Une rĂ©flexion philosophico-politique Ă la lumiĂšre de lâarrĂȘt du 24/03/2021 de la BVerfG et de lâAffaire du SiĂšcle en France
đEHESS, Paris
đïž 27 November 2025
The increasingly frequent recourse to courts of justice to advance claims for the protection of populations that States have failed to meet â or have even contradicted in their decisions â calls into question the sovereign as the privileged locus of decisions regarding the protection of populations. The contemporary juridification of politics is not merely a sign of the continuity of power under new forms: it is also the space where modern political categories (sovereignty, security, necessity, property, and others) reveal their epistemic insufficiency in the face of the complexity of the real. Constitutional and administrative courts, called upon to rule on demands for justice, thus become laboratories of conceptual dislocation, where the modern idea of protection confronts its own limits by recomposing and adjusting older notions such as scarcity, lack, poverty, and abundance.
This conference, drawing on an encounter between historians, legal scholars, and political philosophers, aims to question the structural relationship between law, protection, and scarcity, as well as the possibility that juridification â far from closing off the political âmight still open a new space for thinking the real
Mi intervention is titled: Juridification as Democratic and Counter-Majoritarian Politics? Insights from the ECtHRâs KlimaSeniorinnen Judgment on the âPublic Concernedâ in Climate Change
6th SAFI Annual Conference
Annual Conference of SAFI (Societas Aperta Feminarum in Iuris Theoria)
đUniversity of Amsterdam
đïž 09-10 October 2025
Justice has long served as a cornerstone of both philosophical inquiry and legal practice. Historically, it has been interwoven with the evolution of legal systems that seek to enforce order through punitive measures. Yet, as classical theorists and modern critics have observed, the mechanisms of punishment often reveal a disjunction between the lawâs outward appearance and the deeper, more abstract notion of justice. Thinkers such as Arendt have argued that while law can be deconstructed and critiqued, justice remains an ever-receding horizonâan ideal that cannot be fully captured by rigid legal norms. This tension compels us to ask: How can justice be realized when legal practices and legislative frameworks, often imbued with coercive power, fall short of encompassing the moral imperatives they claim to uphold?
I will present a paper titled Rewriting Rights, or Narra(c)ting Justice Through Women's Courts.
Visions and Care for Democracy
International Conference organised as part of my MSCA Project
đUniversity of Verona
đïž 25-27 June 2025
To commemorate the 50th anniversary of her death, this conference focuses on Hannah Arendtâs 'romantic sympathy' for the federal council system, which she envisioned as the emergence of new, local, participatory, and radically democratic institutions. The conference will explore the potential of Arendtian counciliarism for democratic renewal by examining both the historical manifestations of the council system and its broader political significance.
Riflessioni e visioni dai film di Anna Marziano
đUniversity of Verona / Festival Veronetta Contemporanea
đïž 17 June 2025
âResistereâ ed âesistereâ condividono la stessa radice latina, che rimanda al verbo sistere: âuscire, apparire, stareâ. Se esistere significa essere in vita, ossia manifestarsi sulla scena del mondo, il prefisso âre-â indica la ripetizione dellâazione. Resistere, dunque, esprime un desiderio ostinato di stare in vita, di permanere ed uscire fuori sulla scena del mondo. I film di Anna Marziano danno voce a questo desiderio, esplorando la forza del resistere di fronte al dolore e alla vulnerabilitĂ : dalla malattia che segna il corpo alla nebbia che avvolge una piccola isola della laguna veneziana, sempre piĂč minacciata dal rischio di scomparire sotto le acque. (R)esistere si rivela cosĂŹ come la sorgente di un desiderio collettivo, politico, mai egocentrico. Apparire, uscire fuori, continuare ad esistere implicano, fin dalla loro etimologia, la presenza imprescindibile dellâaltro/a e di un luogo che si faccia spazio dâincontro e comunitĂ . La relazione con gli altri e con il mondo Ăš condizione imprescindibile per lâesistenza di ogni forma di vita. A partire dalla visione di Farsi seme e di alcuni estratti di Al largo e del nuovo film attualmente in fase di produzione intitolato Schiuma di mondi, la regista Anna Marziano intreccerĂ un dialogo con gli ospiti dellâevento, esplorando le molteplici forme contemporanee di (r)esistenza. Tra cura e giustizia, corpi e desideri, malattia e natalitĂ , ci interrogheremo insieme su che cosa significhi resistere ed esistere nel nostro tempo.
Arendtian Trajectories between the Law and Instititions
Lecture Series organised as part of MSCA project
Hannah Arendt Center for Political Studies
đUniversity of Verona
đïž 5 March - 19 March 2025
Discussant for Adriana Cavarero's paper "Euripides' Bacchae and the defeat of the polis"
đUniversity of Trento
đïž 9 April 2025
Should the state ascribe family status to two people who are not romantically involved and recognize them as cohabitants for the purposes of the law, as it does (in some jurisdictions) for romantic couples? Should it do the same for polyamorous unions? While this avenue has been extremely important in recognizing gay and lesbian couples in many jurisdictions, the workshop will problematize its application to other types of non-normative families.
