderly woman, who asked what was going on.
"It's only a beggar," said Max. "It's his placard that's the attraction."
"What on earth does it say?"
"It is May and I am blind."
The woman thanked them and made her way towards the crowd. The three men continued their walk. There was no further talk of creativity; it would have been redundant.