MultiDems will accept both archival and non-archival submissions.
Archival long papers: up to 8 pages of content, excluding references and appendices.
Archival short papers: up to 4 pages of content, excluding references and appendices.
Archival submissions must describe original work that has not been published elsewhere and, if accepted, will appear in the workshop proceedings. Archival submissions require one author to be voluntary as a potential reviewer. Potential reviewers will only be contacted if the existing reviewer pool is not large enough for the number of submissions.Â
Non-archival extended abstracts: up to 4 pages, excluding references. These submissions provide an opportunity to present and discuss work without publication in the workshop proceedings, including relevant work published or accepted elsewhere where permitted by the original venue.
Both long and short submissions may contain technical, empirical, theoretical, conceptual, or critical contributions.
All submissions must use the official ACL formatting templates. Papers will be submitted through OpenReview and will go through a double-blind review process.
MultiDems will accept:
Direct submissions, reviewed by the workshop Program Committee; we will seek reviewers across disciplinary backgrounds and, where appropriate, aim to combine NLP/computer-science and social-science perspectives in the review process.
Papers previously reviewed through ACL Rolling Review (ARR), which may be committed to the workshop through OpenReview.
Papers submitted to the archival track must not have been previously published and must not be under review at any other venue (conference, workshop, or journal) at the time of submission. Submissions that are found to be under review elsewhere, or that substantially overlap with work published or under review elsewhere, will be desk-rejected.