We were delighted to welcome Prof. Suman Seth as our guest at the inaugural session of the New Book Forum on December 4. Self-identifying as a postcolonial historian of science, Seth is currently one of the most renowned experts on global and postcolonial approaches to the history of science, medicine, and environment. His book Difference and Disease: Medicine, Race, and the Eighteenth-Century British Empire illuminates the ways in which medicine was contested between the axis of the global and the local, and eventually influenced the making of ‘race-science’ and the abolitionist movement alike.
The discussion with Prof. Seth highlighted the vast potential of regarding medicine and science through the lens of global history, not only with regard to historical research, but to present-day debates more broadly. If there is one thing we can learn from the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, it is that medicine, disease, and public health are inherently global phenomena. This observation comes as no surprise to global historians of science and medicine.
Since its early days, global history has come a long way. Following calls from postcolonial studies and New Imperial History, recent works have demonstrated that the spread and scientific investigation of disease has only seldom adhered to the clear-cut boundaries of nation states. Rather, medicine and science are (and always have been) embedded in entangled, polycentric systems and networks that extended dichotomies such as ‘colonizer’ and ‘colonized’ or ‘western’ and ‘indigenous’.
For our readers eager to learn more, here are some books that make further important interventions into the past and present of medicine, science, and environment from a global perspective:
Sujata Mukherjee’s groundbreaking study stresses “the biopolitical aspect of colonial governmentality, racial attributes of liberal colonial empire, attempts at the making of colonial self by Indian reformers who sought modernization through vernaculization of medical knowledge, and operating of biopower, by viewing all these changes through the lens of gender” (xvii). Zooming in on the contributions of female Bengali medical practitioners in Indian medical history as well as the question of how the spread and discussion of Western medicine affected the lives of Indian women, the author follows calls to ‘provincialize’ colonial medicine.
In his 2019 monography, Hans Pols explores the history of Indonesian physicians who became active in the Indonesian nationalist movement throughout the late 19th century into the age of decolonization. Tracing back physicians’ activities in educational institutions, nationalist organizations, print media, and political institutions, Pols convincingly illuminates the relationship between medical education, colonial modernity, anti-colonial nationalism, and the failure of public health in independent Indonesia.
Sleeping sickness was among the most common causes of death in 20th-century colonized Africa. Coinciding with breakthroughs in tropical medicine at the beginning of the century, attempts to tackle the disease triggered a series of biomedical experiments at the intersection between science, economy, politics and colonial violence. Sarah Ehlers’ 2019 publication engages with the making of modern biomedicine in its colonial contexts. As her findings suggest, the development of biomedicine was by no means the result of the efforts of individual nation states, but rather a transnational European and deeply colonial endeavour.
Tim Lockley’s recent study on the history of military medicine in the West India Regiments in the 18th and 19th centuries sheds new light on the development of racial thought in the Atlantic World. By focusing on surgeons’ shifting perceptions of the 100’000+ black recruits deployed in the British military in the West Indies, Lockley demonstrates the influence of medical accounts in shaping European notions of black bodies.
Green Unpleasant Land considers the history of the English countryside through the lens of Britain’s colonial endeavors. Rather than a remote place of retreat from the world, the book argues, rural England was “a place of conflict and global expansion.” The book is accessibly written and incorporates elements of Fowler’s own family relationship to transatlantic enslavement. By uncovering the English countryside’s “repressed colonial past,” the book reveals the importance of rural connections to the colonies as sources of ideas about Englishness.