A Case Study of Non-Conjugal Unions and Polyamory
With Nausica Palazzo (Nova School of Law)
Workshop
Centro Interdisciplinar de Estudos de Género
đUniversity of Lisbon
đïž 4 April 2025
Symposium ICI Berlin,
27 June 2024
Organized by Natascia Tosel and Valentina Moro
Vulnerability has emerged as a crucial term to describe the human condition, especially in light of the pandemic. Its etymology can be traced back to the Latin term âvulnusâ, which denoted both a âgeneric woundâ and the âinfringement of a rightâ. This semantic ambiguity still persists in current interpretations of vulnerability, with some understanding it as an ontological concept (namely vulnerability as a shared human condition) and others as a political and legalcategory that identifies specific groups or individuals who are exposed to discrimination. While the universalistic account of the notion fails to bear witness to the unequal distribution of precarity as it affects certain lives, the particularistic approach risks reproducing and even fostering the isolation and marginality of groups and individuals identified as needing protection. In this latter approach, one fails to account both for the agency of such subjects and groups as they resist those conditions and for the systematic and structural connotations of certain forms of violence.
However, many feminist theorizations claim that vulnerability, in its embodied and relational connotation, is still a helpful tool for mapping the present since it allows one to grasp how forms of resistance emerge. Taking this perspective entails many critical questions:
What would it mean to understand vulnerability as a situated condition linked to relationality and interdependency, rather than as a state that pertains to certain subjects? How should politics, institutions, and law take care of vulnerable lives? Can vulnerability be theorized, politicized, and âjuridifiedâ in a manner that takes into consideration the diverse and plural ways in which everyone is exposed to it? In what senses does this concept necessitate an understanding that is derived from situated knowledge, such that the concept does not remain a theoretical abstraction? In order to address such urgent issues, this symposium aims to foster an interdisciplinary dialogue between feminist and gender studies, political philosophy, post- and decolonial studies, critical theory, legal studies, and social sciences.
Symposium UniversitĂ La Sapienza di Roma
13 June 2024
Talk: Juridification. Genalogies of a Critical Concept
Symposium ICI Berlin
23-24 May 2024
Organized by B Camminga, Ruth Ramsden-Karelse, Natascia Tosel
Constitution as a viable social subject is dependent on being recognized by others as such, whether that recognition takes the form of an ethical gesture, a political objective, or a legal instrument. The desire for recognition is therefore often assumed to be universal. For many activists and theorists, recognition of rights and identities has been at the heart of social justice movements, particularly since the 1980s. This is reflected, for example, in the âgay rightsâ slogan, ârecognize our relationshipsâ. Yet, appeals to recognize what certain groups have in common tend to be made at the expense of more widely expanding the range of lives that might be acknowledged as possible and worthy of protection. Moreover, the identificatory categories through which rights claims can be made often fail to map onto the actual lived experiences of those they purport to describe, suggesting that becoming socially legible as part of a group can come at the expense of true recognition as an individual. In such ways and more, the demand for recognition is inherently intertwined with a dimension of conflict and often manifests as a struggle.
Workshop ICI Berlin
16-17 October 2023
Talk: Remake and Repair. Modeling Institutions and Instituting Models
Models and modeling are polysemous terms that take on distinct but related mea- nings in the sciences, humanities, arts, and everyday language. Models can be material entities or mathematical constructs, they can be living organisms or ma- keshift frames for found objects, they can be of a system or for a project. This workshop will focus on how the meaning of models changes as it travels between different domains, and on how a given model is constructed and broken depending on how tightly it is bound to its reference. Opposing the idea that models are mere representations, contributions will inquire into their generative properties: to make a model involves abstractions and idealizations that can have very real effects in its target system. Likewise, to break a model often leads to novel theoretical insights, revealing hidden presuppositions and opening up the possibility of making, and breaking, again.
Since the inception of the project in Fall of 2022, several foci have emerged in the collective research into model theories and modeling practices. These include the formal or relational qualities of models, their temporal dimensions, the incommen- surability between a model and its object, and modelsâ world-building potential. This workshop aims to bring together and extend these perspectives in a broader, interdisciplinary dialogue.
Le pouvoir performatif du droit et la politique de la juridification
Conference Maison Interuniversitaire des Sciences de l'Homme - Alsace, Strasbourg
17 April 2024
Gilles Deleuze, dans "Instincts et institutions", définit les institutions humaines comme des modÚles pour l'action. à partir de cette trame conceptuelle entre l'institution et le modÚle, l'intervention se propose comme une tentative de repenser les deux en dehors des catégories de représentation et de stabilité ou de durée, avec lesquelles ils ont été traditionnellement associés. Au contraire, une constellation conceptuelle différente sera mobilisée, liée aux notions de performativité d'une part et de processus d'autre part. Dans le but de réimaginer à la fois les institutions et les modÚles, nous analyserons à titre d'exemple la maniÚre dont les acteurs sociaux utilisent de plus en plus le langage juridique comme moyen politique et sémiotique pour traduire de nouveaux modÚles de conduite qui visent à transformer (faire et défaire) les institutions.
Symposium UniversitĂ degli Studi di Firenze
23 Februray 2023
Talk: Re-instituting the Social. Between Normativity and Contingency
Symposium UniversitĂ Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
14 October 2022
Talk: The State, the Law, the Institutions. A Study on Juridification