One of the most common questions I get from non-mathematician is whether mathematicians keep making new formulas. This is a natural impression. In K-12 mathematics, and even in some college mathematics courses, we mostly learn mathematics through arithmetic and calculation. We are given a problem and try to find the answer. But mathematics is not only about calculation.
Mathematicians study many kinds of objects, and one of the main things we study is the relations between those objects. There are many kinds of relations. One is an order relation. Another is a function, which describes how inputs in one object are sent to outputs in another. Another is an equivalence relation, which tells us when two objects should be regarded as the same.
For example, two triangles of the same size and shape are congruent, even if they are drawn in different places. If their sizes are different, but one can be obtained from the other by scaling, then they are similar. If their sizes and angles are both different, we may still call both of them triangles.
In each case, we are deciding which differences matter and which differences we want to ignore. This is one aspect of modern mathematics: we look for common properties among different objects, define a notion of when two objects should be considered equivalent, and then try to classify the resulting types.
Order relations appear just as often. For real numbers, any two numbers can be compared. Sets have a different kind of order. If every element of a set A is contained in a set B, we write A⊆B. But unlike real numbers, two sets do not always have to be comparable. It may happen that neither A⊆B nor B⊆A. This makes a familiar construction look a little different. Given two sets A₁ and A₂, we can ask for the smallest set that contains both of them. The answer is their union, A₁∪A₂. So the union of two sets can be understood as an answer to a question about the order relation on sets: among all sets larger than both A₁ and A₂, find the smallest one.
Functions are another basic way of describing relations between mathematical objects. In school mathematics, a function is often presented by a formula such as f(x) = x². But a formula is only one way to describe a function. More generally, a function tells us how elements of one object correspond to elements of another. We can study functions between any sets and many other mathematical objects.
From this point of view, much of mathematics is not about finding numerical answers. It is about understanding objects through the relations between them.
Topology studies geometric shapes, often in high dimensions, and asks when two of them should be regarded as equivalent. One of its main goals is to understand the equivalence classes that arise from this relation and to classify them. We often study properties that do not depend on distance or size. For example, the perimeter and area of a triangle depend on its size. On the other hand, the fact that the sum of its interior angles is always 180 degrees does not.
Topology goes one step further. We allow a triangle to be continuously deformed into a square, a pentagon, or even a circle, and regard all of them as the same shape. This very flexible notion of equivalence turns out to be especially useful when studying geometric objects in higher dimensions.
To do this, topologists use the other kinds of relations as well. We can break a space into smaller subspaces and study how they are ordered by inclusion. We can also study functions between spaces and use them to compare one space with another.
My research focuses on stable homotopy theory and its interactions with other fields, particularly algebraic K-theory, number theory, equivariant algebra and combinatorics.
My thesis work involve studying the algebraic K-theory of the sphere spectrum and the equivariant variants of algebraic K-theory, aiming to deepen our understanding of these fundamental structures.
K-theoretic Tate-Poitou duality at prime 2, Advances in Mathematics. 477 (2025), Paper No. 110370, 26 pp. arXiv
Realizing Compatible Pairs of Transfer Systems by Combinatorial N∞-operads (with David Chan, David Mehrle, Pablo Sanchez Ocal, Angelica Osorno, Ben Szczesny, Paula Verdugo) arxiv submitted
On homological Real trace methods (with Teena Gerhardt, Liam Keenan, Juan Moreno, J.D. Quigley) arxiv submitted
RO(C_2)-graded Tambara Functor (with Noah Wisdom)
Grothendieck-Witt theory and Tate-Poitou duality (with Lucy Yang)
Algebraic Topology Seminar, Columbia University, April 2026
Topology seminar, Indiana University, March 2026
Joint Mathematics Meetings, Special Session on New Voices in Homotopy Theory, January 2026
Topology seminar, Texas State University, October 2025
Algebra seminar, Indiana University, April 2025
Special Session on Homotopy theory and algebraic K-theory, AMS 2025 Spring Central Sectional Meeting, March 2025
Algebraic Topology Seminar, Columbia University, October 2024
Topology Seminar, University of Virginia, October 2024
Topology seminar, Indiana University, October 2024
Homotopy seminar, Ohio State University, September 2024
Advances in Algebraic Topology, MMA MathFest 2024, Auguest 2024 - Slide
FRG Online Seminar, Janunary 2024
Binghamton University Graduate Combinatorics, Algebra, and Topology Conference, November 2023 - Slide
Scissors Congruence, Algebraic K-Theory, and Trace Methods, July 2023 - Note